Maxwell Henderson, Brigita Urbanc, Luis Cruz  Biophysical Journal 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lever-Arm Mechanics of Processive Myosins Yujie Sun, Yale E. Goldman Biophysical Journal Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 1-11 (July 2011) DOI: /j.bpj
Advertisements

Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Volume 101, Issue 8, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 75, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
Coarse-Grained Model of SNARE-Mediated Docking
Klas H. Pettersen, Gaute T. Einevoll  Biophysical Journal 
Thomas J. English, Daniel A. Hammer  Biophysical Journal 
Effect of Microvillus Deformability on Leukocyte Adhesion Explored Using Adhesive Dynamics Simulations  Kelly E. Caputo, Daniel A. Hammer  Biophysical.
Mapping Three-Dimensional Stress and Strain Fields within a Soft Hydrogel Using a Fluorescence Microscope  Matthew S. Hall, Rong Long, Chung-Yuen Hui,
Goran Žagar, Patrick R. Onck, Erik van der Giessen  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
A Model of H-NS Mediated Compaction of Bacterial DNA
Yang Zhang, Andrzej Kolinski, Jeffrey Skolnick  Biophysical Journal 
Modeling Endoplasmic Reticulum Network Maintenance in a Plant Cell
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Mechanically Probing the Folding Pathway of Single RNA Molecules
Platelet Adhesive Dynamics
Marc Jendrny, Thijs J. Aartsma, Jürgen Köhler  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Quantifying Cell Adhesion through Impingement of a Controlled Microjet
Near-Critical Fluctuations and Cytoskeleton-Assisted Phase Separation Lead to Subdiffusion in Cell Membranes  Jens Ehrig, Eugene P. Petrov, Petra Schwille 
Dietmar B. Oelz, Boris Y. Rubinstein, Alex Mogilner 
Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells
Christopher B. Stanley, Tatiana Perevozchikova, Valerie Berthelier 
Agustí Emperador, Oliver Carrillo, Manuel Rueda, Modesto Orozco 
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Taeyoon Kim, Margaret L. Gardel, Ed Munro  Biophysical Journal 
Stationary Gating of GluN1/GluN2B Receptors in Intact Membrane Patches
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
G. Garbès Putzel, Mark J. Uline, Igal Szleifer, M. Schick 
Tests of Continuum Theories as Models of Ion Channels. I
Validating Solution Ensembles from Molecular Dynamics Simulation by Wide-Angle X- ray Scattering Data  Po-chia Chen, Jochen S. Hub  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 101, Issue 8, Pages (October 2011)
Dissecting DNA-Histone Interactions in the Nucleosome by Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA Unwrapping  Ramona Ettig, Nick Kepper, Rene Stehr, Gero.
Hongqiang Ma, Jianquan Xu, Jingyi Jin, Yi Huang, Yang Liu 
Yuliang Zhang, Yuri L. Lyubchenko  Biophysical Journal 
Phase Behavior of DNA in the Presence of DNA-Binding Proteins
The Effect of Dye-Dye Interactions on the Spatial Resolution of Single-Molecule FRET Measurements in Nucleic Acids  Nicolas Di Fiori, Amit Meller  Biophysical.
Volume 100, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing
Coupling of S4 Helix Translocation and S6 Gating Analyzed by Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of Mutated Kv Channels  Manami Nishizawa, Kazuhisa Nishizawa 
Coupling of S4 Helix Translocation and S6 Gating Analyzed by Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of Mutated Kv Channels  Manami Nishizawa, Kazuhisa Nishizawa 
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Nevra Ozer, Celia A. Schiffer, Turkan Haliloglu  Biophysical Journal 
Brownian Dynamics of Subunit Addition-Loss Kinetics and Thermodynamics in Linear Polymer Self-Assembly  Brian T. Castle, David J. Odde  Biophysical Journal 
Alternative Mechanisms for the Interaction of the Cell-Penetrating Peptides Penetratin and the TAT Peptide with Lipid Bilayers  Semen Yesylevskyy, Siewert-Jan.
Volume 113, Issue 3, Pages (August 2017)
Eric R. May, Jun Feng, Charles L. Brooks  Biophysical Journal 
Modeling Endoplasmic Reticulum Network Maintenance in a Plant Cell
Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Ralf Blossey, Fabrizio Cleri 
Enrique M. De La Cruz, Jean-Louis Martiel, Laurent Blanchoin 
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Volume 101, Issue 8, Pages (October 2011)
Molecular Structure of Membrane Tethers
Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 
Rachel M. Abaskharon, Feng Gai  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
A Model of H-NS Mediated Compaction of Bacterial DNA
S.A. Shkulipa, W.K. den Otter, W.J. Briels  Biophysical Journal 
Zackary N. Scholl, Weitao Yang, Piotr E. Marszalek  Biophysical Journal 
Ultraslow Water-Mediated Transmembrane Interactions Regulate the Activation of A2A Adenosine Receptor  Yoonji Lee, Songmi Kim, Sun Choi, Changbong Hyeon 
Fangqiang Zhu, Klaus Schulten  Biophysical Journal 
Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells
Presentation transcript:

A Computational Model for the Loss of Neuronal Organization in Microcolumns  Maxwell Henderson, Brigita Urbanc, Luis Cruz  Biophysical Journal  Volume 106, Issue 10, Pages 2233-2242 (May 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.012 Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the different models and their mechanisms for neuronal displacement and deletion. The bottom row of the diagram represents the specific mechanisms of the respective models. The unrestricted displacement model is not shown. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2233-2242DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.012) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Typical 3D representations of neuronal ensembles resulting from the different displacement and deletion mechanisms. For clarity, the neurons, represented by bright small spheres, are those within a thin section obtained from the middle region of a larger cubic ensemble box. (A) Neuronal positions correspond to the original unaltered ensemble (healthy brains). (B) The same configuration as seen from the top, with arrows indicating representative microcolumns (microcolumns oriented along the axis coming out of the page). (C) A typical neuronal ensemble resulting from the harmonic force displacement mechanism using the smallest force constant (k = 0.005). (D–F) The neuronal-deletion mechanisms acting on the original ensemble from A, with uniform deletions corresponding to a maximum of ∼35% neuronal loss (D), and deletions of clusters of radius 20 μm (E) and 50 μm (F) corresponding to neuronal losses of ∼20% and ∼18%, respectively. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2233-2242DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.012) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Percentage strength of microcolumns for the neuronal deletion mechanisms. (A) F is shown as a function of the percentage of neuronal loss where individual neurons were deleted at random. (B) F is shown as a function of total neuronal loss for the cases of neuronal cluster deletions within a sphere of radius Rcl. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2233-2242DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.012) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 (A) R(t) for one realization of a neuronal system undergoing random displacements (symmetric in all axes) with a harmonic restorative force for a selection of spring constant values. Systems with no restorative force (k = 0) exhibited an R value that increased without bounds. At equilibrium, R for systems with nonzero values of k reached a maximum average, <R>max. See the Supporting Material for details of how to determine the critical number of time steps needed for convergence. (B) Histograms of R from individual neurons of the realizations shown in A, where the histogram for the spring constant value of k = 0 was calculated at t = 1000 and those for values of k > 0 at the equilibrium, <R>max. (C) <R>max as a function of 1/k ( symbols, taken from simulations) and kx, ky, and kz (solid lines, from Eq. A16 in the Supporting Material). Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2233-2242DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.012) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Percentage strength of microcolumns, F, for the harmonic force displacement mechanisms. (A) Percentage strength of microcolumns as a function of 1/k for different neuronal displacement mechanisms. (B) Percentage strength of microcolumns as a function of <R>max for different neuronal displacement mechanisms. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2233-2242DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.012) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Microcolumnar measurements of neuronal systems undergoing different harmonic-force neuronal displacement mechanisms as a function of 1/k. The graphs correspond to neuronal density, ρ (A), width, W (B), degree of microcolumnar periodicity, T (C), interneuronal distance of microcolumns, Y (D), intercolumn distance, P (E), and length, L (F). Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2233-2242DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.012) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions