Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Javed A. Khan, Ben M. Dunn, Liang Tong  Structure 
Advertisements

Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Crystal Structure of Manganese Catalase from Lactobacillus plantarum
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
The crystal structure of bovine bile salt activated lipase: insights into the bile salt activation mechanism  Xiaoqiang Wang, Chi-sun Wang, Jordan Tang,
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Glycerol Dehydrogenase
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
The C. elegans SYS-1 Protein Is a Bona Fide β-Catenin
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Structure of mammalian ornithine decarboxylase at 1
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Core Structure of gp41 from the HIV Envelope Glycoprotein
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Jason O. Moore, Wayne A. Hendrickson  Structure 
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
The 1.8 Å crystal structure of catechol 1,2-dioxygenase reveals a novel hydrophobic helical zipper as a subunit linker  Matthew W Vetting, Douglas H Ohlendorf 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages (August 1994)
Probing the “Dark Matter” of Protein Fold Space
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
A Putative Mechanism for Downregulation of the Catalytic Activity of the EGF Receptor via Direct Contact between Its Kinase and C-Terminal Domains  Meytal.
Structural Basis for FGF Receptor Dimerization and Activation
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
The 4 Å X-Ray Structure of a Tubulin:Stathmin-like Domain Complex
Crystal Structure of the N-Terminal Domain of Sialoadhesin in Complex with 3′ Sialyllactose at 1.85 Å Resolution  A.P. May, R.C. Robinson, M. Vinson,
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 766-775 (May 2008) An Intersubunit Active Site between Supercoiled Parallel β Helices in the Trimeric Tailspike Endorhamnosidase of Shigella flexneri Phage Sf6  Jürgen J. Müller, Stefanie Barbirz, Karolin Heinle, Alexander Freiberg, Robert Seckler, Udo Heinemann  Structure  Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 766-775 (May 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.01.019 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Stereo Views of the Crystal Structure of the Sf6 TSPΔN Monomer and Trimer The N-terminal region, the β-helix domain, and the C-terminal domain of the monomer (A) are displayed in different shades of blue. In the trimer (B), chains are identified by different color. All figures representing structures were prepared using MOLSCRIPT (Kraulis, 1991) and BOBSCRIPT (Esnouf, 1997) in combination with RASTER3D (Merritt and Murphy, 1994). Structure 2008 16, 766-775DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.01.019) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structural Comparison of Sf6 TSP and P22 TSP Crystal structures of the monomers and biologically active trimers of Sf6 TSPΔN (A and C), and of P22 TSPΔN (B and D) (PDB code: 1TSP [Steinbacher et al., 1994]). The view is perpendicular to the trimer axis onto the intersubunit cleft (rotated by ∼45° relative to Figure 1). Structure 2008 16, 766-775DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.01.019) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Architecture of the β-Helix Domain of Sf6 TSP (A) Minimal helix definition according to Yoder et al. (1993b), B1–B3 are β strands, T1–T3 are turns. (B) Cα trace of the minimal helices 3–14, view along the Sf6 TSPΔN trimer axis. The three individual β sheets are labeled b1, b2, and b3, and the stacked turns connecting strands B2 and B3 are labeled t2. (C) Stereo view of the Cα trace of the β-helix domain of Sf6 TSP superimposed onto P22 TSPΔN (thin black trace). (D) Structure-based sequence alignment of β-helix rungs of Sf6 TSP. Colors are as in (A–C). Residue side chains are marked “i” if they point into the β helix and “o” if they point outward. Structure 2008 16, 766-775DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.01.019) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Left-Handed, Coiled-β-Coil Structure Formed by the Right-Handed β Helix (A) The Cα trace of the minimal helix within the monomeric β-helix domain was fitted by a least-squares method to an elliptical superhelix model with a superpitch of about 340 Å, a minor pitch of 4.72 Å, and a twist angle of about 5° per rung; view perpendicular to the β-helix axis. (B) View along the β-helix axis. (C) Coiled-β-coil model, constructed from 7 × 14 rungs of the trimeric β helix. Two chains are drawn as space-filling models, and one chain as Cα trace. Structure 2008 16, 766-775DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.01.019) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Structural Homologs of the Sf6 TSP C-Terminal β Sandwich Domain, Seen in Blue (A) Superposition onto the rat μ2 adaptin domain (1BXX; rmsd, 1.8 Å for 51 matching Cα positions). (B) Superposition onto the capsid protein from African horse sickness virus (1AHS; rmsd, 1.9 Å for 51 matching Cα positions). (C) Topology diagrams from TOPS (Michalopoulos et al., 2004) for Sf6 TSP (left) and the African horse sickness virus capsid protein (right). α Helices and β strands are viewed end-on and indicated by circles and triangles, respectively. Their direction can be deduced from the connecting lines. Structure 2008 16, 766-775DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.01.019) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Localization of the Endorhamnosidase Active Site of Sf6 TSPΔN (A) Difference electron density (contoured at 3σ) observed in a complex of the protein with one repeating unit (RU) of an O-antigen hydrolysis product (α-l-Rhap-(1-3)-β-l-GlcpNAc-(1-2)-α-l-Rhap-(1-2)-α-l-Rhap). The sugar points upwards to the N terminus of Sf6 TSP with its nonreducing end. Glu293 (chain C) and Asp247 (chain A) belong to the binding site. (B) Kinetics of hydrolysis of a fluorescence-labeled dodecasaccharide (3 RU, 2 μM) with 0.36 μM Sf6 TSPΔN wild-type (closed triangles) and mutants D247N (closed diamonds), E293Q (closed squares), E366Q (closed circles) and D399N (open circles) at 15°C, as determined by HPLC (Freiberg et al., 2003). See Table 1 for kcat/KM values calculated from these data. (C) An octasaccharide (2 RU) modeled into the binding site with its reducing end reaching the catalytic residues Asp399 and Glu366, which lie on different chains, as indicated. Bridging water molecules are colored purple. Structure 2008 16, 766-775DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.01.019) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Sf6 TSPΔN Trimer Surfaces The trimer is (A) oriented to display the solvent-exposed side of one monomer (as in Figure 1) or (B) rotated by 70° about the three-fold axis to permit a view into the cleft between two neighboring subunits (as in Figure 2). Surfaces colored according to the electrostatic potential calculated by the program DELPHI, with deepest shades of blue and red corresponding to potentials of ±10 kT (Rocchia et al., 2001). All mutated acidic residues are labeled. Sf6 TSPΔN (C) or P22 TSPΔN (D) with O-antigen octasaccharides (sticks) bound to the surface (monomers in green, red, and blue). View from the N terminus along the three-fold axes. (A) and (B) were drawn with GRASP (Nicholls et al., 1991), (C) and (D) with PyMOL (DeLano, 2002). Structure 2008 16, 766-775DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.01.019) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions