The Enhanceosome and Transcriptional Synergy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thermodynamic Models of Gene Regulation Xin He CS598SS 04/30/2009.
Advertisements

Relationship between Genotype and Phenotype
Regulation of transcription: from lambda to eukaryotes
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 3-5 (January 2013)
Relationship between Genotype and Phenotype
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Kristina M. Johnson, Michael Carey  Current Biology 
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
A Phase Separation Model for Transcriptional Control
Eukaryotic transcription initiation
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages 1-4 (July 1999)
Even-skipped gene regulation
Formation of Chromosomal Domains by Loop Extrusion
Impulse Control: Temporal Dynamics in Gene Transcription
Noise Induces Hopping between NF-κB Entrainment Modes
Clarissa Scholes, Angela H. DePace, Álvaro Sánchez  Cell Systems 
Chromatin Proteins Do Double Duty
Neil J. McKenna, Bert W. O'Malley  Cell 
Systems Biophysics of Gene Expression
Eukaryotic Transcription Activation: Right on Target
Andrey S. Shaw, Michael L. Dustin  Immunity 
Joseph V Geisberg, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell 
David C. Immke, Edwin W. McCleskey  Neuron 
RNA-DNA Triplex Formation by Long Noncoding RNAs
Regulation of Primary Response Genes
Tae Kook Kim, Tom Maniatis  Molecular Cell 
Direct Observation of Single MuB Polymers
The Rpd3 Core Complex Is a Chromatin Stabilization Module
Diabetes Mutations Delineate an Atypical POU Domain in HNF-1α
Daniel F. Tardiff, Scott A. Lacadie, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Fragile Nucleosomes Influence Pol II Promoter Function
Opening Windows to the Genome
Microtubule-Targeted Drugs Inhibit VEGF Receptor-2 Expression by both Transcriptional and Post-Transcriptional Mechanisms  Markus Meissner, Andreas Pinter,
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Small Molecules, Big Effects: A Role for Chromatin-Localized Metabolite Biosynthesis in Gene Regulation  Bryan A. Gibson, W. Lee Kraus  Molecular Cell 
The Bare Lymphocyte Syndrome: Molecular Clues to the Transcriptional Regulation of Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Genes  Angela DeSandro, Uma.
Mathematical Models of Protein Kinase Signal Transduction
Proteins Kinases: Chromatin-Associated Enzymes?
An Atomic Model of the Interferon-β Enhanceosome
Gene Regulation: Activation through Space
PARP Goes Transcription
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Facilitated Recycling Pathway for RNA Polymerase III
Genetic Control of MHC Class II Expression
Making Sense of Transcription Networks
Molecular Mechanisms of Long Noncoding RNAs
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
A Transcription-Independent Role for TFIIB in Gene Looping
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
The Impressionistic Landscape of Meiotic Recombination
Functional and Mechanistic Diversity of Distal Transcription Enhancers
Factors that Mediate and Modulate Androgen Action
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
An Engine for Nucleosome Remodeling
Poised RNA Polymerase II Gives Pause for Thought
Relationship between Genotype and Phenotype
Pantelis Hatzis, Iannis Talianidis  Molecular Cell 
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Relationship between Genotype and Phenotype
Selective Transcription in Response to an Inflammatory Stimulus
Positive and Negative Control of Enhancer-Promoter Interactions by Other DNA Loops Generates Specificity and Tunability  Nan Hao, Keith E. Shearwin, Ian.
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Thomas J Santangelo, Jeffrey W Roberts  Molecular Cell 
The 3D Genome in Transcriptional Regulation and Pluripotency
Transcriptional promiscuity in testes
A New Cohesive Team to Mediate DNA Looping
Transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II at eukaryotic protein-coding genes involves the cooperative assembly on the core promoter of multiple distinct.
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages (July 1996)
Presentation transcript:

The Enhanceosome and Transcriptional Synergy Michael Carey  Cell  Volume 92, Issue 1, Pages 5-8 (January 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80893-4

Figure 1 Manifestations of Synergy There are two manifestations of synergy: The greater-than-additive transcriptional effect of multiple activator-binding sites on a promoter or enhancer, and the nonlinear or sigmoidal response of a gene to increasing activator concentrations. The vertical axis represents relative transcription. The horizontal axis denotes activator concentration (on a log scale). Curve 1 shows a standard parabolic response to increasing activator concentration for a reaction in which activators bind DNA noncooperatively and only a single activator is necessary to recruit the general machinery. Curve 2 shows the sigmoidal shape achieved by cooperative activator binding and by imposing a requirement for multiple activators, either the same molecule or combinations, to recruit the transcriptional machinery. The basis of the synergistic effect lies in a simple extrapolation of the Gibbs free energy equation, where the affinity of protein–protein interactions is exponentially related to the energy (K = eΔG/-RT). The steepness of curve 2 would be influenced by the reciprocal cooperative effects of the transcriptional machinery and the activators. The curves are normalized to occupancy of 90%, or near maximal transcription. The enhanced sensitivity imparted by cooperativity is emphasized by the smaller difference in activator concentration required to increase relative transcription from 10% to 90% in curve 2 versus curve 1. Note that activators need not bind cooperatively to DNA for combinatorial control to function at a fundamental level although multiple interactions with the general machinery are essential. Cell 1998 92, 5-8DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80893-4)

Figure 2 Cooperativity Functions in Enhanceosome and Preinitiation Complex Assembly The final transcription complex assembles in a multistage process, each step of which is cooperative. Initially, activators bind to chromatin in a manner that is inherently cooperative (Kingston et al. 1996). Multiple sequence-specific activators (ovals) and DNA-bending proteins (triangles) then engage in cooperative protein–protein interactions to form a stable enhanceosome. The enhanceosome presents a distinct surface complementary to a surface displayed by coactivators and the pol II general machinery. This leads to cooperative recruitment of pol II and its ancillary factors to DNA and results in synergistic transcription. The reverse and forward arrows indicate reciprocity in the interactions. Although the process is delineated into separate steps, the reciprocity may drive concerted assembly of a transcriptosome. Cell 1998 92, 5-8DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80893-4)

Figure 3 Two Prototypic Enhanceosomes A schematic of the 75 bp TCRα and 57 bp IFNβ enhanceosomes. Cell 1998 92, 5-8DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80893-4)