6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Science with Future CMB Observations Lloyd Knox UC Davis.
Advertisements

Prospects for the Planck Satellite: limiting the Hubble Parameter by SZE/X-ray Distance Technique R. Holanda & J. A. S. Lima (IAG-USP) I Workshop “Challenges.
Current Observational Constraints on Dark Energy Chicago, December 2001 Wendy Freedman Carnegie Observatories, Pasadena CA.
What Figure of Merit Should We Use to Evaluate Dark Energy Projects? Yun Wang Yun Wang STScI Dark Energy Symposium STScI Dark Energy Symposium May 6, 2008.
CMB: Sound Waves in the Early Universe Before recombination: Universe is ionized. Photons provide enormous pressure and restoring force. Photon-baryon.
SDSS-II SN survey: Constraining Dark Energy with intermediate- redshift probes Hubert Lampeitl University Portsmouth, ICG In collaboration with: H.J. Seo,
Observational Cosmology - a laboratory for fundamental physics MPI-K, Heidelberg Marek Kowalski.
Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)
Observational Cosmology - a unique laboratory for fundamental physics Marek Kowalski Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn.
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Nikolaos Nikoloudakis Friday lunch talk 12/6/09 Supported by a Marie Curie Early Stage Training Fellowship.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
Complementary Probes ofDark Energy Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
Dark Energy J. Frieman: Overview 30 A. Kim: Supernovae 30 B. Jain: Weak Lensing 30 M. White: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations 30 P5, SLAC, Feb. 22, 2008.
1 What is the Dark Energy? David Spergel Princeton University.
Statistics of the Weak-lensing Convergence Field Sheng Wang Brookhaven National Laboratory Columbia University Collaborators: Zoltán Haiman, Morgan May,
Weak Gravitational Lensing by Large-Scale Structure Alexandre Refregier (Cambridge) Collaborators: Richard Ellis (Caltech) David Bacon (Cambridge) Richard.
Progress on Cosmology Sarah Bridle University College London.
Inflationary Freedom and Cosmological Neutrino Constraints Roland de Putter JPL/Caltech CosKASI 4/16/2014.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
Different physical properties contribute to the density and temperature perturbation growth. In addition to the mutual gravity of the dark matter and baryons,
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
US Planck Data Analysis Review 1 Lloyd KnoxUS Planck Data Analysis Review 9–10 May 2006 The Science Potential of Planck Lloyd Knox (UC Davis)
Constraints on Dark Energy from CMB Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin Dark Energy February 27, 2006.
Clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth) Many SDSS Colleagues.
Dark Energy Probes with DES (focus on cosmology) Seokcheon Lee (KIAS) Feb Section : Survey Science III.
Cosmology with Gravitaional Lensing
The measurement of q 0 If objects are observed at large distances of known brightness (standard candles), we can measure the amount of deceleration since.
the National Radio Astronomy Observatory – Socorro, NM
Precision Studies of Dark Energy with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope David L. Burke SLAC for the LSST Collaboration Rencontres de Moriond Contents.
Dark Energy and Cosmic Sound Daniel Eisenstein Steward Observatory Eisenstein 2003 (astro-ph/ ) Seo & Eisenstein, ApJ, 598, 720 (2003) Blake & Glazebrook.
LSST and Dark Energy Dark Energy - STScI May 7, 2008 Tony Tyson, UC Davis Outline: 1.LSST Project 2.Dark Energy Measurements 3.Controlling Systematic Errors.
The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun.
3rd International Workshop on Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry NTHU & NTU, Dec 27—31, 2012 Likelihood of the Matter Power Spectrum.
Latest Results from LSS & BAO Observations Will Percival University of Portsmouth StSci Spring Symposium: A Decade of Dark Energy, May 7 th 2008.
Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, ,
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
1 1 Dark Energy with SNAP and other Next Generation Probes Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
Future observational prospects for dark energy Roberto Trotta Oxford Astrophysics & Royal Astronomical Society.
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
CTIO Camera Mtg - Dec ‘03 Studies of Dark Energy with Galaxy Clusters Joe Mohr Department of Astronomy Department of Physics University of Illinois.
Dark Energy: The Observational Challenge David Weinberg Ohio State University Based in part on Kujat, Linn, Scherrer, & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 572, 1.
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
Jochen Weller Decrypting the Universe Edinburgh, October, 2007 未来 の 暗 黒 エネルギー 実 験 の 相補性.
The Nature of Dark Energy David Weinberg Ohio State University Based in part on Kujat, Linn, Scherrer, & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 572, 1.
Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett With: Matt Auger, Vasily Belokurov, Phil Marshall and Alex Hall ArXiv:
Constraints on cosmological parameters from the 6dF Galaxy Survey
Dark Energy From the perspective of an American theorist fresh from the recent Dark Energy Survey Collaboration Meeting Scott Dodelson.
Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
The Dark Energy Survey Probe origin of Cosmic Acceleration:
For the Large-Scale Structure Science Collaboration
Princeton University & APC
Cosmology with Supernovae
Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA
Complementarity of Dark Energy Probes
Some issues in cluster cosmology
Cosmology from Large Scale Structure Surveys
Images: M. Blanton. Images: M. Blanton Figures: M. Blanton & SDSS.
Sun Lei (孙磊) Peking University
Detection of integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect by cross-correlation of the
Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and Weak Lensing Cluster Surveys Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
KDUST暗能量研究 詹虎 及张新民、范祖辉、赵公博等人 KDUST 宇宙学研讨会 国台,
Measurements of Cosmological Parameters
CMB Anisotropy 이준호 류주영 박시헌.
Cosmology with Galaxy Correlations from Photometric Redshift Surveys
Constraining Dark Energy with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope
Presentation transcript:

6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm Cosmology with Galaxy Correlations from the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Hu Zhan (UC Davis) Deep and wide photometric redshift surveys are useful probes of the large-scale structure of the universe. The proposed survey of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) will enable us to measure the galaxy power spectrum on very large scales that are not yet accessible to current galaxy surveys. One may use such large-scale galaxy power spectrum to probe possible features in the primordial power spectrum. On smaller scales, baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) will be readily detectable with LSST and be utilized to achieve percent level measurements of the angular diameter distance as a function of redshift. Meanwhile, if the distribution of photometric redshift errors is accurately quantified as required by weak lensing, then LSST will also be able to measure the Hubble parameter with a comparable accuracy. This will allow LSST BAO to place tight constraints on dark energy equation of state parameters that are competitive with those from LSST weak lensing shear tomography. Very-Large-Scale Matter Power Spectrum Baryon Acoustic Oscillations The matter power spectrum on very large scales is of great interest because it can be cleanly used to infer the power spectrum of primordial fluctuations. The primordial power spectrum is one of our only handles on the mechanism that led to the fluctuations that are responsible for the diversity of structures we see in the universe today. The acoustic waves that give rise to the peaks in the CMB temperature fluctuations also generate a small excess in the galaxy two-point correlation function at roughly 150 Mpc, corresponding to oscillating features in the power spectrum known as baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO). Since the co-moving scales of these features do not change after recombination, BAO can be used as a CMB-calibrated standard ruler to measure the angular diameter distance D and Hubble parameter H and to constrain dark energy (see e.g. Eisenstein, Hu, & Tegmark 1998). Photo-z errors can inflate the uncertainties in H, if one does not know the photo-z error distribution. Figure 3 Baryon acoustic oscillations in LSST galaxy power spectra. Figure 1 Statistical errors of the matter power spectrum from the LSST survey. The solid lines represent the fiducial model power spectrum, while the dotted lines are the power spectrum generated by a step inflation potential (Peiris et al. 2003). In the context of inflation, probing larger scales means probing inflation at an earlier epoch. Larger scales exited the fixed-size horizon earlier and thus had more time to expand. Reaching back to these earlier epochs may provide us with valuable clues about inflation (e.g. Zhan et al. 2006). Exploring these large scales is perhaps the best way, other than precision measurement of CMB polarization on large angular scales, to test the claims of statistical anisotropy in the WMAP temperature maps. The Need to Know the Photo-z Error Distribution Accurately The Hubble parameter is a direct measure of the cosmic expansion rate and, hence, crucial for constraining dark energy equation of state (EOS) parameters. Photo-z surveys cannot measure H accurately through BAO. However, since the photo-z suppression to the power spectrum is exponentially sensitive to H (for Gaussian errors, ), one can achieve tight constraints on H with accurate knowledge of the photo-z error distribution (Zhan & Knox 2005, astro-ph/0509260). This will enable LSST BAO to place tight constraints on dark energy equation of state parameters that are competitive with those from LSST shear power spectra. In reality, photo-z errors are not Gaussian. Therefore, to achieve the constraints, one must quantify the probability distribution of photo-z errors accurately. Reconstructing the Matter Power Spectrum Figure 2 A simple estimator of the matter power spectrum. Dotted lines are redshift space galaxy power spectra with photo-z errors sz = sz0 (1 + z). The reconstructions are performed for sz0 = 0.07. Arrows indicate errors due to a 30% under-estimation of the galaxy bias growth rate. Photometric redshift (photo-z) errors severely suppress the observed galaxy power spectrum. A smaller rms photo-z error leads to a better reconstruction. An incorrect model of galaxy bias evol-ution can alter the shape of the recon-structed power spectrum. But, the bias may not be the dominant error, because it can be determination to percent level through a joint analysis of shear and galaxy correlations (Hu & Jain 2004). A moderate error (~10%) in the fiducial cosmological model does not severely degrade the reconstruction. The reconstruction on smaller scales can be improved with better estimators. Other challenges: photometry errors, extinction, redshift distortion… Figure 4 Left panel: Improvement of the constraints on w0 and wa with strengthening priors on the rms photo-z error, where the dark energy EOS is parametrized as w(z)=w0+wa(1-a). Note that the rms itself is not so crucial as the uncertainties of the rms. Right panel: The importance of high-z data in the presence of an unknown curvature. The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope 6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm Coverage: 20,000 deg2, 0.2 arcsec / pixel FOV: 10 deg2 Depth: 26.5 AB mag @10s (24.5 in u) 24 AB mag in 15 seconds 3 billion galaxies with color redshifts 200,000 Type Ia supernovae 100,000 Shear-selected galaxy clusters http://www.lsst.org Curvature: the Need for High-z Data For LSST BAO with the flatness assumption, high-z data (z >1.4 in Fig. 4) do not provide much additional constraint on dark energy EOS parameters w0 and wa, but it is crucial if one includes curvature as a free parameter (for SNe, see Weller & Albrecht 2001; Linder 2005). This is because curvature is somewhat degenerate with dark energy. For example, it is indistinguishable from dark energy of w = -1/3 in terms of D & H. The curvature term WK evolves as (1 + z)2, so one can constrain it better with high-z data [in this case, s (WK) = ±10-3], assuming that dark energy evolves much slower, and restore the constraints on w0 and wa.