Danube Water Conference 2019

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Danube - Black Sea Task Force for cooperation on water protection in the wider Black Sea Region 1 Philip Weller ICPDR Executive Secretary.
Advertisements

European Union Strategy for the Danube Region (EUSDR) -- A World Bank Perspective High-level Meeting on Financing Belgrade, September 27 th, 2010.
UWWT directive in Croatia – implementation and data availability
Danube River Basin Study Sili Liu Example of international basin-wide watershed management.
1 EECCA-wide trends of water utility performance Tatiana Efimova Helsinki, May 2007 E A P TASK FORCE.
How is the budget raised The own resource system – The overall amount of own resources needed to finance the budget is determined by total expenditure.
Agricultural Policy Analysis Prof. Samuel Wangwe Executive Director REPOA 28 th July 2012.
04/2007 European Funds in Bulgaria Supported by the European Commission (DG ENV)
An Overview of Our Regulatory Proposal
This project is funded by the European Union ENVIRONMENTAL COLLABORATION FOR THE BLACK SEA GEORGIA, MOLDOVA, RUSSIA and UKRAINE Euroconsult This project.
Project Planning and Capital Budgeting
National Investment in Water and Waste Water Infrastructure, Funding & Pricing Mid-West Regional Authority Annual Conference 2009.
PEIP National workshop in Montenegro: developing environmental infrastructure projects in the water sector Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova.
1 Delivery Mechanisms and Scoping Joint Response Team - DWAF, SALGA, NT and dplg Using Section 78.
The implemented reforms and progress on developing a strategy for the WSS sector in Armenia The implemented reforms and progress on developing a strategy.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Better Regulation in New EU Member States Public Policy –
Vienna Insurance Group Financing of Investments
WHAT IS THE ROLE OF ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS? A selection of key economic inputs.
Seminar “American Expertise and technology for the water and wastewater sector” 11 April 2011 Business Opportunities in the Romanian water and wastewater.
Cost recovery study for the Seine Normandie RBMP.
Water.europa.eu Waste water management situation in the Danube region: an overview Vienna, 13 May 2016 Helmut Bloech.
2016 SWA Meeting of Ministers of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene: Technical Meeting Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 17 March National accountability mechanisms in.
Progress and challenges of a transboundary cooperation Dr. Adam Kovacs International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR) Status of.
Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works Vienna May 2016 Water and Sewerage Sector in Bulgaria Challenges and Vision.
1 Financing in water sector - times of change Antti Tooming Ministry of the Environment / Water department, Head of Project bureau 19/05/2016.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT IN BULGARIA STATUS AND CHALANGES ORLIN DIKOV – INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANT.
2017 Danube Water Conference:
Danube Water Conference 2017, Vienna
Progressing a Single Water Utility Approach
National Administration “Romanian Waters” NARW Bucharest - Romania
Association of providers of communal services in Republic of Macedonia - ADKOM Business planning in Macedonia – process starting as a request of the Regulator.
3rd International Scientific Conference on "Energy and Climate Change"
Template for country interventions (5 min)
Danube Water Conference, Vienna, May 2017
Meeting Standards and Expectations in the Water Industry
Context : the experience in 2010 GMR estimated annual gap for achieving universal primary and lower secondary education in at US$25.
Michael Jacobsen, Project Director - Water 18 MaY 2017
Financing Public WSS Infrastructure: Reflections on competing investment drivers and other factors to be considered 3 Challenges & 3 Recommendations from.
The EU Danube Region Strategy (EDRS) is a macro-regional development strategy and action plan for the regions and countries of the Danube river basin.
Elena Petkova Yasen Andreev 76324
BULAQUA Conference Sofia, March 27, 2018
Smart policies, strong utilities, sustainable services
EU Water Framework Directive
European Investment Bank Group
Eurostat Management Plan for Regional and Urban statistics
Development of National Water Tariff Study
Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works
progress of the water reform in bulgaria
Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation network meeting Brussels, 25 February 2010
Developed v. Developing Countries
TARIFFS FOR CLEAN WATER
Afrodita Popa Adriana Pienaru
ADB’s experience with financing renewable energy projects
Bulgaria – Evolution in the Development of the Medium-Term Budgetary Framework Zagreb, Croatia | May 2018.
Analyzing and Structuring Financially Sustainable Investments
Evaluation Network Meeting Brussels, February 2010
22nd WG D Meeting, 15/4/2012 Jacques Delsalle, European Commission
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
COHESION POLICY DELIVERING BENEFITS FOR CITIZENS
ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
A Framework for the Governance of Infrastructure - Getting Infrastructure Right - Jungmin Park, OECD Budgeting & Public Expenditures Division 2019 Annual.
The State of the Sector 2018 Update
A progressive but still unfinished business
OECD and European Commission - Directorate General Environment
India Energy Congress 2013 Sustainable Sources of Energy February 2013.
CIS – Workshop on WFD Economics: taking stock and looking ahead
Scaling up of Renewable Energy for Power Generation in the Western Balkan countries
Synergies between NDCs & SDGs; Integration into National Planning
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
Presentation transcript:

Danube Water Conference 2019 Wastewater Management in the Danube Region: Opportunities and Challenges of UWWTD implementation Mr. Stjepan Gabric (World Bank)

Implementation of UWWTD - Case of new EU countries from Danube River Basin World Bank has a long experience of involvement in wastewater management in Danube region (from 90ties until today), and continue to support wastewater management in EU MS and candidate countries. UWWTD is a key driver of urban wastewater sector transformation in Danube region, with large amounts of funds being committed in an unprecedented wastewater infrastructure investment cycle The overall objective was to: (i) assess results of the UWWTD implementation in the Danube region, taking into account environmental, economic, sustainability and affordability aspects, and (ii) provide contribution to process of UWWTD review, by identifying challenges and actions that countries can take to improve wastewater management. The specific geographic focus of this work was on new EU MS from the Danube River Basin (Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia + Austria), that have joined EU between 2004 and 2013.

Implementation of UWWTD - Case of new EU countries from DRB Where are we? Since 2003, wastewater treatment has shown significant improvement, benefiting from largest ever level of investments in the wastewater infrastructure in the region. Still, if compared to older EU members, significant gaps in compliance with UWWTD requirements continue to exist. Average compliance rates with Article 3, Article 4 and Article 5 in relation to the total subjected wastewater load for a) the EU28 & b) EU8 MS of DRB for the reference year 2014. Implementation delays toward full UWWTD compliance have occurred in all five observed countries (Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia and Bulgaria) of the Danube region, where UWWTD deadlines have already expired, indicating universally unrealistic UWWTD implementation planning.

Implementation of UWWTD - Case of new EU countries from DRB What are water quality implication? All countries investigated have managed to decrease load emissions, corresponding to improved compliance with secondary and tertiary treatment requirements under UWWTD. This has resulted in significant improvement of surface water quality, but more for BOD/COD than N,P.

Implementation of UWWTD - Case of new EU countries from DRB Is it financially sustainable? Estimate of funds needed for full compliance with UWWTD for all current regional MS is around Euro 60 billion, with Euro 44 billion already invested. Future capital expenditure demand is estimated to be about Euro 56  billion needed for continuous UWWTD compliance up to year 2040: (i) Euro 16 bill for still non-equipped agglomerations above 2,000 PE, and (ii) Euro 40 billion for reinvestment for older infrastructure needing renewal until 2040 Per capita costs of UWWTD compliance are not dependant on per capita income. Wastewater pricing policies currently only partially support full cost recovery of water services in the eight countries, with depreciation usually only partially included in the current tariffs Specific investment costs of UWWTD compliance , EUR/PE   Future demand for capital investment up to 2040 in countries in the Danube Region

Implementation of UWWTD - Case of new EU countries from DRB Is it financially affordable? There is wide difference in level of tariffs in the region (average wastewater services in AT (2.0 EUR/m3) are more than three times more expensive than in BG (0.6 EUR/m3). Robust annual tariff increases (within the boundary of EU-recommended affordability thresholds) will be required to achieve TCR ratio targeted value of 1 within a variable timeframe depending on the country. Affordability of water services for the households is not expected to be an issue until 2040, if taking into account the highest 5% (3% for WW services) affordability threshold Target Countries Wastewater tariff affordability ratio [%] in 2015 Wastewater tariff affordability ratio [%] in 2025 Wastewater tariff affordability ratio  in 2040 Austria 0.6 0.66 0.57 Bulgaria 1.6 2.56 2.69 Czech Republic 1.2 1.56 1.39 Croatia 1.4 1.91 1.31 Hungary 1.7 2.07 Romania 3.2 2.99 3.01 Slovenia 0.5 0.69 Slovakia 2.40 Long-term evolution of TCR ratios in countries in the Danube region – SOP scenario

Economic indicators at country level (2000-2040) Implementation of UWWTD - Case of new EU countries from DRB Is it economically viable? For all countries, the overall cost of implementing UWWTD for period 2000-2040 is significantly above the higher range of the estimated benefits (which are calculated in two scenarios, lower or higher estimates) Therefore, it can be assumed that the prevailing driver for UWWTD compliance is the need for uniformity of regulatory compliance under the EU directives, and environmental protection that goes beyond economic justification. UWWTD related costs and benefits discounted (2015) per country in the period 2000-2040, Mio EUR Indicators Economic indicators at country level (2000-2040) AT BG CZ HR HU RO SI SK ENPV (Lower Range) -39,033 -7,915 -18,653 -8,232 -21,024 -33,793 -3,961 -9,339 ENPV (Higher Range) -11,357 -3,476 -9,672 -6,306 -12,801 -21,274 -2,307 -5,023 EIRR (Higher Range) 3% 10% 6% * 2% 5% B/C (Higher Range) 0.76 0.66 0.58 0.31 0.49 0.47 0.52 0.56

Recommendations for better service resilience Invest into a better process to plan wastewater management compliance and avoid underestimating the time needed for directive compliance. Building upon the experience of the new EU member states of the Danube region, candidate countries should prepare a strategic plan for wastewater infrastructure compliance well in advance of accession negotiations. Prioritize investments according to their impact rather than on a readiness basis. Better prioritization of investments is needed to maximize the impact of available resources on UWWTD compliance and WFD objective fulfillment Develop a financing strategy for affordable, sustainable wastewater management. Implementing the UWWTD implies substantial investment that needs to be planned well in advance and staged to facilitate and secure the mobilization of the required financial resources at the lowest costs. Tariff increases are necessary to ensure financial sustainability, but should be accompanied with necessary WSS sector reforms to improve efficiency of service provision (governance, efficiency etc.), as a way to minimize increase

Recommendations for better service resilience Service sustainability - address the question of opex financing and affordability upfront. Positive impact created by massive investments in wastewater infrastructure can be preserved and further enhanced only if service quality levels are sustained. While affordability was overall found not to be a major issues, there is a need to address existing/future affordability constraint, with targeted subsidies for poorer part of population Technical and institutional capacity enhancement is crucial for successful wastewater project implementation. One of the main bottlenecks for UWWTD implementation has been the lack of institutional capacity of the implementing utilities, given the size and complexity of investment projects. Conduct the reforms and policy changes necessary to implement the recommendations ahead of time. Considering the preceding recommendations, candidate countries should develop and implement the critical package of reforms needed to address the challenges and issues on technical and financial levels.

Thank you for your attention! Implementation of UWWTD Case of new EU countries from Danube River Basin Deliverables: Wastewater Management in the Danube Region: Opportunities of EU Accession” Consultant Study Report Wastewater Management in the Danube Region: Opportunities of EU Accession” ANNEX to Consultant Study Report Wastewater Management in the Danube Region: Is the UWWTD implementation delivering results for the people, the economy and the environment? Main Report Publication: Danube Water Program web page (http://www.danube-water-program.org/) or World Bank web page Thank you for your attention!