Tdw12 – user feedback survey YOUR FEEDBACK Tdw12 – user feedback survey

A. COMMON DATA ISSUES Slow internet speed / constant dropouts Takes long time to sync and upload attachments Issues related to Logsheet Errors in logsheet after entering Fixing errors time consuming Incomplete logsheet / missing pages Logsheet not attached on T2 for verification Issues with Data validation Unable to validate if iFIMIS data imported into T2 Data validation time consuming

A. Common Issues: Suggestions Regular communication with SPC and Users of T2 SPC to check on all T2 users on issues faced on a quarterly basis to avoid practical issues and update Tufman 2 accordingly and more user friendly where possible. SPC should advice on what to do when the error of logging in to Tufman 2. If possible email all Observer name and their respective codes Logsheet SPC format need to be revised Data validation Data Validation should be for responsible countries to which vessels are licensed to, while SPC could only provide a reminder to notice for parties to validate timely. Remove or delete the iFIMS trip and just enter into T2 using Logsheet so that it can appear in Dorado reporting

B. DATA SHARING 43% 57% Some countries (e.g. Fiji) data unavailable Responded NO They either have access to all the data they need from T2 43% Responded YES They need some data both flagged or coastal state but are not able to access Some countries (e.g. Fiji) data unavailable Vessels do not send the required data

B. Suggestions Better communication between member countries facilitated by SPC Agreement with the heads of Fisheries with member countries specifically, on data sharing. Penalties Some form of penalty for not sharing data

C. CHARTER ARRANGEMENTS

C. CHARTER ARRANGEMENTS

C. CHARTER ARRANGEMENTS

C. CHARTER ARRANGEMENTS

D. DORADO

D. DORADO

17. Features or functions participants use the most Use for Part 1 Reporting function Catch and effort geographic function Tuna catch and effort Features Position Report monthly summary Vessel cost and catch to generate monthly fuel subsidy National catch estimates

18. Features or functions participants like the most Use for Part 1 Reporting function Catch and effort geographic function Tuna catch and effort Features Position Report monthly summary Vessel cost and catch to generate monthly fuel subsidy National catch estimates ALL features Long line recon

19. Features or function participated would like improved or added Function to report on transshipment data The Mapping Overlaps and repetition needs further cleaning Search button Field for validation in reporting to see how many countries have shared data Chart on more reports

20. Actions that takes the longest time to complete

21. Actions need less time consuming Finding reports and checking data Exporting to right format Creating summaries Math with data, filtering data table Error fixing

22. Actions need the most improvement Creating summaries Data visualization (graphs, maps,etc) Checking data and finding reports Filtering data tables Addressing fix or errors in logsheets

E. GENERAL FEEDBACK 23. What participants like most or least about TUFMAN 2 Most Like Easy to use Web-based so you can access from anywhere anytime Lets you know where errors are Easy to find information and do validations Least Like Slow internet and server errors Takes long time to load Some errors take long time to fix

24. What participants like most or least about TAILS Most Like Helps in artisanal data collection Web-based so you can access from anywhere anytime Paperless auto-calculations Faster process of getting artisanal data to Tufman2 Least Like Slow internet and server errors Too slow for port sampling Some errors take long time to fix

25. Usefulness of SLACK

26. Suggestions on improvement Make regular visit to countries Train countries to handle some errors by themselves