7 EGR consolidation process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ESSnet on EuroGroups Register EGR first cycle in 2009: quality results Item 1: Presentation of the EGR project 4th ESSnet Workshop on the EuroGroups.
Advertisements

Fulvia Cerroni - Serena Migliardo - Enrica Morganti Italian National Institute of Statistics Session 27: Use of administrative sources I Helsinki 5 May.
Statistics on enterprise groups – the EGR potential European Commission – Eurostat Directorate G: Global business statistics.
14-15 September 2011 STATISTICAL BUSINESS REGISTERS AS BACKBONE FOR BUSINESS STATISTICS Joint UNECE/OECD/Eurostat Business Registers expert meeting
International Workshop on Industrial Statistics Beijing, China 8-10 July 2013 Data items for Industrial Statistics (Part 1)
Item III.2 Frame population EGR frame methodology Barry Coenen, Statistics Netherlands MEETS Conference June 2014.
1 ESSnet on EuroGroups Register 1 EuroGroups Register (EGR) Processing NSA legal unit feeback in EGR Description of implications of the NSA feedback when.
Globalization and Business Registers Conclusions from Canadian Project to redesign the Business Register In the context of production of the System of.
General structure of the FATS Survey  Main recommendations: 1.Manual on Statistics of International Trade in Services 2.Handbook of Economic Globalisation.
Geneva – 18/19 June 2007 EuroGroups Register A pilot study for Eurostat to create a register of multinational enterprise groups John Perry – UK ONS Barry.
Data sources of the EuroGroups Register Presentation by Eurostat
1 ESSnet on EuroGroups Register 1 EuroGroups Register (EGR) Future technical development Description of technical improvement of the EGR Based on needs.
ESTAT/EFTA/UNECE high level seminar on streamlining statistical production, 7-8 July 2011 The European Statistical System’s Vision Claudia Junker, Tomasz.
ESTP Course on the EGR November b. Identification of LEU: data flows to/from the EGR IS.
14-Sept-11 The EGR version 2: an improved way of sharing information on multinational enterprise groups.
4° ESSnet workshop on the EuroGroups Register Development of an enhanced EGR Vision EGR version 2.0.
ESTP Course on the EGR November Validation of preliminary EGR data and files to EGR on GEG.
ESTP Course on the EGR November a. EGR Data sources.
Profiling procedure Sarmite Prole Head of Business Register Section Business Statics Department Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia May 19-23, 2014.
March 2016, Rome SGA-I on Big Data, Kick-off meeting.
Data sources and data on enterprise groups Sarmite Prole Head of Business Register Section Business Statics Department Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia.
Statistical Business Register Enterprise Groups in Latvia Sarmite Prole Head of Business Register Section Business Statics Department Central Statistical.
EuroGroups Register Almira Hecimovic, Register Unit 1 Register Unit, Study visit Georgia
Logical Database Design and the Rational Model
A register on Multinational Enterprise groups
The impact of globalisation on the EU-system of statistical units
Cooperation of statistical register and survey departments in Statistics Estonia 22nd Meeting of the Wiesbaden Group on Business Registers Tallinn,
The EuroGroups Register: a tool to share information on globalisation
Sharne Bailey, Tony Byrne UK, Office for National Statistics
ESSnet on profiling: a project centered on «culture» and process ESSnet Workshop in Köln 27-28/10/2011 Division communication externe 2007.
Labour accounts THE CONTRACTOR IS ACTING UNDER A FRAMEWORK CONTRACT CONCLUDED WITH THE COMMISSION.
9 TOPICS GROUPED UNDER THE HEADING BASIC ACCOUNTING RULES
2. Concepts definitions and EGR's user needs
8 EGR preliminary frame and validation tasks
Business Register on Enterprise Groups
5 NSI data to EGR ESTP Training on EGR 6-7 September 2016.
1 What is EGR? ESTP course on EGR 6-7 September 2016.
Recent development of Finnish Enterprise Groups Register
Feasibility study on Nordic register on enterprise groups
Primary key Introduction Introduction: A primary key, also called a primary keyword, is a key in a relational database that is unique for each record.
11 Access to EGR applications
11. Rules of consolidation
10. Methodology of enterprise groups
The impact of globalisation on defining the NACE code
6. EGR Identification Service
The Dutch BR and profiling
Profiling of large and complex businesses
Wiesbadengroup 2018, Neuchâtel (CH)
2. PROFILING methodology (Dominique Francoz)
Multinational enterprise groups in the EU Dissemination from the EGR
10 EGR developments ESTP Training on EGR 6-7 September 2016.
OECD/Eurostat Task Force on Land and other non-financial assets - IPP
7. Files to be prepared for LEU and REL data exchanges
EuroGroups register First results of measures on advancement
7. Consolidation of enterprise groups
The EuroGroups Register: a tool to share information on globalisation
Data integration methods
EGR Identification service
Conference on New Technologies for official Statistics
Michaela Grell – Unit G1 – SBS
Conference on New Techniques and Technologies for official Statistics
The EuroGroups Register Agne Bikauskaite, August Götzfried
3 EGR Identification Service
14. Preliminary EGR and validation
Economic classifications
5 NSI data to EGR ESTP Training on EGR May 2019.
3 EGR Identification Service
7 EGR initial and preliminary frames and validation tasks
ESTP course on EuroGroups Register
Presentation transcript:

7 EGR consolidation process ESTP Training on EGR 6-7 September 2016

EGR - Consolidation process All the data from the different data providers have to be combined to create groups This process is called consolidation and includes priorities and rules Steps of the consolidation process Consolidation of legal units Consolidation of relationships Consolidation of cluster of control Consolidation of groups and enterprises

Data in processing Source area Transformation area Data as received from the data providers Transformation area Data after transformation Redundant information from one source removed Consolidation process Consolidation area Final picture on the entities for a reference year

Authentic store rules (1) The authentic store principal means that in EGR 2.0 the NSI business register sources are categorised as exclusive or non-exclusive sources for information on specific entities The authentic store setting in EGR 2.0 can be full - being a full authentic store implies that there are no other possible sources permitted partial - the partial authentic store implies that additional sources are permitted, however data of the partial authentic store have always preference over the additionally defined sources

Authentic store rules (2) Authentic store is applicable for various EGR IS and EGR CORE units some of them are set by default some others can be set by action In EGR IS NSI register can become authentic store for resident legal units (set by an action) 28 NSI are authentic store No CDP legal units can be added for them Legal units of CDPs are only linked to NSI data, their data are only accepted (e.g. their relationships) if linking was successful

Authentic store settings (1) In EGR CORE an NSI register can become authentic store for the following units/items: Resident legal units Resident relationships (between two resident legal units) Cross-border relationships (between a resident legal unit and a foreign legal unit) Resident enterprises Default settings in EGR for 2015 cycle: All NSIs are partially authentic store for cross-border relationships All NSIs are authentic store for resident ENTs

Authentic store settings (2) Settings are defined by action in EGR CORE for 2014 cycle for: Resident legal units Resident relationships (between two resident legal units)

Authentic store settings (3) EGR IS and EGR CORE combinations on resident legal units: EGR IS partial / EGR CORE partial: sources other than NSA can provide information for that country EGR IS full / EGR CORE partial: sources other than NSA can provide information for that country in EGR CORE (subject that the LEU is provided by NSA in EGR IS) EGR IS full / EGR CORE full: only NSA data will be acceptable in EGR EGR IS partial / EGR CORE full: sources other than NSA can provide information for that country in EGR IS

Authentic store settings (4) EGR relationships between two resident legal units Authentic store for resident RELs CDP relationships cannot be added to EGR between two resident legal units Only NSA data can be the source of domestic relationships Partially authentic store for the resident RELs CDP relationships can be added to EGR between two resident legal units Both the NSA and the CDP relationship data will be used in EGR for domestic relationships In conflicting cases preference will be given to NSA data

Further reading EGR wiki Details on the EGR methodology / Authentic store principle in EGR 2.0

Processing of data The authentic store settings and the predefined order of data sources and will define in EGR 2.0 how groups will be created from the received pairwise relationships of NSIs and CDPs Priority order of data sources EGR NSI of the subsidiary NSI of the parent BvD DnB NSI other than 2 and 3

Information to EGR from one NSI LEU BE222 AT REL data LEU AT111 ENT ATENT111 AT ENT data AT LEU data AT LEL data

Information to EGR from multiple sources BE REL data LEU BE222 ENT BEENT222 BvD REL data BE LEU data BE ENT data BvD LEU data BE LEL data BE REL data AT REL data LEU AT111 ENT ATENT111 BvD REL data AT LEU data AT ENT data BvD LEU data AT LEL data DnB REL data

Consolidation of legal units Source Transformed Consolidated NSA(3) LEID X NSA(3) LEID X NSA(1) LEID X NSA(2) LEID X DnB(1) LEID X BvD(2) LEID X BvD(1) LEID X WITHIN ONE FRAME YEAR Priority NSA BvD DnB Prioritize Update

Consolidation of relationships (1) Process started from scratch per subsidiary Collect all direct RELs on the same subsidiary Determine highest percentage per parent Create direct relationships in order of priority Check for no violation (for example, no more than 100% in total) Collect indirect RELs on the same subsidiary Discard superfluous indirect (if there is direct control) Discard lower priority (if more than 1 parent) Establish indirect relationship

Consolidation of relationships (2) LEU BE2 LEU NL3 NSI_AT AT1-BE2 A C D 89% NSI_AT AT1-NL3 A C D 11% BvD AT1-BE2 A C D 50% BvD AT1-NL3 A C D 50% NSI_NL AT1-NL3 A C D 51% LEU AT1 NSI_AT AT1-BE2 A C D 89% BvD AT1-BE2 A C D 50% NSI_AT AT1-NL3 A C D 11% NSI_NL AT1-NL3 A C D 51% BvD AT1-NL3 A C D 50% Priority EGR NSI of the subsidiary NSI of the parent BvD DnB NSI other than 2 and 3

Consolidation of cluster of control The cluster of control defines legal units that are involved in (control) relationships with each other, ultimately all being under control of the defined topmost legal unit (the head of the group) A legal unit can have control with a single relationship in two cases: Type of ownership = I (indirect) or Type of ownership = D (direct) and voting power >50% Combine clusters with cumulative direct control >50%!

Creation of control clusters In the consolidation process EGR is looking for: Direct control - A legal unit directly owns more than 50 % of the voting rights of another legal unit Consolidated control - A legal unit fully consolidates the accounts of another legal unit (through accounts) Indirect control - A legal unit indirectly owns more than 50 % of the voting rights of another legal unit, through subsidiaries One control cluster can include One to many legal units From one or more countries

From % values…

…to control clusters

Consolidation of groups From clusters to enterprise groups Each new cluster is a new group For already existing groups (data of previous EGR cycle) the identification (continuity) of the enterprise groups is determined By looking at the overlapping enterprises and the number of persons employed of them Where overlap is found on enterprises and employment, the group ID is kept, continuity of groups exists

Processing of data The authentic store settings and the predefined order of data sources and will define in EGR 2.0 how groups will be created from the received pairwise relationships of NSIs and CDPs Priority order of data sources EGR NSI of the subsidiary NSI of the parent BvD DnB NSI other than 2 and 3

Processing of data - Examples (1) Complementary REL data of NSI and CDP NSI SK LEU1 (SK) – LEU2 (LU) – cross border relationship CDP LEU2 (LU) – LEU3 (LU) – resident relationship As LU is PA for resident REL: CDP data accepted, cluster will be: LEU1(SK) – LEU2 (LU) – LEU3 (LU) NSI SK LEU1 (SK) – LEU2 (DK) – cross border relationship CDP LEU2 (DK) – LEU3 (DK) – resident relationship As DK is A for resident REL: CDP data not accepted, cluster will be: LEU1(SK) – LEU2 (DK)

Processing of data - Examples (2) Complementary REL data of NSI and CDP NSI SK LEU1 (SK) – LEU2 (DK) – cross border relationship CDP LEU2 (DK) – LEU3 (US) – cross border relationship Complementary CDP data always accepted for cross-border REL, cluster will be: LEU1(SK) – LEU2 (DK) – LEU3 (US)

Processing of data - Examples (3) Conflicting cases of NSI and CDP REL data NSI SK LEU1 (SK) – LEU2 (LU) – cross border relationship CDP LEU1 (SK) – LEU3 (CZ) – cross border relationship NSI is stronger than CDP, cluster will be: LEU1(SK) – LEU2 (LU) NSI SK LEU 1 (SK) – LEU 2 (LU) – cross border relationship NSI CZ LEU1 (SK) – LEU 3 (CZ) – cross border relationship Two NSI sources, bottom-up REL is stronger than top-down, cluster will be: LEU 1 (SK) – LEU 2 (LU)

Processing of data - Examples (4) Conflicting cases of NSI and CDP REL data CDP1 LEU1 (SK) – LEU2 (CZ) – cross border relationship CDP2 LEU1 (SK) – LEU3 (GI) – cross border relationship Two CDP sources, CDP1 is stronger, cluster will be: LEU1 (SK) – LEU2 (CZ)

Processing of data - Examples (5) Complex case of NSI and CDP REL data NSI SK LEU1 (SK) – LEU2 (LU) – cross border relationship NSI CZ LEU1 (SK) – LEU3 (CZ) – cross border relationship CDP1 LEU2 (LU) – LEU4 (LU) – resident relationship CDP2 LEU2 (LU) – LEU5 (IE) – cross border relationship CDP2 LEU5 (IE) – LEU6 (IE) – resident relationship

Processing of data - Examples (6) LEU 6 IE NSI SK: LEU1(SK)–LEU2(LU) NSI CZ: LEU1(SK)–LEU3(CZ) CDP1: LEU2(LU)–LEU4(LU) CDP2: LEU2(LU)–LEU5(IE) CDP2: LEU5(IE)–LEU6(IE) CDP2 data LEU 4 LU LEU 5 IE CDP1 data CDP2 data Priority EGR NSI of the subsidiary NSI of the parent BvD DnB NSI other than 2 and 3 LEU 2 LU LEU 3 CZ SK data LEU 1 SK CZ data

Processing of data - Examples (7) Complex case of NSI and CDP REL data Bottom-up REL is stronger than top-down: NSI SK data accepted, NSI CZ data not accepted As LU is PA for resident REL: CDP1 data accepted CDP2 data on LEU2 not accepted, CDP1 data are stronger As IE is PA for resident REL: CDP2 data for LEU5 resident REL accepted Clusters will be: LEU1(SK) – LEU2 (LU) – LEU4 (LU) LEU5 (IE) – LEU6 (IE) (domestic group, will be excluded from the EGR frame)

Identification numbers in EGR 2.0 EGR IS LEUs are identified with LEID numbers EGR CORE input files ENTs: ENT_NSA_ID, groups: GEG_EGR_ID EGR CORE system and output LEUs are identified with LEU_EGR_ID No continuity of EGR 1.0 identifiers (EU_LEU_ID, GLOBAL_EG_ID)

Further reading EGR wiki Details on the EGR methodology

Notes