PM10: Comparison of TEOM-FDMS with Gravimetry

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An innovative tool for the review of health and safety work practices and the implementation of effective controls of particulate exposures.
Advertisements

A comparison of OMI NO 2 VTC with in- situ measurements in Switzerland Dominik Brunner, Brigitte Buchmann, Thomas Seitz, and Martin Steinbacher Empa, Swiss.
/foredr/tfmm2 Nor wegian Institute for Air Research Regional monitoring programmes National programmes European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme.
QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA AIR QUALITY PROGRAM CRAIG KREMAN ASSISTANT ENVIRONMENTAL DIRECTOR QUAPAW TRIBE ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE 2014 National Tribal Forum.
S Larssen: PM-PP-Stockholm-Oct-2003.ppt slide 1 PM in Europe - State and past trends Emissions and concentration levels Steinar Larssen Norwegian Institute.
Twinning Project RO2006/IB/EN/09 1 Saxony-Anhalt State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheBukarest Wolfgang Garche Saxony-Anhalt.
Importance of Quality Assurance Documentation and Coordination with Your Certified Laboratory Amy Yersavich and Susan Netzly-Watkins.
Ch. Hueglin, Empa, Duebendorf and AirMonTech Consortium Emep TFMM Meeting May 11-13, 2011 Air Pollution Monitoring Technologies for Urban.
Developments in EMEP monitoring strategy and recommendations from AirMonTech Kjetil Tørseth, NILU/EMEP-CCC.
Working Together for Clean Air PM 2.5 Continuous Methods Lynnwood, Washington Site.
Particulate Matter Monitoring in the Eastern Sierra Region A Brief History Presented by Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District.
QA/QC of Scottish Air Quality Data Ken Stevenson.
Monitoring Station Location and Siting Initially on a residential porch at Marina Towers, aligned with the Mirant Potomac River Generating Station (PRGS)
Temporal and Spatial Variations of PM2.5 Mass in Georgia Xiaolu Zhang EAS 6410 Spring 2007.
IMPROVE Ion Study Plan Presented by Marc Pitchford to the RPO Technical Groups Dallas, TX 12/3/02.
1 Saxony-Anhalt State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang Garche Bukarest EU-Twinning Project RO 2006 IB EN 09 Wolfgang Garche Saxony-Anhalt.
Detecting change in atmospheric ammonia following emission changes Working Group 2 WG 2.
Correcting TEOM Measurements using the KCL Volatile Correction Model David Green, Gary Fuller & Timothy Baker.
Gordon Pierce WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Denver, CO November 6, 2013.
Synergies between EMEP and EUSAAR Wenche Aas and Kjetil Tørseth EMEP/CCC (NILU)
NAME Evaluation Report Name of author(s) Name of institution Year.
Construction Safety at the UW Ron Fouty, Safety Director Capital Projects Office University of Washington.
2011 National Air Quality Conferences March , 2011 Development of the USEPA Quality Assurance Guidance for the Collection of Meteorological Data.
1 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheBukarest National Reference Laboratory for Air.
Pre kick off meeting 1 1 NCHRP_22_24 January Time Frame CM/E finalised the vehicle and test object modelling documents (Parts 2&3) –These documents.
Satellite based versus traditional air pollution monitoring: Requirements, limitations, and chances Dominik Brunner, Christoph Hueglin, Christoph Zellweger,
Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN The implementation of the Gothenburg.
Particulate Matter Monitoring Exercise: Laboratory & Field Methods Lydia Scheer ITEP.
BACC II progress Anders Omstedt. BALTEX-BACC-HELCOM assessment Department of Earth Sciences.
PM Methods Update and Network Design Presentation for WESTAR San Diego, CA September 2005 Peter Tsirigotis Director Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis.
Examination Results Dr. W. Huisman Cairo, November 21th 2012.
Air Quality in EEA and EECCA Europe’s Environment assessment report, th Europe’s Environment assessment report, 2007 (‘the Belgrade report’) Hans.
process and procedures for assessments
Tuning the retrieval: treat or cheat Klemens Hocke, Simone Studer
EDMS v.1 02/07/2013 General trends in ventilation of radiation zones from the viewpoint of public exposure P. Vojtyla / DGS-SEE-XP.
The CAMS Policy products
Extended Bureaux EMEP & WGE, Geneva March 21th 2017
Sumnmary of recommendations of the Telenurse Prague meeting
The French National Reference laboratory (NRL)
Preliminary results of the OEMs HDV PN-PEMS validation study
Urban PM and the integrated assessment.
Contribution from AQUILA to Air Policy Review
Standardisation - What to expect from it?
Continuous PM2.5 Monitoring
NESCAUM MAC Meeting Troy, New Hampshire April 24 – 25, 2007
Signal Conditioning.
FEM Testing Update: 1405 DF TEOM
Replies by the Task Force to the comments provided by GRVA members
Contribution from AQUILA to Air Policy Review
The French National Reference laboratory (NRL)
Assessment of Atmospheric PM in the Slovak Republic
Implementation of the EMEP monitoring strategy
Math Pilot Meeting April 9, 2014
Monitoring strategy, technical issues
Correcting TEOM Measurements using the KCL Volatile Correction Model
Reporting QA Measures to EBAS – and a Word on Flagging
Empa, Air Pollution/Environmental Technologies
Levels of PM10 in The Netherlands
MEASUREMENT OF PM2.5 SEMI-VOLATILE MATERIAL WITH THE FDMS TEOM MONITOR
EUSAAR contribution to the EMEP intensive field campaigns
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
Co-operation with TF on Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution
PM10 trends in Switzerland using random forest models
PM correction factor in France
Comparison of NH3/NH4 and HNO3/NO3 measurements with DELTA minidenuders and impregnated filter methods Robert Gehrig / Christoph Hüglin / Andrea Fischer.
Paul Scherrer Institut
TFMM Workplan & Mandate Augustin Colette & Oksana Tarasova
Iakovos Barmpadimos, André Prévôt, Johannes Keller, Christoph Hüglin
History of 50 years ozone soundings:
Presentation transcript:

PM10: Comparison of TEOM-FDMS with Gravimetry Robert Gehrig, Christoph Hüglin, Beat Schwarzenbach Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research CH-8600 Dübendorf Switzerland

TEOM (Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance) Source: Baron/Willeke: Aerosol measurement

TEOM-FDMS FDMS = Filter Dynamic Measurement System Compensation for possible artefacts (humidity and loss of semi-volatile material)

TEOM-FDMS FDMS = Filter Dynamic Measurement System Compensation for possible artefacts (humidity and loss of semi-volatile material)

Dübendorf, Evaluation phase, FDMS Type B, 2006/2007

Lausanne PM10

Lugano (base and reference signal) ○ before spring 2009 ● after spring 2009 Base signal Reference signal

Dryer efficiency (%)

Zero Air Measurements (Laboratory)

Important observations Majority of TEOM-FDMS in NABEL showed poor comparability with gravimetry (too high values). While reference signal seemed to be plausible, base signal were too high. Poor performance seemed to be connected with low dryer efficiency. With new dryers comparability was often better for a short period, but got worse rather quickly. Filtered air gave not ± 0 μg/m3 signal (contribution from both reference and base signal).

Bern (good performance) TEOM – Grav. TEOM / Grav. ○ before spring 2009 ● after spring 2009

Lausanne (good performance) TEOM – Grav. TEOM / Grav. ○ before spring 2009 ● after spring 2009

Dübendorf (medium performance) TEOM – Grav. TEOM / Grav. ○ before spring 2009 ● after spring 2009

Zürich (medium performance) TEOM – Grav. TEOM / Grav. ○ before spring 2009 ● after spring 2009

AQUILA Recommendations (AQUILA = Air Quality Reference Laboratories in Europe) Recommendation 15 (November 2009) For measurements of the AEI exposure measurements of PM2.5 the standard reference method shall be used where possible.   Recommendation 16 (November 2009) AQUILA recommends to its members not to use new instruments for PM until the demonstration of equivalence is available. Recommendation 17 (November 2009) Current instrumentation may be used on the decision of the NRL/competent body and more rigorous QA/QC procedures shall be introduced as soon as possible.

Conclusions for EMEP Also within EMEP, the gravimetric reference method shall be used where possible for measurements of PM. In existing data base, correct documentation of metadata for PM (used method) is crucial. When comparing PM data from different sites or analysing long term trends considerations concerning data homogeneity are very important.