MTB1 Antagonizes MYC2 for DNA Binding.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure S1 A B C D E F G Long Day Hypocotyl lenght (mm)
Advertisements

Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
HMGA2 is a SUMOylation target.
E2F7/8 and HIF1 are required for hypoxic VEGFA expression.
Effects of MAX reconstitution and of BRG1 depletion in lung cancer cells. Effects of MAX reconstitution and of BRG1 depletion in lung cancer cells. A,
by Toshibumi Shimokawa, and Chisei Ra
The Role of Transcription Factor PU
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
APCFZR1 promotes BRAF ubiquitination in a D-box–dependent manner.
C-MYC induces the transcription of LIG3 and PARP1 in FLT3/ITD- and BCR-ABL1–positive cells. c-MYC induces the transcription of LIG3 and PARP1 in FLT3/ITD-
AGL15 Interacts in a Sequence-Specific Manner with a Noncanonical CArG Motif Present in the Regulatory Region of AtGA2ox6.(A) Enrichment of the AtGA2ox6.
Regulation of CSF1 Promoter by the SWI/SNF-like BAF Complex
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Minchul Kim, Taekhoon Kim, Randy L. Johnson, Dae-Sik Lim  Cell Reports 
Volume 120, Issue 2, Pages (January 2005)
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Xiaolong Wei, Hai Xu, Donald Kufe  Cancer Cell 
BZR1 Positively Regulates Freezing Tolerance via CBF-Dependent and CBF- Independent Pathways in Arabidopsis  Hui Li, Keyi Ye, Yiting Shi, Jinkui Cheng,
Antonin Morillon, Nickoletta Karabetsou, Anitha Nair, Jane Mellor 
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Validation of ChIP-seq reads.
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Arabidopsis MSBP1 Is Activated by HY5 and HYH and Is Involved in Photomorphogenesis and Brassinosteroid Sensitivity Regulation  Shi Qiu-Ming , Yang Xi.
Codependent Activators Direct Myoblast-Specific MyoD Transcription
Mapping of the FD binding site in the AP1 promoter.
The C-terminal part of FD binds to a G-box in the SEP3 promoter in vitro. The C-terminal part of FD binds to a G-box in the SEP3 promoter in vitro. A,
Expression and Histone H4 Acetylation Levels of MAPK6 and WRKY53 in the HDT701 OX and RNAi Plants after M. oryzae Inoculation. Expression and Histone H4.
Arabidopsis WRKY45 Interacts with the DELLA Protein RGL1 to Positively Regulate Age-Triggered Leaf Senescence  Ligang Chen, Shengyuan Xiang, Yanli Chen,
HDAC11 regulates CCL2 expression by recruiting PU.1.
P300 depletion is lethal in cancer cells harboring loss-of-function mutations in CBP. A, synthetic-lethal effects assessed by colony formation assay. p300.
Amanda O'Donnell, Shen-Hsi Yang, Andrew D. Sharrocks  Molecular Cell 
Recognition of GCC-box of BT4 promoter by ERF11 in vitro and in yeast cells. Recognition of GCC-box of BT4 promoter by ERF11 in vitro and in yeast cells.
Fig. 7. Ror-GFP binds to Myc-tagged Wnts and Wnt receptors.
Validation of DNMT3A splice variant expression.
Fig. 4 p100/TSN enables E2F1 to interact with alternatively spliced transcripts. p100/TSN enables E2F1 to interact with alternatively spliced transcripts.
Fig. 5 E2F1 also interacts with alternatively spliced transcripts from the MECOM gene. E2F1 also interacts with alternatively spliced transcripts from.
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
ERF12 Binds Directly to the DRE/CRT Element in the DOG1 Promoter.
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages (September 2015)
Chk1 and 14‐3‐3 proteins inhibit atypical E2Fs to prevent a permanent cell cycle arrest Experimental procedures of the SILAC assay to identify binding.
OsSHI1 Binds Directly to the Promoter Regions of OsTB1 and OsDEP1.
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Identification of chromatin modifying complex recruiting H3K9 methyltransferases. a, A MEME-ChIP analysis was performed to identify the transcription factor.
Mapping the Pirh2 and p73 interaction sites.
Interaction of MAPJD with E-box sequence of the RIOK1 gene.
SATB2-AS1 repressed Snail transcription depending on SATB2-mediated recruitment of HDAC1. SATB2-AS1 repressed Snail transcription depending on SATB2-mediated.
MTB Proteins Lack a Canonical MID and Act as Transcriptional Repressors. MTB Proteins Lack a Canonical MID and Act as Transcriptional Repressors. (A) Y2H.
OsbZIP46 Binds to the OsPM1 Promoter and Activates OsPM1 Expression in Vivo. OsbZIP46 Binds to the OsPM1 Promoter and Activates OsPM1 Expression in Vivo.
Interaction of Cdx1 and Cdx2 with the putative Cdx-binding sites of the human DSC2 promoter. Interaction of Cdx1 and Cdx2 with the putative Cdx-binding.
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2019)
Autophagy Activation Is Mediated by the Secretion of T3Es.
CCA1 Binds the Promoter of GI in Vitro and in Vivo.
OsSHI1 Physically Interacts with IPA1.
MTB1 to MTB3 Are Direct Transcriptional Targets of MYC2.
MTB1 to MTB3 Negatively Regulate Diverse Aspects of JA Responses.
Mutant TERT promoter displays active histone marks and distinct long-range interactions: A, cell lines that were used in the study with their origin and.
MLK4 Is Required for H2A.Z Deposition and H4 Acetylation.
Pst Activates Autophagy to Enhance Plant Susceptibility.
RRC1 Interacts with phyB and Colocalizes in Nuclear Photobodies.
MED25 and JAZ7 Compete to Interact with MYC2.
MTB1 Interacts with MYC2 and Disrupts MED25-MYC2 Interaction.
PIF3 Inhibits the Binding of TCP4 to the Promoters of SAUR Genes and Represses Their Expression. PIF3 Inhibits the Binding of TCP4 to the Promoters of.
Binding of TCP4-Like Proteins to the SAUR Promoters Is Enhanced by Light Signal or the Lack of PIFs. (A) and (B) Light increases the binding of TCP4 to.
Presentation transcript:

MTB1 Antagonizes MYC2 for DNA Binding. MTB1 Antagonizes MYC2 for DNA Binding. (A) Schematic representations of TomLoxD and JA2L showing the amplicons and probe used for ChIP-qPCR assay and EMSA. Positions of the transcription start site (TSS) and transcription termination site (TTS) are indicated. (B) and (C) ChIP-qPCR analysis of the enrichment of MYC2 (B) and MTB1 (C) on the chromatin of TomLoxD and JA2L in MYC2-GFP-9# and MTB1-GFP-5# plants, respectively. (D) and (E) ChIP-qPCR analysis of the enrichment of MYC2 (D) and MTB1 (E) on the G-box regions of TomLoxD and JA2L in MYC2-GFP-9# and MTB1-GFP-5# plants, respectively, upon wounding. Plants were treated with mechanical wounding for the indicated times before cross-linking. (F) and (G) ChIP-qPCR assays of the impaired enrichment of MYC2 on the G-boxes of TomLoxD and JA2L due to MTB-RNAi in MYC2-GFP-9# and MYC2-GFP-9#/MTB-RNAi-8# plants (F) and MTB1-OE in MYC2-GFP-9# and MYC2-GFP-9#/MTB1-OE-11# plants (G) upon wounding. Plants were treated with mechanical wounding for 1 h before cross-linking. For (B) to (G), chromatin of each sample was immunoprecipitated using anti-GFP antibody and quantified by qPCR. The enrichment of target gene promoters is displayed as a percentage of input DNA. Data represent means ± sd (n = 3). For (D) to (G), ACTIN2 was used as a nonspecific control. For (F) and (G), asterisks indicate significant differences detected using Student’s t test (*, P < 0.05 and **, P < 0.01; Supplemental Data Set 2) when compared with MYC2-GFP. (H) EMSA showing that MBP-MTB1 interferes with MBP-MYC2 to bind to DNA probes from the TomLoxD promoter in vitro. Biotin-labeled probes were incubated with a fixed amount of MBP-MYC2 and an increasing amount of MBP-MTB1 or MBP, and the free and bound DNAs were separated on an acrylamide gel. The MBP protein was incubated with the labeled probe to serve as a negative control; mutated probes were used as a negative control. Mu, mutated probe in which the G-box motif 5ʹ-ACCATGTG-3ʹ was deleted. Yuanyuan Liu et al. Plant Cell 2019;31:106-127 ©2019 by American Society of Plant Biologists