Agricultural Order 4.0 Discussion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PINE HOLLOW WATERSHED ENHANCEMENT PROJECT Sherman County Soil & Water Conservation District.
Advertisements

Marylands Approach to Success Stories Presented to the Region III States Meeting May 12, 2009 Presented by Jim George.
Irrigation Mobile Lab Yolo, Solano, & Colusa County Resource Conservation Districts The Yolo Resource Conservation District (RCD) is a farmer-led special.
Evaluating Bids in the U.S. Conservation Reserve Program Ralph E. Heimlich Deputy Director for Analysis, Resource Economics Division, Economic Research.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Proposed Stormwater Regulations Public Forum Richland County Government September 2009.
Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.
South Llano River: One of 2011’sTop Ten National Fish Habitat Action Plan named SLR as “water to watch” WHY?? –Conserve freshwater, estuarine, and marine.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Water Pollution. Watershed A watershed is an area of land from which all the water drains to the same location, such as a stream, pond, lake, river, wetland.
What are some ways people use water? About 70% of the Earth’s surface is covered with water. Over 96% of all the water is salt water.
Watersheds Capture, Store And Safely Release Water.
Freshwater Fishery Management Objective- Discuss the lake habitat to include basic fishery management techniques.
Soil Conservation Poster
Agricultural Best Management Practices For Protecting Water Quality Recommended by Georgia Soil and Water Conservation Commission and approved by the EPD.
Golf Course Water Resources Best Management Practices TOOLBOX  Project Overview  Your Role in the Project April 2009.
Todd Ambs Water Division Administrator, WDNR October 26, 2009 Sustaining the Water Belt of North America.
Protective Regulations Ohio Lake Erie Commission Best Local Land Use Practices January, 2007 Kirby Date, Countryside Program Coordinator.
Ohio Chapter Clean Water Campaign “Protecting our water at the Source” Matt Trokan Ohio Chapter Conservation Manager x311
AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS Determined by the salinity of water 2 types: Freshwater & Marine.
Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.
Changing Focus on Watershed Issues < 1960’s: Water supply and flooding > 1960’s: Land use effects on water quality > 1980’s: Riparian and aquatic ecology.
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
LOWER L’ANGUILLE WATERSHED COST SHARE PATRICIA PERRY ST. FRANCIS COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT.
Sediment & Nutrient Management in the L’Anguille River Watershed St. Francis County Cost Share Project Patricia Perry St. Francis County Conservation.
Mission, Brender, and Yaksum Creeks Habitat Conditions Low flows and associated high temperatures affect distribution and abundance of native species.
What are some ways to reduce the risks to public health in drinking water from Salinas Valley? Andrew Mims Nitrates In Groundwater Presentation ENSTU 300.
Watersheds Chapter 9. Watershed All land enclosed by a continuous hydrologic drainage divide and lying upslope from a specified point on a stream All.
Wetland Wetland San Francisco Bay & Delta San Francisco Bay & Delta Wetland Wetland Steven Ortiz Per.1.
Importance of the Lower Wenatchee River in Salmon Recovery* The Lower Wenatchee is a critical migration corridor for all ESA listed species Of the total.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Inter-Agency Coordination BLM PILOT VERNAL & GLENWOOD SPRINGS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & U.S. Bureau of Land.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Salmon-Safe: Peer-reviewed standards for the management of urban parks and natural areas Carrie Foss WSU Puyallup.
Clean Water Act Mrs. Perryman Mrs. Trimble. Clean Water Act “Restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters”
Riparian Areas: Functions and Conditions Authors: Gene Surber, MSU Extension Natural Resources Specialist Bob Ehrhart, Research Specialist, RWRP, Univ.
Riparian Buffers And Their Role In Coastal Georgia By Jackie Jackson & Bethany Jewell Water Resource Planners.
15 Feet : Minimum Width for Zone 1 Zone 1 Functions: Bank Stabilization Shading (water temperature control) Flood Protection Stream Inputs: Structural.
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources By Joan Schumaker Chadde, Western U.P. Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education. All photos by Chadde,
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Environmental Quality Improvement Program (EQIP) Edwards Aquifer State Resource Concern (EA SRC) Jim.
Human Impacts Part 2- Watersheds. What’s a Watershed? An area of land that drains into a common body of water.
Introduction to Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations CAFOs Christina Richmond West Virginia Department of Agriculture.
Where critical areas & agriculture meet
Agricultural Soil and Water Conservation Stewardship
Where critical areas & agriculture meet
Hydrosphere Notes Part 9-Land Use.
Environmentally sensitive areas
Agricultural Best Management Practices For Protecting Water Quality
Stream Depletion from an Ecological Perspective
Conservation Reserve Program Acres in Iowa
Hudson Wetlands Protection Bylaw
Texas Water Resources Institute
Henrico County Stream Assessment / Watershed Management Program
Washington County Parks and Open Spaces
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources
Water Quality Improvement Projects and Engineering Planning Grant
Warmup 10/22/12 As the population of Durham increases…
Human Activity and Ground Water
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Human Activity and Ground Water
Human Activity and Ground Water
Human Effects on Hydrosphere Quality
Overview of US EPA & State Manure Management Regulations
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources
Environmentally sensitive areas
Agricultural Order 4.0 Discussion
Proposed Agricultural General Order for Bard Valley Regional Board WORKSHOP May 15, 2019 Logan Raub, Env. Sci.
Presentation transcript:

Agricultural Order 4.0 Discussion Item 3 May 15-16, 2019 Riparian Habitat Management Table 5 Paula Richter

Outline Riparian Habitat Functions and Values Staff’s Recommended Option – Table 5

Riparian Habitat Functions, Values and Beneficial Use Protection Municipal/Domestic Supply Sediment Trapping Agricultural Supply Pollutant Filtering Groundwater Recharge Stream Energy Dissipation Fresh Water Replenishment Rain Drop Dissipation Cold/Warm Fresh Water Habitat Shade/Temperature Wildlife Habitat Streambank Stabilization Spawning Habitat Extended Seasonal Flows Commercial/Sport Fishing Surface Water Storage Rare, Threatened, Endangered Species Habitat Wildlife Habitat Recreation Recreation Graphic courtesy of EPA (2005)

Updated Options Tables Irrigation and Nutrient Management – Groundwater Irrigation and Nutrient Management – Surface Water Pesticide Management – Surface Water, Groundwater Sediment and Erosion Management – Surface Water Riparian Habitat Management – Water Quality QUESTIONS: What can growers and the regional board do to ensure that riparian and wetland habitat is protected due to agricultural activities and discharges? How can the regional board use discharge permit requirements to ensure current and future affordable, safe, and clean water for drinking and environmental uses?

TABLE 5: RIPARIAN HABITAT MANAGEMENT FOR WATER QUALITY PROTECTION Ag Order 4.0 – Updated Option Phasing or Prioritization Quantifiable Milestones* (Numeric Limits)   Prioritization based on location-specific conditions such as beneficial use impairment and high-quality waterbodies. Setback Width and Native Vegetative Cover Individual Approach in priority areas Ranch-level setback width and percent native vegetative cover requirements for priority waterbodies are based on stream classification system. Cooperative Approach in priority areas Participate in a Cooperative Watershed Restoration Program (as approved by Executive Officer) AND must have a vegetated setback 1.5 times the width of the waterbody on each side. A Cooperative Approach program may not be approved in certain watersheds if it will result in degradation. Restoration acreage is based upon the setback acreage that would have been required on the farm under the Individual Approach, at the following mitigation ratios: 3P OR Strahler Class Minimum Setback Width Class 1 (ag ditch) no setback requirement Class 2 50 feet with grasses Class 3 and 4 80 feet with shrubs and grasses Class 5 150 feet with trees, shrubs, and grasses Class 6 250 feet with diverse trees, shrubs, and grasses Lakes, estuaries, and wetlands Waterbody Type Ratio Class 2 1:1 Class 3 and 4 2:1 Class 5 and 6 3:1 Lakes, estuaries, and wetlands 4:1 Percent Slope Setback Width Adjustment 15 - 17% add 10 feet 18 - 20% add 30 feet 21 - 23% add 50 feet 24 - 25% add 60 feet

TABLE 5: RIPARIAN HABITAT MANAGEMENT FOR WATER QUALITY PROTECTION Ag Order 4.0 – Updated Option Quantifiable Milestones* (Numeric Limits) Time Schedule* All other non-priority waterbodies and ranches participating in Cooperative Approach All dischargers with a Class 2 or higher waterbody on or adjacent to their ranch must have a vegetated setback for erosion control that is 1.5 times the width of the waterbody on each side. The presence of bare soil vulnerable to erosion is prohibited for all waterbody classes. No non-native invasive species may be planted within setbacks. Prohibition The removal of existing native riparian vegetative cover is prohibited, unless authorized through another permitting mechanism. Setback Width Establishment Setback width establishment date to be determined based on priority areas. Native Vegetative Cover Establishment Native vegetative cover establishment date to be determined based on priority areas.

TABLE 5: RIPARIAN HABITAT MANAGEMENT FOR WATER QUALITY PROTECTION Ag Order 4.0 – Updated Option Monitoring and Reporting*   Incentives Riparian Management Reporting Individual Approach a. Buffer width, in feet b. Total native vegetative cover, in percent c. Vegetative cover by type, in percent (trees, shrubs, grasses, non-vegetated) d. Digital map of farm and setback boundaries Cooperative Approach Cooperative program monitors and reports progress annually. Surface Water Quality Trends All ranches must conduct regional bioassessment trend monitoring, either individually or through a cooperative program. 3P 3P -Cooperative Approach may allow for reduced setback and vegetation requirements within the ranch.

401 Water Quality Certification Minor culvert maintenance Native vegetation planting Non-native invasive species removal Bioengineered soil stabilization Berm removal Trash removal

SUMMARIZED FRAMEWORK TABLE – AG ORDER 4.0 TABLE 1: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - GW TABLE 2: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - SW TABLE 3: PESTICIDES TABLE 4: SEDIMENT & EROSION TABLE 5: RIPARIAN HABITAT Phasing or Prioritization -Location-specific phasing -Watershed prioritization -Waterbody prioritization Quantifiable Milestones* (Numeric Limits) -Discharge Limit AFER + AIRR – R -AFER Limit (by crop) -AFER Limit (consequence) -Receiving SW Limit and/or Discharge Limit -TMDLs or WQOs AFER Limit (consequence) -Impermeable, slope, winter -Sediment mass discharge -Receiving SW alteration -Design storm -Individual or Cooperative -Priority and Non-priority -Setbacks widths -Vegetation -Prohibition Time Schedule* -Time schedule with Discharge Targets & Limits -High AIRR incentive -AFER Limit (by crop) by 2022 -TMDL time schedules -Non-TMDL areas TBD -Table 2, 3 time schedule -TBD Monitoring and Reporting* INMP TNA, R, Irrigation Mgmt. Practices Individual Discharge to GW Domestic Wells GW Trends -Receiving SW Trends -Follow-Up Receiving SW Individual Discharge to SW -PMP -Individual Discharge to SW -GW Pesticides SEMP -RMP -Setbacks and vegetation Incentives -Compost -Increase R -Third party programs -Cooperative approach 3P 3P

Thank You !

Topics for Questions on Table 5 Prioritization Priority waterbody requirements Non-priority waterbody requirements Prohibition

SUMMARIZED FRAMEWORK TABLE – AG ORDER 4.0 TABLE 1: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - GW TABLE 2: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - SW TABLE 3: PESTICIDES TABLE 4: SEDIMENT & EROSION TABLE 5: RIPARIAN HABITAT Phasing or Prioritization -Location-specific phasing -Watershed prioritization -Waterbody prioritization Quantifiable Milestones* (Numeric Limits) -Discharge Limit AFER + AIRR – R -AFER Limit (by crop) -AFER Limit (consequence) -Receiving SW Limit and/or Discharge Limit -TMDLs or WQOs AFER Limit (consequence) -Impermeable, slope, winter -Sediment mass discharge -Receiving SW alteration -Design storm -Individual or Cooperative -Priority and Non-priority -Setbacks widths -Vegetation -Prohibition Time Schedule* -Time schedule with Discharge Targets & Limits -High AIRR incentive -AFER Limit (by crop) by 2022 -TMDL time schedules -Non-TMDL areas TBD -Table 2, 3 time schedule -TBD Monitoring and Reporting* INMP TNA, R, Irrigation Mgmt. Practices Individual Discharge to GW Domestic Wells GW Trends -Receiving SW Trends -Follow-Up Receiving SW Individual Discharge to SW -PMP -Individual Discharge to SW -GW Pesticides SEMP -RMP -Setbacks and vegetation Incentives -Compost -Increase R -Third party programs -Cooperative approach 3P 3P

SUMMARIZED FRAMEWORK TABLE – AG ORDER 4.0 TABLE 1: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - GW TABLE 2: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - SW TABLE 3: PESTICIDES TABLE 4: SEDIMENT & EROSION TABLE 5: RIPARIAN HABITAT Phasing or Prioritization -Location-specific phasing -Watershed prioritization -Waterbody prioritization Quantifiable Milestones* (Numeric Limits) -Discharge Limit AFER + AIRR – R -AFER Limit (by crop) -AFER Limit (consequence) -Receiving SW Limit and/or Discharge Limit -TMDLs or WQOs AFER Limit (consequence) -Impermeable, slope, winter -Sediment mass discharge -Receiving SW alteration -Design storm -Individual or Cooperative -Priority and Non-priority -Setbacks widths -Vegetation -Prohibition Time Schedule* -Time schedule with Discharge Targets & Limits -High AIRR incentive -AFER Limit (by crop) by 2022 -TMDL time schedules -Non-TMDL areas TBD -Table 2, 3 time schedule -TBD Monitoring and Reporting* INMP TNA, R, Irrigation Mgmt. Practices Individual Discharge to GW Domestic Wells GW Trends -Receiving SW Trends -Follow-Up Receiving SW Individual Discharge to SW -PMP -Individual Discharge to SW -GW Pesticides SEMP -RMP -Setbacks and vegetation Incentives -Compost -Increase R -Third party programs -Cooperative approach 1. Prioritization Should staff proceed with including waterbody-based prioritization for riparian requirements in the draft Ag Order 4.0? 3P 3P

SUMMARIZED FRAMEWORK TABLE – AG ORDER 4.0 TABLE 1: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - GW TABLE 2: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - SW TABLE 3: PESTICIDES TABLE 4: SEDIMENT & EROSION TABLE 5: RIPARIAN HABITAT Phasing or Prioritization -Location-specific phasing -Watershed prioritization -Waterbody prioritization Quantifiable Milestones* (Numeric Limits) -Discharge Limit AFER + AIRR – R -AFER Limit (by crop) -AFER Limit (consequence) -Receiving SW Limit and/or Discharge Limit -TMDLs or WQOs AFER Limit (consequence) -Impermeable, slope, winter -Sediment mass discharge -Receiving SW alteration -Design storm -Individual or Cooperative -Priority and Non-priority -Setbacks widths -Vegetation -Prohibition Time Schedule* -Time schedule with Discharge Targets & Limits -High AIRR incentive -AFER Limit (by crop) by 2022 -TMDL time schedules -Non-TMDL areas TBD -Table 2, 3 time schedule -TBD Monitoring and Reporting* INMP TNA, R, Irrigation Mgmt. Practices Individual Discharge to GW Domestic Wells GW Trends -Receiving SW Trends -Follow-Up Receiving SW Individual Discharge to SW -PMP -Individual Discharge to SW -GW Pesticides SEMP -RMP -Setbacks and vegetation Incentives -Compost -Increase R -Third party programs -Cooperative approach 2. Priority Waterbody Requirements a. Should staff proceed with including setback and vegetation requirements for beneficial use protection in priority areas? b. Should staff proceed with incorporating both individual and cooperative watershed-based options for complying with the riparian requirements? 3P 3P

SUMMARIZED FRAMEWORK TABLE – AG ORDER 4.0 TABLE 1: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - GW TABLE 2: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - SW TABLE 3: PESTICIDES TABLE 4: SEDIMENT & EROSION TABLE 5: RIPARIAN HABITAT Phasing or Prioritization -Location-specific phasing -Watershed prioritization -Waterbody prioritization Quantifiable Milestones* (Numeric Limits) -Discharge Limit AFER + AIRR – R -AFER Limit (by crop) -AFER Limit (consequence) -Receiving SW Limit and/or Discharge Limit -TMDLs or WQOs AFER Limit (consequence) -Impermeable, slope, winter -Sediment mass discharge -Receiving SW alteration -Design storm -Individual or Cooperative -Priority and Non-priority -Setbacks widths -Vegetation -Prohibition Time Schedule* -Time schedule with Discharge Targets & Limits -High AIRR incentive -AFER Limit (by crop) by 2022 -TMDL time schedules -Non-TMDL areas TBD -Table 2, 3 time schedule -TBD Monitoring and Reporting* INMP TNA, R, Irrigation Mgmt. Practices Individual Discharge to GW Domestic Wells GW Trends -Receiving SW Trends -Follow-Up Receiving SW Individual Discharge to SW -PMP -Individual Discharge to SW -GW Pesticides SEMP -RMP -Setbacks and vegetation Incentives -Compost -Increase R -Third party programs -Cooperative approach 3. Non-Priority Waterbody Requirements Should staff proceed with including setback and vegetation requirements focused on sediment and erosion control for non-priority areas? 3P 3P

SUMMARIZED FRAMEWORK TABLE – AG ORDER 4.0 TABLE 1: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - GW TABLE 2: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - SW TABLE 3: PESTICIDES TABLE 4: SEDIMENT & EROSION TABLE 5: RIPARIAN HABITAT Phasing or Prioritization -Location-specific phasing -Watershed prioritization -Waterbody prioritization Quantifiable Milestones* (Numeric Limits) -Discharge Limit AFER + AIRR – R -AFER Limit (by crop) -AFER Limit (consequence) -Receiving SW Limit and/or Discharge Limit -TMDLs or WQOs AFER Limit (consequence) -Impermeable, slope, winter -Sediment mass discharge -Receiving SW alteration -Design storm -Individual or Cooperative -Priority and Non-priority -Setbacks widths -Vegetation -Prohibition Time Schedule* -Time schedule with Discharge Targets & Limits -High AIRR incentive -AFER Limit (by crop) by 2022 -TMDL time schedules -Non-TMDL areas TBD -Table 2, 3 time schedule -TBD Monitoring and Reporting* INMP TNA, R, Irrigation Mgmt. Practices Individual Discharge to GW Domestic Wells GW Trends -Receiving SW Trends -Follow-Up Receiving SW Individual Discharge to SW -PMP -Individual Discharge to SW -GW Pesticides SEMP -RMP -Setbacks and vegetation Incentives -Compost -Increase R -Third party programs -Cooperative approach 4. Prohibition Should staff proceed with carrying forward and clarifying the prohibition against removing existing riparian vegetation? 3P 3P

SUMMARIZED FRAMEWORK TABLE – AG ORDER 4.0 TABLE 1: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - GW TABLE 2: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - SW TABLE 3: PESTICIDES TABLE 4: SEDIMENT & EROSION TABLE 5: RIPARIAN HABITAT Phasing or Prioritization -Location-specific phasing -Watershed prioritization -Waterbody prioritization Quantifiable Milestones* (Numeric Limits) -Discharge Limit AFER + AIRR – R -AFER Limit (by crop) -AFER Limit (consequence) -Receiving SW Limit and/or Discharge Limit -TMDLs or WQOs AFER Limit (consequence) -Impermeable, slope, winter -Sediment mass discharge -Receiving SW alteration -Design storm -Individual or Cooperative -Priority and Non-priority -Setbacks widths -Vegetation -Prohibition Time Schedule* -Time schedule with Discharge Targets & Limits -High AIRR incentive -AFER Limit (by crop) by 2022 -TMDL time schedules -Non-TMDL areas TBD -Table 2, 3 time schedule -TBD Monitoring and Reporting* INMP TNA, R, Irrigation Mgmt. Practices Individual Discharge to GW Domestic Wells GW Trends -Receiving SW Trends -Follow-Up Receiving SW Individual Discharge to SW -PMP -Individual Discharge to SW -GW Pesticides SEMP -RMP -Setbacks and vegetation Incentives -Compost -Increase R -Third party programs -Cooperative approach 3P 3P

SUMMARIZED FRAMEWORK TABLE – AG ORDER 4.0 TABLE 1: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - GW TABLE 2: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - SW TABLE 3: PESTICIDES TABLE 4: SEDIMENT & EROSION TABLE 5: RIPARIAN HABITAT Phasing or Prioritization -Location-specific phasing -Watershed prioritization -Waterbody prioritization Quantifiable Milestones* (Numeric Limits) -Discharge Limit AFER + AIRR – R -AFER Limit (by crop) -AFER Limit (consequence) -Receiving SW Limit and/or Discharge Limit -TMDLs or WQOs AFER Limit (consequence) -Impermeable, slope, winter -Sediment mass discharge -Receiving SW alteration -Design storm -Individual or Cooperative -Priority and Non-priority -Setbacks widths -Vegetation -Prohibition Time Schedule* -Time schedule with Discharge Targets & Limits -High AIRR incentive -AFER Limit (by crop) by 2022 -TMDL time schedules -Non-TMDL areas TBD -Table 2, 3 time schedule -TBD Monitoring and Reporting* INMP TNA, R, Irrigation Mgmt. Practices Individual Discharge to GW Domestic Wells GW Trends -Receiving SW Trends -Follow-Up Receiving SW Individual Discharge to SW -PMP -Individual Discharge to SW -GW Pesticides SEMP -RMP -Setbacks and vegetation Incentives -Compost -Increase R -Third party programs -Cooperative approach 3P 3P

SUMMARIZED FRAMEWORK TABLE – AG ORDER 4.0 TABLE 1: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - GW TABLE 2: IRRIGATION & NUTRIENT - SW TABLE 3: PESTICIDES TABLE 4: SEDIMENT & EROSION TABLE 5: RIPARIAN HABITAT Phasing or Prioritization -Location-specific phasing -Watershed prioritization -Waterbody prioritization Quantifiable Milestones* (Numeric Limits) -Discharge Limit AFER + AIRR – R -AFER Limit (by crop) -AFER Limit (consequence) -Receiving SW Limit and/or Discharge Limit -TMDLs or WQOs AFER Limit (consequence) -Impermeable, slope, winter -Sediment mass discharge -Receiving SW alteration -Design storm -Individual or Cooperative -Priority and Non-priority -Setbacks widths -Vegetation -Prohibition Time Schedule* -Time schedule with Discharge Targets & Limits -High AIRR incentive -AFER Limit (by crop) by 2022 -TMDL time schedules -Non-TMDL areas TBD -Table 2, 3 time schedule -TBD Monitoring and Reporting* INMP TNA, R, Irrigation Mgmt. Practices Individual Discharge to GW Domestic Wells GW Trends -Receiving SW Trends -Follow-Up Receiving SW Individual Discharge to SW -PMP -Individual Discharge to SW -GW Pesticides SEMP -RMP -Setbacks and vegetation Incentives -Compost -Increase R -Third party programs -Cooperative approach 3P 3P

Questions ?