Post-submission Outcomes The review black box Editorial rejection

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Choosing a Journal APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.
Advertisements

Peer Review Process and Responding to Reviewers APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.
What happens after submission? Sadeghi Ramin, MD Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
ASV Education and Career Development Workshop Put down the pipette and pick up the pen: Getting your work published The third part of the story... The.
Webinar January 30, 2012 Dr. Rhonda Phillips Editor, Community Development.
Publishing Journal Articles Simon Hix Prof. of European & Comparative Politics LSE Government Department My experience How journals work Choosing a journal.
Paper written! Now for the harder part: getting it published! Sue Silver, PhD Editor in Chief Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment Ecological Society.
Publishing in Medical Journals Richard Saitz MD, MPH Section of General Internal Medicine, BMC Professor of Medicine & Epidemiology, BUSM and BUSPH Associate.
Presentation  Publication A few random thoughts.
Some Suggested Guidelines for Publishing in “A” Journals Rick Iverson 1.Contribution of your work: Originality of ideas  Demonstrate how have you extended.
Manuscript Writing and the Peer-Review Process
Peer Review for Addiction Journals Robert L. Balster Editor-in-Chief Drug and Alcohol Dependence.
FISH 521 Peer review. Peer review Mechanics Advantages Challenges Solutions.
Tips for writing well and getting your work published Madhukar Pai, MD, PhD McGill University, Montreal Editorial board member: Lancet Infect Dis PLoS.
The Submission Process Jane Pritchard Learning and Teaching Advisor.
Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.
So you want to publish an article? The process of publishing scientific papers Williams lab meeting 14 Sept 2015.
A Tutorial for Associate Editors (AEs) 5 May 2013.
Submitting Manuscripts to Journals: An Editor’s Perspective Michael K. Lindell Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center Texas A&M University.
Passive vs. Active voice Carolyn Brown Taller especializado de inglés científico para publicaciones académicas D.F., México de junio de 2013 UNDERSTANDING.
Writing a Research Manuscript GradWRITE! Presentation Student Development Services Writing Support Centre University of Western Ontario.
What do editors want? Steve Milanese. Do not remove this notice. Copyright Notice COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING This material.
How to Get Published in (better) International Journals Hui Wang, MD, PhD Editorial Director John Wiley & Sons.
Successful publishing managing the review process Professor Janet R. McColl-Kennedy, PhD 2004 Services Doctoral Consortium Miami, Florida 28 October.
The Accounting Review Mark DeFond, Sr. Editor Presented at 2014 PhD Project Doctoral Student Association Atlanta Georgia.
"Writing for Researchers" Monday, July :35-3:45PM. Laurence R Weatherley– Spahr Professor of Chemical Engineering, Department of Chemical and.
What Does it Take to Publish in the AJAE? Get a good idea. Turn the idea into a well-posed, answerable question. Do the research right. Write Effectively.
Manuscript Review Prepared by Noni MacDonald MD FRCPc Editor-in-Chief Paediatrics and Child Health Former Editor-in -Chief CMAJ
Medical Writing How to get funded and published November 2003.
Dealing with Reviews. Rejection hurts, but is it fatal?
Scientific Peer Review Yixin Chen, Associate Professor Computer & Information Science University of Mississippi April 9, 2013.
ACADEMIC PUBLISHING How a manuscript becomes an article.
SCI 论文发表流程 1. 上传或写信或发 投递 Dear Prof. xxx (Editor): Attached (Enclosed) please find the word or PDF version of my paper entitled "xxx" with the kind.
HOW TO PUBLISH Nancy E. Hill, Ph.D. Professor Harvard Graduate School of Education Past Editorships: Associate Editor, Child Development Editorial Board.
How to Get Published: Surviving in the Academic World Stephen E. Condrey, Ph.D. Vice President, American Society for Public Administration Editor-in-Chief,
Publishing research in a peer review journal: Strategies for success
The Power of Good Scientific Writing–and How to Promote Yours
Writing for Publication
How does publication in psychological science work?
Writing for Publication: The Joys, Delights & Frustrations
Journeys into journals: publishing for the new professional
Intensive Course in Research Writing
Survive Peer Reviews: How to Respond to Peer Reviewers Comments
Publishing a paper.
The peer review process
Publishing without tears.
APHE Editorial Process
Journal of Mountain Science
From PhD chapter to article
The Role of the Editor Maria J Grant
Role of peer review in journal evaluation
How to publish from your MEd or PhD research
Journal of Social Work Education Former Editor-in-Chief Susan P
Writing and Feedback.
Dealing with reviewer comments
Adam J. Gordon, MD MPH FACP DFASAM
Writing an Article for Publication
Reviews and the Review Process
Journal of Social Work Education Former Editor-in-Chief Susan P
Tessa West New York University
English II March 20, 2018 As you come in, answer questions 3 & 4 for both the revision and editing selections you received yesterday. If you need to read.
Cover Letters Last chance to persuade editors to give your paper a chance!
Chapter 18: Submitting a paper
Appeals Do you really want to publish in this journal?
Strategi Memperbaiki dan Menyiapkan Naskah (Manuscript) Hasil Review
Scholarly Writing: Term Papers to Publication
Writing an Effective Research Paper
Before you appeal, ask yourself:
Reviewing Features in Word
Presentation transcript:

Post-submission Outcomes The review black box Editorial rejection Post-review rejection Reject with resubmission Major revisions Minor revisions Accepted The review black box Submission Outcomes My awesome paper Me Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Submission britishecologicalsociety.org @BritishEcolSoc

Unlocking the review black box

The cost of peer review is time Authors, editors, reviewers, journals all invest time in each submission. Everybody wants it to have been worth your (and their) time– even if they reject your paper. #RejectionIsTheRule britishecologicalsociety.org @BritishEcolSoc

#RejectionIsTheRule 80% rejection rate #RejectionIsTheRule - Got editorially rejected? - Got rejected post reviews? - Got rejected with possibility for resubmission? - Got major revisions? - Got minor revisions? - Got accepted? #RejectionIsTheRule 80% rejection rate (in BES journals) britishecologicalsociety.org @BritishEcolSoc

Editorially rejected? Editorial/desk reject = rejected without review Read decision letter (may have useful feedback on fatal flaws or suggested target journal)… …and then step aside and don’t touch it for 1-2 days Then: Consider rebuttal? Consider staying @ or going down in IF? Consider up-stream submission? Consider going back to the field/lab/greenhouse/computer? Go and celebrate at the pub: your paper has been read by a very exclusive number of academics! britishecologicalsociety.org @BritishEcolSoc

Rejected post-review? Read response letter … and then step aside and don’t touch it for 1-2 days Then: Think objectively about feedback Consider rebuttal? Consider staying @ or going down in IF? Consider up-stream submission? Consider going back to the field/lab/greenhouse/computer? Go and celebrate at the pub: your paper has been read by a very exclusive number of academics! britishecologicalsociety.org @BritishEcolSoc

Rejected, with resubmission allowed? Your paper shows good promise, but needs too much revision to know if it can or cannot be accepted in the end Resubmission does not mean rejection Resubmission does mean lots of work to do Do not get comfy! Re-analyse, re-write, etc. Consider submitting elsewhere – resubmission does not mean rejection, but it does not mean acceptance either. britishecologicalsociety.org @BritishEcolSoc

Not rejected at all! Got major revision? Got minor revision? Percentage of rejection post-revision declines a lot, but: A major revision is not a guarantee of publication A minor revision means a greater likelihood… but no guarantee You still have work to do! britishecologicalsociety.org @BritishEcolSoc

Carefully draft the letter of responses to the editor and reviewers Remember, they couldn't accept your paper as it was. You must make changes or justify why not. britishecologicalsociety.org @BritishEcolSoc

In your response letter… Be polite and appreciative of the effort involved in reviewing a paper. Highlight strengths & address main concerns in your opening paragraph Respond point by point to comments Make it easy to tell your responses from the reviewers’ comments Make it easy to find your changes Show evidence of the points you are making (reference lines in manuscript, provide citations, etc.) Do not refer to reviewers as “he” Do not refer to the reviewers as “you” britishecologicalsociety.org @BritishEcolSoc

What’s the most common track of a paper? - Post-review rejection - Rejected (resubmission invited) - Major revisions - Minor revisions - Accepted - Editorial rejection My awesome paper Me Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Submission Submission britishecologicalsociety.org @BritishEcolSoc

Usually linear… - Editorial rejection - Post-review rejection My awesome paper Me Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - Post-review rejection - Rejected (resubmission invited) - Major revisions - Minor revisions - Accepted - Editorial rejection Submission britishecologicalsociety.org @BritishEcolSoc

Rejection can happen at any point …But not always! My awesome paper Me Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - Post-review rejection - Rejected (resubmission invited) - Major revisions - Minor revisions - Accepted - Editorial rejection Submission Rejection can happen at any point britishecologicalsociety.org @BritishEcolSoc

Accepted! Job isn’t finished! Quick turn-around for proofing of print version Authorship copyright transfer agreement Promote your paper (Twitter, Facebook, blogs, send to your collaborators – but do not mass-email folks) britishecologicalsociety.org @BritishEcolSoc - Go celebrate to the pub, like for reals