AASHTOWare Bridge Task Force

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda – Day 1 8:00 am – 8:15 am Introductions and House Keeping
Advertisements

3D Analysis with AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating
MDOT Load Rating Local Agency Workshop Training Bradley M. Wagner, PE Load Rating Program Manager.
Solutions for Prestressed Reinforced Concrete Structures
Implementation of Darwin – ME Chris Wagner, PE July 26-29, 2010 Kansas City, MO.
SOUTHEAST PBES/ABC REGIONAL PEER EXCHANGE ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT FEBRUARY 26,
Bridge Engineering (6) Superstructure – Concrete Bridges
VOBUG Conference August 3 rd, 2010 Nashville, Tennessee Robert LeFevre, P.E. Adam Price, P.E. Tennessee Department of Transportation Structures Division.
Idaho Load Rating Program
Working with Info Tech, Inc. Teresa Franklin Trnsport Product Manager October 22, 2006 A Primer for Trnsport Users.
Brenden K. Schaefer, P.E. Principal Bridge Engineer Wyoming Department of Transportation 2011 Virtis / Opis User Group Meeting August 2, 2011 Helena, MT.
Rating of Local Bridges for SHVs Using Virtis Software Virtis/Opis User Group Meeting August 3-4, 2010 Moises C. Dimaculangan, P.E. Minnesota Department.
Micheal J. Watters, P.E. Principal Bridge Engineer Wyoming Department of Transportation Virtis / Opis Users Group Meeting August 3, 2010.
AASHTOWare Bridge Update
ONE-WAY SLAB. ONE-WAY SLAB Introduction A slab is structural element whose thickness is small compared to its own length and width. Slabs are usually.
Bridge Engineering (7) Superstructure – Reinforced Concrete Bridges
Design and Rating for Curved Steel I- and box-girder Bridge Structures
Virtis/Opis Technical Update Virtis Opis Bridgeware User Group 2011 Conference Helena, Montana 1.
© 2009 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Steve Willoughby, Bentley Systems Bridge Product Specialist LEAP Bridge: Product Update and Direction.
Virtis-Opis Update Virtis-Opis User Group Training Meeting Helena – August 2011.
PGSuper2AASHTOWare Bridge Data Translator
Shear Capacity of Composite Steel Girder at Simple Support Virtis/Opis User Group Conference Nashville, TN, August 3-4, 2010 George Huang, PhD, PE California.
Todd Thompson, PE – SD DOT AASHTOWare Bridge Task Force, Chair Presented to the RADBUG Traverse City, MI August 12, 2014.
Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation RADBUG - August 2014 Water Management and Structures.
FHWA Update 2011 VOBug Meeting Helena, MT Thomas Saad, P. E. FHWA Resource Center Phone:
EXAMPLE 9.2 – Part I PCI Bridge Design Manual
ODOT Policy for Deck/Slab Closure Pours Sean Meddles, P.E. Assistant Administrator ODOT Office of Structural Engineering.
EXAMPLE 9.3 – Part III PCI Bridge Design Manual
Bridge Structure Types and Components. BRIDGE STRUCTURE TYPES AND COMPONENTS TECHNICAL STANDARDS BRANCH INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION Slide 2.
Bridge Design-Rating 2014 Administrative Overview RADBUG Meeting Traverse City, MI Judy B. Skeen, P.E.
RM Product Update October 2009 Alexander Mabrich, PE, Msc Senior Engineering Consultant.
Beams. BEAMS A structural member loaded in the transverse direction to the longitudinal axis. Internal Forces: Bending Moments and Shear.
TUG, AASHTO, TTF Primer Class Tim Lindberg (TTF Member from South Carolina) October 6, 2007.
TUG, AASHTO, TTF Primer Class Tim Lindberg (TTF Member from South Carolina) November 6, 2005.
2013 Design Rating User Group Presentation Virginia Beach, Virginia August 8, 2013.
NCHRP VOBUG Nashville– 2010 NCHRP Evaluation of Load Rating by LRFR Mark Mlynarski, P.E. – Michael Baker Jr., Inc. Wagdy Wassef, Ph.D. P.E.-
Bentley Leap Bridge Components Overview
AASHTOWare Bridge Rating – Curved Girder Module
LRFR vs. LFR Virtis Opis User Group Meeting, August 2, 2011
1 Differences Between BRASS and AASHTO Standard Spec Engines Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2011 Helena, Montana.
Using Templates to Increase Efficiency
1 AASHTOWare Bridge Technical Update AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/Design User Group Training Meeting Traverse City – August 2014.
AASHTOWare BRIDGEWare Satisfaction Survey Results FY 2010 Wendy L. Gagnier, P.E. BRIDGEWare Project Manager.
Virtis-Opis Beta Testing Todd S. Thompson, PE South Dakota DOT Office of Bridge Design August 3, 2011.
BRIDGE DESIGN & RATING REPORTS TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUP (RTAG) Amjad Waheed, PE 2014 RADBUG Presentation Traverse City, Michigan August 13, 2014.
Bridge Design Implementation Jeff Olsen, PE – MT DOT AASHTOWare Bridge Task Force
C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center
Design and Rating for Curved Steel I- and box-girder Bridge Structures
A Load Rating of a 3 Span Continuous Deck-to- Through Truss Bridge in Br|R AASHTOWare BrDR 2013 User Group Meeting A Load Rating of a 3 Span Continuous.
1 Virtis/Opis Technical Update Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2010 Nashville, Tennessee.
1 Differences Between BRASS and AASHTO LRFD/LRFR Engines Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2011 Helena, Montana.
Dennis M. O’Shea Delaware DOT Pontis Users Group Meeting September 5, 2007 Portland, Maine Task Force Update.
General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD
1 PennDOT Truss Gusset Plate Analysis and Ratings Spreadsheet Overview Karim Naji Assistant Structural Engineer FHWA PA Division
Session 10 Purdue Research Updates Use of railroad flatcars as bridges on low-volume roads.
High Bridge Re-Deck Project
Design and Rating of Precast Culverts for LRFD
Chart 6. 12: Impact of Community Hospitals on U. S
Advisor: Professor M. Kevin Parfitt
Bridge modelling with CSI software.
Agenda 1. Overview of AASHTO LRFD 2. Culvert Design by LRFD
Scan Advances in State DOT Superload Permit Processes and Practices
Oklahoma Higher Education Chancellor Glen D. Johnson
Virtis Opis User Group Meeting, August 6, 2013
AASHTOWare Bridge Management TRT Task Updates
OPENING REMARKS 2019 Rating & Design Bridge User
AASHTOWare Bridge Design & Rating (BrDR) 3D FEM Analysis Capabilities
AASHTOWare RADBUG Meeting July 30-31, 2019 South Lake Tahoe, CA
Batch Analysis of BrR Models
Oklahoma Higher Education Chancellor Glen D. Johnson
Presentation transcript:

AASHTOWare Bridge Task Force Chair - Todd Thompson, PE July 30, 2019

AASHTOWare Bridge Rating and Design Update

Agenda Modernization status Enhancements in 2020 7.1 release Data integration endeavors BrDR presentations Task Force members

Bridge Rating Licensees (FY19)

Bridge Design Licensees (FY19)

Release since last annual meeting 6.8.3 release – October 2018 Modernization Phase 1 Legacy user interface coupled with both the legacy and modernized analysis modules

Coming releases Modernization Phase 2 – Fall 2019 6.8.4 release MBE 3rd Edition with 2019 Interim and bug fixes (approx. 200) Last release of the legacy system, and maintenance, specification updates, and support will cease effective June 30, 2021

Coming releases (Cont’d) Only critical bug fixes will be incorporated into 6.8.4 going forward

Coming releases (Cont’d) Modernized user interface coupled with the modernized analysis module Same bug fixes and Spec Updates 6.8.4 Also includes 3 Load Rating Tool enhancements Culvert – LFR (Funded by Idaho) LFR Floor Systems (Funded by Illinois) LFR for MCB (Funded by Mississippi)

Coming releases (Cont’d) 7.0 Beta testing Beta TAG kicked off testing on March 19 Beta 3 released on June 3 Modernized system has more than 2 million lines of code, user interface has more than 800 windows

Coming releases (Cont’d) 7.0 Beta testing Strategy is to divide and conquer based on structure types, configurations and features 32 Beta testers from 18 agencies Identify testing gaps to be filled by third-party testing

Coming releases (Cont’d) Divide and conquer

7.1 Release 7.1 release – Fall 2020 Specifications updates and bug fixes Modernization “Phase 3”: New features and feature enhancements Total 38 tasks plus additional to be determined Maintenance and User Group enhancements

7.1 Release (Cont’d) Prestressed Concrete Design Tool (Phase 2) Design all the beams in the cross section with additional design parameters like iteration on number of beams Line definition entry with user-defined live load distribution factors and dead loads

7.1 Release (Cont’d) Prestressed Concrete Design Tool (Phase 2) Provide structural framing plan, typical section and beam profile schematics Create a camber table that includes the PCI multipliers Compute stability checks for transport

7.1 Release (Cont’d) Steel Plate Girder Design Tool

7.1 Release (Cont’d) AASHTO Timber Engine Replace MADERO plus… ASR and LRFR capability Support timber glulam beams Axle weight reduction for timber deck rating per AASHTO Standard Specifications

7.1 Release (Cont’d) Improved and additional reporting capabilities 17 recommendations from BrDR Report TAG BrM Web Service Integration (RIPI funded)

7.1 Release(Cont’d) Schedule Based RC I-Beam with Post Tensioning (Mississippi, Caltrans and Task Force funded) Phi Factor for moment MCB PT (BRDRSUP-1620) (Caltrans funded) LLDF for one or two cell box girders (BRDRSUP-1621) (Caltrans funded) Limiting Level Rule on single lane (BRDRSUP-1622) (Caltrans funded)

7.1 Release(Cont’d) Limit applicability range values to lever rule (BRDRSUP-1623) (Caltrans funded) User-defined load distribution (DC2) to MCB Webs (BRDRSUP-938) (Caltrans funded) Establish LLDF using full box case (BRDRSUP-1624) (Caltrans funded) Difference in skew between adjacent supports override (BRDRSUP-936) (Caltrans funded)

7.1 Release(Cont’d) Range of applicability for slabs (BRDRSUP-1627) (Caltrans funded) Report writer for girder-floor beam- stringer systems (BRDRSUP-1628) (Caltrans funded) Analyze local web yielding and local web crippling for steel beam ends (BRDRSUP-695)  (TAG #1 Request) LLDF for steel beam-timber deck (BRDRSUP-1029) (TAG #3 Request)

7.1 Release(Cont’d) Steel Channel for Exterior Girders (BRDRSUP-9313) (TAG #4 Request) Hinges in Girder Floor Systems (BRDRSUP- 581) (TAG #5 Request) Model Section Loss in PS Girders (BRDRSUP-641) (TAG #6 Request) Girder Profile schematic for cross- section based members (BRDRSUP-728 and 1435) (TAG #7 Request)

7.1 Release(Cont’d) Cover Plates on both surfaces of flange (VI 11366) (TAG #9 Request) Slab section schematic including reinforcing steel (BRDRSUP-1444) (TAG #10 Request) Show PS strands on girder profile schematic (BRDRSUP-1431) (TAG #11 Request) Option to account for 100% Section Loss (BRDRSUP-1436) (TAG #12 Request)

7.1 Release(Cont’d) Allow MPF reduction due to low ADTT (BRDRSUP-97) (TAG #13 Request) Rate culverts with variable thickness slabs and walls (BRDRSUP-732) (TAG #14 Request) 3D Analysis for superstructure with hinges (BRDRSUP-553) (Illinois Funded)

7.1 Release(Cont’d) Load Rating Tool’s Permit Analysis Settings enhancement (Minnesota Funded) Allow users to specific custom file paths for various output $150,000 for User Requested Enhancements from 2019 RADBUG meeting

Enhancements Task Force is looking for ideas and input from the RADBUG community and officers Visit with Task Force members one on one with your ideas Discuss it in the business meetings Present some ideas in the Q&A session

Data integration endeavors FHWA Bridge Information Modeling Standardization (HIF-16-011) Evaluated AASHTOWare IFC Bridge Converter TPF-5(372) Building Information Modeling for Bridges and Structures Member of the Software Advisory Group

BrDR presentations TRB – Comparison of Refined Analysis Software for Steel Girder Bridge Design Presented BrDR refined analysis capabilities and provided benchmark results comparison (DL and LL results are in good agreement) IBC – Bridge Load Rating, Posting and Permitting: Today and Tomorrow Present BrR load rating capabilities, near and longer term directions

Task Force members Chair Todd Thompson South Dakota Vice Chair Eric Christie Alabama Member – BrM Beckie Curtis Michigan Craig Nazareth Rhode Island Kent Miller (Bruce Novakovich) Nebraska David Hedeen (Mark Faulhaber) Minnesota FHWA Liaison – BrM Derek Constable FHWA Member – BrD Dean Teal Kansas Mark Bucci (Jeff Olsen) Louisiana Member – BrR Joshua Dietsche Wisconsin Vinacs Vinayagamoorthy California Mike Johnson (Ping Lu) Idaho FHWA Liaison – BrDR Tom Saad

Thank You!