Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
Advertisements

Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Can Non-Mechanical Proteins Withstand Force
A Naturally Occurring Repeat Protein with High Internal Sequence Identity Defines a New Class of TPR-like Proteins  Jacob D. Marold, Jennifer M. Kavran,
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Ligand-Specific Interactions Modulate Kinetic, Energetic, and Mechanical Properties of the Human β2 Adrenergic Receptor  Michael Zocher, Juan J. Fung,
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Chen-Chou Wu, William J. Rice, David L. Stokes  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Transconformations of the SERCA1 Ca-ATPase: A Normal Mode Study
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Ligand-Specific Interactions Modulate Kinetic, Energetic, and Mechanical Properties of the Human β2 Adrenergic Receptor  Michael Zocher, Juan J. Fung,
Linda Balabanian, Christopher L. Berger, Adam G. Hendricks 
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
HyeongJun Kim, Jen Hsin, Yanxin Liu, Paul R. Selvin, Klaus Schulten 
Phage Pierces the Host Cell Membrane with the Iron-Loaded Spike
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Changbong Hyeon, Ruxandra I. Dima, D. Thirumalai  Structure 
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Discovery Through the Computational Microscope
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e2 (December 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Probing the Energy Landscape of the Membrane Protein Bacteriorhodopsin
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Unfolding Barriers in Bacteriorhodopsin Probed from the Cytoplasmic and the Extracellular Side by AFM  Max Kessler, Hermann E. Gaub  Structure  Volume.
Absence of Ion-Binding Affinity in the Putatively Inactivated Low-[K+] Structure of the KcsA Potassium Channel  Céline Boiteux, Simon Bernèche  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e4 (January 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Observing a Lipid-Dependent Alteration in Single Lactose Permeases
Michael Schlierf, Felix Berkemeier, Matthias Rief  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Mapping the Deubiquitination Module within the SAGA Complex
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Mechanistic Explanation of Different Unfolding Behaviors Observed for Transmembrane and Soluble β-Barrel Proteins  Ulf Hensen, Daniel J. Müller  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
A Plug Release Mechanism for Membrane Permeation by MLKL
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Fine Details of IGF-1R Activation, Inhibition, and Asymmetry Determined by Associated Hydrogen /Deuterium-Exchange and Peptide Mass Mapping  Damian Houde,
Unfolding Barriers in Bacteriorhodopsin Probed from the Cytoplasmic and the Extracellular Side by AFM  Max Kessler, Hermann E. Gaub  Structure  Volume.
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 39-46 (January 2010) Probing the Interactions of Carboxy-atractyloside and Atractyloside with the Yeast Mitochondrial ADP/ATP Carrier  Alexej Kedrov, Alex M. Hellawell, Adam Klosin, R. Bill Broadhurst, Edmund R.S. Kunji, Daniel J. Müller  Structure  Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 39-46 (January 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2009.11.009 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2010 18, 39-46DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.11.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structural Characterization of Two-Dimensional Crystals of the ADP/ATP Carrier Aac3p (A) Electron micrograph of a negatively stained tubular crystal of Aac3p. (B) AFM topograph of a similar crystal with the top layer removed. (C) Projection map of a single crystal at 5 Å resolution. The unit cell with dimensions of 42.5 by 172.1 Å is displayed together with p22121 symmetry operators. The red circles indicate the approximate position of CATR. (D) High-resolution AFM topograph showing rows of Aac3p dimers with alternating orientation. Some single Aac3p carriers are encircled and some row borders are indicated by white lines. (E) Simulated crystal packing with a comparative model of Aac3p (Robinson and Kunji, 2006) based on the structure of the bovine ADP/ATP carrier (Pebay-Peyroula et al., 2003) viewed from the water phase. CATR is shown in the sphere representation. (F) Viewed from the membrane plane. Structure 2010 18, 39-46DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.11.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 SMFS of the ADP/ATP Carrier (A) Pushing the AFM stylus onto the reconstituted membrane protein favors the nonspecific attachment of its polypeptide. Upon separating the AFM stylus from the membrane surface, an F-D curve is recorded. The stretching force between the carrier and AFM stylus is monitored by the deflection of the AFM cantilever. Sufficiently high pulling forces induce the stepwise unfolding of the membrane protein and each force peak reflects an unfolding intermediate. Only if the Aac3p molecule attaches with its terminal end to the AFM stylus it is possible to unfold the membrane protein into an entirely stretched conformation of the polypeptide, apart from the last domain, which serves as a membrane anchor. Because Aac3p has 308 amino acids, such F-D curves must exhibit a length of ≈70-80 nm (1 aa ≈0.36 nm). (B) F-D curves (>90%) exhibiting a length of 70–80 nm show similar saw-tooth like patterns. Fitting each force peak with the worm-like-chain (WLC) model (C, red lines) locates the structural segment that established sufficiently strong interactions against unfolding. The scheme above the F-D curve indicates the transmembrane α helices that unfolded such as described by the force peak. For each force peak the unfolding transmembrane α helices are colored in bright red and indicated above the unfolding scheme. Major force peaks are fitted with solid lines, and minor peaks with dashed lines. Structure 2010 18, 39-46DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.11.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 SMFS Discriminates the Two Inhibited Forms of ADP/ATP Carrier (A and B) Superimposed F-D curves recorded in presence of CATR (A) and ATR (B) highlight similarities of their interaction patterns. Each superimposition contains ≈20 F-D curves. The arrow in A indicates the enhanced interaction detected for CATR-inhibited carriers. (C) Average interaction forces and standard error of the mean (±SEM) detected to stabilize structural segments of Aac3p. (D) SMFS observes α helix H2 as a stable intermediate in CATR-bound carrier, but forming a rather unstable intermediate in presence of ATR. (E) Normalized force (average unfolding force times probability) confirms that CATR binding significantly strengthens interactions within α helix H2 of Aac3p. Data shown in (A–E) were recorded at a puling velocity of 350nm/s, and 63 and 73 unfolding events were analyzed for CATR- and ATR-bound carrier, respectively. (F) Probability to detect the interactions stabilizing the unfolding intermediate of α helix H2 increases with pulling velocity both for CATR- and ATR-bound carrier. Structure 2010 18, 39-46DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.11.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Dynamic SMFS (DFS) Spectra of CATR- and ATR-Inhibited ADP/ATP Carriers Most probable unfolding forces (±SEM) of Aac3p structural segments were plotted versus force-loading rates. (A) Among all α helices H2 showed the smallest xu and highest ku0. CATR-binding significantly lowered the unfolding rate compared with ATR, but did not affect the transition state. α Helix H2 was rarely detected in DFS experiments at pulling velocities 85, 170, and 350 nm/s in ATR-bound carrier (Figure 3F) and was not included into analysis. (B) The α-helical pair H3-H4 showed similar xu as observed for α helix H2 but much lower ku0. (C) α helix H5 showed the highest xu and the lowest ku0 among all α helices. (D) α helix H6 showed properties that laid between those of α helices H5 and H2. Structure 2010 18, 39-46DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.11.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 NMR Spectroscopy of ATR and CATR (A) Molecular structures of ATR and CATR with assignment of carbon atoms. At carbon site 4, R (encircled in red) is -H in ATR and -COOH in CATR. Natural abundance [1H,13C]-HSQC spectra of (B) ATR and (C) CATR recorded in H2O. Significant chemical shift changes are indicated in red, whereas those that are unchanged are indicated in blue. Structure 2010 18, 39-46DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.11.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions