CLEPA Input for 3rd IWG ASEP meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Informal document No.GRB-47-4 (47th GRB, February 2008 Agenda item 3 (a) CLEPA presentations supporting justifications of informal documents GRB-47-2.
Advertisements

Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP-10-12e) 1. Proposals for Adoption 2. Proposals for Discussions 3. Next Actions.
Status report of WLTP Sub Group EV EVE 14. At WLTP IWG 10 Adopted open issues.
1 WLTP Open Issue Phase 1B Issue: Number of testsOIL#27. Starting note for IWG Meeting#7 Geneva, WLTP rev1e.
France consideration on maximum noise in Global Technical Regulation on Quiet Road Transport Vehicles ECE-TRANS-WP29-GRB-58 Informal document GRB
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-11-19e) 1. Discussion points 2. Next Actions.
Datum (Tag.Monat.Jahr) OICA Method – short overview IG ASEP, Japan – Draft for an OICA presentation FG. GRBIG-ASEP
Additional Sound Emission Provisions Proposal from France GRBIG-ASEP
1 WLTP Open Issue Phase 1B Issue: Handling of Manual Mode with Automatic Transmission. ACEA Informal Document WLTP-06-17e.
ASEP Test Results CVT & Hybrid Vehicles GRB informal meeting # September 2007 JASIC.
Report of the GRB informal Working Group on ASEP Transmitted by the Chairman of the Informal Group Informal document No. GRB-44-2 (44th GRB, 4-6 September.
Report of the GRB informal Working Group on ASEP Transmitted by the Chairman of the Informal Group Informal document No. GRB-45-3 (45th GRB, February.
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview R51 ASEP IWG July 2017.
ASEP, items for clarification
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview.
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
FOUR-WHEEL STEERING SYSTEM
Informal document GRPE-73-21
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
ASEP -- Revision of D/F and OICA methods --
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Off-cycles principles
ASEP, a way to analyse methods
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
GRBP subjects Meeting 31st October, 2018 Brussels
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Continuously Research on ASEP
Full load curve proposal
“Reference Sound Assessment”
Comments on WLTP documentation
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
ASEP, from 2005 to 2019 Background informations and future works
ASEP for L5 vehicles with CVT/AT
Meeting with Member State experts on Life Cycle Assessment of fuel in relation to Article 7a of proposal COM 2007(18) Interaction with ETS 17 July 2007.
Amendment proposals for Regulation Nos 9, 63 and 92
Main subjects: priority 1, 2, 3
HDV CO2 certification CoP provisions
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
India comments on EPPR 23-33
Reason for performance difference between LVW and GVW
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Full load curve proposal
Some proposals to improve efficiency of road vehicle noise regulation
ASEP IMMA inputs to R51 ASEP IWG
Japan’s proposal on the wording for driving-selectable mode
Suggestions on development of UN Regulation No. 51
Proposal to replace 3 s rule by 2 s rule
Road Traffic Noise An Industry Opinion Noise in EUROPE – 24 April 2017
Replacement exhaust systems
Overview of the recommendations on software updates
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) 1
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
IMMA proposal for rev. 1 of ASEP 2.0
Walter Schlager, Philipp Plathner 5-July 2019
IMMA proposal for rev. 1 of ASEP 2.0
FOUR-WHEEL STEERING SYSTEM
China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd.
GRB informal group R51.03 Annex 10
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
Status of discussion after 7th meeting
Presentation transcript:

CLEPA Input for 3rd IWG ASEP meeting Brussels, 2017-05-10

Feedback on current procedure Overview Does the flow chart (figure 3) capture all cases? Application of electronically controlled technologies Application of variable exhaust system valve Application of sound box Conclusion

Feedback on current procedure Flow chart (1 of 2) Does the Flow chart capture all cases? for P1 test If one of both criteria "nBB <= nBB_ASEP or vBB <= 80 km/h“ is fullfilled, while the other one is not, the gear is valid. -> Proposal to split both requirements. for P4 test Some cases may not be covered if it’s the lowest gear: nbb_ASEP is not reached in locked transmission: Target=70km/h nbb_ASEP is reached in locked transmission: Target=80km/h -> Proposal to include nbb_ASEP criteria. -> Proposal to include non-locked transmission cases Target=80km/h Source: Figure 3 of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRB/2017/2

Feedback on current procedure Flow chart (2 of 2) Does the Flow chart capture all cases? for P1 test If one of both criteria "nBB < nBB_ASEP or vBB < 80 km/h“ is fullfilled, while the other one not, the gear would be valid? -> Proposal to split both requirements. for P4 test Some cases may not be covered if it’s the lowest gear: nbb_ASEP is not reached in locked transmission: Target=70km/h nbb_ASEP is reached in locked transmission: Target=80km/h -> Proposal to include nbb_ASEP criteria. -> Proposal to include non-locked transmission cases Target=80km/h Source: Figure 3 of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRB/2017/2

Feedback on current procedure Application of electronically controlled technologies (1 of 3) Application of variable exhaust system valve Example: Vehicle with PMR>160kW/t with by-pass valve (worst case) Variable exhaust system valves help to comply with Annex 3 while retaining compliant according to Annex 7. Slope assessment for lowest valid gear

Feedback on current procedure Application of electronically controlled technologies (2 of 3) Application of sound box Example: Vehicle with PMR<120kW/t with sound box A proper sound box application does not significantly increase the emitted noise (Annex 3) nor does it affect the linearity of noise emission (Annex 7). -> Sound box systems may also be used for cancellation (upcoming phases). Sound box off Sound box on ->Linear addition of sound

Feedback on current procedure Application of electronically controlled technologies (3 of 3) Application of electronically controlled technologies helps to achieve compliance with Annex 3 while retaining compliant with Annex 7. Electronically controlled technologies (sound box for noise cancellation and electrical valves) are important products to reduce the noise emission and ensure compliance in the future. However, a clear definition of the „modes“ to be tested (e.g. solution 2 in proposal by „ASEP-02- 09“) may be required.

Thank you for your Attention.