Ben Rohrbaugh Lantern UAS, LLC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Initiative on K-12 Teacher Preparation Natasha Speer, Univ. of Maine Tim Scott and Omah Williams, Texas A & M Noah Finkelstein, Univ. Colorado-Boulder.
Advertisements

MIGRATION MIGR-09. How to Run Your Next Implementation... Don't Let It Run You! Patricia Johnson Senior Systems Consultant Strategic Systems Group, Inc.
E-OCVM (Version 2) Explained Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Alistair Jackson EUROCONTROL Episode 3 Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009.
Global Business Blueprint Summary Presenters: Laurie Dempsey, CBP Lois McCluskey, eCP January 28, 2004.
Guide to Project Proposals. Presentation overview Introduction and rationale Project goals and purpose Lit review and theoretical framework Methods Intended.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Project Management Process. Project Complexity means that: a team of people are needed to supply expertise the work needs to be broken into manageable.
Project Title Project Investigators Project Duration: (E.g., 3 years; currently in year 2, or x months if this is a better representation of project time)
State/Urban Area Improvement Planning Conference.
Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
Web Development Process Description
© 2005 Virtue Ventures LLC. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License Feasibility Analysis For Social Enterprise.
McLean & Company1 Improving Business Satisfaction Moving from Measurement to Action.
OSF/ISD Project Portfolio Management Framework January 17, 2011.
PROPOSED PROJECT TITLE Company, Principal Investigator, Phone, Contract Cost Short term goals: what will be accomplished or delivered in this contract.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
1 Local Readiness Team Lead Kick-Off Meeting May 16, 2007.
Beyond the Border Canada – United States Transportation Border Working Group Buffalo, New York April 8-9, 2014.
CLARIN work packages. Conference Place yyyy-mm-dd
Rapid Technology Application Program Mr. Maurice Swinton RTAP Program Manager Engaging the Private Sector:
Company Confidential 1 Developing Aerospace Suppliers in Mexico Kalim Saiyed October 22, 2009.
R 0 G125 B 177 R 78 G 47 B 145 R 185 G 50 B 147 R 245 G132 B 107 R 255 G234 B 83 R 123 G193 B 67 R149 G169 B Goal Setting Overview.
Boeing-MIT Collaborative Time- Sensitive Targeting Project July 28, 2006 Stacey Scott, M. L. Cummings (PI) Humans and Automation Laboratory
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage IT Budgets & Cost World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Project Management Finals Lesson 1 - Principles - Techniques - Tools.
P U B L I C S E R V I C E S State of South Carolina Enterprise Information System Business Case Study SCEIS User Group Briefing Wednesday July 10, 2002.
MGT 437 OUTLET Become Exceptional/mgt437outlet.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Example Presentation: Alignment, Launch & Adoption
Office 365 Security Assessment Workshop
Service Management World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Improvement Story
CallTower Implementation Process Overview
Data Architecture World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Collaboration/Engagement Domain Task Force
Software Configuration Management
Implementing Career Resources, Service-Delivery Tools, and Services
Stephen Bauer NIDILRR Program Officer
Implementation Strategy July 2002
Gender Statistics Toolkit
Global Climate Change Alliance: Intra-ACP Programme
Hyper-V Cloud Proof of Concept Kickoff Meeting <Customer Name>
Water Conservation Update
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Description of Revision
SQL Server BI on Windows Azure Virtual Machines
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Fix it or Forget it? Dealing with Troubled Projects
DMAIC Analyze, Improve, Control
Risk Detection, Operations Efficiency & Economic Analysis Eva K Lee
ORGANIZATIONAL Change management
By Jeff Burklo, Director
Improve Phase Wrap Up and Action Items
[Work Order #] [ARB Date]
1915(i)& (k) Implementation Update
Module 8 ACTION PLANS.
Project collaborators’ names
Re-Purposing and Reusing Training Materials Online
Employee engagement Delivery guide
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
AFIX Standards: a new programmatic tool
Implementing Career Resources, Service-Delivery Tools, and Services
FL DVR CBTAC Program Modules & Reporting.
What is Planning? Start at 9:15—10 minutes to do this. Finish at 9:25.
Define Your IT Strategy
Laboratories Oversight Board Programme Performance Update
Project Progress Summary - Week 18
Schedule (Major Deliverables and Milestones)
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
Project: Validating Deterrence Models for Scanning Technologies
Project Name Here Kick-off Date
Presentation transcript:

Ben Rohrbaugh Lantern UAS, LLC Project: Exploring Homeland Security Applications for Unmanned Autonomous Systems at Maritime Ports

Project Overview Knowledge Gap Addressed: Limitations on containers that can be searched for potential contraband End-users of this research: Customs and Border Protection Main outcomes: Additional tool for autonomous search and contraband detection in containers

Project Overview Goals: The goal of this project is to identify the most useful homeland security applications for unmanned autonomous systems (UAS) technology in a maritime port environment by identifying the highest priorities with regard to contraband detection as determined by DHS requirements and implementing a research and testing plan to validate the use of UAS for such purposes. Objectives: Objective 1: Work with DHS and BTI to decide on the initial type of contraband to be targeted in cargo containers using UAS along with signs of potential tampering, which Lantern UAS will propose be radiation sources. Objective 2: Establish a testing plan to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of different sensor and camera configurations for onboard UAS operation. Objective 3: Determine requirements for controlled testing and conduct outreach to necessary partners to identify a location and facility for the testing. Objective 4: Begin testing in a controlled environment and gathering statistics based on multiple test sources, sensor configurations, and search patterns. Objective 5: Prepare for testing in a maritime port environment

Example of the concept

Milestones Milestone 1: Determine UAS/sensor configurations and obtain necessary hardware. Determine the contraband types and cargo configurations to be prioritized and find controlled testing location. [On track for completion in anticipated timeframe – by month three] Milestone 2: Completed CONOPS for UAS operations. Identify which sensor modalities will be most effective for this purpose based on stationary testing. [On track to begin initial testing on schedule – month three] Milestone 3: Provide report and briefing on results of simulations of sensors being used on UAS and the most effective modalities for sensors used on UAS. Milestone 4: Begin pilot program in controlled environment. Milestone 5: Conduct interim review with BTI and project champion. Milestone 6: Delivery of full report on testing and simulations.

Deliverables Deliverable 1: Determine the requirements for using UAS to detect contraband and/or tampering in cargo containers at a maritime port, and define configurations of sensor and imaging packages to be tested for this purpose. Deliverable 2: Begin experiments to determine sensitivity and specificity of sensor and imaging packages and develop CONOPS for port operations and identify controlled environment for testing. Deliverable 3: Begin testing in controlled environment. Deliverable 4: Review of simulation and testing in controlled environment and approach potential port partners about testing in the field. Deliverable 5: Develop full report on research program. Status: We are on track to begin controlled environment testing on the anticipated timeline Potential problems: The most significant possible problems are the unanticipated technical challenges that begin when we start to conduct live testing and validate the results of simulations we have conducted.

Performance Metrics KPI-RI-1: Establishing CONOPS for operations at ports including the key configurations of sensors and UAS, regulatory and requirements, and identified location for controlled testing. KPI-RI-2: Conducting regular testing of UAS in controlled environment or at port through pilot program and identifying the areas where UAS provide the greatest potential benefit and where there are the largest challenges. KPI-RI-3: Identifying the sensors and cameras that can most effectively be used by UAS to identify potential security threats and tampering on containers. KPI-D-1: Provide ongoing feedback on testing pilot program to CBP and other interested components of the homeland security enterprise. KPI-D-2: Provide final report on the potential merits of UAS operations that can be disseminated to DHS, the scientific community, and to the public.

Question and Answer