ACD Analysis Status Work done by Taro Kotani. Much help from Heather. Advice from Ormes, Hartman, Moiseev, Norris, Ritz, Thompson… Main issues: Hermeticity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMCal Jet Trigger Analysis for ALICE* Christopher Anson Creighton University *Supported by the U.S. DOE Office of Science.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
1 ALICE EMCal Electronics Outline: PHOS Electronics review Design Specifications –Why PHOS readout is suitable –Necessary differences from PHOS Shaping.
Basic Principles of X-ray Source Detection Or Who Stole All Our Photons?.....
Alex Moiseev, 02/01/021 ACD VETO SIGNALS AND EFFICIENCY With the recent changes, the following ACD VETO signals will be generated: AEM VETO HIT MAP, created.
The Gamma-Ray Large Area Space Telescope: UNDERSTANDING THE MOST POWERFUL ENERGY SOURCES IN THE UNIVERSE Anticoincidence Detector for GLAST Alexander Moiseev,
S. Ritz 1 Hardware Trigger Throttle Issues Context: the triggers Purpose of throttle on TKR trigger Earlier design using TKR geographic information The.
Using  0 mass constraint to improve particle flow ? Graham W. Wilson, Univ. of Kansas, July 27 th 2005 Study prompted by looking at event displays like.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Review of the GLAST/LAT Project, Feb , 2001 S. Ritz 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Design Steven M. Ritz Goddard.
S. Ritz1 Checking Out What is Checked In  Need to optimize balance of checking between users and developers. –infuse more of a culture of detailed checking.
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
MC Study of B°  S Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectCalibration and Analysis group meeting, April, 3, 2006 CAL on-orbit calibration with protons. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU.
Hardware Failure Impacts Exercises S. Ritz. Issues Recent results from design reliability analysis (system engineering, Thurston et al.) Probabilities.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
GLAST LAT Project S. Ritz 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Adding Converter to the Blank TKR Planes? Bill Atwood, Tune Kamae, Steve Ritz 4 September 2002.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Review of the GLAST/LAT Project, Feb , 2001 J. Ormes/R. Larson 1 ACD Subsystem Jonathan F. Ormes ACD Subsystem Manager.
1 Gamma-Ray Astronomy with GLAST May 24, 2008 Toby Burnett WALTA meeting.
Residual Background events after Rejection Cuts M total background events (GlastReleasev3r3p7) 344 residual events after Bill's rejection cuts. 342.
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb27,2006 S. Ritz Backgrounds and Trigger Rates 1 Backgrounds and Trigger Rates on Orbit S. Ritz with many contributions.
Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal – University of Udine ATLAS Week, Prague, Sep 2003.
T. Burnett1 GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Baseline-Preliminary Design Review, January 9, 2002 SAS Software: Sources Detector geometry model Simulation Event.
Report on the UCSC/SCIPP BeamCal Simulation Effort FCAL Clustering Meeting 24 June 2015 Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics.
Geant4 for GLAST BFEM -Comparison with Distributions in BFEM Data – T. Mizuno, H. Mizushima, S. Ogata, Y. Fukazawa (Hiroshima/SLAC) M. Roterman, P. Valtersson.
MuID LL1 Study (update) 09/02/2003 Muon Trigger Upgrade Meeting.
A. SarratTPC jamboree, Aachen, 14/03/07 1 Full Monte Carlo of a TPC equipped with Micromegas Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia Motivation Simulation content.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Baseline-Preliminary Design Review, January 8, 2002 Document: #1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: AntiCoincidence Detector (ACD) Overview.
10/10/2005 Alex Moiseev 2006 LAT Beam test 1 Suggestions to 2006 LAT prototype beam test plan Alex Moiseev, NASA/GSFC.
Progress report of the GLAST ACD Beam Test at CERN (Backsplash study) simulation and analysis Tsunefumi Mizuno, Hirofumi Mizushima (Hiroshima Univ.) and.
High-energy Electron Spectrum From PPB-BETS Experiment In Antarctica Kenji Yoshida 1, Shoji Torii 2 on behalf of the PPB-BETS collaboration 1 Shibaura.
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
OUTGOING NEUTRONS IN CALET CALET AIMS AT DETECTING UHE CR ELECTRONS HIGH REJECTION FACTOR FOR PROTONS/NUCLEI NEEDED POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENT RESPECT ‘STANDARD’
1 Suggestions to 2006 LAT prototype beam test plan Alex Moiseev, NASA/GSFC.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Mathsercise-C Rounding Ready? Here we go!. Estimate the value of: 1 Rounding x 7.85 Answer Question 2 Round each number to a sensible figure.
Web - Mail – Shunt Reactor Market Forecast ( )
Report of GLAST Balloon Flight October Annual meeting of Astronomical Society of Japan T. Mizuno and other GLAST Balloon Team
Compact Linear Collider
FLUKA Muon Calculations For Electronic Applications
On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration
Solar gamma-ray and neutron registration capabilities of the GRIS instrument onboard the International Space Station Yu. A. Trofimov, Yu. D. Kotov, V.
Muons in IceCube PRELIMINARY
completed in austral season South Pole completed in austral season.
ACD in 2006 CERN beam test Here I am listing beam test ACD issues for discussion: ACD will be represented in CERN beam test instrument by minimum 4, and.
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope ACD Final Performance
Comparison of GAMMA-400 and Fermi-LAT telescopes
GLAST LAT tracker signal simulation and trigger timing study
GAMMA-400 performance a,bLeonov A., a,bGalper A., bKheymits M., aSuchkov S., aTopchiev N., bYurkin Y. & bZverev V. aLebedev Physical Institute of the Russian.
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope
Spacecraft Anomaly Analysis and Prediction System – SAAPS
Electron Observations from ATIC and HESS
Measurement of Cosmic-Ray Electrons with H.E.S.S.
Point Sources Jacob Feintzeig WIPAC − May 21, 2014
Balloon Flight Engineering Model Balloon Flight Results
Name That Atom! Use your knowledge of atoms to find the name of each of the following atoms. Use a Periodic Table!
Cosmic-Ray Source Generator
Imaging crystals with TKR
A measurement of the diffuse TeV gamma ray emission from the Galactic Plane with the ARGO-YBJ experiment Lingling Ma Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP),CAS.
ACD Subsystem ACD segmentation and the
Estimation of Sensitivity to Gamma Ray point Sources above 30TeV
ACD transparency - gaps between tiles - holes in tile to attach them
GLAST Large Area Telescope: Jonathan Ormes / Rudolph Larsen
Mini Tower Preliminary Results
Forward-Backward Asymmetry Study in
J/Y Simulations for Trigger
CALET-CALによる ガンマ線観測初期解析
「Cosmic-rays and diffused gamma-rays」
ACD Backsplash test at CERN in 2002
Analysis of GLAST Balloon Experiment Data
Overview of Beam Test Benoit, Ronaldo and Eduardo Nov 8 , 2005 thanks to Steve and Bill for helping to consolidate all the information.
Presentation transcript:

ACD Analysis Status Work done by Taro Kotani. Much help from Heather. Advice from Ormes, Hartman, Moiseev, Norris, Ritz, Thompson… Main issues: Hermeticity requirements Segmentation of back row(s) Revisit hit efficiency requirements Revisit electron rejection

Hermeticity requirement In principle, not a problem. But no one has ever flown a segmented ACD. Scale is set in part by hit efficiency requirement What is the impact of cracks? Rerun background rejection analysis and plot rejection as a function of crack width (note, tile inefficiency was included in AO analysis) what are these??!

What are these?? Due to evolving knowledge and time constraints, for AO analysis the background rate calculations included an estimate of the proton splashback and re-entrant albedo, but the spectrum was that of the galactic cosmic rays. (arguably a pessimistic assumption). This is the first look at low-energy protons in the simulation. Some questions to address here… is the simulation sensible? if not fix it; if yes, work on filter design.

What to do? This is an important question to investigate. It will be interesting to see the G4 simulation. It does not have a significant impact on the ACD design questions – these are bigger issues for the instrument and they won’t drive the hermeticity, efficiency, segmentation, etc.

Remaining Issues Segmentation of back row(s) driven by high energy requirements (AO plan had high segmentation to avoid backsplash when the ACD is needed in the analysis). Primary driver is electron rejection. Work is just starting on electron rejection. Worst energy decade appears to be 1-10 GeV. The electron rejection also drives the efficiency requirement.