The New Project Examination Hans Hüttel Anette Kolmos Kathrin Otrel-Cass Egon Moesby Jette Holgaard Reviewed by Lars Peter Jensen Picture: http://www.information.dk/153342 The Faculty of Engineering and Science

Why we are here today Information about the new exam format. Project exams will be group-based. This was the case at Aalborg University until 2007. But not everything will be as it was pre-2007! Remember: while project exams are group-based, the assessment is individual (this has always been the case!) Have you seen the film? Dk. The Faculty of Engineering and Science

Implementing the new exam format Group project examination to start in the winter semester of 2012 (exams held in January 2013) for all first-year bachelor programs and selected first-year master programs As from summer semester 2013 all project examinations will be group-based Exemptions will be granted for final projects at Bachelor and Master level. The Faculty of Engineering and Science

A comparison Individual project exams Group-based project exams The group presentation (app. 1 hour) at the start is not part of the examination. Individual assessment of the presentation is not possible. The group presentation (app. 1 hour) at the start is part of the examination. Individual assessment is possible. About 30 minutes of individual questions based on selected aspects of the project. A joint discussion involving the entire group. All aspects of the project are examined. More detailed knowledge in selected aspects are assessed by rounds of individual questions for each student. App. 30 minutes pr. Student. Feedback from the supervisors and examiners after the project has been assessed and grades are given. Feedback becomes part of the examination itself. Further feedback can be given after the grades are given. The Faculty of Engineering and Science The Faculty of Engineering and Science

An example of the structure of the new project exam. Presentation of project (students) 6-10 minutes pr. student Comments to the presentation (examiners) break A general, question-based discussion with more methodological questions Specific questions for each student break The examiners agree on the grades Wasn’t it about an hour for presentation Announcement and justification of grades (Some students might prefer this individually) Total planned exam time: 45 minutes pr. student. Max. 5 hours The Faculty of Engineering and Science

An example of the physical setup of the new project exam Supervisors and examiners Blackboard Who are the yellow and red markers standing for?? Group of students to be assessed The Faculty of Engineering and Science

Assessment in the new project exam format The assessment is individual; grades may (and often will) vary. The individual student is assessed on the basis of an overall evaluation of the fulfillment of the project module’s learning objectives as reflected in: the written project report and the overall presentation the student's contribution to the presentation the student's contribution during the joint discussion the student's contribution during the individual question round(s) Partial grades are not given, not even "unofficial" ones, for the individual elements, but all aspects must be satisfactory in order for the student to pass the exam. The Faculty of Engineering and Science

Extraordinary possibility, only this year: The new project exam for final project (Bachelor or Master thesis) exam. Same procedure and assessment format as for every other project exam but timing is 1 hour pr. Student for the whole examination procedure. Extraordinary possibility, only this year: Individual exam. You have to apply to the study board. The Faculty of Engineering and Science

Learning from the past 11 The Faculty of Engineering and Science Picture: markjuleen.com 11 The Faculty of Engineering and Science The Faculty of Engineering and Science

The preferences Kolmos and Holgaard, 2008 The Faculty of Engineering and Science

The reactions at the time of the ban in 2007 There was a strong preference towards the group based exam from: 94% of the internal staff examiners (facilitators) (n=162) 87% of the external examiners (n=131) 69% of the students (n=516) Kolmos and Holgaard, 2008 Picture: http://www.outcomesnm.org/images/team_home.gif The Faculty of Engineering and Science

Strong points for group assessment Easier to examine all parts of the project thoroughly. Less temptation to ask “textbook questions” that ignore the actual project. Identification and recognition of the diversity of students’ knowledge. Opportunity to demonstrate applied knowledge and competence. Students can build on and benefit from each other’s contribution. The feedback during the exam makes it easier for students to understand their grades. Picture: loridennis.com The Faculty of Engineering and Science The Faculty of Engineering and Science

Skills tested - TekNat The Faculty of Engineering and Science The ability to: GRP 2006 IND 2008 Answer questions quickly Remember concepts and definitions Argue for methodological choices Relate different concepts to each other Show theoretical overview Show analytical skills Discuss the pros and cons of a solution Transfer knowledge to other situations Make an oral presentation Enter into dialogue and collaboration Comment and elaborate on arguments Work in teams More than 9 out of 10 felt that this ability was tested to a large or to some extent More than 7 out of 10 felt that this ability was tested to a large or to some extent More than 5 out of 10 felt that this ability was tested to a large or to some extent Fewer than 5 out of 10 felt that this ability was tested to a large or to some extent The Faculty of Engineering and Science

What students said about group-based exams The students that were in favour of group-based exams also emphasized: that the team setting create a pleasant atmosphere that they have learned a lot during the exam because of the thorough discussions. More than 80% either disagreed or partly disagreed that ‘it is easy to hide in a group-based exam’ (82%), and that ‘you do not have to cover the whole curriculum in a group-based exam’ (80%). Kolmos and Holgaard, 2008 The Faculty of Engineering and Science

Conducting a good exam (for all involved) Prepare the joint discussion really well. Plan the individual round of questions well and make sure you have discussed this with students in advance. Keep track of contributions using a detailed scorecard and extensive notes. Prepare to give feedback on the performance of each student The Faculty of Engineering and Science

How can you prepare for the new format? All exams, no matter what the format, are a challenge. Make sure that you and your colleagues agree on your interpretation of the exam format. Share information about the exam format and strategies on how to ‘get through’ and be prepared early on in the teaching and supervision process. Meet the students some days before the exam to explain/discuss the format again. Agree on what constitutes good behaviour during the exam. Talk to experienced colleagues. The Faculty of Engineering and Science

All information on: The Faculty of Engineering and Science Http://www.tek-nat.aau.dk/Officielle+dokumenter/Uddannelsesregler+og+ressourcer/Projekteksamen/ The Faculty of Engineering and Science

Questions? Starting over – learning from experience 19 Picture: infinitevitality1.wordpress.com 19 The Faculty of Engineering and Science The Faculty of Engineering and Science