FlashSystem 9100 with Epic Workloads

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Metrics for Effective Storage Performance and Capacity Reporting.
Advertisements

Module – 3 Data protection – raid
© 2009 IBM Corporation Statements of IBM future plans and directions are provided for information purposes only. Plans and direction are subject to change.
Engenio 7900 HPC Storage System. 2 LSI Confidential LSI In HPC LSI (Engenio Storage Group) has a rich, successful history of deploying storage solutions.
Snapshots in a Flash with ioSnap TM Sriram Subramanian, Swami Sundararaman, Nisha Talagala, Andrea Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi Arpaci-Dusseau Copyright © 2014.
The All-Flash Array for the Next Generation Data Center SOLUTION OVERVIEW.
The All-Flash Array for the Next Generation Data Center.
© 2009 IBM Corporation Statements of IBM future plans and directions are provided for information purposes only. Plans and direction are subject to change.
Faster and Easier with Built-in Data Protection Ryan Troy – NorthEast System Engineering Manager 12/13/13.
Managing storage requirements in VMware Environments October 2009.
Sinfonia: A New Paradigm for Building Scalable Distributed Systems Marcos K. Aguilera, Arif Merchant, Mehul Shah, Alistair Veitch, Christonos Karamanolis.
IBM® Spectrum Storage Virtualize™ V V7000 Unified in a nutshell
Performance Acceleration Module Tech ONTAP Live August 6 th, 2008.
© 2014 IBM Corporation IBM FlashSystem John Clifton
Scalability Module 6.
File Systems and N/W attached storage (NAS) | VTU NOTES | QUESTION PAPERS | NEWS | VTU RESULTS | FORUM | BOOKSPAR ANDROID APP.
1 Some Context for This Session…  Performance historically a concern for virtualized applications  By 2009, VMware (through vSphere) and hardware vendors.
Windows Server ® Virtualization Infrastructure Planning and Design Published: November 2007 Updated: January 2012.
Nexenta Proprietary Global Leader in Software Defined Storage Nexenta Technical Sales Professional (NTSP) COURSE CONTENT.
Improving Disk Latency and Throughput with VMware Presented by Raxco Software, Inc. March 11, 2011.
FlashSystem family 2014 © 2014 IBM Corporation IBM® FlashSystem™ V840 Product Overview.
Session objectives Discuss whether or not virtualization makes sense for Exchange 2013 Describe supportability of virtualization features Explain sizing.
Microsoft Azure Storage. Networking Compute Storage Virtual Machine Operating System Applications Data & Access Runtime Provision.
1© Copyright 2012 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. EMC Mission Critical Infrastructure For Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Accelerated With VFCache EMC.
1© Copyright 2012 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. EMC PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION FOR MICROSOFT FAST SEARCH SERVER 2010 FOR SHAREPOINT EMC Symmetrix.
Log-structured Memory for DRAM-based Storage Stephen Rumble, John Ousterhout Center for Future Architectures Research Storage3.2: Architectures.
David Palme Portland Schools. Why I’m Here Today Portland Public Schools Small Department 1.5 FTE Old Equipment 20 Servers (8 10+ years old, 5 ESXI, 5.
ONStor Pantera 3110 ONStor NAS. Copyright 2008 · ONStor Confidential Pantera 3110 – An Integrated Channel only NAS  Integrated standalone NAS system.
1© Copyright 2012 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. EMC VNX5700, EMC FAST Cache, SQL Server AlwaysOn Availability Groups Strategic Solutions Engineering.
© Copyright 2004 Instrumental, Inc I/O Types and Usage in DoD Henry Newman Instrumental, Inc/DOD HPCMP/DARPA HPCS May 24, 2004.
Pathway to Petaflops A vendor contribution Philippe Trautmann Business Development Manager HPC & Grid Global Education, Government & Healthcare.
NetApp: for the Cloud All Flash SDN © 2015 NetApp, Inc. All rights reserved. NetApp Confidential – Limited Use 1.
© 2014 IBM Corporation 1 IBM FlashSystem™ POC Best Practices IBM & IBM BP Only © 2014 IBM Corporation 1 Title of presentation goes here FlashSystem family.
© 2014 IBM Corporation 1 Flash Landscape and Market Overview © 2014 IBM Corporation 1 Title of presentation goes here FlashSystem family 2014 Flash Landscape.
Enhanced Availability With RAID CC5493/7493. RAID Redundant Array of Independent Disks RAID is implemented to improve: –IO throughput (speed) and –Availability.
© 2014 IBM Corporation 1 Product Overview © 2014 IBM Corporation 1 Title of presentation goes here FlashSystem family 2014 FlashSystem 840/V840 Overview.
Deploying disk deduplication for Hyper-v 3.0 Žigmund Maťašovský.
FusionCube At-a-Glance. 1 Application Scenarios Enterprise Cloud Data Centers Desktop Cloud Database Application Acceleration Midrange Computer Substitution.
System Storage TM © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage™ DS3000 Series Jüri Joonsaar Tartu.
E2800 Marco Deveronico All Flash or Hybrid system
Oracle & HPE 3PAR.
EonStor DS 2000.
What’s New in VMware vSAN 6.6?
Microsoft Virtual Academy
iSCSI Storage Area Network
Curator: Self-Managing Storage for Enterprise Clusters
Diskpool and cloud storage benchmarks used in IT-DSS
Fujitsu Training Documentation RAID Groups and Volumes
100% Exam Passing Guarantee & Money Back Assurance
2016 Citrix presentation.
What is Fibre Channel? What is Fibre Channel? Introduction
Experience of Lustre at a Tier-2 site
HPE Persistent Memory Microsoft Ignite 2017
IBM C Braindumps
C VCE
Large Scale Test of a storage solution based on an Industry Standard
Tips To Pass IBM Certification Exam In First Attempt - C Exam
Tintri Smart Storage for Virtualisation & Private Cloud
A Survey on Distributed File Systems
Upgrading to Microsoft SQL Server 2014
Real IBM C exam questions and answers
2018 Huawei H Real Questions Killtest
12/3/2018 Desktop Virtualization Corey Hynes Kyle Rosenthal President Technical Lead HynesITe Inc Spider Consulting @windowspcguy.
Building continuously available systems with Hyper-V
Storage & Backup Solution Update
Open Source Activity Showcase Computational Storage SNIA SwordfishTM
IBM FlashSystem Family is Citrix Ready
Microsoft Virtual Academy
Microsoft Virtual Academy
DataOptimizer Transparent File Tiering for NetApp Storage Robert Graf
Presentation transcript:

FlashSystem 9100 with Epic Workloads

Epic Workloads This material will share information with you on why the FlashSystem 9100 is a suitable storage system for Epic workloads Measurement of the FlashSystem 9150 with Epic has been performed with favourable results A FlashSystem 9100 with Epic blue print has been updated and is available on the redbook site here

Performance Measured FlashSystem 9100 Epic workload IBM FlashCore Modules deliver high performance with low latency Over 1M IOPS 4k read cache miss Inline hardware compression consistently ensures sub 1ms response FlashSystem 9100 bandwidth Up to 34GB/s possible to the host, with ~40GB/s internal bandwidth Ability to process host workloads as well as dealing with copy services and RAID rebuild operations Measured FlashSystem 9100 Epic workload 210k IOPS without snapshot 105k IOPS during 45 minute snapshot By comparison Pure claim a 175k with an X70 – a machine that is comparable to a FlashSystem 9150

Scalability Scale the solution with the workload … … Grow with the workload overtime Clustering allows linear performance scaling Each additional 9100 has the bandwidth and capacity for 24 more FlashCore Modules Another 800TB effective Up to another 1M IOPS, and to 34GB/s Use a clustered pair of 9150s to compete against Pure X90 Or SAS expansion allows more storage with no further performance increase

FlashSystem 9100 has 99.9999% proven availability DRAID6 with FCM technology proactively identifies and repairs errors without impacting workloads FlashSystem 9100 has 99.9999% proven availability 100% availability guarantee with HyperSwap configurations installed by Lab Services engagement

Copy on Write or Redirect on Write? Copy on Write takes a copy of the data and moves it to the snapshot for the written extent. Although this causes some IO amplification to preserve the existing data before updating it with the new data, there is ample bandwidth available within the FlashSystem 9100 to perform this CPU efficient operation Redirect on Write causes metadata manipulation to allow the new copy of the data to be written to free storage without having to preserve the old copy first. Although this takes less throughput, it may require IO of metadata, and CPU usage to manipulate metadata Redirect on Write is not required for Epic workloads to have good performance!