USPAS Course on 4th Generation Light Sources II

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DL/RAL Joint Accelerator Workshop 21 st January 2009 Free Electron Laser Studies David Dunning MaRS ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Advertisements

Schemes for generation of attosecond pulses in X-ray FELs E.L. Saldin, E.A. Schneidmiller, M.V. Yurkov The potential for the development of XFEL beyond.
Eric Prebys USPAS, Hampton, VA  Wikipedia lists about 60 light sources worldwide USPAS, Hampton, VA 2015Special Topic - Light Sources 2.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Design and Performance Expectation of ALPHA accelerator S.Y. Lee, IU 2/26/ Introduction 2. Possible CIS re-build and parameters 3. Issues in the.
Does the short pulse mode need energy recovery? Rep. rateBeam 5GeV 100MHz 500MWAbsolutely 10MHz 50MW Maybe 1MHz 5MW 100kHz.
USING A MICRO FABRICATED UNDULATOR TO BRIDGE THE FOUR DECADE GAP BETWEEN REGULAR PURE PERMANENT MAGNET UNDULATORS AND INVERSE COMPTON SCATTERING SOURCES.
The UCLA PEGASUS Plane-Wave Transformer Photoinjector G. Travish, G. Andonian, P. Frigola, S. Reiche, J. Rosenzweig, and S. Telfer UCLA Department of Physics.
1 Energy recovery linacs Sverker Werin MAX-lab 8 July 2003.
Overview of ERL R&D Towards Coherent X-ray Source, March 6, 2012 CLASSE Cornell University CHESS & ERL 1 Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based ScienceS.
The impact of undulators in an ERL Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory FLS 2012, March 2012.
Properties of Synchrotron Radiation Presentation at JASS02 Seminar; Jordan, Oct , 2002 Herman Winick, SSRL/SLAC, Stanford University.
Free Electron Lasers (I)
Eric Prebys USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
Optimization of Compact X-ray Free-electron Lasers Sven Reiche May 27 th 2011.
X-RAY LIGHT SOURCE BY INVERSE COMPTON SCATTERING OF CSR FLS Mar. 6 Miho Shimada High Energy Research Accelerator Organization, KEK.
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Compact X-ray & Emittance Measurement by Laser Compton Scattering Zhi Zhao Jan. 31, 2014.
Max Cornacchia, SLAC LCLS Project Overview BESAC, Feb , 2001 LCLS Project Overview What is the LCLS ? Transition from 3 rd generation light sources.
USPAS Course on Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs G. A. Krafft and A. Bogacz Jefferson Lab Timofey Zolkin Lecture 12: ERL x-ray light source USPAS.
Singel pass FELs for ERL. X-RAY FELS BASED ON ERL FACILITIES A. Meseck, C. Mayes F. Löhl G. Hoffstätter.
Capture and Transport Simulations of Positrons in a Compton Scheme Positron Source A. VIVOLI*, A. VARIOLA (LAL / IN2P3-CNRS), R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS)
The Next Generation Light Source Test Facility at Daresbury Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop, Daresbury,
TAC SASE FEL Project Dr. Ömer Yavaş * Ankara University * On behalf of TAC SASE FEL Study Group Meeting on the Feasibility of X-Band Linac Based FEL Facility.
김 귀년 CHEP, KNU Accelerator Activities in Korea for ILC.
J. Corlett. June 16, 2006 A Future Light Source for LBNL Facility Vision and R&D plan John Corlett ALS Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting June 16, 2006.
Production of coherent X-rays with a free electron laser based on optical wiggler A.Bacci, M.Ferrario*, C. Maroli, V.Petrillo, L.Serafini Università e.
USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs1 CHESS / LEPP USPAS Course on Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs I. V. Bazarov Cornell University.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
Free Electron Laser Studies
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
SLS-2 – Ugrade of the Swiss Light Source
Plans of XFELO in Future ERL Facilities
Status and Interest of the X-ray FEL SINAP
Timing and synchronization at SPARC
Very Asymmetric Collider for Dark Matter Search below 1 GeV
Paul Scherrer Institut
Conveners: L.Serafini,F. Villa
LCLS-II-HE FEL Facility Overview
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
Free Electron Lasers (FEL’s)
F. Villa Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - LNF On behalf of Sparc_lab
Compton effect and ThomX What possible future?
Using a Bessel Light Beam as an Ultra-short Period Helical Undulator
Peking University: Jinqing Yu, Ronghao Hu, Haiyang Lu & Xueqing Yan
ERL working modes Georg Hoffstaetter, Professor Cornell University / CLASSE / SRF group & ERL effort High Current mode High Coherence mode High Buch charge.
Monocycle Harmonic Generation in FELs
LCLS-II-HE FEL Facility Overview
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
ERL accelerator review. Parameters for a Compton source
VUV/Soft X-ray Oscillators
Emittance Partitioning between x (or y) and z dimensions
TW FEL “Death-Ray“ Studies
Diagnosis of a High Harmonic Beam Using
Jim Clarke ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory March 2006
Val Kostroun and Bruce Dunham
Serge Kalmykov, UNL (WG 6, Tuesday, 10/26/2017) vg +15 fs
Longitudinal-to-transverse mapping and emittance transfer
Longitudinal-to-transverse mapping and emittance transfer
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
USPAS Course on Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs
Introduction to Free Electron Lasers Zhirong Huang
Proposal for Smith-Purcell radiation experiment at SPARC_LAB
USPAS Course on 4th Generation Light Sources II
Enhanced Self-Amplified Spontaneous Emission
DANE Compton ring for ultra high flux photons in the 100 KeV-10 MeV energy range D. Alesini (LNF, INFN Frascati)
Electron Optics & Bunch Compression
Accelerator Physics Xray Sources and FELs
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
Presentation transcript:

USPAS Course on 4th Generation Light Sources II ERLs and Thomson Scattering G. A. Krafft and I. V. Bazarov Jefferson Lab and Cornell University Thomson Scattering Sources

Thomson Scatter Sources & Related Proposals Thomson Scattering vs. Undulator Radiation Thomson Scattering Sources (TSS): JLAB BNL Duke Berkeley Idaho Accelerator Center Naval Research Lab Other proposals: Small-Angle Geometry Laser Electron Storage Ring Sir J.J. Thomson

Thomson Scattering vs. Undulator Radiation p Undulator radiation can be looked as Thomson scattering (and vice versa) Same signature: polarization, harmonic content when a0, K  1

Thomson Scattering Same as Short Undulator Radiation For K  1: useful fraction ~ (/)(/ph)2 Scaling with undulator period of the formulas above: to keep radiation wavelength the same: to keep the number of photons the same if undulator length is kept the same: if number of periods is kept the same: B0 in undulator is limited to ~ Tesla, thus, electron energy is constrained to some multi-GeV, and undulator period to ~ cm for hard x-ray production.

Different Thomson Scattering Geometries mbarn possible advantages include compact design (small ), fs x-ray pulses we’ll look at different examples of TSS:  = /2,  =  and  << 1

Photons Wanted

Reality Check Against Photon “Starvation” From undulator: mostly incoherent photons  Thomson scattered x-rays: Laser pulse needed: 1 ~ or: or ~ 10 J / pulse (TW laser) for can be tough to match laser and electron beams in space-time, i.e. only a fraction of electrons or photons will participate in scattering rep rate is limited to ~ kHz (don’t need more for pump probe exp.)

Outline Thomson Scattering vs. Undulator Radiation Thomson Scattering Sources (TSS): JLAB BNL Duke Berkeley Idaho Accelerator Center Japanese Tohuku Group Other proposals: Small-Angle Geometry Laser Electron Storage Ring

… …

… peak 0.1 % bw peak

Outline Thomson Scattering vs. Undulator Radiation Thomson Scattering Sources (TSS): JLAB BNL Duke Berkeley Idaho Accelerator Center Japanese Tohuku Group Other proposals: Small-Angle Geometry Laser Electron Storage Ring

Duke FEL-production

Machine Description

Measured -rays Note: -ray polarization is ~ 100 %

Future Plans

Outline Thomson Scattering vs. Undulator Radiation Thomson Scattering Sources (TSS): JLAB BNL Duke Berkeley Idaho Accelerator Center Japanese Tohuku Group Other proposals: Small-Angle Geometry Laser Electron Storage Ring

Experimental Results

Outline Thomson Scattering vs. Undulator Radiation Thomson Scattering Sources (TSS): JLAB BNL Duke Berkeley Idaho Accelerator Center Naval Research Lab Other proposals: Small-Angle Geometry Laser Electron Storage Ring

The Layout

Interaction Region

Indirect Laser Pulse Measurements

X-ray Measurements

Outline Thomson Scattering vs. Undulator Radiation Thomson Scattering Sources (TSS): JLAB BNL Duke Berkeley Idaho Accelerator Center Naval Research Lab Other proposals: Small-Angle Geometry Laser Electron Storage Ring

Outline Thomson Scattering vs. Undulator Radiation Thomson Scattering Sources (TSS): JLAB BNL Duke Berkeley Idaho Accelerator Center Naval Research Lab Other proposals: Small-Angle Geometry Laser Electron Storage Ring

… …  3°

6° 3°

… … … … x, y = 4 mm? Note: state-of-the-art peak brightness from 3rd generation light sources approaches 1024 photons s-1 mm-2 mrad-2 per 0.1% bw, and average flux is 1015 photons s-1 per 0.1% bw.

f 104 per 0.1% bw per pulse should be 1018 Note: different laser parameters were used for different Thomson scattering sources

Peak brightness alone can be misleading Single photon peak brightness: or in conventional units: peak brightness @ 1 Å when photon degeneracy is 1 Summary Thomson scattering sources can provide ~ 103-4 shorter pulses than that of 3rd generation light sources, with peak brightness lower by at least ~ 103-4 and average flux lower by at least 109-10 assuming state-of-the-art rep rate for laser. Even if the rep rate of Thomson scattering event were somehow improved to some sub-GHz (c.f. next project), average flux would still be ~ 103-4 when compared to a 3rd generation light sources.

Outline Thomson Scattering vs. Undulator Radiation Thomson Scattering Sources (TSS): JLAB BNL Duke Berkeley Idaho Accelerator Center Naval Research Lab Other proposals: Small-Angle Geometry Laser Electron Storage Ring

General Idea phase space damping rate: due to bends alone, i.e. small phase space excitation rate: due to bends alone, i.e. small

Damping From Thomson “Undulator”

Theoretical emittance & energy spread Note: large initial emittance can hinder the damping

Fabry-Perot resonator & Projected performance laser peak power: 0.2 TW (transient) 6 GW (steady) rep rate: 0.1 GHz (steady) laser power req.d: 200 W