Dual-stiffness origami gripper.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Demonstrations I, II, and III.

Advertisements

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Force limits and layout design.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Demonstrations integrated system tests.

Technologies in the integrated gripper:

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

Robot surface tension experiments.

TPAD training protocol.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

Schematic representation of the milliDelta.

Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Gripper that grasps autonomously.

Results of the performance study experiment: Compression (sample size: n = 5). Results of the performance study experiment: Compression (sample size: n.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

The foldable robotic arm with seven modules assembled in series.

Prosthesis grasping and control.

A shared-control method for effective bimanual robot manipulation.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

Technologies in the integrated gripper:

Quasi-static and dynamic trajectories.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Force limits and layout design.

Experimental results for healthy participants.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Rolling soft robot driven by integrated ring oscillator.

Experimental characterization of the milliDelta’s quasi-static workspace (yellow) compared with the theoretical workspace (blue) generated by the kinematic.

Experimental results for tremor reduction.

Prosthesis system diagram.

Translation of a spherical object.

Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Fig. 3 Scan rate effects on the layer edge current.

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Results of the performance study experiment: Bending (sample size: n = 5). Results of the performance study experiment: Bending (sample size: n = 5). (A)

Coadaptive movements of fully soft robotic design.

Fig. 1 Bioinspired design of AAD for promoting wound contraction.

Mechanical behavior. Mechanical behavior. (A) The compliant origami consists of three layers: a prestretched elastomer membrane bonded between two outer.

Fig. 6 External drivers and model response.

Collision resilience and foldability of the origami drone.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Quadcopter equipped with dual-stiffness origami arms.

Fig. 3 Photon number statistics resulting from Fock state |l, S − l〉 interference. Photon number statistics resulting from Fock state |l, S − l〉 interference.

Experimental setup for HIL Bayesian optimization.

Electronic structure of the oligomer (n = 8) at the UB3LYP/6-31G

Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.

Fig. 4 Control analyses ensured that the relation between rotational acceleration and changes in FA does not depend on thresholds. Control analyses ensured.

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Fig. 1 Geometry of the TCO prototypes.

Fig. 2 Folding motions of the TCO with strain-softening behavior.

Details of seal design. Details of seal design. (A) RAD sampler (left), with close-up view (right) indicating the soft edges that form the light seal.

Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.

Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.

Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.

Analysis of experimental results.

Force and angular speed profiles in the normal collision (contact angle, 90°) at 1.2 m/s for the naked and origami-protected configurations on the rough.

Force and angular speed profiles at a contact angle of 30° and initial speed 1.2 m/s for fixed and rotary configurations on rough and smooth surfaces.

Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic skins. Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic.

Fig. 1 Design principle and SEM characterization of super-origami DNA nanostructures with n-tuples. Design principle and SEM characterization of super-origami.

Bioinspired dual-stiffness origami.

Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison with human trackers. Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison.

Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.

Presentation transcript:

Dual-stiffness origami gripper. Dual-stiffness origami gripper. (A) The original Oriceps (18) crease pattern was modified with two additional folds indicated by the red dashed lines. (B) The grasping motion of the compliant origami gripper (i.e., the bending angle β) is activated by folding the two input tiles highlighted in green with the angle α. (C) Experimental measurement of the grasping force F as a function of the input angle α. When the origami gripper grasps an object, the grasping force rapidly grows until a threshold is reached, as indicated by the horizontal dashed line, when the structure undergoes buckling along the compliant fold, hence avoiding overload of the grasped object. (D) The origami gripper in the rigid configuration firmly holding an object. (E) The origami gripper in the soft configuration holding an object without overloading it. Stefano Mintchev et al. Sci. Robotics 2018;3:eaau0275 Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works