M. Franz, J. Ott, A. Watrelot, L. Küssel, H. Husslein 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development of guideline-based quality indicators for recurrent miscarriage E. van den Boogaard, M. Goddijn, N.J. Leschot, F. van der Veen, J.A.M. Kremer,
Advertisements

L. M. Moolenaar, M. Connolly, B. Huisman, M. J. Postma, P. G. A
Mostafa Metwally, Cynthia M. Farquhar, Tin Chiu Li 
Effect of androgen supplementation or modulation on ovarian stimulation outcome in poor responders: a meta-analysis  Sesh Kamal Sunkara, Jyotsna Pundir,
S. La Vignera, E. Vicari, R. A. Condorelli, C. Franchina, G. Scalia, G
Programmes and prospects for ovotechnology
Cancer and fertility: strategies to preserve fertility
Kay Neumann, Georg Griesinger  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Attitudes and policies regarding access to fertility care and assisted reproductive technologies in Israel  Daniel Sperling, Yael Simon  Reproductive.
Vuong Thi Ngoc Lan, Nguyen Khanh Linh, Ho Manh Tuong, P. C
Diet and endometriosis risk: A literature review
Multiple-dose and double-dose versus single-dose administration of methotrexate for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis 
Hatem Abu Hashim  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
E. Jauniaux, I. Ben-Ami, R. Maymon  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
A. Osman, J. Pundir, M. Elsherbini, S. Dave, T. El-Toukhy, Y. Khalaf 
E. Jauniaux, I. Ben-Ami, R. Maymon  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Willem Ombelet  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
In vitro maturation improves oocyte or embryo cryopreservation outcome in breast cancer patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation 
L. L. van Loendersloot, M. van Wely, S. Repping, F. van der Veen, P. M
High serum oestradiol concentrations in IVF cycles increase the risk of pregnancy complications related to abnormal placentation  Jacob Farhi, Avi Ben.
Cornelia van Zyl, Maretha J. Visser  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Gillian M. Lockwood  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Female gender pre-selection by maternal diet in combination with timing of sexual intercourse – a prospective study  A.M. Noorlander, J.P.M. Geraedts,
Establishment and validation of a score to predict ovarian response to stimulation in IVF  Clelia Chalumeau, Jessika Moreau, Nicolas Gatimel, Clementine.
Anti-Müllerian hormone as an independent predictor of twin versus singleton pregnancy in fresh cycles  Reshef Tal, David B. Seifer, Moisey Khanimov, Eliana.
Why are reproductive cancers more common in nulliparous women?
Perinatal outcomes after stimulated versus natural cycle IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Mohan Shashikant Kamath, Richard Kirubakaran, Mariano.
K. Gersak, A. Veble  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Désirée García, Rita Vassena, Andrés Prat, Valérie Vernaeve 
Hillary B. Alberta, Roberta M. Berry, Aaron D. Levine 
What’s on the mind of IVF consumers?
S Munné, E Fragouli, P Colls, MG Katz-Jaffe, WB Schoolcraft, D Wells 
Sarah McCredie, William Ledger, Christos A. Venetis 
Effect of N-acetyl-cysteine after ovarian drilling in clomiphene citrate-resistant PCOS women: a pilot study  A. Nasr  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Chief editor's 2017 annual report
Effect of energy expenditure and physical activity on the outcomes of assisted reproduction treatment  Mert Kucuk, Fadime Doymaz, Bulent Urman  Reproductive.
M. Dieterich, M. Bolz, T. Reimer, S. Costagliola, B. Gerber 
Cross-border reproductive care: a review of the literature
Myotonic dystrophy type 1 and PGD: ovarian stimulation response and correlation analysis between ovarian reserve and genotype  C. Dechanet, C. Castelli,
Mostafa Metwally, Cynthia M. Farquhar, Tin Chiu Li 
Ronit Machtinger, Raoul Orvieto  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Donor information considered important to donors, recipients and offspring: an Australian perspective  I.S. Rodino, P.J. Burton, K.A. Sanders  Reproductive.
A retrospective analysis of ovarian stimulation with letrozole in women undergoing artificial insemination by donor  X.J. Sun, L. Jiang, L.C. Ji, R. Nie,
Impact of vitamin D levels on ovarian reserve and ovarian response to ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors  Alberta Maria Fabris, Maria Cruz, Carlos Iglesias,
V Isachenko, E Isachenko, R Kreienberg, M Woriedh, JM Weiss 
LH concentrations do not correlate with pregnancy in rFSH/GnRH antagonist cycles  Kevin Doody, Paul Devroey, Keith Gordon, Han Witjes, Bernadette Mannaerts 
Should we be promoting embryo transfer at blastocyst stage?
Stephen C. Collins, Esther Chan  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
GnRH antagonist pre-treatment: one centre's experience for IVF–ICSI cycle scheduling  Veronique Viardot-Foucault, Sadhana Nadarajah, Weng Kit Lye, Heng.
Ovarian stimulation and endometriosis progression or recurrence: a systematic review  Edgardo Somigliana, Paola Viganò, Laura Benaglia, Andrea Busnelli,
Pietro Gambadauro, Ramesan Navaratnarajah 
Implication of apoptosis in sperm cryoinjury
Does exogenous LH in ovarian stimulation improve assisted reproduction success? An appraisal of the literature  Micah J. Hill, Gary Levy, Eric D. Levens 
Genome-wide analysis shows no genomic predictors of ovarian response to stimulation by exogenous FSH for IVF  Jeroen van Disseldorp, Lude Franke, Rene.
The Alpha Consensus Meeting on the professional status of the clinical embryologist: proceedings of an expert meeting    Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Response: time-lapse systems for ART
C Almeida, M Sousa, A Barros  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Elective single-embryo transfer: persuasive communication strategies can affect choice in a young British population  O.B.A. van den Akker, S. Purewal 
Nigel Pereira, Anna Voskuilen-Gonzalez, Kolbe Hancock, Jovana P
Predictive value of ovarian reserve markers in smoking and non-smoking women undergoing IVF  Thomas Freour, Lionel Dessolle, Miguel Jean, Damien Masson,
Ovarian reserve screening before contraception?
Comparative incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa or recombinant FSH  Basil C. Tarlatzis,
Cryobanking of human ovarian tissue: do women still want their tissue stored beyond 5 years?  Kirsten Tryde Macklon, Erik Ernst, Anders Nyboe Andersen,
Programmes and prospects for ovotechnology
Claudio Manna, Loris Nanni, Alessandra Lumini, Sebastiana Pappalardo 
Randomized controlled trial of benzocaine versus placebo spray for pain relief at hysterosalpingogram  E.A. Bachman, S. Senapati, M.D. Sammel, S.K. Kalra 
China’s model of egg donation is a policy lesson for Britain
Yakoub Khalaf, Susan Bewley, Peter Braude 
Fertility in cancer patients after cryopreservation of one ovary
Use of progestins to inhibit spontaneous ovulation during ovarian stimulation: the beginning of a new era?  Antonio La Marca, Martina Capuzzo  Reproductive.
Presentation transcript:

Prospective evaluation of the learning curve of fertiloscopy with and without ovarian drilling  M. Franz, J. Ott, A. Watrelot, L. Küssel, H. Husslein  Reproductive BioMedicine Online  Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 408-414 (April 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.12.015 Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 (a) learning curve in Centre 1, including complications i–iii (for details see Results); and (b) learning curve in Centre 1 without complications, diagnostic fertiloscopy versus fertiloscopy with ovarian drilling. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2015 30, 408-414DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.12.015) Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions