MALTA Investigator I-V Measurements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiation damage in silicon sensors
Advertisements

Jaap Velthuis, University of Bristol SPiDeR SPiDeR (Silicon Pixel Detector Research) at EUDET Telescope Sensor overview with lab results –TPAC –FORTIS.
1 Pixel Readout of GEMs Motivation The Setup Results Next Steps A. Bamberger, K. Desch, J. Ludwig, M. Titov, U. Renz, N. Vlasov, P. Wienemann, A. Zwerger.
Studies and status of CMOS-based sensors research and development for ATLAS strip detector upgrade 1 Vitaliy Fadeyev, Zach Galloway, Herve Grabas, Alexander.
G.Villani jan. 071 CALICE pixel Deep P-Well results Nwell 16 μm x 16 μm P-well 17 μm x 17 μm Collecting diodes 3.6 μm x 3.6 μm Bias: NWell 3.5V Diodes:
Striplet option of Super Belle Silicon Vertex Detector Talk at Joint Super B factory workshop, Honolulu 20 April 2005 T.Tsuboyama.
G.Villani jan. 071 CALICE pixel Deep P-Well results Nwell ≈ 900 μm 2 P-well 1μm ring gap Collecting diodes 3.6 x 3.6 μm 2 Bias: NWell 3.5V Diodes: 1.5V.
G.Villani jan. 071 CALICE pixel Deep P-Well results Nwell ≈ 900 μm 2 P-well 1μm ring gap Collecting diodes 3.6 x 3.6 μm 2 Bias: NWell 3.5V Diodes: 1.5V.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Particle Physics Department A Novel CMOS Monolithic Active Pixel Sensor with Analog Signal Processing and 100% Fill factor.
SPiDeR  First beam test results of the FORTIS sensor FORTIS 4T MAPS Deep PWell Testbeam results CHERWELL Summary J.J. Velthuis.
Summary of CMS 3D pixel sensors R&D Enver Alagoz 1 On behalf of CMS 3D collaboration 1 Physics Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Edgeless Medipix sensors for medical X-ray imaging applications Marten Bosma BND School in Rathen, 2009-Sep-14.
1 Nick Sinev LCWS08, University of Illinois at Chicago November 18, 2008 Status of the Chronopixel project J. E. Brau, N. B. Sinev, D. M. Strom University.
Wire Bonding and Analogue Readout ● Cold bump bonding is not easy ● Pixel chip is not reusable ● FE-I3 is not available at the moment ● FE-I4 is coming.
Fully depleted MAPS: Pegasus and MIMOSA 33 Maciej Kachel, Wojciech Duliński PICSEL group, IPHC Strasbourg 1 For low energy X-ray applications.
Specifications & motivation 2  Lowering integration time would significantly reduce background  Lowering power would significantly reduce material budget.
CEA DSM Irfu 20 th october 2008 EuDet Annual Meeting Marie GELIN on behalf of IRFU – Saclay and IPHC - Strasbourg Zero Suppressed Digital Chip sensor for.
1 Activities in Wuhan TopMetal sensor & ALICE ITS upgade Xiangming Sun CCNU ALICE ITS Upgrade and O2 Asian Workshop 2014.
Hybrid Pixel R&D After BTeV As of two years ago: –FNAL-designed readout chip had two minor fatal flaws. –No system demonstration had yet been done. An.
Technology Overview or Challenges of Future High Energy Particle Detection Tomasz Hemperek
Overview of Activities at COMSATS Presented by: Team Leader: Hira KhanDr. Arshad S. Bhatti Sujjia Shaukat.
The development of the readout ASIC for the pair-monitor with SOI technology ~irradiation test~ Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ. 29 th Mar  Introduction.
IEEE October 16-22, 2004 First Look at the Beam Test Results of the FPIX2 Readout Chip for the BTeV Silicon Pixel Detector First Look at the Beam Test.
Maria Rita Coluccia Simon Kwan Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
Test structures for the evaluation of TowerJazz 180 nm CMOS Imaging Sensor technology  ALICE ITS microelectronics team - CERN.
Tracking at the Fermilab Test Beam Facility Matthew Jones, Lorenzo Uplegger April 29 th Infieri Workshop.
Charge Multiplication Properties in Highly Irradiated Thin Epitaxial Silicon Diodes Jörn Lange, Julian Becker, Eckhart Fretwurst, Robert Klanner, Gunnar.
Giulio Pellegrini 27th RD50 Workshop (CERN) 2-4 December 2015 Centro Nacional de MicroelectrónicaInstituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona 1 Status of.
CdTe prototype detector testing Anja Schubert The University of Melbourne 9 May 2011 Updates.
Anna Maria Fiorello - Research Dept ATLAS-Pixel Project: Bump Bonding ATLAS BUMP BONDING PROCESS.
Study of Geiger Avalanche Photo Diode applications to pixel tracking detectors Barcelona Main Goal The use of std CMOS tech. APD's in Geiger mode (that.
Pixel Sensors for the Mu3e Detector Dirk Wiedner on behalf of Mu3e February Dirk Wiedner PSI 2/15.
Aras Papadelis. NIKHEF 1 Aras Papadelis B-physics meeting 15/ Results from the Nov2004 VELO test beam (and what followed…)
Charles University in Prague Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Brief presentation Zdenek Dolezal.
TCT measurements of HV-CMOS test structures irradiated with neutrons I. Mandić 1, G. Kramberger 1, V. Cindro 1, A. Gorišek 1, B. Hiti 1, M. Mikuž 1,2,
1 /28 LePIX – Front End Electronic conference – Bergamo 25 May 2011 – Piero Giubilato LePIX – monolithic detectors in advanced CMOS Collection electrode.
SPiDeR  Status of SPIDER Status/Funding Sensor overview with first results –TPAC –FORTIS –CHERWELL Beam test 09 Future.
Pixel 3D Sensor Test Beam Analysis
Fully Depleted Low Power CMOS Detectors
Dima Maneuski, Advances in rad-hard MAPS 2016, Birmingham
The pixel research activities at SDU
Ivan Peric, Christian Kreidl, Peter Fischer University of Heidelberg
HV/HR CMOS in Oxford: Facilities, experience, and interests Arndt, Bortoletto, Huffman, Jaya John, Nickerson, Placket, Shipsey, Vigani.
Characterization and modelling of signal dynamics in 3D-DDTC detectors
Preliminary results from 3D CMS Pixel Detectors
Design and Characterization of a Novel, Radiation-Resistant Active Pixel Sensor in a Standard 0.25 m CMOS Technology P.P. Allport, G. Casse, A. Evans,
Charge collection studies with irradiated CMOS detectors
Marcin Chrząszcz Cracow University of Technology Itamar Levy
Sep th Hiroshima Xi’an Test-beam evaluation of newly developed n+-in-p planar pixel sensors aiming for use in high radiation environment.
HR-HV CMOS activities and plans at Glasgow
HV-MAPS Designs and Results I
HVCMOS sensor technology R&D
AMS-Chess1 Characterization
Characterization of a Pixel Sensor for ITK
Craig Buttar 17th June 2014 Report on CMOS testing Craig Buttar 17th June 2014
Ivan Peric for ATLAS and CLIC HVCMOS R&D and Mu3e Collaborations
Simulation on the Response of the STAR HFT Pixel Detector
HVCMOS Detectors – Overview
Peter Kodyš, Zdeněk Doležal, Jan Brož,
TCAD Simulation and test setup For CMOS Pixel Sensor based on a 0
Simulation on the Response of the STAR HFT Pixel Detector
PIXEL Slow Simulation Status Report
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
Enhanced Lateral Drift (ELAD) sensors
Status of pixel study 2nd CMOS sensor (CPS) submission: digital CPS prototypes design at IHEP & CCNU In-pixel digitization and readout structure study.
Aras Papadelis NIKHEF Vertex 2005, Nikko, Japan
3D sensors: status and plans for the ACTIVE project
R&D of CMOS pixel Shandong University
Project Update 7 Shiyu Wang (Boston University) CERN, Project Update 7.
Clustering-based Studies on the upgraded ITS of the Alice Experiment
Presentation transcript:

MALTA Investigator I-V Measurements Shiyu Wang (Boston University), Enrico Schioppa (CERN), Carlos Solans(University of Oxford) CERN, Project Update 4

Recap: Motivation for IV Measurements To observe and validate possible “punch-through” effect. Sudden current spike between Substrate (depleted zone) and pwell. Caused by potential difference between pwell and sub overcoming isolation layer in between (depletion layer). Expected to occur at large potential differences between pwell and sub (also expected to see a intersection between the variable Pwell voltage and the sub voltage) Modified Process (Source from ATLAS Readout Meeting)

Setup, updated Malta Readout Meeting Measurements carried out in building 28/2-017 (Laser Telescope Lab) Using probe station setup.(Bad decision, we keep having needles broken and bad resolution of the chip, probe station now retired) Room kept at constant 21oC and stable humidity. (Again bad, we could use a fridge for the chip instead, may be expensive, but we are using fridge now)

Setup - Pwell/Sub GNDs Common Malta Readout Meeting Pwell and deep Pwell SUB V+ VRESET

Results – Pwell/Sub GNDs Common Malta Readout Meeting First two measurements, problems encountered: W12 sector example W4 sector example 104 104 Substrate Current [A] Substrate Current [A] Pwell 0.00V Pwell 1.00V Pwell 2.00V Pwell 3.00V Pwell 0.00V Pwell 1.00V Pwell 2.00V Pwell 3.00V Pwell 4.00V 10 3 10 3 Pwell 4.00V 102 Pwell 5.00V Pwell 6.00V 102 Pwell 5.00V Pwell 6.00V 10 10 1 1 101 101 5 10 15 20 Substrate Voltage [V] Behavior does not make sense, as compared with the modified CMOS process, likely due to broken chip or flawed probe station or… Breakdown voltage inversely proportional to Pwell voltage. (too strange to accept, let’s just change the setup and test again)

Setup - Pwell GND reference Malta Readout Meeting Deep Pwell (Sub-Pwell) Δ V+ VRESET All PSU GNDs are common / shorted

Results - Pwell GND reference Malta Readout Meeting W12 – E (Sub-Pwell) Δ [V] Currents observed by ΔV PSU. Breakdown voltage occurring following similar pattern to previous measurements (inversely proportional to pwell voltage). Negative currents between substrate and pwell in negative Δ regions. Punch-through defined by difference in currents observed between pwell PSU and Δ PSU (we need more example of this).

Results - Pwell GND reference Malta Readout Meeting W4-A (MALTA have 12 different sectors) Punch-through observed at lowest pwell voltages 104 Punch-Through Current [A] Punch-Through Current [A] 6000 Pwell 0.00V Pwell 1.00V Pwell 0.00V Pwell 1.00V 10 Pwell 2.00V 3 Pwell 2.00V 4000 Pwell 3.00V Pwell 4.00V Pwell 5.00V Pwell 3.00V Pwell 4.00V 2000 102 Pwell 5.00V Pwell 6.00V Pwell 6.00V 2000 4000 6000 10 1 101 5 5 10 15 20  Voltage [V] 5 5 10 15 20  Voltage [V] Current difference between Pwell PSU and ΔV PSU, which could be evidence for the punch through current. (Punch through effect proved at W4 sector)

Results – Something more Malta Readout Meeting W12 – E No punch-through observed for W12. 104 Punch-Through Current [A] Punch-Through Current [A] Pwell 0.00V 2000 Pwell 0.00V Pwell 1.00V Pwell 2.00V Pwell 1.00V Pwell 2.00V 10 3 Pwell 3.00V Pwell 4.00V Pwell 4.00V Pwell 5.00V Pwell 3.00V 102 Pwell 5.00V Pwell 6.00V Pwell 6.00V 2000 10 4000 1 6000 101 5 5 10 15 20  Voltage [V] 5 5 10 15 20  Voltage [V] Current difference between Pwell PSU and ΔV PSU. (Punch through current)

TJ-Monopix pixel matrix Pixel size: 36.4 μm x 36.4 μm, use standard process the 64x16 pixel matrix includes 8 different sectors, we use them to reset mechanism and process of the original MALTA chip 8x2 special pixels in the top corners to monitor the analogue signals on the collection electrode and front-end output for different splits 1800 µm 5000 µm TJ-Monopix with synchronization and fixes for improved charge collection

MALTA Telescope System 6 MALTA and Monopix sensor-based planes connected to 6 FPGAS Centralized powering Simulation estimates yield 3.9 um resolution (much efficient than 6 single MALTA sensors) Plan to install at CERN SPS first before apply them on ATLAS ITK Expected Beam Location