Coordinated Ribosomal ITS2 RNA Processing by the Las1 Complex Integrating Endonuclease, Polynucleotide Kinase, and Exonuclease Activities  Lisa Gasse,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Advertisements

Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
The Rb-Related p130 Protein Controls Telomere Lengthening through an Interaction with a Rad50-Interacting Protein, RINT-1  Ling-Jie Kong, Alison R. Meloni,
Purusharth Rajyaguru, Meipei She, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 Provides a Catalytic Mechanism for APC/C Inhibition by the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhanyun Tang, Hongjun Shu, Dilhan Oncel,
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Structure of the Papillomavirus DNA-Tethering Complex E2:Brd4 and a Peptide that Ablates HPV Chromosomal Association  Eric A. Abbate, Christian Voitenleitner,
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Sherilyn Grill, Valerie M. Tesmer, Jayakrishnan Nandakumar 
The Transmembrane Kinase Ire1p Is a Site-Specific Endonuclease That Initiates mRNA Splicing in the Unfolded Protein Response  Carmela Sidrauski, Peter.
The Unstructured C-Terminal Tail of the Clamp Subunit Ddc1 Activates Mec1/ATR via Two Distinct Mechanisms  Vasundhara M. Navadgi-Patil, Peter M.
Gracjan Michlewski, Sonia Guil, Colin A. Semple, Javier F. Cáceres 
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Hung-Ta Chen, Steven Hahn  Cell 
Volume 138, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Joseph D. Mancias, Jonathan Goldberg  Molecular Cell 
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 139, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 91, Issue 4, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (August 2007)
The Intrinsically Disordered Sem1 Protein Functions as a Molecular Tether during Proteasome Lid Biogenesis  Robert J. Tomko, Mark Hochstrasser  Molecular.
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (July 2004)
The Putative RNA Helicase Dbp4p Is Required for Release of the U14 snoRNA from Preribosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae  Martin Koš, David Tollervey 
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Cdc7-Dbf4 Phosphorylates MCM Proteins via a Docking Site-Mediated Mechanism to Promote S Phase Progression  Yi-Jun Sheu, Bruce Stillman  Molecular Cell 
Incorporation of the Rpn12 Subunit Couples Completion of Proteasome Regulatory Particle Lid Assembly to Lid-Base Joining  Robert J. Tomko, Mark Hochstrasser 
Yutian Peng, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell 
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages (June 2010)
Targeted Proteomic Study of the Cyclin-Cdk Module
Hyunsuk Suh, Dane Z. Hazelbaker, Luis M. Soares, Stephen Buratowski 
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Per Stehmeier, Stefan Muller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (May 2007)
Helena Celesnik, Atilio Deana, Joel G. Belasco  Molecular Cell 
Claudia Schneider, James T. Anderson, David Tollervey  Molecular Cell 
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Sichen Shao, Ramanujan S. Hegde  Molecular Cell 
Structure of an RNA Silencing Complex of the CRISPR-Cas Immune System
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 21, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
George Simos, Anke Sauer, Franco Fasiolo, Eduard C Hurt  Molecular Cell 
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
Sebastian Rumpf, Stefan Jentsch  Molecular Cell 
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
James Fishburn, Neeman Mohibullah, Steven Hahn  Molecular Cell 
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
RNA Repair: An Antidote to Cytotoxic Eukaryal RNA Damage
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Presentation transcript:

Coordinated Ribosomal ITS2 RNA Processing by the Las1 Complex Integrating Endonuclease, Polynucleotide Kinase, and Exonuclease Activities  Lisa Gasse, Dirk Flemming, Ed Hurt  Molecular Cell  Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages 808-815 (December 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.021 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2015 60, 808-815DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.021) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 In Vitro ITS2 Processing in Isolated Pre-60S Particles Catalyzed by the Purified Las1 Complex (A) ITS2 processing scheme beginning with 27SB pre-rRNA, the last precursor containing unprocessed ITS2. For full processing scheme, see Figure S1A. (B) Affinity purification of TAP-tagged Las1, Erb1, and Rsa4 from yeast lysates. Eluates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining and subsequently tested for in vitro C2 processing. For Las1-TAP, bands indicated on the right were identified by mass spectrometry. The upper star (∗) marks a Las1 degradation band, the lower star IgG. (C and D) In vitro C2 cleavage catalyzed by the purified Las1-TAP complex using TAP-Erb1 or TAP-Rsa4 particles as a substrate, in the absence or presence of ATP. RNA was analyzed by primer extension to detect 27S, 26S, 25S′ pre-rRNA, and 25S rRNA (C) and northern blotting to detect 7S pre-rRNA, 5.8S, and 5S rRNA (D). (E) High-salt extraction of Las1-TAP yields a Las1-Grc3 heterodimer active in C2 cleavage. Las1-TAP affinity purified in low-salt (100 mM) or high-salt (600 mM NaCl) buffer, as well as TAP-Erb1, was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining. (F and G) In vitro C2 cleavage catalyzed by the purified high-salt or low-salt Las1-TAP using TAP-Erb1 as rRNA substrate, in the absence or presence of ATP. RNA was analyzed by primer extension (F) and northern blotting (G). The white line indicates a superfluous lane that was cut from the picture in both (F) and (G). See also Figure S1. Molecular Cell 2015 60, 808-815DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.021) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Las1 Complex Mutants Mapping in Catalytic Residues Are Non-viable and Defective in ITS2 Processing (A) Affinity purification of TAP-Rsa4/Las1-AID particle and of Las1-Grc3 heterodimers, split-tag affinity purified via wild-type or mutant Las1-TEV-ProtA and Flag-Grc3. Eluates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining and subsequently tested for in vitro C2 processing. (B and C) In vitro C2 cleavage catalyzed by the purified wild-type and indicated Las1 Las1H134A or R129A mutant complexes using TAP-Rsa4/Las1-AID particle as rRNA substrate. RNA was analyzed by primer extension (B) and northern blotting (C). (D) Cell viability of las1 catalytic mutants. LAS1 shuffle strain transformed with plasmids encoding the indicated wild-type and mutant Las1 proteins under endogenous LAS1 promoter control. Transformants were analyzed for growth by spotting in 1/10 dilution series on SDC-Leu (plating control) or on SDC + FOA (5-fluoro-orotic acid) plates (for complementation). They were grown for 2 days at 30°C. (E) Affinity purification of TAP-Rsa4/Las1-AID particle and split-tag affinity purification of four subunit (4su) Las1-Grc3-Rat1-Rai1 complexes via wild-type or mutant Grc3 or Rat1. Eluates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE/Coomassie staining and subsequently tested for in vitro ITS2 processing and mode of pre-rRNA cleavage. The different running behavior of Grc3 in lanes 2–4 versus 5 and 6 is due to using Flag-tagged Grc3 versus untagged Grc3. (F) In vitro ITS2 processing catalyzed by purified Las1 complexes, harboring intact or mutant Grc3 and Rat1 subunits. RNA was analyzed by primer extension. For northern blotting, see Figure S2F. Note that 27S pre-rRNA cleavage was less complete in the case of wild-type Las1 heterotetramer isolated via Rat1 in the second purification step in the absence of ATP, but complete in the presence of ATP. See also Figure S2. Molecular Cell 2015 60, 808-815DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.021) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Las1 Cleaves 27SB Pre-rRNA at Site C2, Leaving a 2′,3′ Cyclic Phosphate at the 3′ End of 7S and Free Hydroxyl Group at the 5′ End of 26S Pre-rRNA Phosphorylated by Grc3 (A) Grc3-dependent phosphorylation of the 5′-OH end of 26S generated by Las1-dependent C2 cleavage. Extracted RNA was analyzed by 6% TBE-Urea PAGE followed by autoradiography. In lanes 6–10, 26S pre-rRNA is only labeled with [γ-32P]ATP if wild-type Grc3 is present (lane 8), but not with mutant Grc3 (lane 9 and 10), although the cleaved fragments are present in all samples containing wild-type Las1 (lanes 2–5), which can be labeled with T4 PNK. (B) Las1 endo-cleavage generates a 2′,3′ cyclic phosphate at the 3′ end of 7S pre-rRNA. Extracted RNA was analyzed by 6% TBE-Urea PAGE followed by autoradiography. Lanes 1 and 2 depict the input of all conditions visualized by labeling the 5′ end with T4 PNK. The 3′ end of 7S pre-rRNA is only accessible for 3′ labeling with T4 RNA ligase after T4 PNK treatment (2′,3′ cyclic phosphatase activity) (lane 10), but not after rSAP treatment (3′ phosphatase activity) (lane 6). (C) Scheme of ITS2 rRNA processing by the ITS2 processome (Las1-Grc3-Rat1-Rai1). Las1 cleaves 27SB pre-RNA into 7S (2′,3′ cyclic phosphate at the 3′ end) and 26S (5′-hydroxy at the 5′ end) pre-rRNA. 26S pre-rRNA is 5′ phosphorylated by Grc3 using ATP and further processed by Rat1-Rai1. See also Figure S3. Molecular Cell 2015 60, 808-815DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.021) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Structural and Biochemical Characterization of the Las1-Grc3-Rat1-Rai1 Complex (A) Y2H interaction between Las1 and Grc3. Y2H plasmids expressing the indicated GAL-BD (GAL4 DNA binding domain) and GAL-AD (GAL4 activation domain) constructs with the indicated amino acid boundaries were transformed into a yeast reporter strain and grown on the indicated plates. Growth on SDC-Ade reveals a strong Y2H interaction. p53-SV40 interaction served as positive control. (B) Multiple sequence alignment of the Las1 C-terminal part, which interacts with Grc3, derived from S. cerevisiae, C. thermophilum, D. rerio, and H. sapiens orthologs using ClustalW2 and Jalview. Multiple sequence alignment of the corresponding full-length Las1 sequences is shown in Figure S4A. (C) Assembly of a stable Grc3-Rat1-Rai1 core complex in the absence of Las1. Split-tag affinity purification of ProtA-TEV-Grc3 in the first and Rat1-Flag in the second step from yeast lysates in the presence (lane 1) and absence (lane 2) of Las1. (D) Electron microscopy of the purified Las1-Grc3-Rat1-Rai1 complex. Upper part, selected class averages of the negatively stained unfixed Las1 complex, split-tag affinity purified via Las1-TEV-ProtA and Rat1-Flag. Lower part, typical class average of the Las1-complex indicating its dimensions, compared to the crystal structure of the S. pombe Rat1-Rai1 heterodimer (Xiang et al., 2009) (red and blue, PDB: 3FQD) and of a Grc3 homology model based on the Clp1 crystal structure (Noble et al., 2007) (green; residues 75–557; obtained by Phyre prediction). For both, the Rat1-Rai1 and Grc3 model density maps were calculated at 30 Å resolution and are shown at the same scale as the EM class average of the Las1 complex. See also Figures S4B and S4C. Molecular Cell 2015 60, 808-815DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.021) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions