Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

Intermediate-level learner

Perception of discriminatory organizational relationships

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

Table 3. Number of MS patients/ Year of diagnosis / Current Residence

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. State Science & Technology Councils in India

Regression Statistics

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

Teachers Response (N= 11)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 8. Drawing result before game

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Acrylic Type SOV SS df MS F–value p–value

student achievement scores

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

Knowledge about elderly care

in the last evaluation of the software

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

Table 2. Regression statistics for independent and dependent variables

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Test of Normality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Population by University

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

Table 1. Demographic Profile of the Respondents

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Training Programs in Management and Leadership

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Behavioral strategies

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Gender N Mean S.D Df t-cal P

Presentation transcript:

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results Source of variation SS Df MS F ratio A (Gender) 0.573 1 0.001* B (Stream of study) 1437.49 2.57* C (Residence) 33.87 0.061* A  B 801.13 1.435* A  C 404.76 0.725* B  C 195.35 0.350* A  B C 1537.73 2.754* Within group 167521.14 300 558.40 * Not significant Dhiman Kar et al. Attitude of University Students towards E-learning in West Bengal. American Journal of Educational Research, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 8, 669-673. doi:10.12691/education-2-8-16 © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing.