TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment: A Mirror with 2 Faces Accountability Reflective Practice.
Advertisements

The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
General Education Assessment AAC&U GE and Assessment Conference March 1, 2007.
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
The CHE’s Accreditation Criteria QA Forum: Professional bodies February 2012.
Standards Definition of standards Types of standards Purposes of standards Characteristics of standards How to write a standard Alexandria University Faculty.
ARMENIA: Quality Assurance (QA) and National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Tbilisi Regional Seminar on Quality Management in the Context of National.
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
The Academic Assessment Process
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
What should be the basis of
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation.
PCTIA Accreditation WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE APPLYING FOR ACCREDITATION.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Applying the Principles of Prior Learning Assessment Debra A. Dagavarian Diane Holtzman Dennis Fotia.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
1.  Accreditation: ◦ Purpose ◦ Guiding Principles  Accreditation Standards Development Working Group ◦ Members ◦ Goals  Proposed Framework for Standards.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
VT University Libraries: Identifying, Teaching, and Assessing What Matters Most Office of Academic Assessment Ray Van Dyke,
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Teaching at the University of Luxembourg: Organization, quality assurance and evaluation of student achievements
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
© 2008, Tod O' Dot Productions EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY – ENTERPRISE COOPERATION NETWORK Socrates Erasmus Programme Project No: Ref LLP
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Monitor and Revise Teaching. ObjectivesObjectives Describe how to monitor teaching List ways to contribute to broader evaluations Explain how to review.
PUBLIC ACCREDITATION AGENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION “Key aspects of quality assessment for teaching and learning in HE” Niko Hyka Innovation and information.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Self Assessment for Pastoral Care
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Programme Review Directorate of Quality Promotion QP_DN.
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
NCEQE Conference 6 December 2016
Information Literacy and Accreditation
Tony Kirchner Developing a Quality Assurance Plan with the Teacher Work Sample as the Linchpin Tony Kirchner
EUR-ACE Engineering Programme Accreditations
Preparing for Higher Education Review (HER)
Guidelines for Self-Assessment at Program Level
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
Assessment and Accreditation
Standard Four Program Impact
What should a decision-maker know?
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
February 21-22, 2018.
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
A Guide to the Sharing Information on Progress (SIP)
Fort Valley State University
Development of Internal Quality Assurance and its Challenges in Taiwan Higher Education from University and Students’ Perspectives Angela Yung Chi Hou.
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS Maha Khachab University of Balamand June 23, 2014

TLQAA Model of Quality Assurance Standards Internal Evaluation Peer Review External Evaluation

Formulation of tlqaa standards Comparative Analysis of International Standards 1st Draft Discussion and Redefinition by Consortium 2nd Draft National Round Table Consensus Reached TLQAA Standards

The TLQAA Standards Elements Mission/ Goals and Objectives Governance Teaching & Learning Academic Programs General Resources Human Resources Students Principles Public disclosure Integrity

TLQAA Standard 3: Teaching & Learning The institution promotes and offers adequate support for teaching and learning effectiveness. The institution promotes active learning, articulates goals, and evaluates student learning based on accepted practices. 3.1.The institution provides evidence for effective teaching in line with academic requests and learning outcomes. 3.2. The institution ensures a climate conducive to teaching and learning effectiveness through qualified faculty, facilities, support units, and administration of institutional affairs. 3.3. The institution develops procedures regulating academic decision-making affecting learning, including service learning, internships, and employment, so as to safeguard the centrality of learning to the institution. 3.4. The institution systematically evaluates student learning and provides evidence of success rates and weaknesses. 3.5. Assessment of student learning is continuous and embedded.

TLQAA Standard 3: Teaching & Learning 3.6. Assessment provides evidence that students have met the knowledge, skills, and competencies consistent with institutional goals and program outcomes at the time of graduation. 3.7. The institution provides evidences on the impact of faculty staff research and their teaching content and methodology. 3.8. The institution provides evidence of student learning opportunities and demonstrates it is achieving its objectives and reaching a good quality of learning. 3.9. The institution shall have procedures whereby it can check that the purpose of any action that it undertakes, including outside work experience, community service, and mobility, is to encourage learning by the student, 3.10. The institution uses of the most appropriate assessment approach for each course and learning outcome.

Internal evaluation process Formation of steering committee TLQAA Procedures and Tools Production & Validation of Internal Evaluation Report

Use of TLQAA Tools for The Self-Study Develop a series of questions and criteria per standard Reflect the extent to which the self-assessment evaluates against the standards Demonstrate the level of achievement of the standards Collect supporting information relevant to each standard Analyze the information Report by synthesizing the information collected and the findings

Questions Associated with Criteria of Standard 9

Self Assessment Report General Structure

Institutional External Evaluation Methodology 1. Document Analysis Self Study Report with supporting Evidence 2. Planning for the Visit Set objectives of the Site Visit Identify Key Stakeholders Referral to standards Develop lists of questions 3. Site Visit Interviews with Key Stakeholders Documentation of findings External Evaluation Report Feedback

Sample Evaluation Form

Sample Evaluation Form

TLQAA External Evaluation Committee Values of Practice Professionalism of Reviewers Vigilance of Chairperson Sharing Know How’s by European Experts Neutrality Attitude Values of Practice

Document References Institutional Evaluation Guide for Preparing a Self Assessment Report (TLQAA pilot evaluation): Towards the Quality Assurance Agency; Lebanon December 2012 Institutional Evaluation Expert Tool: Towards the Quality Assurance Agency; Lebanon May 2013