Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Advertisements

Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
Beam loading compensation 300Hz positron generation (Hardware Upgrade ??? Due to present Budget problem) LCWS2013 at Tokyo Uni., Nov KEK, Junji.
Conventional Source for ILC (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost) Junji Urakawa, KEK LCWS2012 Contents : 0. Short review of 300Hz conventional positron source.
Page 1 Review 09/2010 Overview of MEIC Electron Collider Ring Yuhong Zhang.
Toward a Test Facility for an ERL Circulator Ring Based e-Cooler MEIC Electron Cooler Test Facility Planning Retreat January 31, 2012.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
RF system issues due to pulsed beam in ILC DR October 20, Belomestnykh, RF for pulsed beam ILC DR, IWLC2010 S. Belomestnykh Cornell University.
Synchronization Andrew Hutton Slava Derbenev Yuhong Zhang.
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
Review 09/2010 page RF System for Electron Collider Ring Haipeng Wang for the team of R. Rimmer and F. Marhauser, SRF Institute and Y. Zhang, G. Krafft.
EIC Users Meeting, SBU, 6/27/14 Polarized Electron Beams in the MEIC at JLab Fanglei Lin for MEIC Study Group EIC Users Meeting, Stony Brook University,
MEIC Electron Ring Injection from CEBAF
DTL Option for MEIC Ion Injection Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang Jlab 3/30/
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011.
Jan Low Energy 10 Hz Operation in DRFS (Fukuda) (Fukuda) 1 Low Energy 10Hz Operation in DRFS S. Fukuda KEK.
GDE meeting Beijing (Mar.27, 2010) 1 DRFS LLRF system configuration Shin MICHIZONO KEK LLRF lack layout for DRFS DRFS cavity grouping HLRF requirements.
CEPC SRF System Heat Load CEPC Top-level Parameters related to SRF System (1) ParameterUnitMain Ring Booster Injection Booster Extraction.
A CW Linac scheme for CLIC drive beam acceleration. Hao Zha, Alexej Grudiev 07/06/2016.
1 DR 10 Hz Repetition Rate S. Guiducci (LNF) AD&I webex, 23 June 2010.
Multi-stage pulse compressor
CEPC APDR Study Zhenchao LIU
Outlook of future studies to reach maximum gradient and current
Space Charge Effect Simulation Using DA Based FMM and Electron Cooling Simulation for JLab’s MEIC Project.
XFEL Project (accelerator) Overview and recent developments
PEPPo Based Polarized Positron Beam Formation for JLEIC
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
A Superconducting Proton/Electron Linac
Performance Recovery at CEBAF
ATF project meeting, Feb KEK, Junji Urakawa Contents :
CEPC Ring RF System Jiyuan Zhai (IHEP) Workshop on the Circular Electron Positron Collider Rome, May 25, 2018.
MEIC Polarized Electron Source
CEBAF Pulsed Operation for JLEIC Electron Injection
Polarized Positrons in JLEIC
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
RF Parameters Calculation for JLEIC Colliders (e Ring)
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
DTL for MEIC Ion Injection
JLEIC ion fullsize booster (2256m) space charge limit (Δν=0
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Robinson Instability Criteria for MEIC e Ring
H. Wang1, R. A. Rimmer1, S. Wang1, J. Guo1
Ion bunch formation options for 400GeV JLEIC
Parameters Changed in New MEIC Design
JLEIC 200 GeV Ion Injector Chain and Bunch Formation
Synchronization in MEIC
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
HE-JLEIC: Boosting Luminosity at High Energy
RF Parameters for New 2.2 km MEIC Design
Summary of the maximum SCRF voltage in XFEL
JLEIC CCR Path Length and Gap Formation
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Comments to the Report of the Community Review of EIC Accelerator R&D for the Office of Nuclear Physics, February 13, 2017 (60 pages) By Haipeng Wang,
MEIC low rep-rate operation and path length
Cavity tuning options for synchronization
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Cooling of C6+ ion beam with pulsed electron beam
Transient Beam Loading Effects in RF System for the Electron Storage Rings and its Control Strategies to the MEIC Injection, Storage and Synchronization.
Some Thoughts on the JLEIC Ion Injector
RF Parameters for New 2.2 km MEIC Design
MEIC beam path change with e-ring bypass lines
RF system for MEIC Ion Linac: SRF and Warm Options
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
Beam Synchronization in MEIC: The Problem, Scale and Prospect
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Choice of harmonic number with the consideration of ion beam formation
JLEIC electron ring with damping wigglers
Presentation transcript:

Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang CEBAF Pulsed Mode Operation for MEIC Proof of Principle Study Proposed for FY 2015-16 LDRD Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang

MEIC Conceptual Design IP Future IP Ion Source Booster MEIC Collider Rings 12 GeV CEBAF Halls A, B, C Electron Injector Hall D SRF Linac e-SRF i-SRF + NCRF Crab Cooling Layout is still evolving! Stage I MEIC CEBAF as full-energy e-/e+ injector 3-12 GeV e-/e+ 8-100 GeV protons <40 GeV/u ions Stage II EIC up to 20 GeV e-/e+ up to 250 GeV protons up to 100 GeV/u ions

Bunch Filling Pattern in CEBAF 75.3ms, 10.5 revs in e-ring Bunch train injected into the Figure-8 E-ring Each bunch train 3.233ms ~2X e-ring trans damping time (12-700ms) 72.07ms 7.17µs, 1 rev in e-ring 24.23µs, 6 turns-0.967µs in CEBAF (4.2µs per turn) 51.07ms ~2X e-ring damping time bunch train structure in the CEBAF North linac 0.967ms Each bunch train 3.233µs bunch train structure from the gun 75.3ms, 10.5 turns in e-ring

Requirement for CEBAF Pulsed beam with very low duty factor Beam pulse width shorter than CEBAF rev time, no multi-pass BBU Assume currently CEBAF can get ~1MW CW beam power from the cavities at 3-12 GeV, then we should be able to get ~5.5MW pulsed beam power in the proposed scheme. Must maximize pulsed beam current to the RF power limit, especially at low energy end 𝐼 𝑖𝑛𝑗 ≈ 5.5(MW) 𝐸(GeV) (mA) 𝑇 𝑖𝑛𝑗 ≈2 𝜏 𝑑 𝐼 𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 (mA)𝐸(GeV) 5.5𝑀𝑊

Gradient Droop of Cavities Cavity voltage with time varying beam loading and incident power, on resonance, no phase change 𝑉 𝑐 (t)= 𝑒 − 𝑡− 𝑡 0 𝑇 𝑓 𝑉 𝑐0 + 1 𝑇 𝑓 𝑡 0 𝑡 𝑒 𝑡− 𝑡 0 𝑇 𝑓 2 𝑄 𝐿 𝑄 𝑒 𝑅 𝑄 𝑄 𝑒 𝑃 𝑖𝑛 (𝑡) − 𝑅 𝑄 𝑄 𝐿 𝐼 𝑏 (𝑡)𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜙 𝑑𝑡 For periodical pulsed beam current 𝐼= 𝐼 𝑏 , 𝑛 𝑇 0 <𝑡<𝑛 𝑇 0 + 𝑇 𝑝 0, 𝑛 𝑇 0 + 𝑇 𝑝 <𝑡< 𝑛+1 𝑇 0 If we have a fixed incident power Pin: 𝑉 𝑐 𝑡 = 2 𝑄 𝐿 𝑄 𝑒 𝑃 𝑖𝑛 𝑅 𝑄 𝑄 𝑒 − 𝑒 𝑛 𝑇 0 + 𝑇 𝑝 − 𝑇 0 −𝑡 𝑇 𝑓 𝑉 𝐼 1− 𝑒 − 𝑇 𝑝 𝑇 𝑓 1− 𝑒 − 𝑇 0 𝑇 𝑓 − 𝑉 𝐼 (1− 𝑒 − 𝑇 𝑝 𝑇 𝑓 ),𝑛 𝑇 0 <𝑡<𝑛 𝑇 0 + 𝑇 𝑝 𝑉 𝐼 𝑒 𝑇 0 −𝑡 𝑇 𝑓 (𝑒 𝑇 𝑝 𝑇 𝑓 −1), 𝑛𝑇 0 + 𝑇 𝑝 <𝑡< 𝑛+1 𝑇 0 𝑉 𝐼 = 𝑅 𝑄 𝑄 𝐿 𝐼 𝑏

Gradient Droop of Cavities Example: A typical C100 cavity with max pulsed current (Ib=400 µA), pulse width Tp=10ms, period T0=20ms, Pin=2500W(CW) Ib(A) Vc(MV) T(s) Gradient droop with CW RF for a C100 cavity with typical Qe=3.2×107: Vc(MV) Ib(µA) Tp (µs) T0(ms) ΔVc 13.7 (12GeV w/ margin) 400 10,000 20 59% 13.7 25 10 0.30% 5.0 (~4.8GeV operation) 0.81% 5.0 1000 2.05% Will be worse in C50/C25 due to lower operation gradient CEBAF arc momentum acceptance is ~0.2%

Use feed-forward to eliminate gradient droop To eliminate gradient droop, we need to pulsate the klystron power and keep it synced with beam pulse This could be done with RF feed-forward + pulse-to-pulse feed-back. Klystron power and beam current need to be synced, with RF pulse slightly wider than the beam pulse (so the gradient droop won’t happen within the beam pulse). Pulse to pulse change in delay needs to be controlled to the order of 0.1µs or less For the above RF pulse structure, in the worst case (~3GeV), the finest beam time structure (~1µs pass to pass spacing) will cause the energy droop of ~0.2% in the first arc, but will average out in the higher energy arcs. Shorter pass to pass spacing (slightly larger storage ring) will also help. C100/R100 Qext needs to be lowered with stub-tuners for low gradient/high current operation 2 𝑄 𝐿 𝑄 𝑒 𝑅 𝑄 𝑄 𝑒 𝑃 𝑖𝑛 (𝑡) = 𝑉 𝑐 + 𝑅 𝑄 𝑄 𝐿 𝐼 𝑏 𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜙 24.23µs, 6 turns-0.967µs in CEBAF (4.2µs per turn) ~1X e-ring damping time RF pulse in a typical C100 cavity at 12.5MV 0.4mA synced with bunch train in the CEBAF North linac 0.967ms Each bunch train 3.233µs P=1.44kW P=4.05kW Flat Vc=12.5MV ~1X e-ring damping time ~1X e-ring damping time

Proof of Principle Experiments Goal: confirm that CEBAF cavities can provide the current that meets MEIC electron storage ring injection requirement, providing a maximum of 1.5-2mA pulsed current without significant gradient droop Stage 1: single cavity and single module operation Utilize the injector spectrometer to monitor beam energy droop from quarter module and R-100, up to 25µs and 1.5-2mA beam pulse Apply feed-forward in the injector R100 module and compare the voltage droop to the case w/o feed-forward Stage 2: CEBAF multi-pass pulsed operation with C100s Detune all the C20/C50 Apply feed-forward in C100 cryomodules, and try to get ~2MW (~5GeV 0.4mA) pulsed beam with ~4µs beam pulse width. Lower energy may be tested, but will be limited by the availability of stub tuners.