Gideon v. Cochran “Legal Brief”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supreme Court Case Review The Rights of the Accused
Advertisements

Is the 6th Amendment Right to Counsel (lawyer) a Fundamental Right?
- Clarence Earl Gideon- Age 51 - Panama City, Florida - June 3, Break-in at Pool Room - Stolen Change in Juke Box/Vending Machine.
EOC PRACTICE JUDICIAL 3. EOC JUDICIAL 1.The Supreme Court ruled that an indigent defendant in a criminal trial has a fundamental right to the assistance.
Landmark Supreme Court case: Gideon V. Wainwright
■Essential Question ■Essential Question: –How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? ■Warm-Up Question: –?
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Mr. Blough Academic Civics.
Gideon vs. Wainwright (1963)
6 th Amendment protections, bail, grand jury, jury selections, plea bargaining.
Objective 29L Analyze he rights of the accused as set forth in the 4 th,5 th,6 th,8 th, and 14 th Amendments, including but no limited to such cases as.
The United States Supreme Court The highest court in America.
Miranda v. Arizona. Facts of the Case Police arrest Ernesto Miranda after the victim identifies him in lineup Police interrogate Miranda for two hours.
Gideon Vs Wainwright Louis Jenkins And Jackson Joy.
G IDEON V W AINWRIGHT (1963) Vivian Lee. C ASE O VERVIEW On June 2, 1961, ten dollars and drinks were stolen from a Panama City, Florida, pool hall Clarence.
The Right to Councel. Betts was indicted for robbery and detained in a Maryland jail. Betts was indicted for robbery and detained in a Maryland jail.
Exemplar.  1.Right to an attorney (6 th Amendment) 2.Freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures (4 th Amendment) 3.Freedom from cruel and unusual.
Gideon v. Wainwright Woll Group 2. Facts of the Case Defendant; Clarence Gideon broke in to a pool hall looking or “Kool Aide” money. Defendant; Clarence.
Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.
 What do lawyers do?  How can they be helpful?.
 Between midnight and 8 a.m.  June 30, 1961  Robbery at Bay Harbor Pool Room  Panama city, Florida.
Right to Counsel, Due Process
Unit 4 Lesson 7: Gideon v. Wainwright
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
Selena McClure Period 3rd The Right to An Attorney
By: Allie Tome. FACTS  Palko robbed a store and killed two police officers in his flee  Charged of first degree murder, convicted of second degree murder.
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
Supreme Court Case Study.  Analyze and discuss the system of the utilizing precedent in the American Court System.  Compare and Contrast how different.
Supreme Court Cases of the 60s. Mapp v. Ohio, 1961 What happened? - illegal search of home found “obscene materials”. Mapp was convicted. Brought to court.
The Warren Court and judicial activism “The biggest damn fool mistake I ever made”, Dwight D. Eisenhower on Earl Warren, quoted in 1977 Chief Justice,
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963).
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Judges as Champions of the Constitutional Right to Counsel
Supreme Court Activity: You Decide
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Judicial Branch Famous Trials.
Bill of Rights Study Guide
By Michael Cleary Period 8 10/3/13 College Business Law Mr. Como
Process of Law.
Important Court Cases of the 20th Century
Miranda Warnings.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES:
The Federal Court System
WJES Mrs. Bryant’s 5th Grade Social Studies
By Luke Wilson and Lucas Weaver
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Presented By: Dashawn Currington & Adam Walker
Cody Lee | Reed Elenz | 1st period 1963
Criminal Case Steps Arrested and booked.
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? Warm-Up Question: ?
Criminal Procedure: Theory and Practice, 2d.
Vocabulary Activity Subpoena Indigent Double Jeopardy
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s?
Clarence sues Louie You decide the outcome.
Gideon v Wainright 6th and 14th Amendments.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Defendants’ Rights Edgenuity Lessons 3.4 and 3.5.
Turbulent Times (The 1960s and 1970s
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s?
Rights of the Accused.
Gideon v. Wainwright 1963 Eliseo Lugo III
Miranda v. Arizona Matthew & Noah.
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? Warm-Up Question: ?
Supreme Court Decision and Reasoning
Gideon v. Wainwright The Right to Legal Counsel
The 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments
Presentation transcript:

Gideon v. Cochran “Legal Brief” Facts – what happened? Gideon was charged in a Florida state court with a felony for breaking and entering. Gideon did not have money and could not hire a lawyer to represent him. When Gideon requested the court appoint an attorney for him, the court refused. Florida courts were only obligated to appoint lawyers for poor defendants in capital cases (death penalty). Gideon defended himself in his trial. Gideon was convicted by a jury and the court sentenced him to five years in a state prison.

Gideon v. Cochran “Legal Brief” Issue – what was the Supreme Court being asked to decide? Was Gideon’s right to a fair trial and due process of law (as protected by the 6th and 14th Amendments) violated when the state did not appoint an attorney for him??

Gideon v. Cochran “Legal Brief” Decision – what did the Supreme Court decide? Unanimous opinion The Court said that Gideon had a right to be represented by a court-appointed attorney and, in doing so, overruled its 1942 decision of Betts v. Brady.

Gideon v. Cochran “Legal Brief” Reasoning– what were the constitutional connections, precedents, laws, or other arguments used by the court? The Court found that the 6th Amendment's guarantee of counsel was a fundamental right, essential to a fair trial, which should be made applicable to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.