Volume 16, Issue 16, Pages (August 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (April 2007)
Advertisements

Genetic Specification of Axonal Arbors
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages (August 2014)
Federico Dajas-Bailador, Emma V. Jones, Alan J. Whitmarsh 
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Caroline Medioni, Mirana Ramialison, Anne Ephrussi, Florence Besse 
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
The DHHC Palmitoyltransferase Approximated Regulates Fat Signaling and Dachs Localization and Activity  Hitoshi Matakatsu, Seth S. Blair  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 23, Pages (December 2009)
Naoki Hisamoto, Chun Li, Motoki Yoshida, Kunihiro Matsumoto 
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 25, Issue 19, Pages (October 2015)
Daniel T. Babcock, Christian Landry, Michael J. Galko  Current Biology 
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Vagus Motor Neuron Topographic Map Determined by Parallel Mechanisms of hox5 Expression and Time of Axon Initiation  Gabrielle R. Barsh, Adam J. Isabella,
Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw 
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (May 2005)
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Distinct Protein Domains and Expression Patterns Confer Divergent Axon Guidance Functions for Drosophila Robo Receptors  Bettina Spitzweck, Marko Brankatschk,
Li E. Cheng, Wei Song, Loren L. Looger, Lily Yeh Jan, Yuh Nung Jan 
The Intracellular Domain of the Frazzled/DCC Receptor Is a Transcription Factor Required for Commissural Axon Guidance  Alexandra Neuhaus-Follini, Greg J.
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
Numb Inhibits Membrane Localization of Sanpodo, a Four-Pass Transmembrane Protein, to Promote Asymmetric Divisions in Drosophila  Kate M. O'Connor-Giles,
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Naoki Hisamoto, Chun Li, Motoki Yoshida, Kunihiro Matsumoto 
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages (August 2014)
HBL-1 Patterns Synaptic Remodeling in C. elegans
EB3 Regulates Microtubule Dynamics at the Cell Cortex and Is Required for Myoblast Elongation and Fusion  Anne Straube, Andreas Merdes  Current Biology 
Boss/Sev Signaling from Germline to Soma Restricts Germline-Stem-Cell-Niche Formation in the Anterior Region of Drosophila Male Gonads  Yu Kitadate, Shuji.
Circadian Pacemaker Neurons Change Synaptic Contacts across the Day
BTB/POZ-Zinc Finger Protein Abrupt Suppresses Dendritic Branching in a Neuronal Subtype-Specific and Dosage-Dependent Manner  Wenjun Li, Fay Wang, Laurent.
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Dendrites of Distinct Classes of Drosophila Sensory Neurons Show Different Capacities for Homotypic Repulsion  Wesley B. Grueber, Bing Ye, Adrian W. Moore,
Propagation of Dachsous-Fat Planar Cell Polarity
ELAV, a Drosophila neuron-specific protein, mediates the generation of an alternatively spliced neural protein isoform  Sandhya P. Koushika, Michael J.
Dendrite Self-Avoidance Is Controlled by Dscam
Motion Processing Streams in Drosophila Are Behaviorally Specialized
Volume 25, Issue 20, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Control of Dendritic Field Formation in Drosophila
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Jillian L. Brechbiel, Elizabeth R. Gavis  Current Biology 
Benjamin J. Matthews, Wesley B. Grueber  Current Biology 
Drosophila atonal Fully Rescues the Phenotype of Math1 Null Mice
Aljoscha Nern, Yan Zhu, S. Lawrence Zipursky  Neuron 
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Shigeki Yoshiura, Nao Ohta, Fumio Matsuzaki  Developmental Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 18, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (May 2003)
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
Interaxonal Interaction Defines Tiled Presynaptic Innervation in C
Notch-Dependent Induction of Left/Right Asymmetry in C
Control of Dendritic Field Formation in Drosophila
Volume 22, Issue 19, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 16, Issue 16, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Caroline Medioni, Mirana Ramialison, Anne Ephrussi, Florence Besse 
Different Levels of the Homeodomain Protein Cut Regulate Distinct Dendrite Branching Patterns of Drosophila Multidendritic Neurons  Wesley B Grueber,
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 16, Issue 16, Pages 1678-1683 (August 2006) Control of Axonal Sprouting and Dendrite Branching by the Nrg-Ank Complex at the Neuron-Glia Interface  Misato Yamamoto, Ryu Ueda, Kuniaki Takahashi, Kaoru Saigo, Tadashi Uemura  Current Biology  Volume 16, Issue 16, Pages 1678-1683 (August 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.061 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Development of da Neurons and IgSF Molecule Nrg (A) Peripheral neurons in the embryo were visualized by 22C10 staining. Body axes are indicated. Stained neuronal cell bodies and axon fascicles in an abdominal hemisegment (red box) are schematically drawn. da neurons of individual classes (differentially colored diamonds), multidendritic neurons other than da (white bowl-shape symbols), external sensory neurons (white ovals), and chordotonal neurons (white pen-shaped symbols) are illustrated (adapted from [5]). The box lined in black includes a dorsal cluster. (B) A diagram that illustrates spatial arrangements of epidermal cells, muscles, a peripheral glial cell, and a ddaE. (C) Schematic representation of the two Nrg forms, Nrg180 and Nrg167 (1302 and 1240 amino acids in length, respectively). Amino acid sequences of their intracellular domains are partly distinct because of alternative splicing (white and gray regions) [16]. Mutations of nrg2 and nrg3 are indicated. The epitope of the Nrg180-specific antibody BP104 is localized in an intracellular subregion (red bar) [16]. (D) Comparison of exon-intron structures of the wild-type (OregonR, OR) and the protein-trap line G305X. An EGFP-coding artificial exon (green box) was inserted into an intron in the G305X line [18]. TM indicates the transmembrane region. (E) Western-blot analysis of wild-type (OR) and homozygous G305X pupae. Red arrowheads point to weak signals, probably those of Nrg180::GFP proteins. The amount of proteins in each lane was equivalent to 0.5 pupae. Current Biology 2006 16, 1678-1683DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.061) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Morphological Phenotypes and an Altered Molecular Distribution in ddaE neurons in nrg2 embryos (A–D) Wild-type dorsal dendritic-arborization neuron E (ddaE) (A and B) and those of nrg2 mutants (C and D) in live embryos. Ages of embryos are indicated by hours after egg laying (AEL) at the bottom. Yellow brackets and arrowheads point to dendritic arbors and axons of individual ddaEs, respectively; the blue arrows in (C) and (D) indicate ectopic branches. The base of the axon was very close to the epidermis in the mutant, whereas it was located on a deeper face of the cell body in wild-type animals (compare [A] and [B] with [C] and [D]). Cell bodies of dmd1 neurons are located anterior to ddaEs (Star) [6]. (E–J) Distributions of Nod-ßgal in ddaE of wild-type (E–G) and nrg2 mutant embryos (H–J) at 19–21 hr AEL. ddaE neurons were stained for membrane bound Venus (Venus-pm; [E and H]) and for Nod-ßgal (F and I), and each pair of images was merged (G and J). Yellow dotted lines in (E), (G), (H), and (J) indicate axons, and arrowheads in (H)–(J) point to Nod-ßgal at terminals of an ectopic branch. Genotypes were UAS-Venus-pm/Y; IG1-1/+ (A and B), nrg2 UAS-Venus-pm/Y; IG1-1/+ (C and D), UAS-Venus-pm/Y; IG1-1/+; UAS-nod-lacZ /+ (E-G), and nrg2 UAS-Venus-pm/Y; IG1-1/+; UAS-nod-lacZ/+ (H–J). Scale bar represents 10 μm. Current Biology 2006 16, 1678-1683DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.061) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Rescue of Embryos from the Abnormal Dendritic and Axonal Phenotypes (A–E) HA-tagged Nrg167 was expressed in nrg2 mutant embryos, which were then examined to see whether the dendritic and axonal phenotypes were rescued to normal or not. (A) Nrg167HA was expressed in both ddaE and glia. (B–E) Nrg167HA was expressed under the ubiquitin promoter. It fully recovered the mutant phenotypes (B). (C–E) Nrg167HA protein distribution in the rescued embryo was similar to those of endogenous Nrg167 and Nrg::GFP proteins in the protein-trap line ([C]; compare with Figures S1E and S1F). Small yellow arrows in (C) and (D) point to signals from dendritic branches, and small arrowheads in (D) and (E) point to dendritic terminals that appeared to be very close to, or in contact with, epidermal cell boundaries. The lower part of (E) is a Z section at a line that connects white arrowheads. All images were taken at 19–21 hr AEL, and (A) and (B) were those of cells in live animals. (F) Percentages of ddaE with ectopic branches (left y axis) and the number of second-order branches per ddaE (right y axis). Numbers of ddaE analyzed are indicated. Relevant genotypes were UAS-Venus-pm/Y; IG1-1/+ (WT in [F]), nrg2 UAS-Venus-pm/Y; IG1-1/+ (nrg2 in [F]), nrg2 UAS-Venus-pm/Y; IG1-1/UAS-nrg167HA (Nrg167HA [neuron] in [F]), nrg2 UAS-Venus-pm/Y; IG1-1/UAS-nrg167HA; repo-gal4/+ ([A] and Nrg167HA [neuron & glia] in [F]), and nrg2 UAS-Venus-pm/Y; IG1-1/ubi-nrg167HA ([B–E] and ubi-Nrg167HA in [F]). Scale bars represent 10 μm. Data are presented as means ± standard error (SE). Current Biology 2006 16, 1678-1683DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.061) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Knocking Down ank in ddaE Caused Ectopic Branches (A–E″) Control ddaE (A–A″ and D–D″), nrgRNAi ddaE (B–B″), and ankRNAi ddaE (C–C″ and E–E″) of 3rd-instar larvae were visualized by using Venus-pm ([A–E] and green in [A″]–[E″]) and stained with either Nrg180-specific antibody (BP-104; [A′–C′] and magenta in [A″]–[C″]) or antibody specific for the long form of Ank2 (Ank2long; [D′ and E′] and magenta in [D″] and [E″]). Isoforms were generated by alternative splicing from the ank2 gene [23]. We confirmed that Ank2 short form was also reduced in ankRNAi ddaE (data not shown). Asterisks in this figure indicate cell bodies of ddaE. (F) ankRNAi ddaE with an ectopic branch. In this figure, the yellow arrowheads point to axons, and the blue arrows indicate ectopic branches. This image is of a living 3rd-instar larva. (G) Percentages of ddaE with ectopic branches in 3rd-instar larvae of individual genotypes, except for nrgRNAi (ddaE & glia), in which case 19–20-hr-AEL embryos were used. (nrgRNAi [ddaE & glia] died before 2nd-instar stage.) Numbers of ddaE analyzed are indicated. Asterisks indicate p < 0.05 (ANOVA), and ns denotes not significant. (H and I) ddaE with an ectopic branch in a nrgRNAi (ddaE & glia) embryo (H) and a part of its tracing with green and magenta for neuronal and glial morphology, respectively (I). Under our experimental conditions, glia were more faintly labeled than ddaE. Relevant genotypes were UAS-Venus-pm/Y; IG1-1/+ ([A–A″ and D–D″] and control in [G]), UAS-Venus-pm/Y; IG1-1/nrgRNAi; nrgRNAi/+ ([B–B″] and nrgRNAi [ddaE] in [G]), UAS-Venus-pm/Y; IG1-1/+; ankRNAi ankRNAi/+ ([C–C″, E–E″, and F] and ankRNAi [ddaE] in [G]), UAS-Venus-pm/Y; IG1-1/ nrgRNAi; repo-gal4/nrgRNAi ([H and I] and nrgRNAi [ddaE & glia] in [G]). Scale bars represent 10 μm (A–E″, H, and I) and 40 μm (F). Current Biology 2006 16, 1678-1683DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.061) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions