The Annual Report to Congress on IDEA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation to: Title I Program Conference & Annual Homeless Liaison Conference Presented by: Ruth Cantor, Program Consultant, Babies Can’t Wait Erica.
Advertisements

Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
LAW REVIEW By Monica Soto SERP301A September 11, 2006.
News You Can Use: Family Engagement and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Melody Musgrove, Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
The Early Learning Challenge Fund: Metrics and Data Danielle Ewen February 22, 2010.
Using State Data to Inform Parent Center Work. Region 2 Parent Technical Assistance Center (PTAC) Conference Charleston, SC June 25, 2015 Presenter: Terry.
Monitoring Significant Disproportionality in Special Education Systems Performance Review & Improvement Fall Training 2011.
Significant Disproportionality Symptoms, Remedies and Treatments.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Spring 2012.
Kathy Hebbeler SRI International February 17, 2010 Characteristics of Children Served in Part C.
Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Maryland IDEA Scorecard Data Driven Decision Making Nancy.
Equity in IDEA ___________________ NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Michael Yudin Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Ruth.
State Advisory Panel & Interagency Coordinating Council Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)Significant Disproportionality & Overview of SAP/ICC Website.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems The Importance of Personnel Data Donna Spiker Co-Director, DaSy Center OSEP 2016 Virtual leadership Conference.
MADSEC June 22, 2016 Janice E. Breton State Director of Special Services.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Using Integrated Data to Support the Transitions in Special Education Wednesday, July 13, :00 –
Agenda Part I Recap of the Final Rule Part II Standard Methodology Part III Remedies Part IV Dates Part V Questions.
Time for Change: Examining Utah Data Relating to Student Performance
Educator Equity Resource Tool: Using Comprehensive Equity Indicators
What Data Can Tell Us – and What It Can’t
Proposed Significant Disproportionality New Data Collection Presenters: Robert Trombley, Richelle Davis.
Comprehensive CEIS and CEIS: Requirements, Challenges, and Resources
Indiana (8 Counties, Southeastern)
Part C Data Managers — Review, Resources, and Relationship Building
DISPROPORTIONALITY REGULATIONS
New Significant Disproportionality Regulations
Using Formative Assessment
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference Aug , 2016
Legal Foundations of Special Education
CClick here to get started
Technology Solutions for Early Childhood Symposium
What’s New in the IDC Part C Exiting Data Toolkit
Educator preparation policy as a lever for improving teacher and leader preparation: Keeping promises in Tennessee Collaboration for Effective Educator.
Agenda Part I Significant Disproportionality Part II Equity in IDEA Final Rule Overview Part III Standard Methodology Part IV Data Reporting Part V Questions.
Module 1 Federal Legislation and Florida State Process
Part C State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report:
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Questions, Data, and Reports: Connecting the Data Dots Using the DaSy Framework System Design and Development Subcomponent Taletha Derrington and Kathleen.
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Child Outcomes Data: A Critical Lever for Systems Change
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
OSEP Initiatives on Early Childhood Outcomes
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Why Collect Outcome Data?
Early Childhood and Family Outcomes
NC Preschool Pyramid Model Leadership Team Summit January 9-10, 2019
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Overview of the National deaf-blind child count
2019 OSEP Leadership Conference
Head Start Research Conference Washington, DC July 2014
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Christina Kasprzak Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Section 618 Public Reporting Requirements Thursday, September 11, 2014
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
No Two Shortages Are The Same: Using Educator Data To Target Efforts
A Parent (Center) at the Table: Building SEA & IHE Collaborations
Using Data to Build LEA Capacity to Improve Outcomes
2019 OSEP Leadership Conference
Significant Disproportionality Fiscal Webinar
Significant Disproportionality Stakeholder Meeting
Significant Disproportionality
Examining Data for the 1% Waiver
Alignment Across the Ages
Presentation transcript:

The Annual Report to Congress on IDEA Uses Outside the Beltway 2019 OSEP LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE

2019 OSEP Leadership Conference DISCLAIMER: The contents of this presentation were developed by the presenters for the 2019 OSEP Leadership Conference. However, these contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)

Presenters Richelle Davis, OSEP Jennifer Sargent, New Editions Consulting, Inc. Linda Lynch, Westat

The Annual Report to Congress on IDEA: What Do You Know? Raise your hand if you….. Have heard of the Annual Report to Congress (ARC) on IDEA Know where to find the ARC online Are already using the ARC in your job

Agenda What is the Annual Report to Congress (ARC) on IDEA? Purpose Contents Where to find it online Why should you care about the ARC? How can you use the ARC?

Purpose of the ARC (1/2) Describe our nation’s progress in Providing early intervention services to infants, toddlers, and their families and a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) for children with disabilities Ensuring that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected Assisting States and localities in providing for the education of all children with disabilities Assessing the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities

Purpose of the ARC (2/2) The report provides information that will lead to improvements in early intervention and educational results and functional outcomes for infants, children, and youth with disabilities ED is required by law to report to Congress and the public each year on the progress of implementing IDEA Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (P.L.94-142) Reaffirmed in December 2004 reauthorization as IDEA (P.L. 108-446) Production of the 41st ARC is underway

Contents of the ARC (1/3) Section I: The national picture (51 exhibits) Section II: The State picture (31 exhibits) Section III: Findings and determinations (13 exhibits)

Contents of the ARC (2/3) Section IV: Research under Part E of the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 Section V: Studies and evaluations under IDEA Section 664 Section VI: Extent and Progress of Assessment of National Activities

Contents of the ARC (3/3) Appendix A: Infants, Toddlers, Children, and Students Served Under IDEA, by Age Group and State Appendix B: Developmental Delay Data for Children Ages 3 Through 5 and Students Ages 6 Through 9 Served Under IDEA, Part B  Appendix C: Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Reduction and Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS)

The ARC Is Available Online 23 years of Annual Reports to Congress online https://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/index.html State-level data files (.csv files) http://www2.ed.gov/programs/osepidea/618-data/state-level-data- files/index.html IDEA static tables (Excel files) http://www2.ed.gov/programs/osepidea/618- data/static-tables/index.html

Why You Should Care About the ARC (1/2) Fulfills statutory requirement that ED report to Congress annually on the implementation of IDEA across the country Confirms that OSEP uses the data States report to meet high-stakes needs Confirms the importance of continued efforts to improve the quality of 618 data States report to OSEP

Why You Should Care About the ARC (2/2) Provides a resource for national and State IDEA data and related information Summarizes what the Department believes Congress wants to know about efforts to serve the educational needs of children with disabilities

Top 5 Reasons to Use the ARC Concise presentation of a lot of information National and state-level data available Standardized from year to year to increase accessibility and use Highly informative exhibit notes Intensive multi-level Department review and approval process

How the ARC Can Inform Data-driven Decisions Examples of national policy decisions Identification of disabilities Educational settings Exiting Comparisons of your State vs. others Determinations

How the ARC Can Address Specific Questions of Interest (1/2) Are there any interesting results in the data about infants and toddlers birth through age 2 served under IDEA Part C? Numbers and Percentages Served: relatively stable, with a very slight and slow increase in the percent of the population served over the last 10 years Primary Service Settings: nearly 90 percent of infants and toddlers served under IDEA, Part C received services in the home in the fall of 2016 Exiting: Part B eligible, exiting Part C accounted for the largest percentage (36.4%) of infants in toddlers in school year 2015-16

How the ARC Can Address Specific Questions of Interest (2/2) Are there any interesting trends in the disability categories for students age 6 through 21 served under IDEA Part B? Autism: Steady increase in the percentage of the population of students reported in the category of autism Other Health Impairment: Steady increase in the percentage of the population of students reported in the category of other health impairment (more level trend for ages 18 through 21) Specific Learning Disability: General decease, leveling out, then slight increase in the percentage of the population of students reported in the category of specific learning disability

How the ARC Presents Complex Data Ratios and percentages 10-year trends at the national-level Comparison between two points in time at the state-level Risk ratios

Example of Risk Ratios Race/ethnicity Child counta in the 50 states and DC Resident population ages 3 through 5 in the 50 states, DC, and BIEb Risk indexc (%) Risk index for all other racial/ethnic groups combinedd (%) Risk ratioe Total 744,414 11,718,379 6.4 † American Indian or Alaska Native 8,230 98,419 8.4 6.3 1.3 Asian 29,045 584,469 5.0 0.8 Black or African American 100,622 1,628,388 6.2 1.0 Hispanic/Latino 182,039 3,074,512 5.9 6.5 0.9 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 1,787 23,889 7.5 1.2 White 391,508 5,761,388 6.8 1.1 Two or more races 31,184 547,314 5.7

How the ARC Can Help Identify Data Quality Issues Exhibit Notes Data are not available Data were excluded

How the ARC Can Help You Understand Determinations Section III presents History of determinations process Current determinations process Determinations for each State Changes in determinations at the national level Status of two Part B and two Part C indicators at the national level

How the ARC Can Help You Locate Ongoing Studies or Evaluations Sections IV, V, and VI Concise summaries of studies and evaluations Links to websites with more detailed information about these studies and evaluations, including study reports

Summary We described the purpose, contents, and online location of the ARCs We proposed reasons the ARC may be a valuable resource to you We provided some specific examples of how you and other stakeholders can use the ARC for different purposes We hope you will download the ARC and explore its contents further

Discussion 1/2 Question: How can you use the ARC in your work as State or local special education director or early intervention program staff Parent Training Center director and staff Part B and Part C data manager TA providers State Advisory Council and State Coordinating Council members Researchers OSEP and U.S. Department of Education staff Other stakeholders

Discussion 2/2 Question: What specific questions of interest in your State or program do you have that the ARC can help answer?

For More Information Jennifer Sargent: jsargent@neweditions.net Richelle Davis: Richelle.Davis@ed.gov Linda Lynch: lindalynch@westat.com

2019 OSEP Leadership Conference DISCLAIMER: The contents of this presentation were developed by the presenters for the 2019 OSEP Leadership Conference. However, these contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)