Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY
Advertisements

1 Stormwater Program Videoconference April 23, 2013 Bill Cole, Water Quality Standards Unit.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Sublethal Limitations Workgroup January 19, 2010 (please sign in and include an address)
What's New for Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Bill Dimond MDEQ Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory.
Whole Effluent Toxicity NPDES Program
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing Water Quality Standards Workgroup Meeting June 26, 2007.
Clean Water Act Section 402 Issues Facing Kentucky Kentucky Professional Engineers in Mining Seminar September 6, 2013 Lloyd Cress, Kentucky Coal Association.
Low Flow Calculations In NPDES permits the permitted industry or municipality must meet certain requirements with regards to the toxicity of their effluent.
CHEE 370 Waste Treatment Processes
Whole Effluent Toxicity
©Lloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C. Presented by: LAUREN KALISEK (512) Congress Avenue Suite 1900 Austin, Texas.
Water Quality Standards and MS4 Storm Water Permitting.
Whole Effluent Toxicity and How It May Help You & One City’s Experience Evaluating Unfamiliar Wastestreams Presented By Lyle Milby City of Norman Environmental.
Critical Conditions Review
Philip Markle Environmental Scientist
Chronic Estuarine & Marine Silver Toxicity: Water Quality Parameters as Modifying Factors T.J. Ward, R.L. Boeri T.R. Wilbury Laboratories C. Hogstrand.
and Environmental Risk Assessment
WQBELs Karen Holligan May 6, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
Implementation of Antidegradation Policies for Indiana Waters.
Status of the WET Program William Telliard Director, Analytical Methods USEPA Office of Science & Technology Office of Water.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
Environmental Policy Agencies, Laws, and Issues. Policy Policy: an outline of actions, incentives, penalties, and rules that a company, group, or government.
STATUS OF ECOLOGY’S DRAFT FLOW BLENDING POLICY WATER QUALITY PARTNERSHIP MEETING January 20, 2005.
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Implementation Procedures (IPs) Brittany Lee Standards Implementation Team
Guide to Selecting Qualified WET Laboratories Robert N. Brent, Ph.D. DynCorp Science and Engineering Group.
SWAMP Statewide Monitoring Programs Statewide Monitoring Programs Regional Monitoring Programs Regional Monitoring Programs Infrastructure & Tools Infrastructure.
Toward the development of northern water standards presentation to the MVLWB December 5, 2007 Kathleen Racher Water Resources Division.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
Implementation Procedures Comment Period: 1/19/10 - 3/17/10 Draft IPs available at: Electronic comments may be.
1 Dr. Richard Reiss Sciences International, Inc. October 20, 2005 Environmental Safety of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients.
WET Permitting and Limits Phillip Jennings (6WQ-PO) Whole Effluent Toxicity Coordinator US EPA Region Ross Ave. Dallas, TX P F
1 PARCC Data Privacy & Security Policy December 2013.
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Critical Conditions Review Jeff Borski │ Water Quality Assessment Team.
Bacteria Rulemaking Inclusion of Bacteria Limits in TPDES Permits.
EPA’s WET Interlaboratory Variability Study Findings Marion Kelly USEPA Office of Science & Technology Office of Water.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
30 TAC Chapter 307 Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Workgroup meeting March 7, 2007.
 40 CFR § (d)(1)(v) “(W)hen the permitting authority determines, using the procedures in paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section, toxicity testing.
 40 CFR § (d)(1)(v) “(W)hen the permitting authority determines, using the procedures in paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section, toxicity testing.
TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed Linda Pardy (858) Jimmy.
FTIP/FSTIP Amendment Caltrans Checklist LILIBETH GREEN CALTRANS, OFFICE OF FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (916) OR
Connie Brower NC DENR Division of Water Resources.
WQBELs Karen Holligan September 23, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
Revisions to: The Procedures to Implement the Surface Water Quality Standards Mrs. Brittany M. Lee Standards Implementation Team Phone:
 40 CFR § (d)(1)(v) “(W)hen the permitting authority determines, using the procedures in paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section, toxicity testing.
The Safe Drinking Water Act (1974, 1984, & 1996) By: Cat Pittard, APES.
Integrated Watershed Management
Submittal And Review Of New And Revised Water Quality Standards
Water Quality Standards Submittal & Review Process
Module 17: MIXING ZONES A limited area or volume of water where initial dilution of a discharge takes place and where numeric water quality criteria.
Planning Commission Public Hearing September 9, 2016
State of Minnesota Section 404 Assumption Feasibility Study
Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering
Critical Conditions Review
PNW SETAC Vancouver, WA April 2011
Water Quality Credit Trading
الاسبوع الإرشادي.
MINISTRY OF JUSTICE, LEGAL & PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS
Report of Proceedings Surface Water Quality Standards Triennial Review Environmental Management Commission November 13, 2014 Steve Tedder – EMC Hearing.
Waters of the U.S. Updates and Changes
Spencer Bohaboy Policy Development Specialist Water Quality Policy
Low Flow Calculations In NPDES permits the permitted industry or municipality must meet certain requirements with regards to the toxicity of their effluent.
EPA Region IV and ADEM NPDES Permit Coordination
Westcas position paper
Update on Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET)
TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair Water Quality Division
Update on Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET)
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Presentation transcript:

Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET)

WET and the IPs WET implementation must conform to: The method manuals The Standards EPA Region VI

Method Manuals

The Standards

EPA Region VI Approves Standards and IPs 2005 WET Policy December 28, 2015 letter 1998 Memorandum of Agreement

IPs Within those constraints, we are free to propose policy and procedures. Several examples will be presented.

Acceptability Criteria Hypothesis Testing (NOEC) CV PMSD Point Estimate (IC25)

Menu 2 Intermittent stream (Menu 1) within 3 miles of perennial waters (Menu 3) Normally requires chronic testing to protect the aquatic life of the perennial waters… Except when the discharge flow is <10% of the 7Q2 of the RW, then requires 48-hour acute testing at 100%

Type of Test Freshwater vs. Saltwater Testing 1 ppt vs 2 ppt Reproduction in the water flea, Ceriodaphnia dubia

WET Determination Federal law requires WET testing for all EPA-designated majors The IPs allow us to also require some industrial minors to perform WET testing 24-hour acute also used at discretion

IPs and Stakeholders We value the input of our Stakeholders. Now is the time to start thinking about any changes you would like to see and propose them when the draft IPs are issued.

SUMMARY The IPs are guidance, not rule, which we mostly adhere to. However, being guidance, they can be flexible and can change over time, especially with stakeholders input. Michael Pfeil (512) 239-4592