On behalf of the STEAM team

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
System Simulation made easy by Electric Circuits Electronics, Power Electronics, Machines, Semiconductors... Thermal Networks Conduction, Convection,
Advertisements

Properties of cast resin transformers
MQXF Quench Protection Analysis HiLumi workshop – KEK, Tsukuba Vittorio Marinozzi 11/18/2014.
Zian Zhu Superconducting Solenoid Magnet BESIII Workshop Zian Zhu Beijing, Oct.13,2001.
MUTAC Review, 9 April MuCOOL and MICE Coupling Magnet Status Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA
The 23 rd MICE Collaboration Meeting -1- ICST/HIT Jan.13 to 17, Harbin/China Large Prototype Coil Test and Plan Fengyu Xu Institute of Cryogenics.
Twin Solenoid Twin Solenoid - conceptual design for FCC-hh detector magnet - Matthias GT Mentink Alexey Dudarev Helder Pais Da Silva Leonardo Erik Gerritse.
Possibilities of Finite Element Modelling for a Better Understanding of Heat Transfer in Rutherford-Type Cables The use of COMSOL Multiphysics as an analysis.
1 QXF heater proposal M. Marchevsky, H. Felice, T. Salmi, D. Cheng, G. Sabbi, LBNL.
MQXF state of work and analysis of HQ experimental current decays with the QLASA model used for MQXF Vittorio Marinozzi 10/28/
3 Nov 2006S. Kahn -- Quench Protection1 Quench Protection of the 50 T HTS Solenoid Steve Kahn Muons Inc. 3 November 2006.
A novel model for Minimum Quench Energy calculation of impregnated Nb 3 Sn cables and verification on real conductors W.M. de Rapper, S. Le Naour and H.H.J.
Davide Tommasini Nb3Sn versus NbTi in HeII THERMOMAG-07, Paris 19 November 2007 Typical insulations for Rutherford cables Heat transfer model Heat flux.
LMC 30 LPC A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 30 Sept 2009, LMC meeting 1.9 K, 0 T, 7.5 kA run Heat pulse.
1 Numerical study of the thermal behavior of an Nb 3 Sn high field magnet in He II Slawomir PIETROWICZ, Bertrand BAUDOUY CEA Saclay Irfu, SACM Gif-sur-Yvette.
Thermal and electrical analysis of superconducting magnets Some available tools and results L. Bottura Review on the Thermal Stability of Superconducting.
HFM High Field Model, EuCARD WP7 review, 20/1/2011, Philippe Fazilleau, 1/16 EuCARD-WP7-HFM Dipole Conceptual Review Nb 3 Sn dipole protection Philippe.
MQXF protection – comparison between 1 or 2 power supplies Vittorio Marinozzi 06/08/
LQ Quench Protection – G. Ambrosio 1 LQ DS video Mtg – May. 23, 2007 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Quench Protection Giorgio Ambrosio LQ DS.
1 Feb 2007S. Kahn -- Quench Protection1 Quench Protection for Very High Field Magnets using HTS Conductors Stephen Kahn Muons Inc. NFMCC UCLA Meeting 1.
E. Todesco PROTECTION IN MAGNET DESIGN E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With help from B. Auchmann, L. Bottura, H. Felice, J. Fleiter, T. Salmi, M.
WAMSDO-2013, New Techniques, GdR WAMSDO, January 2013 Gijs de Rijk CERN 1 NEW TECHNIQUES.
QXF quench heater delay simulations Tiina Salmi, T. Salmi.
Modelling and testing of circuit protection of new superconducting magnets for the HL-LHC project 1 st Workshop FTEC 2015 Alejandro Fernandez Navarro.
FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 1/19 FRESCA II Dipole review March 28 th, CERN Magnet protection Protection studies.
TE-MPE -EI 23/6/2011,Antonopoulou Evangelia RQS circuit Simulation results of Quench Antonopoulou Evangelia June 2011 Thanks to E. Ravaioli.
LHC circuit modeling Goal: Create a library of electrical models and results for each circuit Useful and usable for the next 20 years…… Web site cern.ch/LHC-CM.
P. P. Granieri 1,2, M. Breschi 3, M. Casali 3, L. Bottura 1 1 CERN, Geneva, CH 2 EPFL-LPAP, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, CH 3 University.
TE-MPE –EI, TE - MPE - TM 8/12/2011, Antonopoulou Evelina RQS circuit Simulation results Antonopoulou Evelina December 2011 Thanks to E. Ravaioli.
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. Acoustic Emission Characterization in Superconducting Magnet Quenching Arnaldo Rodriguez-Gonzalez Instrumentation Meeting Presentation.
Study of the HTS Insert Quench Protection M. Sorbi and A. Stenvall 1 HFM-EuCARD, ESAC meeting, WP 7.4.1CEA Saclay 28 feb. 2013,
HQ02A2 TEST RESULTS November 7, 2013 FERMILAB. HQ02 test at Fermilab 2  First HQ quadrupole with coils (#15-17, #20) of the optimized design o Only coil.
SC Undulators protection and commissioning W. Venturini Delsolaro Acknowledgements: R. Denz, R. Maccaferri.
Thermal screen of the cryostat Presented by Evgeny Koshurnikov, GSI, Darmstadt September 8, 2015 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna)
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 Quench Protection of Long Nb 3 Sn Quads Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab.
FNAL Workshop, July 19, 2007 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V.Kashikhin 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole (ILC HGQ1) V. Kashikhin.
The most likely cause of death for a superconducting magnet Input data for thermal modeling of Nb 3 Sn Superconducting Magnets by Andrew Davies Find the.
CHATS-AS 2011clam1 Integrated analysis of quench propagation in a system of magnetically coupled solenoids CHATS-AS 2011 Claudio Marinucci, Luca Bottura,
Matthias Mentink Education / Job experience
Equivalent lumped-element
Massimo Sorbi on behalf of INFN team:
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Milan Majoros, Chris Kovacs, G. Li, Mike Sumption, and E.W. Collings
Status of QLASA Tool Adapter
11T Magnet Test Plan Guram Chlachidze
Quench Simulation at GSI
Quench estimations of the CBM magnet
Maxwell 3D Transient.
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Protection of FCC 16 T dipoles
Development of the Canted Cosine Theta Superconducting Magnet
Quench protection of the MAGIX high-order correctors
Mechanical Modelling of the PSI CD1 Dipole
Nb-Ti Strand and 2D magnet coil
Naoyuki Amemiya Kyoto University
Update on circuit protection simulations of the HL-LHC Inner Triplet circuit Matthias Mentink, Circuit specifics + STEAM simulations: Samer Yammine, LEDET.
Matthias Mentink Education / Job experience
Circuits description and requirements - Closed Session-
Status of studies on FCC magnet circuit architecture and protection
Detailed global view on protection and detection of the circuits
Using the code QP3 to calculate quench thresholds for the MB
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
The superconducting solenoids for the Super Charm-Tau Factory detector
PANDA solenoid quench calculations
Quench calculations of the CBM magnet
Simulations of failure cases 1st STEAM Workshop June 2019
BBQ (BusBar Quench) 1st STEAM Workshop June 2019
STEAM Apps 1st STEAM Workshop June 2019
Online data analysis Franco J. Mangiarotti CERN – TE-MSC-TF
Presentation transcript:

On behalf of the STEAM team cern.ch/STEAM ProteCCT (Protection of Canted-Cosine-Theta-type Magnets) 1st STEAM Workshop 13-14 June 2019 Matthias Mentink, On behalf of the STEAM team

Overview Motivation Thermal aspects Internal circuit / Co-simulation User interface Complexities + correction factors: Oversimplified model of eddy currents in the formers  Correction factor fLoopFactor Additional helium present between the (non-bonded) formers and outer cylinder  Correction factor addedHeCpFrac Simulation vs. experimental observations Running the model Demonstration Summary

Motivation Why STEAM-ProteCCT? Canted-Cosine-Theta (CCT) magnets: superconducting strand inside slots in conductive former [1] Insulated Nb-Ti/Cu strand Aluminum former Why STEAM-ProteCCT? Canted Cosine Theta Magnets: Concentric superconducting coils held in place by conductive aluminum formers Quench protection of MCBRD Twin Aperture Orbit Correctors for HL-LHC upgrade and other future CCT-type magnets Magnet is discharged over energy extractor Eddy currents in the conductive formers  Heating in formers  Fast development of normal zone throughout superconducting coils (Quench-back) Complex three-dimensional geometry  Quench simulation with STEAM-ProteCCT CCT coils Formers Eddy currents in the formers Eddy currents in formers surrounding CCT coils during discharge (Field, courtesy J. van Nugteren) [1] G. Kirby et al. IEEE Trans. on Appl. Supercond. 28, p. 4002205 (2018)

Thermal aspects Turn-to-turn periodic boundary condition Thermal layout [1] Three-dimensional thermal propagation in simplified geometry [2] Longitudinal heat propagation along length of strands, insulation, and formers Transverse heat propagation Individual thermal elements for strands, insulation, formers, former insulation Heat flow to the bath: 1.9 K: Kapitza + film boiling cooling, 4.5 K: Nucleate + film boiling Periodic boundary condition: Simulation of single turn per former to simulate entire magnet Non-linear magnetic-field- and temperature-dependent properties taken from STEAM library and LEDET material database [2] M. Mentink et al. IEEE Trans. on Appl. Supercond. 28, p. 4004806 (2018)

Internal circuit / Co-simulation Main circuit with CCT coils: Inductance, internal resistance, crowbar and dump resistor Formers + outer cylinder: Inductively coupled to main circuit M Circuit types: Internal circuit: inductance of CCT coils, internal resistance, crowbar, dump resistor + switch External circuit: ProteCCT takes external current waveform (co-simulation) Both cases: Main circuit (CCT coils) inductively coupled to formers and outer cylinder Adaptive time-stepping (constraints on maximum dT/dt, maximum dI/dt in formers, user-specified dt) Representation of internal circuit

Model input: Excel file User interface ProteCCT user manual [3] All user input is taken from a single Excel file (inspired by LEDET user interface) Co-simulation: Tool exchanges information through text-files For the most part, easy-to-understand parameters (Conductor RRR, Operating current, etc.) Model input: Excel file [3] M. Mentink, “STEAM-ProteCCT User manual”, EDMS nr. 2160020, (2019)

Complexity & correction factor #1: fLoopFactor Coupling-matrix calculated in Comsol, assuming simplified 2D geometry with cos-θ current distribution Determination of fLoopFactor by matching to experimentally observed low-current discharge (no quench-back) Coupling matrix: Calculated in Comsol, assuming simplified 2D geometry with cos-θ current distribution in the coils, formers, and outer cylinder [3] Assumption: Eddy current flows axially through formers Reality: Eddy current model is oversimplified, so global correction factor fLoopFactor needed that augments the effective path lengths of the eddy currents fLoopFactor determined by matching discharge to experimental result at low current without quench-back [3] M. Mentink, “STEAM-ProteCCT User manual”, EDMS nr. 2160020, (2019)

Complexity & correction factor #2: addedHeCpFrac Sliding and deformation of formers during powering (Courtesy Martin Novak) Liquid helium between formers Simulated vs. Observed onset of Quench back (Measurement data: Courtesy F. Mangiarotti) In addition to helium to bath cooling: Additional liquid helium present between non-bonded formers and outer cylinder  Slows down quench-back onset Extra helium heat capacity: 0.13 MPa liquid + gas, with inclusion helium gas enthalpy Added as global correction factor addedHeCpFrac  Additional heat capacity in formers (~0.6%) Determination of correction factor by matching quench back onset tQB at I0 = 400 A, 1.9 K, 1.43 Ω  Used as a global parameter

Simulation vs. Experimental observation MCBRDp1 prototype, discharge over 1.43 Ω dump resistor MCBRDp1 prototype, discharge over Metrosil varistor MCBRDs1b short model, discharge over Metrosil varistor Comparison between simulation and experimental (MCBRD prototype apertures and short models): High degree of consistency between simulations and experimental observations Checked for: Different magnetic lengths, former material types, operating temperatures, varying dump resistors + Metrosil varistors, operating currents Two fixed global correction parameters fLoopFactor and addedHeCpFrac for all cases Measurement data: Courtesy F. Mangiarotti

Running the simulation Voltage-to-ground calculation (During simulation, t = 50 ms) Strand temperature development (During simulation, t = 50 ms) Very fast: Typically no more than few minutes to run Free-to-use standalone executable, no license required (Does require MCR installation) During simulation: Optional plotting of voltage-to-ground and strand temperature for each time-step Simulation output written to excel file: Time-dependent Current, hot-spot temperature, voltage-to-ground of selected turns, etc

Demo: MCBRDp1 ProteCCT is found on STEAM website: cern.ch/steam Command prompt output Voltage distribution in magnet during simulation, t = 50 ms Strand temperature development during simulation, t = 50 ms ProteCCT is found on STEAM website: cern.ch/steam Manual: EDMS Nr. 216002 (link of STEAM website) Simulation tool available of steam website Running requires installation of Matlab runtime (see Matlab runtime.txt)

Eddy currents in the formers Summary CCT coils Formers Eddy currents in the formers ProteCCT Simulation tool for evaluating discharge of CCT-type magnets (With quench-back from conductive formers) Very fast, standalone executable User-interface: Input from Excel, output to Excel (plus optional plotting during execution) Available on STEAM website (cern.ch/steam) Free to use, but please reference to ProteCCT manual when used for publications / presentations Future development User interface development Automatically generated reports Suggestions?