Divergent social contracts: Rousseau and The Federalist papers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why do we need a government?
Advertisements

Jean-Jacques Rousseau ( )
Jean Jacques Rousseau French Contemporary of Voltaire
POLITICAL PHILOSOPHERS 101
Common Property Resources held in common and available for use by all or any members of society with few restrictions except to prevent exclusive use or.
Proposal That all laws be enacted by the general will. This is not mere absolute democracy, as the will is ‘general’ in two senses:
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Rousseau on Self-Government and Self-Education John Zumbrunnen Department of Political Science.
Do Now Why is it written in the law that it is illegal to kill someone?* *your answer should be 2-3 complete sentences 5 minutes.
By: nadroJ, kciN, ydoC, celA, nitsuJ, Sakajausa.  Born June 28 th 1712 In Geneva in the Republic of Geneva  Died July 2 nd 1778 in the Kingdom of France.
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
The Birth of Modern Political Theory
TWO VIEWS OF GOVERNMENT
Ideological Philosophers Hobbes, Locke, & Rousseau answer the three big questions Social 30.
The Origin of Civil Society
Political Philosophy Foundation of American Government.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau - Emile Unit 3 - Day 8. Jean-Jacques Rousseau Jean-Jacques Rousseau ( ) Born in Geneva, Switzerland Mother dies in childbirth,
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Historical Background A Brief History Political Though t.
Lecture 4: Liberty and Democracy: J. S. Mill The Foundations of Modern Social and Political Thought.
PATTERSON PGS Standards and Practices of American Democracy.
Origins of Our Government Principles & Ideas. The Idea of a Society Jean Jacques Rousseau –“State of Nature” there is no law or morality (The Strongest.
Political Theorists. Descriptions of Government “The Punishment which the wise suffer who refuse to take part in the government, is to live under the.
Enlightenment s. What does it mean to be Enlightened?
Philosophical Foundations of American Government Learning Objective: You will analyze western political ideas that led to the foundation of the of the.
September 1, 2015 Do Now  Is it important to question those in authority? Give evidence to support your position.
POL 101: Responsible Citizenship Democratic Theory.
Modernity, Capitalism and Alienation (Estrangement) Philosophers have hitherto only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it. (Karl.
Philosophy 219 Rousseau, “Discourse” and “Of the Social Contract”
STEPHANIE RUEDIN SEBASTIAN TORP KARIM EL-ZAWAHRY PAUL GAILEY Jean Jacques Rousseau & Montesquieu.
Global II Chapter 17, Section 2 The Enlightenment – Age of Reason READ: pg
ENLIGHTENMENT  During the Enlightenment Period many ideas that influenced the Framers of the United States Government developed. These ideas are seen.
Late 1600s-Mid 1700s A movement in which the methods of the Scientific Revolution are applied to thinking and discussing politics and religion.
Human government was established by God as a means to controlling sinful man – Genesis 9:5-6.
The Enlightenment. Reason  1600s & 1700s, following Scientific Revolution  Change in society and politics  Applied reason to understanding people and.
Enlightenment s. What does it mean to be Enlightened?
The Enlightenment: The Age of Reason. Essential Understanding Enlightenment thinkers believed that human progress was possible through the application.
Rousseau Mark Philp.
"... the common Question will be made who shall judge whether the Prince or Legislative act contrary to their Trust? ... I reply, The People shall be Judge.
According to the Founding Fathers, and how it changed in the mid-1800s
Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau.
Ideas Behind our Government
American Political Culture
New ideologies.
The American Enlightenment,
Rousseau, “Discourse” and “Of the Social Contract”
Enlightened Minds & Revolutionaries!
Ch 2 Sec 1 Philosophy in the Age of Reason
Rousseau, “Discourse” and “Of the Social Contract”
Rousseau Mark Philp.
Modern Political thought
Philosophers that Influenced American Government
Locke v Hobbes.
The Philosophers.
The Enlightenment 18th Century European movement in which thinkers attempted to apply the principles of reason and the scientific method to all aspects.
The Age of Reason and Science
Formation of Government
People of the Enlightenment
World History - Ackerman
ENLIGHTENMENT THINKERS
World History - Ackerman
1. “Power should be a check to power.
THE ENLIGHTENMENT IN EUROPE
The Enlightenment.
Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen
Essential Questions Who are the philosophers that influenced out founding fathers? Political philosophy- Machiavelli Political philosophy- Hobbes Political.
Principles of Government
Rousseau, “Discourse” and “Of the Social Contract”
Philosophers Influential on the US Constitution
American Government Early Political Thinkers
Presentation transcript:

Divergent social contracts: Rousseau and The Federalist papers Dr Imogen Peck University of Warwick

Rousseau: life and works 1712 - born in Geneva 1728 - briefly converts to Catholicism, forfeiting Genevan citizenship 1742 - Moves to Paris 1745 - Opera performed, meets Thérèse Levasseur. 1750 - First Discourse 1754 - Second Discourse 1755 - Political Economy 1758 - Lettre à d’Alembert 1761 - Julie ou la Nouvelle Hélöise 1762 - The Social Contract and Emile 1771 - Considerations on the Government of Poland 1778 - Reveries and Dialogues

The state of nature Man is guided by two main passions: Amour de soi – a constant impulse to preserve one’s life. Pity (pitie) – compassion for the suffering of other members of society. ‘Pity is what takes us without reflection to the aid of those we see suffering. Pity is what, in the state of nature, takes the place of laws, mores, and virtues, with the advantage that no one is tempted to disobey its sweet voice’. (Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men) Differentiates amour de soi from Hobbes’ right of nature, which is more like amour propre (vanity).

the problem Contrary to natural law theorists Rousseau thinks it’s circumstance, and not the application of God given reason, that led man out of the state of nature. In these more communal situations you start to get increasing inequality. Conflict between ‘the right of the strongest and the right of the first occupant’. ‘The first man who, having enclosed. Piece of ground, bethought himself of saying This is mine, and found people simple enough to believe him, was the real founder of civil society. From how many crimes, wars, and murders, from how many horrors and misfortunes might not any one have saved mankind, by pulling up the stakes, or filling up the ditch, and crying to his fellows: Beware of listening to this impostor; you are undone if you once forget that the fruits of the earth belong to us all, and the earth itself to nobody’. (Second Discourse) ‘Man is born free and everywhere he is is chains’ (The Social Contract, I.1)

(The Social Contract, I.6) the question How to ‘find a form of association that will defend and protect the person and goods of each associate with the full common force, and by means of which each, uniting with all, nevertheless obey only himself and remain as free as before’. (The Social Contract, I.6)

The solution ‘These clauses, rightly understood, all come down to just one, namely the total alienation of each associate with all of his rights to the whole community. For, in the first place, since each gives himself entirely, the condition is equal for all, and since the condition is equal for all, no one has any interest in making it burdensome to the rest […] each, by giving himself to all, gives himself to no one, and since there is no associate over whom one does not acquire the same right as one grants him over oneself, one gains the equivalent of all one loses, and more force to preserve what one has’. (The Social Contract, I.6)

Three forms of freedom Natural – ‘unlimited right to do anything everything that tempts him’. Civil – ‘which is limited by the general will’. Moral – ‘which alone makes man truly the master of himself; for the mere impulse of appetite is slavery, while obedience to a law which we prescribe to ourselves is freedom’. (The Social Contract, I.8).

particular and general will Particular Will ‘tends to partiality’ (SC II.1) ‘Each individual man, as a man, have a particular will contrary to or different from the general will he has as a citizen’ (SC I. 7) General Will tends to ‘equality’ (SC, II.1) ‘general will alone can direct the forces of the State according to the end of its institutions, which is the common good’ (SC II.1) Sovereignty – ‘nothing but the exercise of the general will’ (SC II.1)

Forcing to be free ‘Each individual man, as a man, have a particular will contrary to or different from the general will he has as a citizen…hence for the social compact not to be an empty formula, it tacitly includes the following engagement which alone can give force to the rest, that whoever refuses to obey the general will shall be constrained to do so by the entire body: which means nothing other than he shall be forced to be free; for this is the condition which, by giving each Citizen to the Fatherland, guarantees him against all personal dependence; the condition which is the device and makes for the operation of the political machines, and alone renders legitimate civil engagements which would otherwise be absurd, tyrannical, and liable to the most enormous abuses’. (SC, I.7)

Arriving at the general will: the problem of democracy ‘There is often a considerable difference between the will of all and the general will: the latter looks only to the common interest, the former looks to private interest, and is nothing but a sum of particular wills; but if, from these same wills, one takes away the pluses and the minuses which cancel each other out, what is left as the sum of the differences is the general will’ (SC II.3) When a law is proposed in the assembly of the people, what they are being asked is not precisely whether they approve or reject the proposal, but whether it does or does not conform to the general will that is theirs. Each one expresses his opinion on this by voting, and the declaration of the general will is drawn from the counting of the votes. Therefore when the opinion contrary to mine prevails, that proves nothing except that I was mistaken, and what I thought to be the general will was not. If my private will had prevailed, I would have done something other than what I wanted’. (SC IV. 2) VS

The federalist papers: the context 1775 and 1783 – War of Independence 1777 - Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union 1787 - Constitution of America ratified John Singleton Copley, ‘The Defeat of the Floating Batteries at Gibraltar’ (1782)

Aims of The federalist papers ‘It will be forgotten, on the one hand, that jealousy is the usual concomitant of violent love, and that the noble enthusiasm of liberty is too apt to be infected with a spirit of narrow and illiberal distrust. On the other hand, it will be equally forgotten that the vigour of government is essential to the security of liberty; that, in the contemplation of a sound and well-informed judgement, their interests can never be separated; and that a dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people than under the forbidding appearance of zeal for the firmness and efficiency of government’. Introduction, The Federalist Papers  

bibliography Rousseau C. Morris, The Social Contract Theorists (1999) P. Riley, Will and political legitimacy : a critical exposition of social contract theory (1982) M. Cranston, The noble savage : Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 1754-1762 (1993) On voting/general will M. Schwartzberg, ‘Voting the General Will: Rousseau on Decision Rules’, Political Theory (2008), 403-423 C. Bertram, ‘Rousseau's Legacy in Two Conceptions of the General Will: Democratic and Transcendent’, The Review of Politics (2012) 403-419 P. Riley, ‘Rousseau’s General Will’, The Cambridge Companion to Rousseau The Federalist Papers R. Hammersley, Revolutionary moments : reading revolutionary texts (2015)