WRC 19 Agenda Item 7 Issue A New Delhi 11 June 2019.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Some important points on Regulatory Issues discussed at the second meeting of the Sub- working Group of RPG 1.Regulatory text for the new regional Agreement.
Advertisements

Yvon Henri Radiocommunication Bureau ITU.
1 ITU-R Strategic Plan Draft Report from the RAG Correspondence Group RAG Informal Meeting on ITU-R Strategic and Operational Plans Geneva, 21 May 2013.
BR WORKSHOP ON THE EFFICIENT USE OF THE SPECTRUM/ORBIT RESOURCE ESOA Limassol, Cyprus, April
WRC–12 Industry Debrief 23 April 2012 Agenda item 1.13 – BSS and feeder links 21.4–22 GHz Presenter: Geoff McMillen.
John Taylor Nairobi, Kenya Sept 3-4, 2013 WRC-15 Agenda Item
WRC-12 Preparation CPG Chairman /
WMO Workshop on Radio Frequencies for Meteorology Meteorological Satellite Services David F. McGinnis U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA 7 October 2002 Geneva,
National Science Foundation 1 Dr. Tomas E. Gergely Electromagnetic Spectrum Manager National Science Foundation Registration of Radio.
Chris Hose Geoff McMillen
How is Technical & Regulatory Examination carried out in the BR - a detailed view.
WRC–12 Industry Debrief 23 April 2012 Agenda item 1.19 – Software-defined radio and cognitive radio systems.
CEPT preparations status for WRC-15 Mr. Per Christensen (ECO Director) August 2015 The second Annual Middle East & North Africa Spectrum Management Conference,
WRC–12 Industry Debrief 23 April 2012 Agenda item 1.20 – High Altitude Platform Stations (HAPS) Presenter: Dick Butler.
1 Improving the Radio Regulations, Prospective WRC (WRC-15) Agenda Items Per Hovstad, Principal Spectrum Engineer Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co.
John Taylor ICAO Preparatory Spectrum Seminar for WRC-15 Thailand March 11-12, 2014 WRC-15 Agenda Item
1. 2 Notification of frequency Assignments for recording in the Master Register Prepared by : Eng.yasir Mohammed Bashar
Role of World Radiocommunications Conference and European preparations for WRC Stella Lyubchenko 4 th CEPT Workshop on European Spectrum Management and.
International Telecommunication Union Document WRC-15-IRWSP-15/16-E 1 September 2015 English only 3 rd ITU INTER-REGIONAL WORKSHOP ON WRC-15 PREPARATION.
National Preparatory Working Group meeting for World Radio-communications Conference 2015 Aeronautical Agenda Item 1.7 Presented by Takalani Tshikalaha.
Agenda item 9.2 On any difficulties or inconsistencies encountered in the application of the Radio Regulations (non-ESOMPS)
Agenda item 1.16 VHF data exchange system (VDES).
PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Protocol Amending the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organisation.
CRAF POSITION ON WRC-19 AGENDA ITEMS RELEVANT TO RADIO ASTRONOMY Talayeh Hezareh - CRAF FM Max Planck Institute for Radio astronomy Bonn, Germany MAY 20,
International Telecommunication Union Document WRC-15-IRWSP-15/8-E 3 September 2015 English only 3 rd ITU INTER-REGIONAL WORKSHOP ON WRC-15 PREPARATION.
International Telecommunication Union Document WRC-15-IRWSP-15/14-E 1 September 2015 English only 3 rd ITU INTER-REGIONAL WORKSHOP ON WRC-15 PREPARATION.
Employer Reporting June 2015.
CEPT Conference Preparatory Group
Delivering the standards and spectrum to fuel 5G
broadband applications, in accordance with Resolution 233 (WRC-12)
Non Planned Space Services (Coordination and Notification procedures)
WRC-12 A.I. 1.7 Eric ALLAIX DGAC-DSNA.
Cindy Cook Chairman, TG 5/1 November 2, 2016
HEADING FOR SLIDE Sub Heading
Steering Group on Radio Frequency Coordination (SG-RFC)
Panel Session 2 WRC-15 Agenda items 1.16, 1.4, 1.15
SADC WRC-15 Preparatory Meeting
Panel Session 3 WRC-15 Agenda item 1.1
29 July 2015 MS. NIKI KRUGER CHIEF DIRECTOR: TRADE NEGOTIATIONS
Bundesnetzagentur Use of the Fixed Satellite Service for RPAS C2 link (ITU Resolution 155 (WRC-15)) Martin WEBER REGIONAL PREPARATORY GROUP.
SADC WRC-15 Preparatory Meeting
WRC-15 Agenda Item 1.7 John Taylor ICAO Preparatory Spectrum Seminar for WRC-15 Thailand March 11-12, 2014.
WRC-12 A.I. 1.7 Eric ALLAIX DGAC-DSNA.
WRC-12 A.I. 1.3 Eric ALLAIX DGAC-DSNA.
THURAYA Proprietary Information
5G and IMT Identification - Views from CEPT-
John Taylor ICAO Spectrum Workshop for WRC-15 CAIRO Feb 16-17, 2015
Panel Sessions 7 & 8 WRC-15 Agenda items 7 & 9.1 issues (9.1.2, 9.1.3, 9.1.5, 9.1.8) Khalid Al Awadhi.
Doriana Guiducci, European Communications Office
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON TRADE & INDUSTRY Protocol Amending the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organisation (WTO)
Panel Session 5 WRC-15 Agenda items 1.6, 1.8, and 1.7
Draft ICAO Position for ITU WRC-19
COSPAR SA 2008, E110 IUCAF session
SADC WRC-15 Preparatory Meeting
Towards a Common ITU/ISO/IEC Patent Policy
Workshop on Erroneously-Filed Elements and Parts
RR-TAG Opening Report Report of the May 2010 interim meeting
Coordination of Satellite networks
World Radiocommunications Conference
John Taylor Nairobi, Kenya Sept 3-4, 2013
Possible Future Agenda Items
Ownership of Satellites
Agenda Item Overview & draft India proposal
WRC Preparations: A Satellite Industry Perspective David Meltzer Global Satellite Coalition
GSC position on key WRC-19 AI 1.5 ESIMs
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Radio Frequency Management Division (RFMD) Carlos Flores 18 July 2019.
Preliminary GSC positions on WRC-19 agenda items 1.13 IMT
François Rancy Chairman, ITU Special Committee
WRC-19 Updates July 23, 2019 CANTO Annual Conference
The role of spectrum in achieving interoperable governmental and commercial communications networks Enrico Vassallo, ESA Frequency Management Office Head.
Presentation transcript:

WRC 19 Agenda Item 7 Issue A New Delhi 11 June 2019

Agenda Item 7, Issue A Director Report at WRC15 highlighted overfilings of NGSO systems and of extremely large constellations. Current practice allows Bringing Into Use (BIU) and notification of NGSO systems with one satellite, but it does not clarify the deployment of subsequent satellites. WRC15 asked to clarify the BIU of frequency assignments to NGSO systems and what to do when a constellation is not deployed as filed. Studies considered that the deployment of satellites in a constellation may take a period of many months. Proprietary to OneWeb

The Importance of Agenda Item 7, Issue A Agenda Item 7 issue A needs to prevents the warehousing of spectrum and orbital resources by: (i) encouraging deployment of NGSO systems in a reasonable amount of time and with reasonable control by the ITU. (iii) provide more certainty to serious operators that want to develop and deploy real constellations. Thus, Agenda Item 7, Issue A aims to: Establish rules for the BIU and deployment timelines of NGSO systems Develop a milestone-based approach to NGSO system deployment Develop penalties for not meeting the milestones Allow transitional measures for NGSO systems already BIU’d Proprietary to OneWeb

Geostationary (GSO) Systems Non-Geostationary Systems (NGSO) Current Practice Geostationary (GSO) Systems Non-Geostationary Systems (NGSO) Provision 11.44B establishes clear requirements: 90 days in the notified position 30 days after BIU to inform the Office Application of Resolution 49 (WRC-15) There are no provisions in the RR Practice: same as 11.44B. No additional provisions, regardless of the number of satellites and the number of orbital planes indicated in the notification information. In view of the numerous notified NGSO systems, this practice could lead to a hoarding of the spectrum and the resurgence of so-called "paper satellite networks", as stated by the Director of the Radiocommunication Bureau in his report to the WRC-15. Proprietary to OneWeb

Current BIU Process for NGSO Current BIU process is governed by No. 11.44B: Advanced Publication Information (API)* Coordination Request (CR/C) 6+ months after API Completion of Coordination (Art. 9) BIU and Notification (11.44B) 7 years BIU (No. 11.44B): with a single NGSO satellite deployed within the 7 year regulatory period maintained at the intended orbit for 90 days Notification after the 90 day period * API is automatically generated with CR/C for Ku and Ka FSS bands as of July 2016 Proprietary to OneWeb

New BIU Approach for NGSO – AI 7 Issue A Proposed milestone-based approach: Commencement Date To Deployment of Satellites Milestone 1 S1% T1 Milestone 2 S2% T2 Milestone 3 S3% T3 Current BIU Process Transition period 0 to 4 years 7 years 7 to 10 years 14 to 21 years Proprietary to OneWeb

Key Principles for AI 7, issue A 1. BIU All CPM Methods support BIU with a single (1) satellite In orbit for Options: (A) 90 days, (B & D) 1 to 90 days, (C) undefined OneWeb supports Option A Based on Total # of satellites in a filing Time of MS1 MS1 , T1 at MS% =7-10% Total satellites. MS2 , T2 at MS% =30-50% Total satellites MS3 , T3 at MS% =75-100% Total satellites 2. Milestone Approach OneWeb supports Option F Penalty System that does not meet a Milestone gets no. satellites reduced. Deployment Factor allows continued deployment up to Actual* DF where, DF = 1/(MS%) 3.Commencement Date Date adopted by the WRC19: (i) 23 Nov 19, (ii) 1 Jan 21, (iii) 1 Jan 23 OneWeb Supports 23Nov 19 Transition Allows adoption by prior-BIU’d systems Should not be too long to avoid spectrum and orbit warehousing Proprietary to OneWeb

1. Milestone Approach – CPM text Option F Option A Proprietary to OneWeb

Examples: Option F and Option A With regard the Option for the Milestones – OneWeb supports Option F, or A In selecting the most appropriate Option, OneWeb is of the view that one needs to consider: The Balance between preventing spectrum warehousing and flexible NGSO operational requirements. MS1 should occur no later than 1 year after the end of the 7-year regulatory period, with low a deployment of 10% of the notified Total satellites. The total number of years allowed for the complete deployment of the system should not be more than 5/6 yrs Proprietary to OneWeb

2. Commencement Date of Milestones The following table summarizes the options of the Commencement Date in the CPM-19 Report. Method F (OneWeb) Methods C and D Method B 23rd Nov 2019 1st Jan 2021 1st Jan 2023 MS1 MS2 MS3 Method F WRC-23 WRC-19 WRC-27 23 Nov 19 1 Jan 21 MS1 MS2 MS3 Method C & D MS1 MS2 MS3 Method B 1 Jan 23 Proprietary to OneWeb

2. Commencement Date of Milestones The following table summarizes the options of the Commencement Date in the CPM-19 Report. Method F (OneWeb) Methods C and D Method B 23rd Nov 2019 1st Jan 2021 1st Jan 2023 A later date leads to (i) Paper Filings and (2) Coordination uncertainty by real systems, as it: Leads “paper satellite networks”, as it was identified by the Director of the BR at WRC-2015. Would create uncertainty with respect to frequency coordination between later filed non-GSO system and earlier ones. If it is too long it will leave the real NGSO systems in limbo to finalise frequency coordination. Also because, the first milestone (MS1) should occur no later than 1 January 2021, so that WRC23 has the necessary hindsight, perspective and time to possibly adjust the overall milestone approach if cases of potential difficulty were reported to the BR and/or RRB before the conference. Proprietary to OneWeb

3. Transitional Measures - Case (1): For systems whose regulatory period (No. 11.44) ending before the commencement date of milestones would be counted from such a date; - Case (2): For systems whose regulatory period ending after the Commencement Date of milestones would be counted from the date of expiry of their regulatory period (No 11.44), i.e. no transition measure needed. EiF Commencement Date Transition Period Proprietary to OneWeb

Putting everything together WRC19 WRC23 WRC27 BIU Proprietary to OneWeb

Conclusions - Agenda Item 7, Issue A OneWeb Supports Period required to BIU – Retain 90 days (Option A) as per No. 11.44B. Milestones – Support Option F, or Option A, which include a deployment factor (DF) Commencement Date and Transitional measures. - Support Commencement Date of 23 Nov 2019, or compromise to 1 Nov 2021 as long as MS1 is before WRC-23. - For systems with Latest Date of BIU (the end of 7-year regulatory period) before the dates above, the Milestone Commencement Date should be as above. For all other (newer) systems, it should be their Last Date of BIU. Option F Option A 1 years – 10% 1 year – 10% 3 years – 33% 6 years – 100% 5 years – 75% Proprietary to OneWeb

Thank you Tony Azzarelli VP Spectrum Licensing Affairs tony@oneweb Thank you Tony Azzarelli VP Spectrum Licensing Affairs tony@oneweb.net www.oneworld.net Proprietary to OneWeb