Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 16, Issue 17, Pages (September 2006)
Advertisements

Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
María Dolores Vázquez-Novelle, Mark Petronczki  Current Biology 
Two Phases of Astral Microtubule Activity during Cytokinesis in C
Shuhei Yoshida, Masako Kaido, Tomoya S. Kitajima  Developmental Cell 
Evidence for an Upper Limit to Mitotic Spindle Length
Colleen T. Skau, David R. Kovar  Current Biology 
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages R1156-R1158 (December 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 22, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 136, Issue 3, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 15, Pages (August 2015)
Kai Yuan, Patrick H. O’Farrell  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages (October 2008)
Kif15 Cooperates with Eg5 to Promote Bipolar Spindle Assembly
Zhang-Yi Liang, Mark Andrew Hallen, Sharyn Anne Endow  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 24, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (July 2015)
Control of Local Rho GTPase Crosstalk by Abr
Multiple Mechanisms Contribute to Centriole Separation in C. elegans
Volume 22, Issue 16, Pages (August 2012)
Guillaume Halet, John Carroll  Developmental Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Large Cytoplasm Is Linked to the Error-Prone Nature of Oocytes
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
The Centriolar Protein Bld10/Cep135 Is Required to Establish Centrosome Asymmetry in Drosophila Neuroblasts  Priyanka Singh, Anjana Ramdas Nair, Clemens.
Samuel F. Bakhoum, Giulio Genovese, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Xuehong Xu, Bruce E. Vogel  Current Biology 
The Timing of Midzone Stabilization during Cytokinesis Depends on Myosin II Activity and an Interaction between INCENP and Actin  Jennifer Landino, Ryoma.
Myosin 2-Induced Mitotic Rounding Enables Columnar Epithelial Cells to Interpret Cortical Spindle Positioning Cues  Soline Chanet, Rishabh Sharan, Zia.
EB1-Recruited Microtubule +TIP Complexes Coordinate Protrusion Dynamics during 3D Epithelial Remodeling  Sarah Gierke, Torsten Wittmann  Current Biology 
Katja Wassmann, Théodora Niault, Bernard Maro  Current Biology 
Thomas Tischer, Melina Schuh  Cell Reports 
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Functional Comparison of H1 Histones in Xenopus Reveals Isoform-Specific Regulation by Cdk1 and RanGTP  Benjamin S. Freedman, Rebecca Heald  Current Biology 
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Self-Organization of MTOCs Replaces Centrosome Function during Acentrosomal Spindle Assembly in Live Mouse Oocytes  Melina Schuh, Jan Ellenberg  Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 22, Pages (November 2010)
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
KIF4 Regulates Midzone Length during Cytokinesis
Justin Crest, Kirsten Concha-Moore, William Sullivan  Current Biology 
Joshua N. Bembenek, John G. White, Yixian Zheng  Current Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 17, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Samuel F. Bakhoum, Giulio Genovese, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (February 2006)
A New Model for Asymmetric Spindle Positioning in Mouse Oocytes
Kinetochore Dynein Is Required for Chromosome Motion and Congression Independent of the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhenye Yang, U. Serdar Tulu, Patricia Wadsworth,
Kari Barlan, Wen Lu, Vladimir I. Gelfand  Current Biology 
STIL Microcephaly Mutations Interfere with APC/C-Mediated Degradation and Cause Centriole Amplification  Christian Arquint, Erich A. Nigg  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 17, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Nicole M. Mahoney, Gohta Goshima, Adam D. Douglass, Ronald D. Vale 
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Mi Hye Song, L. Aravind, Thomas Müller-Reichert, Kevin F. O'Connell 
David Vanneste, Masatoshi Takagi, Naoko Imamoto, Isabelle Vernos 
Volume 20, Issue 22, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
Contributions of Turgor Pressure, the Contractile Ring, and Septum Assembly to Forces in Cytokinesis in Fission Yeast  Stephen A. Proctor, Nicolas Minc,
TAC-1, a Regulator of Microtubule Length in the C. elegans Embryo
Julie C Canman, David B Hoffman, E.D Salmon  Current Biology 
MT1-MMP-Dependent Invasion Is Regulated by TI-VAMP/VAMP7
Volume 24, Issue 21, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
Melina Schuh, Christian F. Lehner, Stefan Heidmann  Current Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (April 2011)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages 955-960 (June 2011) Spire-Type Actin Nucleators Cooperate with Formin-2 to Drive Asymmetric Oocyte Division  Sybille Pfender, Vitaliy Kuznetsov, Sandra Pleiser, Eugen Kerkhoff, Melina Schuh  Current Biology  Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages 955-960 (June 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.029 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2011 21, 955-960DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.029) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Spire1 and Spire2 Mediate Asymmetric Spindle Positioning by Assembling a Cytoplasmic Actin Network (A) Spindle movements in live oocytes expressing mCherry-α-tubulin (red, microtubules, merged with differential interference contrast [DIC]). Oocytes were injected with control siRNA (Control), Spire1 and Spire2 siRNAs (Spire1+2 RNAi) and Spire1 and Spire2 siRNAs together with human Spire1 and Spire2 mRNAs (rescue). White ovals mark initial spindle positions. Time is given in hr:min. The scale bar represents 10 μm. See also Movie S1. (B) The spindle was tracked in oocytes in 3D data sets (13 sections, every 7 μm) as shown in (A). Spindle movements in control (black; v = 0.20 ± 0.06 μm/min; n = 13), Spire1+2 RNAi (red; v = 0.03 ± 0.03 μm/min; n = 23; p < 10−12), and rescue experiments (gray; v = 0.16 ± 0.04 μm/min; n = 9; p = 0.09) are plotted. (C) Oocytes from control, Spire1+2 RNAi, and rescue experiments were fixed during spindle relocation and stained with Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin so that F-actin would be labeled. Boxed regions are magnified on the right. Scale bars represent 10 μm. (D) The mean intensity of the cytoplasmic phalloidin staining was measured in oocytes (as shown in [C]) that were injected with control siRNA (black); with different oligo sets of Spire1 and Spire2 siRNAs (red); with Spire1 and Spire2 siRNAs together with human Spire1 and Spire2 mRNAs (rescue; red); and in oocytes treated with 4 μM Latrunculin B or DMSO (Latrunculin B (red); DMSO (black)). Data are means ± SD. p values were calculated with a Student's t test. Current Biology 2011 21, 955-960DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.029) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Spire1 and Spire2 Drive Polar Body Extrusion by Promoting Assembly of the Cleavage Furrow (A) Live oocytes injected with control siRNA (control; n = 61) or Spire1 and Spire2 siRNAs (Spire1+2 RNAi; n = 96) were monitored by long-term time-lapse microscopy, and arrest in metaphase I (red) or progression into anaphase (black) were scored. (B) The time between nuclear-envelope breakdown (NEBD) and anaphase onset was measured in live control oocytes (n = 30) and Spire1+2 RNAi-treated oocytes (n = 33). p values were calculated with a Student's t test. (C) Live oocytes injected with control siRNA (control; n = 57), Spire1 and Spire2 siRNAs (Spire1+2 RNAi; n = 90), and Spire1 and Spire2 siRNAs together with human Spire1 and Spire2 mRNAs (rescue; n = 30), were scored for successful cytokinesis (cytokinesis) or cytokinetic failure upon anaphase onset (failed cytokinesis). (D) Anaphase in live control and Spire1+2 RNAi-treated oocytes expressing EGFP-α-tubulin (green, microtubules) and H2B-mRFP (red, chromosomes) merged with DIC. Boxed regions are magnified without DIC below. Scale bars represent 10 μm. Time is given in hr:min. See also Movie S2. (E) Polar body extrusion in live oocytes expressing EGFP-α-tubulin (green, microtubules) and Spire1-mCherry (upper row) or Spire2-mCherry (lower row). The first image is merged with DIC. Time-lapse images of boxed regions without DIC are shown on the right. Scale bars represent 10 μm. Time is given in hr:min. See also Movie S3. Current Biology 2011 21, 955-960DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.029) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Spire1 and Spire2 Cooperate Synergistically with Fmn2 to Assemble F-Actin in Mouse Oocytes (A and B) Colocalization of Spire1-mCherry (A) or Spire2-mCherry (B) (red) and Fmn2-mEGFP (green) at the oocyte surface (upper row), in the cytoplasm (middle row), and in the cleavage furrow (lower row). (C) Wild-type oocytes (wild-type) and oocytes overexpressing Fmn2-mCherry (Fmn2), Spire1-mCherry and Spire2-mCherry (Spire1+2), or Spire1-mCherry and Spire2-mCherry together with Fmn2-mCherry (Spire1+2; Fmn2) were fixed during spindle relocation and stained with Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin to label F-actin. Scale bars represent 10 μm. (D) The mean intensity of the cytoplasmic actin network was measured in oocytes as shown in (C). Percentages specify the increase of the network intensity in comparison to that of controls (highlighted by stripes). Current Biology 2011 21, 955-960DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.029) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Spire1 and Spire2 Cooperate Interdependently with Fmn2 in a Functional Unit (A) The mean intensity of the cytoplasmic phalloidin staining was measured in wild-type oocytes (black column) and in wild-type oocytes overexpressing Spire1-mCherry and Spire2-mCherry (wild-type; Spire1+2) or Fmn2-mCherry (wild-type; Fmn2); in Spire1- and Spire2-depleted oocytes without (Spire1+2 RNAi) or with (Spire1+2 RNAi; Fmn2) Fmn2-mCherry; in oocytes from Fmn2 knockout mice without (Fmn2−/−) or with (Fmn2−/−; Spire1+2) Spire1-mCherry and Spire2-mCherry (red columns). Data are means ± SD. p values were calculated with a Student's t test. (B) The spindle was tracked in oocytes injected with control siRNA (black; v = 0.20 ± 0.06 μm/min; n = 13), in Spire1- and Spire2-depleted oocytes without (red; v = 0.03 ± 0.03 μm/min; n = 23; p < 10−12) or with (gray; v = 0.02 ± 0.01 μm/min; n = 11; p < 10−8) Fmn2-mCherry. (C) The spindle was tracked in wild-type oocytes (black; 0.11 ± 0.05 μm/min; n = 23); in oocytes from Fmn2−/− mice without (red; 0.02 ± 0.01 μm/min; n = 12; p < 10−7) or with (gray; 0.02 ± 0.01 μm/min; n = 12; p < 10−8) Spire1-mCherry and Spire2-mCherry. (D) Successful cytokinesis (cytokinesis) or failure of cytokinesis (failed cytokinesis) were scored for oocytes injected with negative control siRNA (control; n = 57), for Spire1- and Spire2-depleted oocytes without (Spire1+2 RNAi; n = 90) or with Fmn2-mCherry (Spire1+2 RNAi; Fmn2; n = 14); for oocytes from Fmn2+/+ mice (Fmn2+/+ n = 31), Fmn2−/− mice without (Fmn2−/− n = 30) or with (Fmn2−/−; Spire1+2 n = 41) Spire1-mCherry and Spire2-mCherry. Current Biology 2011 21, 955-960DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.029) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions