Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring ROI to Make the Case for Training HRPYR Topic by Table Thursday, April 17, 2008.
Advertisements

Southwood School: A Case Study in Training and Development
Curriculum Development and Course Design
SNDT Women's University Introduction to Evaluation and Assessments  Presented by Kathleen (Kat) Miller, Senior Consultant with Booz Allen Hamilton  4.
Session 412 Why Don’t We Weigh Them? Gloria Gery Gery Associates March 2, 2004 Training and Online Learning Atlanta.
Training Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation Kelly Arthur Richard Gage-Little Dale Munson Evaluation Strategies for Instructional Designers.
Reasons for Evaluating Training Companies are investing millions of dollars in training programs to help gain a competitive advantage. To justify the costs.
Advances in Human Resource Development and Management
Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark.
Fred Barranger (N72) John Wishall (N721B) 24 February 2015
IHS Romania SRL Mission and performance indicators Presentation: IHS ROMANIA SRL Nicolae Tarălungă International Conference: September Ensuring quality.
Unit 10: Evaluating Training and Return on Investment 2009.
Kirkpatrick.
Multimedia Evaluation WED 503 and 504 October 11, 2005.
Who was there and how many were there? Did they learning something? Will they change behavior? Inputs: Time, Money, Materials Numbers Reached, Frequency.
6 Chapter Training Evaluation.
Instructional Design and Content Development Workshop
Evaluating Training Programs E-learning Assignment Bret (one-t) Painter.
The Role of Assessment in the EdD – The USC Approach.
Overcoming Objectives
‘Innovative Nutrition & Swallowing Training’ Leah Platt Community Dietitian September 2011.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Online Learning Programs ITEC 860 Fall 2003 Aniruddh Mukerji.
Chapter 6 Training Evaluation. Chapter 6 Training Evaluation Concepts Training Evaluation: The process of collecting data regarding outcomes needed to.
5 Chapter Training Evaluation.
TRAINING EVALUATION WHAT? WHAT? WHY? WHY? HOW? HOW? SO WHAT? SO WHAT?
Group HR Training & Development Welcome Good Evening 18 th September 2012 Sukanya Patwardhan.
This project is financed by the European Union 1 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation of Training By Senior.
Dr. Shulagna Sarkar Assistant Professor , Jt. Coordinator – PGDM – HRM
Penilaian Program Pembangunan Staf
Evaluation of Strategic HRD Chapter 11. Why Evaluate ? The Purpose of Evaluation: Viewpoints & Challenges Evaluation is a core part of what makes us compete.
Human Resource Management Lecture-22.  Learning Theory and Employee Training.
Strategic Human resource Management Training & Developing.
Chapter 7 Learning Objectives 1.Discuss how to link training programs to organizational needs. 2.Explain how to assess the need for training. 3.Explain.
Scholarship in Medical Education Miguel Paniagua, MD, FACP American Geriatrics Society Meeting Orldando, FL May 2010.
Program Evaluation DR. MAJED WADI. Objectives  Design necessary parameters used for program evaluation  Accept different views of program evaluation.
Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Evaluation
T206 Creating New Training Evaluation Measures: Subjective Norms And Behavioral Intentions By: Mary L. Lanigan, Ph.D. Human Performance & Training Governors.
This project is financed by the European Union 1 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation of Training By Senior.
Is Your Training Program REALLY Working? How to achieve the highest ROI for your training investment.
Kaplan University Writing CenterSaturday, March 05, IX520 Needs Assessment and Evaluation in Education and Training Unit 7 Seminar September 13,
M & E System for MI’s Training Program & Guidelines for MI’s Completion Report Presented by Monitoring and Evaluation Officer Mekong Institute January.
Assessing Learning Outcomes Dr. Deb Gebeke, Facilitator.
Using Pre and Post Scenarios to Assess Skill Attainment in Educational Settings Allison Nichols, Ed.D. Evaluation Specialist West Virginia University Extension.
Evaluating Training The Kirkpatrick Model.
Preventing HCAI’s through an education programme for nurses
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Delivery of Training & Monitoring & Evaluation
Models of Curriculum Evaluation Teaching & Learning Commons
Evaluation of Information Literacy Education
9/12/2018 Product Knowledge.
BEST PRACTICES IN LIBRARY INSTRUCTION FORUM November 7, 2007
PART IV TRAINING THE SALES TEAM. PART IV TRAINING THE SALES TEAM.
Training & Development
Chapter Six Training Evaluation.
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
SPIRIT OF HR.in TRAINING EVALUATION.
قياس اثر التدريب د . محمد البيشي.
FRAMEWORK OF EVALUATION QUESTIONS
Utilizing Kirkpatrick’s “Levels of Evaluation”
Train the Trainer Your Name.
Education Theory and Practice B ETP520S
Presenter: Angelia Bendolph Harkcon, Inc.
Measuring Course Effectiveness
Assessments and the Kirkpatrick Model
Adjunct Training – August 2016 | Jason Anderson
6 Chapter Training Evaluation.
Adult Learning and Training
WSQ Competency Standard
Presentation transcript:

Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation Assessing Training Effectiveness, most often entails using the Four Levels of Evaluation, developed by Donald Kirkpatrick. According to this model, evaluation should always begin with level one (Reactions) then moving forward to the fourth step (Results). Information from each prior level represents a more precise measure of effectiveness.

Reactions At this level evaluation measures how participants in a training program react to it. It attempts to answer the questions regarding the participants perceptions: Did they like it? Was the material relevant to their work? Was the training clear? According to Kirkpatrick all training programs should be evaluated at this level to provide for the improvement of a training program.

Learning Assessing at this level moves the evaluation beyond learner satisfaction and attempts to asses the extent students have advanced in skills, knowledge, or attitude. To asses the amount of learning that has occurred due to a training program, level two evaluation often use tests conducted before training (pre test) and after (post test).

Transfer This level measures the transfer that has occurred in learners behavior due to the training program. Evaluating at this level attempts to answer the question Are the newly acquired skills, knowledge, or attitude being used in the everyday environment of the learner?

Results Frequently thought of as the bottom line, this level measures the success of the program in measures that managers and executives understand- Increased production Improved quality Decreased costs Reduced frequency of accidents Higher Profits

References Winfrey, Elaine C. (). Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation Retrieved September 09, 2002 from http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/Articles/k4levels/start.htm