Table 6. Percentages of Indicators

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

before and after rehabilitation

Table 4. Age group distribution of enteropathogens

Table 4. Mechanical properties of repair and substrate concrete

Percentage of Polyethylene

Properties Test results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Supplier Input Process Output Customer

Table 2. Result of Actual Technical Writing Needs

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 5. Properties of The Tested Soil

Tensile strength (MPa) Length (m) of fibers/kg

Table 2. Physical properties of Portland cement

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

Daily Percentage HMF Intake

Total Energy Consumed (%)

Tensile Test after Firing

Marshall characteristics

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

Table 1. Chemical composition of materials

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 8. Drawing result before game

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Reservoir Capacity (m3)

Area Number of Roadmaps %

Table 4. Percentage of post-harvest waste reported by the farmers

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Total CO2 Emissions (Electricity + Fossil Fuel)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Criteria for urban highway environmental impact assessment

Table 2. Waste characterization in Port Harcourt, Source [1]

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Inscribed circle diameter

Table 3. The needed requirements of the Concrete Sustainability

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Diagnostic methods for systemic fungal infection (n=70)

Table 1. Geometric properties of steel tubes used

Table 1. Characteristics (age, height, and weight) of the participants

Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. The most important aspect applied in MIVES

Table 5. Pvalues of ttests for direction a

Table 3. Main properties of the thin brass electrode

Simulation Frequency(Hz)

Injection Substations No. of Transformer Units Installed

Table 6. Pvalues of ttests for direction b

Average Hardness value (HRC)

Table 3. List of PT specimens

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

Table 4. Surface roughness (outer faces)

Cumulative Percentage

Control Valve Tag Number

Accomplished Recommendation Planned Actions for Control

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Table 1. Project Control Factors and their hierarchy

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

No. of runs Xo X1 X2 X3 X4 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Si2

Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Value creation (Y2)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Surface roughness (inner faces)

Compressive Strength difference at 1 week (MPa)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Figure 2. Changes in each parameter

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

Table 6. Percentages of Indicators Category ID Final Value Percentages Cement Industry (CI) CI1 0.77 25.16% CI2 0.81 26.47% CI3 0.78 25.49% CI4 0.70 22.88% Aggregate Requirements (AG) AG1 0.67 8.16% AG2 0.75 9.14% AG3 0.74 9.00% AG4 0.68 8.28% AG5 0.79 9.62% AG6 0.59 7.19% AG7 AG8 0.76 9.26% AG9 0.84 10.23% AG10 0.82 9.99% AG11 Reinforcement Steel (RFT) RFT1 15.31% RFT2 RFT3 0.80 16.33% RFT4 0.65 13.26% RFT5 13.67% RFT6 15.51% RFT7 0.52 10.61% Formwork (FW) FW1 0.85 34.69% FW2 32.25% FW3 33.06% Concrete Manufacturing (CM) CM1 21.10% CM2 20.05% CM3 19.27% CM4 19.79% CM5 Different Types of Concrete (DC) DC1 25.08% DC2 26.31% DC3 26.01% DC4 0.73 22.60% Ready-Mixed Concrete (RMC) RMC1 0.89 36.78% RMC2 33.47% RMC3 0.72 29.75% Construction Techniques (CT) CT1 0.86 16.77% CT2 0.88 17.15% CT3 15.79% CT4 16.37% CT5 CT6 The Site (SL) SL1 32.93% SL2 33.74% SL3 0.83 33.33% H.R. (HR) HR1 51.66% HR2 48.34% Waste Disposal (WD) WD1 0.92 15.16% WD2 14.66% WD3 14.00% WD4 13.51% WD5 14.17% WD6 0.87 14.33% WD7 Security and Safety (SS) SS1 26.09% SS2 24.22% SS3 23.91% SS4 25.78% Mohamed O. Rageh et al. Sustainability Requirements of Concrete Structures. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 5, 174-186. doi:10.12691/ajcea-5-5-1 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.