© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Table 2. Results of the parameters of proximate, ultimate and petrographic analysis of coal samples Devidas S. Nimaje et al. Assessment of Fire Risk of.

Advertisements

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Table 3. Results of CPT, Szb, ∆E, and FT

before and after rehabilitation

Table 4. Age group distribution of enteropathogens

Table 1. Empirical MSE to estimate the CP distribution parameter λ

Percentage composition (%)

Hospital live Deliveries

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Table 4. Filter Sand Sieve Analysis

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 5. Properties of The Tested Soil

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

Areas of Specialization

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

Variable Pharmacy (n=319) Sociology (n=205) Total (n=524) P-values

Total Energy Consumed (%)

Tensile Test after Firing

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Management Philosophy

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Educational Qualification of Respondance

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Percentage of post-harvest waste reported by the farmers

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. Control sample industry distribution

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Age-sex literacy rates by various surveys.

Year range Rainfall (mm) ∆s in rainfall Temp (°C) ∆s in temp RH (mm)

Total CO2 Emissions (Electricity + Fossil Fuel)

Age-sex employments by various surveys.

National Sanitation Foundation Water Quality Index (NSFWQI) WQI Value

Table 2. Waste characterization in Port Harcourt, Source [1]

Not currently employed

Rating of Water Quality

% of inhibition of hydrolysis (INH)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Transformer Annual MVA Loadings (%) Average MVA Loading (%)

Overall Average Female Overall Average Male/Female

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Injection Substations No. of Transformer Units Installed

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Table 1. Use of productivity-enhancing technologies in farming

Table 1. Nigeria under-five mortality level and trends ( )

t-test for Equality of Means

Oil Absorption capacity(g/g)

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 1. Sampled Size by Status and Qualification of Academic Staff

MASTERS DEGREE HOLDERS

Cashew juice stored for 30 days

Table 4. Value creation (Y2)

Geometry and Mensuration

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Ownership of ITNs in the LGAs

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Compressive Strength difference at 1 week (MPa)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 5. Nigerian Standard of soil classification for roads and bridges Location 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Sample P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 L.L (≤35%) 34.5 Pass 36.6 Fail 33.5 23.5 Pass 22.5 Pass 35.5 49.6 Fail 34.5 Pass 41.4 Fail P.I(≤12%) comment 13.5 12.1 11.5 9.5 Pass 8.7 Pass 12.5 11.3 21.6 Fail 19.43 Fail C.B.R soaked for subbase (≥30%) 11.0 40.0 18.0 64.90 Pass 72.70 Pass 36.0 54 5.1 9.0 7.7 Fail C.B.R unsoaked Base course (≥80%) 32.0 ND 30.0 77.5 Pass 83.8 Pass 48.0 Overall Rating Sub-base Base Poor ND: not determined Amadi A.N. et al. Assessment of the Geotechnical Properties of Lateritic Soils in Minna, North Central Nigeria for Road design and Construction. American Journal of Mining and Metallurgy, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 1, 15-20. doi:10.12691/ajmm-3-1-3 © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing.