Figure 1. Probabilistic learning task

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure 1 Experimental arena to study female locations in response to a green LED. The LED was switched on in the LED ... Figure 1 Experimental arena to.
Advertisements

Figure 1 Female receptivity in the Playback Experiment
Figure 1 Waveforms of example stimuli illustrating how within-individual variation was manipulated. Invariant signals ... Figure 1 Waveforms of example.
Figure 1. Distribution of ABCB1 SNVs and haplotypes.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1 Data-selection process
Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.
Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.
Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access
Figure 1. Medicaid receipt and ACA favorability
Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider.
Figure 1 Phases of the research. Author’s own work.
Figure 1. Linkage analyses of the SNPs in the MRE11 gene and haplotype blocks. Haplotype blocks were defined for all ... Figure 1. Linkage analyses of.
Figure 1. Structure of two poxtA-carrying plasmids in E
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.
Figure 1 The Kaplan–Meier curves of time to death post first hospitalization. hosp, hospitalization. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.
AHA: American Heart Association; ALT: ...
Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.
Fig. 1 CT demonstrating aortic wall thickening with renal artery involvement (short arrow). There is also subtle ... Fig. 1 CT demonstrating aortic wall.
Figure 2 Boxplots indicating male (top) and female (bottom) mate preferences for native (positive numbers) or foreign ... Figure 2 Boxplots indicating.
Black: diagnosis ... Black: diagnosis from any department; grey: diagnosis at a rheumatology department. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.
RCTs: randomized controlled ...
Fig. 1 MRI aspect of an osteitis of the left acetabulum at baseline (A), 3 months (B), 1 year (C) and 2 years later, ... Fig. 1 MRI aspect of an osteitis.
Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated for the stimuli used in the experiment, centered on the background; following ... Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated.
Figure 1 Mean ± standard error proportions of (a) courtship and (b) copulation by female-male type pairing. Error bars ... Figure 1 Mean ± standard error.
Figure 1. Historical dialectic framework to assess transnational advocacy network influence Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.
Take home figure The protective role of CNP/NPR-B/NPRC.
Fig. 3 Interrelationship between themes describing the experiences of people with shoulder disorders Unless provided in the caption above, the following.
x-axis, post-partum days. Closed ...
Fig. 1. A flowchart of cohort participants screened, enrolled and followed-up between 1 July 2015 and 31 May Fig. 1. A flowchart of cohort participants.
Fig. 1 Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematous at the lower limbs
Fig. 1 Flow chart of included patients for analyses
Fig. 1 Flow chart for selection of study subjects
Figure 1 Schematic of the sequential learning task with examples of conflict and uncertainty trials and HDDM. (A) A ... Figure 1 Schematic of the sequential.
Figure 1. Susceptibility of all P
Prevalence and distribution of ...
Figure 1. Profiles of the top 50 mRNA probes of the first gene signature identified in the South African cohort. ... Figure 1. Profiles of the top 50 mRNA.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Figure 1 Relationships between pair indices of dance performance (joint entropy or mutual information) and the past ... Figure 1 Relationships between.
Figure 1. Time–kill studies for selected isolates (each line represents the average of duplicate studies). AMP, ... Figure 1. Time–kill studies for selected.
Figure 1 Immunohistochemistry for human cell differentiation molecules in samples of the right ventricular septum from ... Figure 1 Immunohistochemistry.
Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European children completing all components of B4SC in 2013 and 2015 Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European.
Figure 1 MIC test strips showing reversion of daptomycin resistance of isolate 5 passaged in vitro. This figure ... Figure 1 MIC test strips showing reversion.
Figure 1. Trunk and leg fat over study period. LS, log transformed.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Figure 1. Data access using HMP16SData
Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot presenting no difference in progression to RA in patients with clinically suspect ... Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot presenting no difference.
Figure 1. Oncoprint of selected pathogenic alterations detected in ctDNA. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1. Observed mean (SD) micafungin plasma concentrations.
Fig. 1 A network representation of top 100 co-occurring terms
Figure 1. Genetic context of blaNDM-21 on pNDM21_020023
Fig. 1 Statistics of the main characters’ dialogues.
The figure shows the fraction of ...
Figure 1 Grant agencies and charitable foundations supporting Plan S.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Fig. 1 Schematic subcategorization of AAV in three clinically relevant disease categories defined by clinical ... Fig. 1 Schematic subcategorization of.
Fig. 1: World distribution of field sampling locations of Aedes aegypti and Aedes mascarensis screened for Wolbachia ... Fig. 1: World distribution of.
Figure 1 Percentage of male and female helpers in different categories
Figure 1 Strategies for reconciling protection and participation.
Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.
Figure 1. Measuring respondent unhappiness with their child marrying someone from the other party and happiness with ... Figure 1. Measuring respondent.
Figure 1 ABCDE of primary prevention.2
Figure 1. Forest plot of lung cancer mortality in LDCT trials.
Figure 1. Evolutionary process of a policy field.
Table 2. Mean noise level results for hand dryers in dBA
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1. Probabilistic learning task Figure 1. Probabilistic learning task. (A) Top row: stimuli and feedback probabilities (percent positive feedback vs. ... Figure 1. Probabilistic learning task. (A) Top row: stimuli and feedback probabilities (percent positive feedback vs. negative feedback). Middle row: schematic of an example trial during the learning phase. On each trial of the task, they viewed a fixation cross (green circle, 1 s) followed by a pair of visual stimuli that are not easily verbalized by most English speakers (ie, Japanese Hiragana characters) presented in black on a white background in 72 pt font. They then pressed the key corresponding to the stimulus that they believed to be correct. Visual feedback was provided following each choice: the word “Correct!” printed in blue or “Incorrect” printed in red (1 s). If no response was made within 6 seconds, then the words “no response detected” were displayed in red (1 s). Bottom row: schematic of an example trial during the testing phase. (B) Experiment session sequence across 2 days.. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Nicotine Tob Res, nty136, https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty136 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 2. Smoking, behavior, and computational results. Top Figure 2. Smoking, behavior, and computational results. Top. (A) Smoking characteristics. Carbon monoxide (CO) levels ... Figure 2. Smoking, behavior, and computational results. Top. (A) Smoking characteristics. Carbon monoxide (CO) levels (left panel) and Tobacco Craving Questionnaire (TCQ) (right panel) taken during smoking as usual (SU), smoking abstinence (SA), and cigarette consumption (CC) session. (B) Learning phase (left side) and testing phase (right side) accuracy in task performance (left side). Bottom. Q-learning results on (C) positive (green bars: left side) and negative (red bars: right side) learning rate values, and (D) exploration (blue bars: left side) and perseveration (purple bars: right side) parameters. Results are shown for the first block of 60 trials. Error bars indicate standard errors of the means. * = p < .05, ** = p < .01, *** = p < .001. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Nicotine Tob Res, nty136, https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty136 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.