Binding Specificity of Retinal Analogs to Photoactivated Visual Pigments Suggest Mechanism for Fine-Tuning GPCR-Ligand Interactions  Sundaramoorthy Srinivasan,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Advertisements

Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Gurkan Guntas, Sarah F. Mitchell, Marc Ostermeier  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Thomas E. Edwards, Bruce H. Robinson, Snorri Th. Sigurdsson 
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Elizabeth Pham, Evan Mills, Kevin Truong  Chemistry & Biology 
A Visual Pigment Expressed in Both Rod and Cone Photoreceptors
HyeongJun Kim, Jen Hsin, Yanxin Liu, Paul R. Selvin, Klaus Schulten 
Conversion of Red Fluorescent Protein into a Bright Blue Probe
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Beena Krishnan, Lila M. Gierasch  Chemistry & Biology 
Riboswitches: Fold and Function
Fiber-Dependent and -Independent Toxicity of Islet Amyloid Polypeptide
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
A Subdomain Swap Strategy for Reengineering Nonribosomal Peptides
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Engineered Domain Swapping as an On/Off Switch for Protein Function
Covalent Protein Labeling at Glutamic Acids
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Structure of Yeast OSBP-Related Protein Osh1 Reveals Key Determinants for Lipid Transport and Protein Targeting at the Nucleus-Vacuole Junction  Mohammad.
Ligand Control of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Activity: New Insights
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
RNA Quadruplex-Based Modulation of Gene Expression
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Crystal Structure of Deinococcus Phytochrome in the Photoactivated State Reveals a Cascade of Structural Rearrangements during Photoconversion  E. Sethe.
Inhibitor Mediated Protein Degradation
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Methods for the Elucidation of Protein-Small Molecule Interactions
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages e11 (December 2017)
Conformation-Selective ATP-Competitive Inhibitors Control Regulatory Interactions and Noncatalytic Functions of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases  Sanjay B.
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Richard D. Perrins, Giuseppe Cecere, Ian Paterson, Gerard Marriott 
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
A Stable Prefusion Intermediate of the Alphavirus Fusion Protein Reveals Critical Features of Class II Membrane Fusion  Claudia Sánchez-San Martín, Hernando.
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Volume 21, Issue 22, Pages (November 2011)
Ethan B. Butler, Yong Xiong, Jimin Wang, Scott A. Strobel 
Structural Insight into BLM Recognition by TopBP1
Geetanjali J. Jog, Jun Igarashi, Hiroaki Suga  Chemistry & Biology 
A Universal Screening Assay for Glycosynthases: Directed Evolution of Glycosynthase XynB2(E335G) Suggests a General Path to Enhance Activity  Alon Ben-David,
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Binding Specificity of Retinal Analogs to Photoactivated Visual Pigments Suggest Mechanism for Fine-Tuning GPCR-Ligand Interactions  Sundaramoorthy Srinivasan, Eva Ramon, Arnau Cordomí, Pere Garriga  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 369-378 (March 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.006 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 369-378DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol. 2014 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Photoactivated Visual Pigment Regeneration with Retinal Analogs Purified recombinant rhodopsin added to the microcuvette was illuminated for 30 s (>495 nm) after the dark-state spectra stabilized. (A and B) A 2.5-fold of 11CR/9CR to the concentration of rhodopsin sample was added and mixed well. Regeneration was also followed by UV-visible spectroscopy on the same fluorimetric samples (inset, A and B: 1, dark; 2, illuminated; 3, regenerated). (C and D) Analogous to rhodopsin, red cone opsin was illuminated (>495 nm) after the stable baseline dark-state spectrum was obtained, followed by 11CR/9CR addition. UV-visible spectroscopy of dark-state red cone opsin was also measured as in the rhodopsin case (inset C and D: 1, dark; 2, illuminated; 3, regenerated). Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 369-378DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.006) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Difference in Accessibility of Retinal Binding Sites of Rhodopsin and Red Cone Opsin with Retinal Analogs (A and B) 11CR and 9CR (2.5-fold more than the rhodopsin concentration) were added to purified rhodopsin, followed by illumination (>495 nm) and 50 mM hydroxylamine addition in the same sample when the stable spectra was obtained after each treatment. (C and D) Same experiment was carried out with purified red cone opsin. Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 369-378DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.006) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Phosphate Buffer—Low-Salt Conditions—Improves 9CR Regeneration Kinetics of Photoactivated Rhodopsin Purified recombinant rhodopsin in 2 mM NaPi buffer (containing 0.05% DM) was illuminated (>495 nm) after the dark-state spectra stabilized. (A) Then 2.5-fold of 9CR was added to the concentration of rhodopsin and mixed thoroughly. The experiment was also followed by UV-visible spectroscopy (inset A: 1, dark; 2, illuminated; 3, regenerated). (B and C) Blue native PAGE and SDS-PAGE were performed with rhodopsin-purified PBS and in NaPi, which was expressed in HEK293S-GnTi− cells. (D) The western blotting was carried out with rhodopsin, expressed in COS-1 cells, and purified in PBS, in NaPi. Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 369-378DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.006) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Transducin Activation of 9CR Regenerated Visual Pigments (A and B) Rhodopsin and red cone opsin were monitored by means of fluorescence spectroscopy, and samples were treated by illumination (λ > 495 nm), 9CR addition, and a second illumination using white light. (C) Rhodopsin and red cone opsin samples, taken at different time points from the experiments reported in (A) and (B) and denoted as S1–S6 (with the corresponding time in min), were analyzed for transducin activation. Each data point in (C) is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 369-378DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.006) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Molecular Models of Rhodopsin and Red Cone Opsin (A and B) Molecular complexes for 11-cis (pale-yellow) and 9-cis (orange) retinal bound to rod (A) and red cone (B) opsins. (C) Comparison between helical arrangements in dark-state rhodopsin (PDB ID code 1GZM, shown as white transparent cartoon) (Li et al., 2004) and opsin soaked with ATR (PDB ID code 2X72, shown as colored cartoons) (Standfuss et al., 2011). The color code for opsin helices is as follows: TM1, light gray; TM2, gold; TM3, red; TM4, dark gray; TM5, green; TM6, blue; TM7, pale red. Dashed lines display the distances between the shown amino acids (see main text; dark-state rhodopsin, white; active opsin, yellow). (D and E) The entrance site for retinals in the dark (D) and opsin (E) states. Rod opsin residues are shown in colors, whereas residues in red cone opsin are shown in white. Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 369-378DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.006) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions