- Strictly Confidential -

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATR Combi & Freighter  Exit.
Advertisements

CEM-STEEL Floor Decking Roof Decking Security Walls
Fire-Resistive Construction (2nd part)
Flame Retardant Fabrics:
Summary of NFPA 101 Interior Finish Requirements
CNRS – UNIVERSITE et INSA de Rouen 7th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference BLAbla CNRS – UNIVERSITE et INSA de Rouen.
Chapter 2.1 Definition and classification
Marine, Railway and ground Transportation ACOUSTIC MATERIALS for.
Composite Flame Retardant and Smoke Suppressing Surfacing Mat John Rowen Fire Smoke Toxicity SAMPE 2003 Session 7E Avtec Industries 9 Kane Industrial Drive.
Fire Safety of Road Vehicles Status and Trends Fire safety road vehicles Japan, September 2014 Presentation given at Tokyo September 2014.
STANDARDIZATION OF PROTECH  J.K.GUPTA, SCIENTIST ’C’, BIS.
Ensuring fire safety in buses Michael Försth, Asbjørn Hagerupsen, Jan Petzäll Informal document No. GRSG (95th GRSG, 21 – 24 October 2008 agenda.
Task 3.4. Validation of horizontal solutions Fire and mechanical characterization.
Site Planning and Layout  In the design phase of a facility, fire protection requirements are considered in the site layout  Water supply, traffic and.
TS/CV/DC CFD Team CFD Simulation of a Fire in CERN Globe of Science and Innovation Sara C. Eicher CERN, CH.
Task 3.4. Validation of horizontal solutions Fire and mechanical characterization.
Fire.
Commercial Interior Design: Part II Contract documents for commercial interior design practice describe the proposed construction, and any f.f.&e. installation.
Concept Equipment design and manufacture fire testing instruments according to international test methods. Our range of products are used to test the fire.
Test Methods and Apparatus for a Video-based System for Cargo Fire Verification I. Willms, W. Krüll, J. Shirer 1 Fourth Triennial International Fire and.
Fire, Thermal & Acoustic Insulation New European Resistance To Fire Standards.
MOLIT Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport KATRI Korea Automobile testing & research Institute 1p lnformation of Korea Cases on Vehicle Indoor.
ARMAFLEX Ultima SPECIAL FEF PRODUCTS
Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group, Atlantic City, NJ By: Robert Ian Ochs Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 Federal Aviation.
Fire-Related Properties of Materials Chapter 7. Mehta, Scarborough, and Armpriest : Building Construction: Principles, Materials, and Systems © 2008 Pearson.
A comparative study of test methods for assessment of fire safety performance of bus interior materials Presentation at GRSG 97, October 20-23, 2009, Geneva.
Construction Type of Buildings
Design Fires A Structural Engineering Perspective Dr M Gillie.
1 Louise C. Speitel FAA, WJH Technical Center, Atlantic City, NJ USA Materials Meeting, Niagara Falls, NY June 17, 2008 Development of Decomposition Product.
Comfort, Safety & Durability. Cellular Silicone Foam Unique Features  Inherently Fire Proof  Zero Smoke Toxicity  Zero Smoke Visibility Loss  Wide.
Finish & Furniture Selection ID 234 Chapter 9 What is Regulated by Codes: Walls & Ceilings – Class A, B, C (flame spread/smoke) Floors – Class I & II.
Fire Resistance of the Load Bearing Structure of High Bay and Instrument Halls Fire and Egress Safety Analysis of the Instrument Halls Björn Yndemark WSP.
Developing Fire Safety Assessments Future Considerations Fire and Materials Working Group March 4 – 5, 2009 Daniel Slaton, Boeing.
J Developments in: - Low Smoke Fire Resistant Floor Coverings - Low Smoke Fire Resistant Interior Repair Compounds.
Plumbing Radiant Heating & Cooling Turf Conditioning Permafrost Ice and Snow Melt Ecoflex ® SupportSustainabilityEngineered PolymerCommercial SystemsIntroductions.
Hot /Cold Aisle Containment  Traditional Data Center/Telco designs are changing significantly!
*patent pending. INTUMAX ® EP1115X-HPis a unique two component epoxy fire retardant – intumescent coating based on our proprietary non-halogenated phosphate.
Building Construction
Introduction of HYUNDAI CNG BUS
NASP 2008 Annual Conference Subro Goes Hollywood! SUBRO GOES HOLLYWOOD NASP 2008 Annual Conference.
Introducing INTUMAX®EP1115X-HP. DNV Certificate No
Chapter 5 Fire Behavior and Building Construction
Why Know Building Construction
Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Structural Fire Engineering, October 2015, Dubrovnik, Croatia
Egle Rackauskaite, Catherine Hamel, Angus Law, Guillermo Rein 
Sinusoidal Modeling I. Getting the trig equation from data points.
NFPA 5000 Occupancy Classifications
Enclosed Parking Ventilation 1 EK Engineering (India) CO/NO2 detection, Fan Control and automation System E: Mobile:
Variables Investigated :
ICHS - October 2015 Jérôme Daubech
Fire protection and prevention
Smokes toxicity & opacity
Building Construction
Fabric Air Dispersion Systems
Effect of Earthquake on Fire Protection Systems
Enclosure Fire Dynamics
Parametric Equations and Calculus
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures –
Fire Characteristics.
International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting
test results and second proposal by Japan
Effisus FR Effisus FR Membrane Non-Combustible / Fire resistant!
February 2019.
NON-PROFIT COMPANY FOR QUALITY CONTROL AND INNOVATION IN BULDING
- Strictly Confidential -
Behaviour of M2 & M3 general construction in case of Fire Event
AIRCRAFT FIRE REGULATIONS
Dr. Patrick Seiniger BMVI, Section StV 22
- Strictly Confidential -
Presentation transcript:

- Strictly Confidential - Smoke Density and Toxicity Analysis of different classification and test methods used in transport modes C. Vinson - GERFLOR - Strictly Confidential -

SMOKE DENSITY Synthesis MARITIME RAILWAY (EU) RAILWAY (USA) AIRCRAFT (USA/EU) AIRCRAFT Classification document IMO / FTP Code 2010 EN 45545-1 EN 45545-2 NFPA 130 FAR Part 25 / CS-25 ABD 0031 (Airbus) BSS (Boeing) Hazard levels HL1 / HL2 / HL3 Test method FTP Part 2 : EN ISO 5659-2 (NBS Smoke chamber) EN ISO 5659-2 ASTM E662 Testing configuration Horizontal Vertical Test time 20 mn 10 mn Irradiation 25 kW/m² with pilot flame and 25 kW/m² without pilot flame and 50 kW/m² without pilot flame 25 kW/m² with pilot flame or 25 kW/m² without pilot flame 25 kW/m² with pilot flame Measured parameters Ds max. (for the 3 types of irradiation) Ds(4) VOF4 Ds(1,5) Level by type of product Bulkheads, linings, ceilings ≤ 200 Primary deck coverings ≤ 400 Floor coverings ≤ 500 - Floor composites, Non listed products Ds max. (25 kW/m²) ≤ 600/300/150 - Seat upholstery Ds max. (25 kW/m²) ≤ 300/300/200 - Interior vertical surfaces, Curtains and sunblind Ds(4) (50 kW/m²) ≤ 600/300/150 VOF4 (50 kW/m²) ≤ 1200/600/300 - Flooring wall and ceiling lining and panels ≤ 100 ≤ 200 Interior ceiling and wall panels, Partitions, Galley structures

SMOKE TOXICITY Synthesis MARITIME RAILWAY (EU) RAILWAY (USA) AIRCRAFT (USA/EU) AIRCRAFT Classification document IMO / FTP Code 2010 EN 45545-1 EN 45545-2 NFPA 130 FAR Part 25 / CS-25 ABD 0031 (Airbus) BSS (Boeing) Hazard levels HL1 / HL2 / HL3 Test method FTP Part 2 : EN ISO 5659-2 + ISO 19702 (FTIR) EN 45545-2 Annex C (EN ISO 5659-2+FTIR) NF X70-100-1 NF X70-100-2 AITM 3.0005 (Airbus) BSS 7239 (Boeing) (ASTM E662+ Gases Analysis methods) Testing configuration Horizontal Vertical Test time 20 mn 10 mn Irradiation 25 kW/m² with pilot flame and 25 kW/m² without pilot flame and 50 kW/m² without pilot flame 25 kW/m² with pilot flame Furnace Temp. : 600°C 25 kW/m² without pilot flame Measured parameters Maximum individual concentration for 7 gases CITG at 4 and 8mn (global index for 8 gases, with a comparison between result and reference concentration ) CITNLP Maximum individual concentration for 6 gases at 1,5 and 4mn Level by type of product CO ≤ 1450 ppm HBr ≤ 600 ppm HCl ≤ 600 ppm HCN ≤ 140 ppm HF ≤ 600 ppm / NOx ≤ 350 ppm SO2 ≤ 120 ppm (200 ppm for floor coverings) Floor composites, Seat upholstery CITG 4 and 8 ≤ 1,2/0,9/0,75 Interior vertical surfaces, Curtains and sunblind CITG4 and 8 Interior seals, Non listed products CO ≤ 3500 ppm HCl ≤ 500 ppm HCN ≤ 150 ppm HF ≤ 200 ppm NO/NO2 ≤ 100 ppm SO2 ≤ 100 ppm

SMOKE DENSITY AND TOXICITY Definitions Measured parameters Ds max.: maximum specific optical density during the total test period Ds(4): product’s specific optical density at the time t = 4 mins Ds(1.5): product’s specific optical density at the time t = 1.5 mins VOF4: modified integral of specific optical density over the first 4 mins CITG: global indexs a toxicity for 8 gases, with a comparison between result and reference CITPNL: concentration Hazard Levels Railway vehicles are classified in accordance with the fire hazard level (HL) dependent on operation and design categories. The three hazard levels are: HL1, HL2 and HL3 with HL1 being the lowest requirement and HL3 being the highest.

SMOKE DENSITY AND TOXICITY Conclusion One apparatus with two different testing configuration : horizontal or vertical, Differents irradiations, 25 or 50 kW/m², with or without pilot flame, Two different test time :10 or 20 minutes, For DENSITY differents measured parameters : Ds at time, Ds max, VOF with different time : 1,5 à 20 minutes, For TOXICITY 2 differents approach : maximum concentration for each gas or global index All these parameters have a significant influence on the result. As it is difficult to determine an ideal configuration, I think it is better to work first on the spread of fire.