Annoyance and other health effects of transportation noise

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R E 1 Monitoring environmental health around Schiphol airport Carla van Wiechen, Danny Houthuijs, Siem Heisterkamp, Erik Lebret.
Advertisements

28/05/2008 The demand for personal air transport in Europe ILA Conference Berlin, 28 May 2008.
Quiet Please: The Future of EU Noise Policies Brussels, 25 May 2011 Burden of Disease from Environmental Noise Dr Rokho Kim WHO Regional Office for Europe.
Road traffic noise and cardiovascular health Quiet please, Brussels, May2011 Dr. Mette Sørensen, Senior Researcher Environment and Cancer, Danish Cancer.
Rail Freight Noise Abatement in Europe A consensus building workshop for all relevant stakeholders Conclusions and next steps Luc Aliadière, UIC UIC, Paris.
Spring 2015 ETM 568 Callier, Demers, Drabek, & Hutchison Carter, E. J., Pouch, S. M., & Larson, E. L. (2014). The relationship between emergency department.
1 Managing noise in the EU: current and upcoming challenges Colin Nugent The Future of EU Noise Policies 25 May 2011 Brussels.
EBD for Dental Staff Seminar 2: Core Critical Appraisal Dominic Hurst evidenced.qm.
Author: Todor Denisia-Suzana Co-author: Bigiu Adriana, Rus Victoria, Georgescu Mihai 1.
Health Impact Assessment A case study from Austria.
Task Force on Health Recent results - Particulate matter Michal Krzyzanowski TFH Chair Head, Bonn Office European Centre for Environment and Health WHO.
Concept and Objectives SINPHONIE Project kick-off meeting November, REC Conference Center, Szentendre Hungary Eduardo de Oliveira Fernandes IDMEC-FEUP.
Exposure-effect relationships between road traffic and aircraft noise exposure and reading comprehension: The RANCH Project. C Clark,
Hypertension and Exposure to Noise Near Airports: the HYENA study Jarup L, Babisch W, Houthuijs D, Pershagen G, Katsouyanni K, Cadum E, Dudley ML, Savigny.
Cognitive Impact on Children from Airplane Noise 2008.
Cardiovascular Disease Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting April 22, 2005.
Noise Policy Options for Farnborough Airport – Presentation on work carried out by Hepworth Acoustics for Rushmoor Council Peter Hepworth Thursday 31 st.
Workshop on EU regulations concerning statistical returns in respect of the carriage of passengers, freight and mail by air Belgrade, October - November.
Traffic noise and risk for diabetes and cancer Mette Sørensen Senior researcher, leader of research group Urban Environment Diet, Genes and Environment.
NOISE CONTROL IN URBAN PLANNING Student Maria Dyachenko Scientific Supervisor post-graduate Tatyana Voronova English Supervisor Doctor of philosophy, Assoc.
Unit 11: Evaluating Epidemiologic Literature. Unit 11 Learning Objectives: 1. Recognize uniform guidelines used in preparing manuscripts for publication.
04/03/2016 A proactive noise management: The EU at the service of national decision-makers ARC – 20 November 2015.
Update dose-effect relations for annoyance for aircraft noise Martin van den Berg Steering group noise Tampere.
15 January 2015 Add Presentation Title in Footer via ”Insert”; ”Header & Footer” Latest research on Wind Turbine Noise Take away from EWEA works shop on.
Can an evidence based coaching intervention improve outcomes for older people with congestive heart failure (CHF) and their informal caregivers within.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
Webinar May 25th METHYLPHENIDATE FOR CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH ATTENTION DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER (ADHD)
Mary Ellen Eagan President Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc. Using ‘Supplemental Metrics’ to Address the Effects of Noise on People TRB ADC40 Committee.
Final Meeting of the CAPACT project, 4-6 July 2007, Almaty, Kazakhstan M. Krzyzanowski and Kubanychbek Monolbaev WHO Regional Office for Europe EECCA participation.
‘Air Monitoring and Protection Strategies in EECCA’ UNECE/WGEMA Workshop, Geneva, 11 June 2007 Dr Hans-Guido Mücke for the WHO European Centre for Environment.
Paper title Authors. Slide text Please maintain suitable font size, noting that the presentation will be to an audience of over 100 delegates We recommend:
CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF A JOURNAL
Noise Major Airport, Noise mapping and action plan
Performance Based Transition
Cardiff Partnership Board
Assessment of Safety and Physical Environment factors in Governmental Primary Schools in Dammam Farhan M Al-Anezi.
Evaluating Cumulative Impacts: The Value of Epidemiology
How to read a paper D. Singh-Ranger.
Aircraft noise management in Denmark
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Sleep Patterns and Risk of Injury among Rural Minnesota Adolescents
Overview of the GRADE approach – selected slides
Baltic Sea cooperation for reducing ship and port emissions through knowledge- & innovation-based competitiveness BSR InnoShip Baltic Sea cooperation for.
National Academy of Neuropsychology
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE – A POWERFUL TOOL IN THE HANDS OF AUTHORS
Noise-related operation restrictions at Helsinki airport (EFHK) & the Balanced Approach Dr. Outi Ampuja Chief Advisor.
Wind Turbine noise: Characteristics of Strongly Annoyed Residents
Health effects of noise: health community’s policy recommendations
Noise Policy Update EPUK 2017 Annual Conference Jon Bowers
Conference on noise 24 April 2017 John F Ryan Director public health.
Bernhard Berger, Marco Paviotti DG Environment, European Commission
Literature searching & critical appraisal
Measures to Reduce Noise of Night Operations
Noise Major Airport, Noise mapping and action plan
Cardiovascular and metabolic effects of long-term exposure to traffic noise Göran Pershagen Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet.
Cardiff Partnership Board
9th Noise Expert Group Centre Borschette, Brussels, Belgium.
Sabine Wollscheid, Senior Researcher, Dr. phil.
Marie-Eve Héroux Technical Officer, Air Quality and Noise
The impact of small-group EBP education programme: barriers and facilitators for EBP allied health champions to share learning with peers.
Update on EU developments
Recent health impact research in Denmark
‒‒ Preliminary results of the EIONET survey
Update on forthcoming assessments by ETC/ACM
Evaluating Cumulative Impacts: The Value of Epidemiology
Towards WHO Guidelines on Environmental Noise
ANC Annual Conference – 6 June 2019
WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region Charlotte Clark Associate, Acoustics Annual Conference 6th June 2019 Manchester.
10th Noise Expert Group BREYDEL auditorium, Brussels, Belgium.
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2019
Presentation transcript:

Annoyance and other health effects of transportation noise + Annoyance and other health effects of transportation noise Results from NORAH and WHO Evidence Review Rainer Guski Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany Noise in Europe, Brussels, April 24, 2017

Contents Sources of Evidence: NORAH + WHO Review Noise Annoyance Depression Cardiovascular Effects Effects on Children‘s Reading Summary and Conclusions Guski: Annoyance and other health effects 2017-04-24 p. 2

WP3: Children's cognition, HQoL Sources of Evidence: NORAH + WHO Review 1a A multi-disciplinary field research initiative, called NORAH (Noise Related Annoyance, Cognition and Health), worked in Germany 2011-2015 Comprised effects of air, road, and rail transportation noise WP1: Annoyance & HQoL WP2: Health WP3: Children's cognition, HQoL WP0: Acoustics Guski: Annoyance and other health effects 2017-04-24 p. 3

Sources of Evidence: NORAH + WHO Review 1b NORAH included surveys, special tests and health insurance data in the large vicinity of Frankfurt Airport and surveys at Cologne/Bonn, Stuttgart and Berlin-Schönefeld airports At Frankfurt Airport, the survey used a panel study including 3 waves (2011, 2012, and 2013) Frankfurt Airport installed a new runway and a night curfew in winter 2011/12 Individual address-specific, long-term noise levels for all three noise sources were estimated (ca. 1.000,000 participants) Guski: Annoyance and other health effects 2017-04-24 p. 4

Sources of Evidence: NORAH + WHO Review 2 WHO Europe commissioned a systematic evidence review of the effects of long-term environmental noise on long- term annoyance Methods: Data sources and study eligibility criteria were defined, a systematic literature search was done, publication quality was assessed and selection criteria for the papers defined (e.g. publication years: 2000-2014) At the end, 57 studies could be used for quantitative meta- analysis. The published data were backed up by a questionnaire sent to the authors of the papers Review publication to appear in 2017: Guski, R., Schreckenberg, D. & Schuemer, R. (2017). Review: WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Annoyance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH), submitted (Manuscript ID: ijerph-192252). Guski: Annoyance and other health effects 2017-04-24 p. 5

Noise Annoyance: Aircraft Noise 1 12 surveys provided comparable data on exposure / annoyance, ∑ N=17,094 % HA higher than EU standard curve at comparable Lden 25 % HA at 54 dB Lden Guski: Annoyance and other health effects 2017-04-24 p. 6

Noise Annoyance: Aircraft Noise 2 NORAH WP1 (Schreckenberg et al. 2015) reports comparable results: Frankfurt Airport (FRA 2011-2013) is associated with highest %HA, Cologne/Bonn (CGN), Stuttgart (STR) and Berlin-Schönefeld (BER) are associated with somewhat lower %HA Guski: Annoyance and other health effects 2017-04-24 p. 7

Noise Annoyance: Road Traffic Noise 25 surveys provided comparable data on exposure / annoyance, ∑ N=34,112 % HA comparable to EU standard curve NORAH: similar results Guski: Annoyance and other health effects 2017-04-24 p. 8

Noise Annoyance: Railway Noise 9 surveys provided comparable data on exposure / annoyance, ∑ N=10,970 % HA higher than EU standard curve at comparable Lden Guski: Annoyance and other health effects 2017-04-24 p. 9

Health Effects 1: Depression Secondary data-based case-control study 77,295 cases; 578,246 controls Linear Odds Ratio increase per 10 dB increase LpAeq,24h: Aircraft: 8.9% (no optimal fit) Road traffic: 4.1% Railway: 3.9% (no optimal fit) Guski: Annoyance and other health effects 2017-04-24 p. 10

Health Effects 2: Heart insufficiency / hypertens. heart disease Secondary data-based case-control study 104,145 cases; 654,172 controls Linear Odds Ratio increase per 10 dB increase LpAeq,24h: Aircraft: 1.6% Road traffic: 2.4% Railway: 3.1% Aircraft noise Road traffic noise Railway noise Guski: Annoyance and other health effects 2017-04-24 p. 11

Health Effects 3: Sleep disturbance Polysomnographic sleep data registration within bedrooms of residents at Frankfurt Airport 2011-2013 49 participants (2011), 83 participants (2012) Results: Some relieve due to night flight ban, more morning complaints Guski: Annoyance and other health effects 2017-04-24 p. 12

Effects on children‘s reading capabilities NORAH WP 3 (Cognitive development and quality of life of children): Concentrated on chronic aircraft noise effects at school and home on primary school children with respect to: acquisition of reading skills the development of reading-relevant speech skills quality of life Looked for exposure-response relations, controlling for as much confounders as possible Data from 1,243 children + 1,185 parents + 85 teachers Found a statistically highly significant decrease of reading performance of children with increasing aircraft noise levels (LpAeq,08-16h 40-60dB): a 10 dB increase of long-term noise levels was followed by one month retardation of reading performance. Guski: Annoyance and other health effects 2017-04-24 p. 13

Summary and conclusions 1 + Summary and conclusions 1 Evidence review on annoyance and NORAH both show a considerable increase of % Highly Annoyed by aircraft noise at comparable LpAeq (e.g., Lden) in relation to EU standard Possible causes of the increase: Modern aircraft noise estimation procedures differ Number of aircraft movements differ Airport fleet compositions differ Situational context of surveys may differ (“change”) Other ? Evidence review on annoyance and NORAH both show an increase of % Highly Annoyed by railway noise at comparable LpAeq (e.g., Lden) in relation to EU standard Night time freight traffic ? Guski: Annoyance and other health effects 2017-04-24 p. 14

Summary and conclusions 2 + Summary and conclusions 2 NORAH WP2 shows Large increase of depression risks with increasing levels of aircraft, road, and railway noise levels Increase of heart insufficiency/hypertensive heart disease with increasing levels of railway, road, and aircraft noise levels With respect to cardiac infarction, stroke, and heart insufficiency, railway noise effects were stronger, as compared to the other traffic noise sources Sleep disturbance during the night decreased somewhat after implementation of a night flight ban at Frankfurt Airport. However, negative feelings in the morning hours increased NORAH WP3 Found a decrease of reading performance of school children with increasing aircraft noise levels. More protection against transportation noise is needed. Guski: Annoyance and other health effects 2017-04-24 p. 15

Thank you for your attention! + Thank you for your attention! www.norah-study.de Acknowledgements: The Evidence review of annoyance was commissioned by WHO Europe. NORAH was commissioned by the Hessian state-owned Environment & Community Center (ECC), Kelsterbach, Germany.