Patient selection process in the present study.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment.

Advertisements

Date of download: 6/29/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: The Emerging Role of Exercise Testing and Stress.

Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Relationship between tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

Algorithm for the management of aortic valve stenosis

Management strategy for patients with aortic stenosis

Survival Benefit of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Ejection Fraction And Low Gradient With Normal Ejection.

Aortic valve replacement in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: Left ventricular ejection fraction matters Victor Dayan, MD, PhD, Philippe Pibarot,

Algorithms proposed by the Heart Valve Clinic International Database (HAVEC) group for disease staging and management in patients with aortic valve stenosis.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging

by Mario Gössl, Garvan C. Kane, William Mauermann, and David R. Holmes

Patrizio Lancellotti et al. JIMG 2016;9:

Shadi Al Halabi et al. JACEP 2015;1:

Alan G. Japp et al. JACC 2016;67: Differentiation of Athlete’s Heart From Early DCM by Myocardial Deformation Imaging Two-dimensional speckle.

Figure 3 A patient with aortic and mitral stenosis

Johannes Steiner et al. JACC 2017;70:

Johannes Steiner et al. JACC 2017;70:

Aspects to be considered by the Heart Team for the decision between TAVR and SAVR in patients at increased surgical risk. Aspects to be considered by the.

Figure 2 A patient with aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation

MACE rate among CAD severity groups (total 0

Johannes Steiner et al. JACC 2017;70:

(A–C) Sequential angiographic images demonstrating placement of the wire, using the retrograde technique in the LV cavity (A), followed by balloon placement.

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

The effect of GOODCOLL versus POORCOLL on LVEF, LVEDV and scar at 4 months. The effect of GOODCOLL versus POORCOLL on LVEF, LVEDV and scar at 4 months.

Wayne L. Miller et al. JCHF 2013;1:

Mohit K. Turagam et al. JACEP 2017;3:

Prabhat Kumar et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep

Connie W. Tsao et al. JCHF 2016;4:

Bar chart of systolic function in healthy individuals, HCM LVH− patients and HCM LVH+ patients. GLS was significantly worse in the HCM LVH+ patients compared.

Bar chart of cardiac volumes and EF in the healthy individuals, HCM LVH− patients and HCM LVH+ patients. Blue bars show the indexed diastolic volumes (EDVI.

Classification of left ventricular (LV) size by (A) LV internal diameter in diastole (LVIDD) according to LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi), (B) LVIDD.

Comparison of CMR and echocardiography in aortic regurgitation.

Receiver operating characteristic curves for the association of primary outcome using each clinical risk score and each clinical risk score adjusted for.

Marie-Annick Clavel et al. JIMG 2017;10:

Time course of changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular diastolic dimension (LVDd) in 13 patients with the development.

Cumulative survival without events during 1 year in patients with preserved systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40%) and with.

Associations between β-blocker dosage group, predischarge heart rate group, and the primary composite outcome of death or cardiovascular rehospitalisation.

Relationship between the change in left ventricular ejection fraction (ΔLVEF) and change in left ventricular diastolic dimension (ΔLVDd) at 4 years at.

Flow chart of the 1683 study members at age 60–64 years by hypertension (HT) status. Flow chart of the 1683 study members at age 60–64 years by hypertension.

Patient selection. *This category included 10 patients with suspected tachyarrhythmia, 9 treated for cancer with cardiotoxic cytostatics and/or transthoracic.

Flow chart patient inclusion.

Associations between presence of tachycardia at time of admission (heart rate ≥120/min) and the primary composite outcome of death or cardiovascular rehospitalisation,

Flow chart showing reinterventions by type in patients with anomalous origin of coronary artery from the pulmonary artery patients, divided into early.

Different behaviours between group 1 and group 2 patients of the mean and SD of Δ for low frequency (LF), high frequency (HF) and total power (TP) calculated.

Simpson's biplane ejection fraction (A), and two-dimensional speckle-tracking global longitudinal strain (B) in patients receiving clozapine treatment,

(A and B) Pressure tracings showing haemodynamic results pre-BAV (A) and post-BAV (B) procedure. (A and B) Pressure tracings showing haemodynamic results.

Representative images of coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve (FFR) from a patient who showed no resting ECG abnormality. Representative images.

Ejection fraction preoperatively and at follow-up in conventional (C) and no-touch (NT) groups. Ejection fraction preoperatively and at follow-up in conventional.

Connie W. Tsao et al. JCHF 2016;4:

Rick A. Nishimura et al. JACC 2014;63:e57-e185

Average left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) values during the 1 year of observation in patients with preserved systolic function (LVEF >40%) and.

Unadjusted means by smoking status

Amir A. Mahabadi et al. JIMG 2017;10:

Impact of preoperative MG below 40 mm Hg and presence of postoperative PM on frequency of a decline in absolute pVO2 of more than 10% between pre-AVR and.

Satoru Kishi et al. JCHF 2014;2:

Percentage distribution of ESC HF subtypes and no cardiac dysfunction (no dysf, n=38) among all 370 included patients, where HFvhd is HF due to valvular.

Rick A. Nishimura et al. JACC 2017;70:

Histograms of LVESVI, LVEDVI, LVMI, and 3D LVEF Tabulations of frequencies of left ventricular end-systolic volume (A), end-diastolic volume (B), mass.

Maxime Berthelot-Richer et al. JIMG 2016;9:

Philippe Pibarot et al. JIMG 2015;8:

Evan M. Zahn et al. JCIN 2016;9: Relationship Between Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction The graph depicts.

Time to first event analysis revealed a significant difference in estimated event-free (death or hospitalisation) survival between patients with left ventricular.

KM analysis of 1-year mortality in the study population stratified according to different baseline characteristics. KM analysis of 1-year mortality in.

Changes in clinical parameters and use of catecholamines during hospitalisation (A) inotropic score, B) serum lactate levels and (C) SAPS II from baseline.

Unadjusted means according to normal versus abnormal cardiac variables among current smokers. DD, diastolic dysfunction; LVM, left ventricular mass; RVFAC,

Change in 6 min walk distance at 12 months in subgroups defined by baseline characteristics. The mean (95% CI) for the difference between CABG and medical.

Heritability estimates in percentages using structural equations modelling for primary trait phenotypes in DCM (LVEF and LVEDD), HCM (IVSd) and LQTS (QTc).

Constantijn Franssen et al. JCHF 2016;4:

Adjusted cumulative incidence of stroke, by sex and heart failure status. Adjusted cumulative incidence of stroke, by sex and heart failure status. The.

Kaplan-Meier curves showing the probability of symptom-free survival according to the rate of heart rate rise during exercise testing in (A) for the whole.

Cardioprotective effects of ivabradine administration in the setting of acute coronary syndromes and myocardial infarction. Cardioprotective effects of.

Presentation transcript:

Patient selection process in the present study. Patient selection process in the present study. The flow chart shows grouping of patients based on the 2014 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology valvular disease guideline. AS, aortic stenosis; HG, high-gradient; LF, low-flow; LG, low-gradient; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MG, mean gradient; NF, normal-flow; SVi, stroke volume index. Yugo Nara et al. Open Heart 2019;6:e000988 ©2019 by British Cardiovascular Society