ADCP-Corrected Absolute Geostrophic Current and Transport

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Central Plains Nocturnal Low-Level Jet (Wind Maximum) What is this??? Go to: and pull up:
Advertisements

Pre-Calculus Solving Problems With Trigonometry. Using Angle of Depression The angle of depression of a buoy from the top of the Barnegat Bay lighthouse.
Horizontal Pressure Gradients Pressure changes provide the push that drive ocean currents Balance between pressure & Coriolis forces gives us geostrophic.
Morphodynamic Equilibria in Tidal Embayments with Decreasing Cross-Section Henk Schuttelaars The Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research Utrecht.
Horizontal Pressure Gradients Pressure changes provide the push that drive ocean currents Balance between pressure & Coriolis forces gives us geostrophic.
Meteorologisk Institutt met.no OPNet, Geilo May 27, 2009LPR 1 The IAOOS Seaglider Project A few notes for the OPNet meeting, May 27-28, 2009 prepared by.
A Voyage of Discovery Physical oceanography Instructor: Dr. Cheng-Chien LiuCheng-Chien Liu Department of Earth Sciences National Cheng Kung University.
Wind Driven Circulation I: Planetary boundary Layer near the sea surface.
Response of the Upper Ocean to Winds
CEE 262A H YDRODYNAMICS Lecture 18 Surface Ekman layer.
AGU, 2003 Greenland Iceland Shet- land Faroes image:AGU 2003 Cost ‐ efficient monitoring of the main Atlantis inflow to the Arctic Mediterranean B. Hansen,
Mechanical Vibrations
Ekman Flow September 27, 2006.
Numerical Methods Part: False-Position Method of Solving a Nonlinear Equation
Summary Part 1 Measured Value = True Value + Errors = True Value + Errors Errors = Random Errors + Systematic Errors How to minimize RE and SE: (a)RE –
An example of vertical profiles of temperature, salinity and density.
What are the best locations for wind turbines in Japan? Shinichi Hongo.
Ekman pumping Integrating the continuity equation through the layer:. Assume and let, we have is transport into or out of the bottom of the Ekman layer.
12.808, Problem 1, problem set #2 This is a 3 part question dealing with the wind-driven circulation. At 26 o N in the N. Atlantic, the average wind stress.
Geopotential and isobaric surfaces
Cross-Gyre Thermohaline Transport in the Tropical Atlantic: The role of NBC Rings Bill Johns Zulema Garraffo Division of Meteorology and Physical Oceanography.
By: Aaron Dyreson Supervising Professor: Dr. Ioannis Schizas
Permanent Meanders in the California Current System and Comparison of Near- Surface Observations with OGCM Solutions Luca Centurioni (SIO-PORD) Collaborators:
IB Physics SHM Lab PART 1: Periods of oscillating system.
GOOS/GCOS measurements of near-surface currents Rick Lumpkin National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlantic Oceanographic.
ITHACA: First Findings from CTD Profiling Ivica Vilibić, Branka Grbec Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Split, Croatia and ITHACA CTD.
RD Instruments Home of the ADCP Measuring Water in Motion and Motion in Water AVOIDING BIASED DATA DURING REAL TIME HADCP DATA COLLECTION.
EXAMPLE: Graph 1 shows the variation with time t of the displacement d of a traveling wave. Graph 2 shows the variation with distance x along the same.
Simple Harmonic Motion Waves 14.2 Simple Harmonic motion (SHM ) 14-3 Energy in the Simple Harmonic Oscillator 14-5 The Simple Pendulum 14-6 The Physical.
WinRiver.
Class Meeting Nov. 26, 2:00pm-4:45pm
The Boussinesq and the Quasi-geostrophic approximations
Satellite Data for CLIMODE
The β-spiral Determining absolute velocity from density field
Statistics Presentation
Central Divided Difference
Ionospheric Effect on the GNSS Radio Occultation Climate Data Record
LCDR John Hendrickson 17SEP2008
Effects of Ship’s Envelope on Wind Measurements
Discharge Rate in White Point Swash
San Francisco Bay Properties
Comparison of Aircraft Observations With Surface Observations from
Examination of a Boundary Layer Jet
The Maroonstone Rocket
Combination of oceanographic data with wind data acquired during the cruise to try to draw conclusions on wind stress, Ekman transport and Ekman layer.
LCDR George Wright, USN OC 3570 – Winter 2008 Friday, March 14th 2008
Characterization of Sound Speed Profiles
Forward Divided Difference
Evidence of the California Undercurrent in CTD Data
Operational Oceanography and Meteorology
GEOSTROPHIC, EKMAN & ADCP VOLUME TRANSPORT
LT Ricardo Roman OC3570 March 7, 2006
CTD/XBT Comparison, Quality of JJYY Data and XBT Data Analysis of the Mixed Layer Depth by LT Mike Roth OC MAR01.
CTD AND XBT TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT COMPARISON
A HEIGHT AND STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF THE MARINE BOUNDARY LAYER OFF THE CALIFORNIA COAST LCDR Matthew J. Moore   13 Sep 2004 OC3570 Cruise Project.
The California Current System: Comparison of Geostrophic Currents, ADCP Currents and Satellite Altimetry LCDR David Neander, NOAA OC3570, Summer 2001.
Validating NAVO’s Navy Coastal Ocean Model
LEUT Scott Peak, RAN OC 3570 Winter 2004
Comparison of Computed Geostropic Currents and ADCP
Operational Oceanography and Meteorolgy
What are we seeing in the surface currents?
Ekman Divergence From Shipboard Wind Measurements
ADCP Referenced Geostrophic Velocities and Transport Part II: Along-Shore LT Eric Macdonald Line 85.
Solving Problems With Trigonometry
An Analysis of the Eckman Mass Transport for Cruise Data OC
Forward Divided Difference
An Analysis of San Clemente Basin: Crosshore vs. Alongshore
ENS Alicia A. Washkevich, USN
CTD RELATIVE GEOSTROPHIC VELOCITY VS. ADCP VELOCITY
in situ or Altimetry ? Arctic – Subarctic Ocean Fluxes focus topics:
Presentation transcript:

ADCP-Corrected Absolute Geostrophic Current and Transport OC 3570 LT Terry McNamara 7 March 2006

Overview Introduction Method Sources of Error Assumptions Results 1 Overview Introduction Method Sources of Error Assumptions Results Conclusions Questions

Introduction Cruise: 19-26 January Line 70 Moss Landing Port San Luis Port Hueneme Line 70 Cruise: 19-26 January

3 Method Calculate onshore geostrophic transport from two deep CTD casts at either end of line 70 Assumes level of no motion (z=3532.5m) ADCP gives true currents down to approx. 650m Can use ADCP to obtain correct transport

Sources of Error Misalignment angle Schuler Oscillation 4 Sources of Error Misalignment angle Known for R/V Point Sur and accounted for Schuler Oscillation Known and accounted for

Sources of Error Ageostrophic velocities Drift currents Tides 5 Sources of Error Ageostrophic velocities Drift currents Tides Internal waves Inertial oscillations

6 Assumptions Max depth of Ekman layer well above layer used for correction Tides negligible out at Line 70 Other ageostrophic currents negligible ADCP & GPS errors small

7 Results

8 Choosing a Level 31 30 29 33 32 28 du dz = 0

Raw ADCP Level 31 Velocities 9 Raw ADCP Level 31 Velocities

Interpolated Level 31 Velocities 10 Interpolated Level 31 Velocities u’ v’

CTD-Derived Velocities 11 CTD-Derived Velocities Level 31

12 CTD & ADCP At Level 31 u’ cm/s

Correction u’ averaged over Line 70 at Level 31 (z=259 m) 13 Correction u’ averaged over Line 70 at Level 31 (z=259 m) By CTD: u’ = -1.0433 cm/s By ADCP: u’ = -0.0616 cm/s Correction to Geo. Vel. = +0.9817 cm/s

ADCP-Corrected Transport 14 ADCP-Corrected Transport

15 Conclusions Geostrophic Transport referenced to 3532m level of no motion: 3.1 Sv offshore Absolute Geostrophic Transport: 11.1 Sv onshore Significant current down to 3500+ m

Please address your questions to me!