Control of a cell-cultured microrobot in vitro and in vivo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Demonstrations I, II, and III.
Advertisements

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.
Cytotoxicity of MSP samples to normal and cancer cell lines.
Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.
Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.
TPAD controller performance for three force components.
Fluorescence-based in vivo imaging of MSP.
Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].
TPAD training protocol.
Histology results comparing surgical and naïve groups.
Workspace comparison of Delta robots.
T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.
Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.
Spontaneous locomotion of hygrobots under spatial gradient of humidity
Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.
Distribution of the number of collisions and the average closest-neighbor distance as a function of communication range and delay. Distribution of the.
Visual explanation of the interaction terms.
Visual explanation of the interaction terms.
Power-free sterilization of culture plate.
Prosthesis grasping and control.
Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.
Tactile features for prosthesis perception.
Online verification using reachable occupancies.
Illustration of the addressable wireless folding concept.
Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.
Experimental characterization of the milliDelta’s quasi-static workspace (yellow) compared with the theoretical workspace (blue) generated by the kinematic.
T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.
Prosthesis system diagram.
Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.
Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities under different grid lengths (lg) and burr lengths (lb). Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities.
2D motility characterization and external magnetic steering of RBC microswimmers. 2D motility characterization and external magnetic steering of RBC microswimmers.
Magnetic actuation of BMRs.
Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.
Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.
Steady-state performance of the soft robotic device in LHF models.
Results from clothespin relocation test.
Fluorescence response of actuator.
Construction of a biohybrid robot with an antagonistic pair of skeletal muscle tissues. Construction of a biohybrid robot with an antagonistic pair of.
The two modalities for the multitask condition.
Potential applications of the light-induced actuator.
Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.
Quadcopter equipped with dual-stiffness origami arms.
In vitro cell-release experiments on a glass substrate.
Motions of the biohybrid robot powered by the antagonistic pair of skeletal muscle tissues. Motions of the biohybrid robot powered by the antagonistic.
In situ concurrent removal of MRSA bacteria and MRSA-secreting PFTs by RBC-PL-robots. In situ concurrent removal of MRSA bacteria and MRSA-secreting PFTs.
Object manipulations performed by our biohybrid robots.
Overhead snapshots. Overhead snapshots. (A to E) Mark I3, robot experiments (movie S1). (F) Mark I3, simulation (movie S2, side by side with a run on the.
Fig. 6 WPS imaging of different chemical components in living cells.
Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.
AEGIS autonomous targeting process.
Overview of the experimental setup and visual stimulus.
Details of seal design. Details of seal design. (A) RAD sampler (left), with close-up view (right) indicating the soft edges that form the light seal.
Laboratory tests. Laboratory tests. (A) Time lapse of the landing process, refilling process, and subsequent launch. (B) Comparison of position and velocity.
Discrimination accuracy across conditions.
Fig. 6 MSC encapsulation in vitro within PdBT cross-linked gels.
State-of-the-art midwater sampling tools.
Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.
Characterization and optimization of the device.
The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.
Fig. 3 Comparisons of NDVI trends over the globally vegetated areas from 1982 to Comparisons of NDVI trends over the globally vegetated areas from.
Iron line orientation inside the PDMS matrix.
Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.
Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.
Setup of the microrobot-assisted high-precision wet transfer.
Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic skins. Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic.
Fig. 4 Gallium increases P. aeruginosa sensitivity to peroxides.
Robot-initiated joint attention.
Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison with human trackers. Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison.
Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.
Setup used in the study. Setup used in the study. A child interacts with the robot tutor with a large touchscreen sitting between them, displaying the.
Presentation transcript:

Control of a cell-cultured microrobot in vitro and in vivo. Control of a cell-cultured microrobot in vitro and in vivo. (A) Movement of a microrobot cultured with MC3T3-E1 cells along a desired rectangular path in clockwise direction in PBS. (B) Velocity of MC3T3-E1 cell–cultured microrobot against the magnetic field gradient in different fluid environments (n = 4). (C) Position errors of the MC3T3-E1 cell–cultured microrobot in different fluid environments (with a magnetic field gradient of 4 to 9 T/m). (D) Time-lapsed images of the MSC-cultured microrobot moving in the yolk of a zebrafish embryo. (E) Velocity of MSC-cultured microrobot against the magnetic field gradient in vivo (n = 4). (F) Positional errors of the MSC-cultured microrobot in vivo (with a magnetic field gradient of 20 T/m). Error bars indicate SD. Junyang Li et al. Sci. Robotics 2018;3:eaat8829 Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works