Appraising result framework

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Results-Based Management (RBM) and the UNDAF Results Matrix.
Advertisements

Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.
An initiative of the ACP Group of States funded by the European Union Global Climate Change Alliance: Intra-ACP Programme Training Module Mainstreaming.
1 CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT Lecture 3 Project management methodologies.
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
A member of CGIAR consortium East and Central Africa Flagship Overview of DevResult Chris Okafor, Flagship Manager Rachel Zozo, M&E Officer.
INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT PLANNING AND APPRAISAL LOGICAL FRAME WORK PREPARED BY GEORGE BOTCHIE.
Module 9 Mainstreaming in country monitoring systems Country-led environmental and climate change mainstreaming (specialist course) Training materials.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
SUB-MODULE 5. MEANS OF VERIFICATION RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation 1 Common monitoring and evaluation framework Jela Tvrdonova, 2010.
Monitoring and Evaluation Orientation 17 th May 2011 MCA Namibia.
Guidelines for LDS preparation for Croatian LAG’s Estonian Leader Union Kadri Tillemann and Kristiina Timmo 28 th of September, Zagreb.
Using results frameworks to shift the focus of evaluation to a strategic level Emerging research on the principles underpinning results frameworks Kate.
M&E TRAINING MODULES Different tools for different applications.
Logical Framework Slide 1 Mekong Institute & UNESCO Regional Office-Bangkok 23 February – 6 March 2009; Khon Kaen, Thailand Prepared by the Education Policy.
Presenting the AGENDA FOR TRANSFORMATION (AfT) Engaging the CSOs on AfT Monitoring from HRBA Approach Ministry of Planning Republic of Liberia.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation Common monitoring and evaluation framework for evaluation of rural development programs.
Results Oriented Monitoring & Evaluation Model (ROMEM) Presented by Shawn Grey Ministry of Transport and Works Jamaica. Model developed by MTW and DPMI.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,
LIPH HANDBOOK PART 1: PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES Planning Framework
Working with Logic Models
SPSA Evaluation Reyna Corral
Implementation Plan I want to plan a project
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
SCOA for Municipalities:
GEF Familiarization Seminar
Monitoring & Evaluation Processes A A walkthrough of the whole process
Managing for Results Capacity in Higher Education Institutions
Evaluation : goals and principles
BUMP IT UP STRATEGY in NSW Public Schools
SCOA for Municipalities:
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
Business Environment
Business Environment
Business Environment
Logical Framework I want to design a project by planning out the logic
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
16 May 2018 Briefing to the Portfolio Committee of the Department of Sport and Recreation portfolio on the review of the draft APP.
Session 3 The monitoring framework
UNDP-UNEP POVERTY & ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE (PEI): MID-TERM REVIEW
منهج الإطار المنطقي وإطار الرصد والتقييم وإطار النتائج
Session 9 Recap on LFM and IL.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring programs and projects Using Results Framework
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Project Management Training
Describe result frameworks
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
Task Force on Target Setting and Reporting TFTSR
Background Initiated by the MDB Working Group on MfDR 2004
THEORY OF CHANGE VS. LOGICAL FRAMEWORK
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Results Based Management for Monitoring & Evaluation
Changing the Game The Logic Model
Monitoring programs and projects
Appraising result framework
Executive Director, Atkinson Review
Monitoring programs and projects Using Results Framework
Session 2: Designing M&E for Climate Actions
Appraising result framework
Appraising result framework
National Skills Development Plan (NSDP) Skills Planning and Research
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Appraising result framework
Presentation transcript:

Appraising result framework

Agenda Result framework: principles and process Analysis of result framework: case based discussion of selected projects Common issues in project planning and implementation

What is a Result and What is Not?

What is a Result and What is Not?

On June 4, 2018 about three dozen shops were monitored Case: “Agriculture Minister Assures to End Syndicate System in Kalimati Vegetable Market” On June 4, 2018 about three dozen shops were monitored To manage the market properly To end the existence of syndicates

Preamble: Results Based Monitoring and Evaluation Guidelines, 2010, NPC

Result Result means the output, production or outcomes/effect achieved from the implementation of any programme. -(NPC, 2010, Results Based Monitoring and Evaluation Guidelines 2067/2010)

Results Framework A results framework represents the underlying logic that explains how the development objective of a project is to be achieved. It is an explicit articulation (graphic display, matrix, or summary) of the different levels or chains of results expected from a particular intervention - project, program, or development strategy (WB, 2012).

Logics in Result Frameworks 10% increase in the no. of primary level students continuing on to high school with in 3 years Improve reading proficiency among students in primary level by 20% within 3 years 500 primary level students with low reading proficiency complete a reading summer camp (100 students * 5 groups)

The Results Chain Output Outcome Goal Result Risk Activities Inputs

The Results Chain: Example Impact: Can study better for exam Outcome: More alert Output: Cup of strong coffee Activities: 1) Fill kettle, 2) Boil Water, 3) Pour in cup, 4) Add coffee, milk and sugar, 5) stir Inputs: Water, Coffee, Sugar, Milk, Kettle, Cup, Spoon, Heat Source

How Result Framework Works? National/sector area National/sector area Goal Purpose Project/ Program Project/Program Outputs Inputs Activities Present situation Expected situation

How Results Framework Works? आयोजना प्रभाब Project/Program Outcomes Project/Program Outputs Project/Program Activity Inputs National Goal Sectoral Goal Regional/International Goal More Impact Collective Accountability Less

Origin and Development Pre 2000 AD Post 2000 AD Command and control, management Management by objectives, SMART objective Logical Framework Approach, shift of line item budgets to budgeting around objectives Development and humanitarian communities Results based management Paris Declaration (OAHRM) Accra Agenda for Action (OIDC)

Managing for Development Results An alternative “change management” approach that focuses on the whole results chain (ADB, 2012). It is about defining outcomes and outputs with measurable indicators and time-bound targets; allocating resources for activities; implementing activities and monitoring progress and targets; and evaluating performance against targets.

NPC, Logical Framework Result Chain and its description Indicator of Performance Criteria for Validation Key Assumptions Goal Purpose Outcome Output Activity Input

ADB, Design and Monitoring Framework Design Summary Performance Target/Indicators Data Sources/ Reporting Mechanisms Assumptions and Risks Impact Outcome Output Activity with milestone Inputs

WB, Results Framework Impact OC1 OP1 OP2 … Programs/ Indicators Baseline (YYYY) Targets MoV Responsible Agency Assump. /Risks YYYY Impact OC1 OP1 OP2 … Programs/ S. Programs (Inputs)

Appraising Result Framework Case (Emergency Earthquake Assistance Project’s Design and Monitoring Framework) Individual work (15 min): How is the hierarchy of change in design? What about indicators? Are they measurable? How sure are you in achieving results? Group Work (15 min) and 5 min each for Presentation: Discuss in group and consolidate the findings. List issues/challenges regarding this project in terms of planning and implementation.

Issues: Project Planning and Implementation Inclusive participation Focusing the dialogue on results at all phases of the development process Aligning programming, monitoring and evaluation with results Keeping measurement and reporting simple Managing for, not by results; and Using results information for learning and decision-making

Issues… Difficulty in applying causal logic Difficulty in learning Difficulty in integrating Difficulty in revising Difficulty in measuring Difficulty in ‘accrediting’

Further Readings National Planning Commission (NPC), 2010, Results Based Monitoring and Evaluation Guidelines 2067/2010, Kathmandu, NPC. World Bank (WB), 2012, designing a results framework for achieving results: a how-to guide, Washington DC, WB. Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2012, Managing for Development Result: Relevance, Responsiveness and Result Orientation, Manila, ADB.

Thank you ?