Table 3. Sugar contents of the examined food samples (g/100 g)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Advertisements

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Lacto-ovo vegetarian group
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Figure 3. The culture medium containing the plant extract composition of the present invention can effectively promote the proliferation of mesenchymal.
Table 1. Empirical MSE to estimate the CP distribution parameter λ
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. the contents of free amino acids
Table 2. Changes in body composition, energy and water intake
Figure 1. Gel electrophoresis of total genomic DNA extracted from: M, DL 2000 DNA Marker (Takara).1, smoked and cooked sausage (pork and beef); 2, raw.
Steamed black soybeans
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Bread formulation for two kilograms of dough
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Thermotolerant coliforms
Neutrient detergent fiber %
Mean in positive samples1 (µg/kg) Highest value found (µg/kg)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. Composition of goat milk according to breed and country
Table 6. Frequency of RTEC Consumption in Terms of Gender
Table 4. RTEC Consumption in Terms of Place of Residence
SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Daily Percentage HMF Intake
Figure 2. Universal primers (mcb398/mcb869) amplified a 472 bp fragment of mitochondrial gene: M, DL 2000 DNA Marker (Takara). 1, smoked and cooked sausage.
Table 1. Formulation of gluten-free cake
Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 9, doi: /jfnr
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Composition of the diet (g/kg)
Table 3. Descriptive Statistics – All Banks
Management Philosophy
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 5. Sensory evaluation of mayonnaise samples
Table 2. Phytonutriments and antinutritionals factors Contents
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 6. Control sample industry distribution
Table 1. Commercial Characteristics of Canned White Asparagus
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
% of inhibition of hydrolysis (INH)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Summary Statistics of Top Cut 1-m Samples
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Protopanaxatriol (PPT) Microwave processed drying raw ginseng (%,w/w)
Acid value (as oleic acid) Peroxide value (meq / kg)*
Number of questionnaires sent out
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Composition of the experimental diets
Table 1. Nigeria under-five mortality level and trends ( )
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 6, doi: /jfnr-4-6-2
Much more than it should
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Total soluble substance (%)
Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant
Solid-liquid ratio (B)
Cashew juice stored for 30 days
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 6, doi: /jfnr-4-6-2
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 6, doi: /jfnr-4-6-2
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Ingredients/100g dry sample
Presentation transcript:

Table 3. Sugar contents of the examined food samples (g/100 g) Fructose Glucose Sucrose Lactose Sucralose Maltitol TotalSugar Jelly tots Max 6.00 38.80 44.77 6.42 nd* 0.06 93.47 Min 3.79 4.33 33.83 5.17 nd 0.03 48.19 Mean 4.99 11.55 38.57 5.75 60.89 Chocolate 27.82 15.86 12.86 53.10 21.95 9.03 6.51 41.90 24.68 12.45 9.97 47.10 Pudding 0.71 1.92 23.67 26.30 0.45 1.22 15.03 16.70 0.54 1.46 17.98 19.98 Yogurt 2.05 1.30 11.48 0.90 15.65 1.03 1.16 10.58 0.78 12.89 1.18 10.93 0.85 14.18 Cookie 22.30 11.98 34.55 41.20 0.07 1.12 16.00 6.82 2.62 17.75 27.19 Wafer 31.50 11.20 22.20 14.70 46.20 7.10 6.60 19.80 2.40 40.00 12.52 8.04 16.92 5.50 42.98 Cake 0.02 4.20 65.60 2.10 24.00 4.00 75.60 0.05 21.00 1.33 0.80 0.50 45.50 50.85 0.69 4.96 1.50 60.42 *nd= not detected. Şana SUNGUR et al. Determination of Sugar Profiles of Sweetened Foods and Beverages. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 6, 349-354. doi:10.12691/jfnr-4-6-2 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.