Shared Positive Affect Shared Negative Affect

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Swann Arp Adams, PhD Cancer Prevention and Control Program University of South Carolina The Impact of Federally Qualified Health Centers on Cancer Mortality-to-Incidence.
Advertisements

A Comparison of Early Versus Late Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically III Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and.
Breast Cancer among Women Living in Poverty: Better Care in Canada than in the United States Historical Cohort Support of a Health Insurance Explanation.
Delay from Testing HIV Positive until First HIV Care for Drug Users: Adverse Consequences and Possible Solutions Barbara J Turner MD, MSEd* John Fleishman.
Racial Disparities and Socioeconomic Status in Association with Survival in Older Men with Local/Regional Stage Prostate Cancer Xianglin L. Du, M.D., Ph.D.
Chance, bias and confounding
Impact of Cancer Diagnosis and Chemotherapy on Mammography Use Xinhua Yu, M.B., Ph.D. A. Marshall McBean, M.D., M.Sc. Beth A. Virnig, Ph.D., M.P.H Division.
Breast Cancer Detection, Treatment, and Survival in Medicare and Medicaid Insured Patients Cathy J. Bradley, Ph.D. Professor of Health Administration Co-leader,
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Incidence, Survival and Treatment Linda C. Harlan, PhD, MPH National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Control and.
FEMALE BREAST CANCER JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL CANCER REGISTRY Prepared by Theresa SanLorenzo-Caswell, CTR 10/03/20014.
Lecture 8 Objective 20. Describe the elements of design of observational studies: case reports/series.
Ethnic Disparities in Early Breast Cancer Management among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders Rebecca P. Gelber, MD, MPH Department of Medicine, University.
The effect of surgeon volume on procedure selection in non-small cell lung cancer surgeries Dr. Christian Finley MD MPH FRCSC McMaster University.
Social Epidemiologic Methods in International Population Health and Health Services Research A Research Agenda Using Cancer Care as a Sentinel Indicator:
Kevin Kovach, DrPH(c), MSc, CHES Johnson County Department of Health and Environment – Olathe, Kansas Does the County Poverty Rate Influence Birth Weight.
Breast Cancer Care of Mexican American Women in High Poverty California Neighborhoods: Protective Effects of Social and Financial Capital, Including Health.
PROSTATE CANCER JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL CANCER REGISTRY Prepared by Theresa SanLorenzo-Caswell, CTR 09/01/2013.
MELANOMA JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL CANCER REGISTRY Prepared by Theresa SanLorenzo-Caswell, CTR 10/16/20014.
A Glimpse of the Science Behind the American Cancer Society Access to Care Campaign Impact of Being Uninsured or Underinsured on Individuals with Cancer.
Spillover Effects of State Mandated-Benefit Laws The Case of Outpatient Breast Cancer Surgery June 5, 2007 John Bian, Ph.D., Atlanta VAMC, American Cancer.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
Rural Health Research Center S outh C arolina Greater Rurality Increases Barriers to Primary Health Care: Evidence of a Gradient in Access or Quality Janice.
Urban/Rural Differences in Survival Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Breast Cancer Melony E.S. Sorbero, Ph.D. RAND Corporation Funded by Health Resources.
Printing: This poster is 48” wide by 36” high. It’s designed to be printed on a large-format printer. Customizing the Content: The placeholders in this.
BREAST CANCER BY STAGE OF DISEASE AT DIAGNOSIS, CENTRAL OKLAHOMA Arthur Owora, MPH; Aaron Wendelboe, PhD; David Thompson, PhD; Janis Campbell, PhD The.
Breast Cancer among Socioeconomically Vulnerable Women in Vulnerable Places Historical Evidence of Better Care in Canada than in the United States.
Hannah K Weir, PhD Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch North American Association of Central Cancer Registries Quebec City, Quebec, Canada June 2010.
Measures of disease frequency Simon Thornley. Measures of Effect and Disease Frequency Aims – To define and describe the uses of common epidemiological.
Gender differences in reading from a cross-cultural perspective- the contribution of gender equality David Reilly, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith.
Methods of Presenting and Interpreting Information Class 9.
What does the data tell us? Colorectal CANCER IN NEVADA
Breast Cancer Survival in Ontario, 1985 to 2005
Current or Former Smokers
NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
Jun Li, MD MPH Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer
Descriptive study design
Prognostic significance of tumor subtypes in male breast cancer:
JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL CANCER REGISTRY
Statistical Core Didactic
Does Public Health Insurance Affect How Much People Work?
Breast Cancer Survival in Ontario, 1985 to 2005
(2) - Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, and
Historical Cohort Support of a Health Insurance Explanation
Prepared by staff in Prevention and Cancer Control.
Journal Club Notes.
Shared Positive Affect Shared Negative Affect
Chapter 7 The Hierarchy of Evidence
Cancer 101: A Cancer Education and Training Program for [Target Population] Date Location Presented by: Presenter 1 Presenter 2 1.
Coffee drinking and leukocyte telomere length: A meta-analysis
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Ovarian Cancer Facts and Figures
Dr T P E Wells 13 July 2018 Breast SSG Bath
Prepared by staff in Prevention and Cancer Control.
Historical Cohort Support of a Health Insurance Explanation
Annals of Internal Medicine • Vol. 167 No. 12 • 19 December 2017
Effect of Obesity on Prognosis after Early Breast Cancer
States That Expanded Medicaid Experienced Greater Improvement in Health Care Access Among Low-Income Populations, 2013 to 2015 Average percentage-point.
Narrative Reviews Limitations: Subjectivity inherent:
EAST GRADE course 2019 Introduction to Meta-Analysis
Publication Bias in Systematic Reviews
Badwe RA et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 72.
Joseph Schuchter, MPH Cincinnati Children’s Hospital
How the Affordable Care Act Has Improved Americans’ Ability to Buy Health Insurance on Their Own Findings from the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance.
Do Latinas who live in ethnic enclaves have better or worse survival?
NAACCR/IACR Combined Annual Conference 2019
NoelleAngelique M. Molinari, PhD Nidhi Jain, MD CDC
Arti Parikh-Patel, PhD MPH Cyllene Morris, DVM MPVM
Colorectal cancer survival disparities in California
Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan, PhD
Recent Incidences and Trends of the Top Cancers in Northeast Tennessee Appalachian Region Adekunle Oke1, Sylvester Orimaye2, Ndukwe Kalu1, Dr. Faustine.
Presentation transcript:

Shared Positive Affect Shared Negative Affect Observational Evidence of Much Better Cancer Care Among Extremely Poor Canadians Than Americans, 1996 to 2009 Kevin M. Gorey,a Isaac N. Luginaah,b Madhan K. Balagurusamy,a Frances C. Wright,c Caroline Hammd & Sindu M. Kanjeekald aUniversity of Windsor, bUniversity of Western Ontario, cSunnybrook Health Sciences Center, dWindsor Regional Cancer Center Abstract Method Results Samples Canadian cancer care has been observed to be advantaged in Canadian-US studies of near poor to poor places. None have studied extremely poor places. This study observed the differential effects of extreme poverty on breast & colon cancer care in Ontario (N = 585) and California (N = 2,925). Registry-based random samples diagnosed between 1996 & 2000 were followed until 2009. High poverty neighborhoods (30+% poor) were compared between-country. Extremely poor cancer patients in Ontario were largely advantaged as compared with their California counterparts. The relative risks of long waits or not receiving indicated radiation or chemotherapy and of not surviving were much greater among extremely poor patients in California. Such much greater risks of substandard American cancer care among extremely poor people as compared with significant, but smaller effects observed among the near poor/poor suggests a dose-response relationship. Sampling Frames: Ontario (previously enhanced samples) & California Cancer Registries, 1996 to 2000 Cancer Cases: All selected in very low-income Ontario census tracts (50+% LI); cases in high poverty (30 to 40+% poor) California CTs randomly selected at a 5:1 ratio (Jargowsky, 1997; Stats Canada, 2002; US Census Bureau, 2001; Wilson, 1987) Ecologically adjusted for CAD-USD differences, purchasing power and median household income Stratified by Place & Disease Stage at Diagnosis : Places: Large megalopolises, smaller metropolitan areas and rural to remote areas Sentinel diseases (treatable & good prognoses with timely best treatment) sampled in Ontario & California: Node negative breast cancer: 65 & 325 cases AJCC stage II or III colon cancer: 520 & 2,600 cases Synchrony (IS) Shared Positive Affect Shared Negative Affect Cooperation .440* -.065 Assertion .458* .540** -.560** Responsibility .368 .488* -.233 Self Control .451* .469* -.220 TOTAL .535** .586** -.325 HYPOTHESIS SUPPORTED HYPOTHESIS REJECTED * Significant at p < .05 ** Significant at p < .01 Analyses Introduction Effect of country estimated on Surveillance Epidemiology & End Results (SEER) program-based cancer directed treatments and 8-year survival; to 2009 Primary Research: Effect of country estimated with maximum likelihood logistic regression model Rate ratios internally standardized for age & gender 95% CIs based on the Mantel-Haenszel c2 test Research Syntheses: Age & gender-adjusted rate ratios pooled with fixed effects meta-models; updated to 2011 RRs weighted by their inverse variances Discussion Political & scientific debates on the relative access & effectiveness of US & Canadian health care systems are longstanding & unresolved. Breast & colon cancer care may be conceived as sentinel health care performance indicators. 3. Systematic & meta-analytic reviews identified 3 methodological problems and 3 research needs (Gorey, 2009; Guyatt et al., 2007) Methodological problems: (1) Between-country case-mix differences on disease stage at diagnosis and (2) Diverse urban and rural places not accounted for & (3) Power problems Research needs: (1) Advance understandings beyond survival to care processes (timely access to best initial and adjuvant treatments); (2) Care processes & outcomes among extremely poor people & (3) Longer term follow-up beyond 5 years 6. Research question: Are extremely poor Americans (vs. Canadians) with breast or colon cancer disadvantaged on treatment access and survival? Summary: We observed very large Canadian cancer care advantages in extremely poor places. Modest to large advantages had been observed in near poor to poor places. And studies have consistently observed no such Canada-US differences in middle or high-income places. This study’s observations of much greater risks of substandard American cancer care among the extremely poor suggests a dose-response relationship, that is, that very low-income is a causal barrier to effective cancer care in the US. Rates of uninsured or underinsured were 9-fold greater in extremely poor US places than elsewhere. Treatment refusal rates for these generally very treatable cancers were less than 5% in both countries. Conclusion: More inclusive health care insurance coverage in Canada seems the most plausible explanation. It underscores the need to enact recent health care reforms across all 50 states in ways that are consistent with their federal legislative intent. Hypotheses Primary Research: Extremely poor breast and colon cancer patients in Ontario will be much more likely to gain timely access to initial cancer care and to survive for 8 years than will their counterparts in California. Research Syntheses: Canadian cancer care advantages among extremely poor people will be larger than those previously observed among the near poor or the poor. For more information please contact: gorey@uwindsor.ca