MAKING MONEY MATTER (M³)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
LAUSD | Division of Special Education Outcome 6/7 Donnalyn Jaque-Antón Associate Superintendent Schools for All Children 2004/2005 Least Restrictive Environment.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
1 Marie Izquierdo & Pablo G. Ortiz. Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools schools defined as “persistently low- achieving” by the requirements.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
1 Building District Capacity through State Monitoring of SIG The Massachusetts Model March 22, 2011 Presented by Karla Brooks Baehr, Deputy Commissioner.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
IDENTIFYING & PRIORITIZING PROBLEMS OF PRACTICE December 2014 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell, Director Sue Cohn, School Improvement.
Qua lity Special Education Programs in the School Turnaround Context: Focused Programmatic Improvements Lauren Morando Rhim September 16, 2015.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Professional Development: the heart of the matter.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Vermont Early Childhood MTSS
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
10+ Ways to Analyze Data Presenter: Lupe Lloyd Lupe Lloyd & Associates, Inc.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Confidential 1 Regional Achievement Center 3 Essex and Hudson Counties School Improvement Plan April 2013.
LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.
Evidence-Based and Promising Practices to Increase Graduation and Improve Outcomes Dr. Loujeania Bost Dr. Catherine Fowler Dr. Matthew Klare.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Colorado Alternative Cooperative Education (ACE) CTE Redesign CACTE July 2017 Key Messages for Early Implementation & Change Management in SY
Local Control Accountability Plan Board of Education June 25, 2015 Alvord Unified School District Students | Teachers | Instructional Content.
(Miles Intermediate).
Documented District Support Needs
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
Office of Special Education
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant
System Goals Academic Excellence Educational Equity Social and Emotional Learning Improving and Expanding Facilities.
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
Zelphine Smith-Dixon, State Director of Special Education
HCS Elementary Education Department
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Resource Allocation and District Action Reports: RADAR
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools.
Beth Joseph Angela Landry
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Improve IEP Project IEP Form Improvement Project
FC 335 Safe and Supportive Schools Competitive Grant Webinar
Systemic Student Support (S3) Academy
Joann Hooper Patty Rooks Paulette Richmond Gary Wenzel
Office of Student and Family Support
The Alabama Continuous Improvement Plan ACIP
Evidence-Based Practices Under ESSA for Title II, Part A
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
NC Mathematics and Science Partnership Program
Ensuring Equity for All Students
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
Introductions Introduction
IDEA State Monitoring and General Supervision
Implementing, Sustaining and Scaling-Up High Quality Inclusive Preschool Policies and Practices: Application for Intensive TA September 10, 2019 Lise.
S.T.E.A.M. Focused Instruction:
IDEA State Monitoring and General Supervision
Presentation transcript:

MAKING MONEY MATTER (M³) Statewide System of Support April 9, 2019

to the DESE M³ Video Conference WELCOME to the DESE M³ Video Conference

DESE Assistance & Support Contents 01 M³ Overview 02 DESE Assistance & Support 03 Alignment to School Improvement CONTENTS 04 Grant Requirements

Overview M³ OVERVIEW 01

As part of MA Results Driven Accountability (RDA) initiative M³ INCEPTION Launched in FY17 As part of MA Results Driven Accountability (RDA) initiative To reconsider systemic use of federal special education funds First Year dedicated to data analysis and planning Subsequent years dedicated to program implementation

Reserve small portion of FC 240 IDEA funds M³ PARTICIPANTS Districts that have Needs Assistance, Intervention, or Substantial Intervention Special Education Determination and At least 1 school in MA Accountability percentiles 1-10 Reserve small portion of FC 240 IDEA funds At least 2% for this initiative

Offers an opportunity for collaboration to: M³ PROGRAM Offers an opportunity for collaboration to: Explore data, Investigate root causes, Identify needs, Develop a Multi-Year Strategic Plan, Design annual Action Plans, Implement strategies, and Engage in a continuous improvement cycle Intended to accelerate improved student performance outcomes, especially for students on IEPs.

Investment in effective, sustainable instructional practices CORE PRINCIPLES Investment in effective, sustainable instructional practices Engagement in a continuous cycle of improvement Collaboration among stakeholders Integration with district/school improvement efforts, including blending and braiding of funds Support from DESE Accountability for outcomes

M3 Assistance and Support 02

M³ REVIEW & IMPROVEMENT The initiative is completing 3rd year Responsive to district feedback and recent research Aligned more closely to District/School Improvement Efforts Reviewed, fine-tuned, and updated initiative

DESE M³ UPDATED THEORY OF ACTION IF we require that a portion of entitlement funding be directed toward district improvement of performance outcomes for students on IEPs through evidence-based, inclusive instructional practices and services; and DESE provides technical assistance…

DESE M³ UPDATED THEORY OF ACTION THEN districts will Uncover system gaps, Identify high impact interventions to fill those gaps, that Emphasize Tier 1 inclusive practices and supports, and Build capacity and systems to implement and sustain identified practices with fidelity and at scale SO THAT all student’s performance outcomes, especially students on IEPs, will improve.

“EVIDENCE-BASED” STRATEGIES RECOMMENDED Aligning with Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) definition: Strong evidence from at least one well-designed and well- implemented experimental study; Moderate evidence from at least one well-designed and well- implemented quasi-experimental study; or Promising evidence from at least one well-designed and well- implemented correlational study with statistical controls for selection bias.

DESE ASSISTANCE Statewide System of Support (SSoS) Transitioned from Special Education Policy and Planning Office (SEPP) Focus on targeted assistance supports to districts & schools SSoS Malden Office – initiative management & grant technical assistance SSoS Regional Offices - Coastal & West/Central Assistance Directors & Assistance Leads & Strategic Transformation Targeted Assistance Liaisons customized support to SSoS-served districts as part of assistance to districts and schools for turnaround Charter Schools and School Redesign Office – assistance and supports specific to Charter and Virtual Districts Resource Allocation Strategy and Planning Office – application review as part of new consolidated FC 240/262 IDEA application

M³ Alignment to School Improvement 03

Align M³ with Other School Improvement Strategies Consult with SSoS Regional Assistance Directors, Assistance Leads & Targeted Assistance Liaisons Integrate with other turnaround/improvement initiatives and action plans Prioritize schools designated as Requiring Assistance or Intervention (percentiles 1-10 or low performing subgroups) Prioritize schools identified for Low Performance of Students with Disabilities subgroup

DISTRICT EXAMPLE STRATEGY Identified Need: Improve literacy performance for students on IEPs Strategy: After School Tiers 2 & 3 Supports aligned to turnaround plan with regular review of data for outcomes plan for gradual expansion to other grade levels & schools fine tuning of program as successes & challenges identified

DISTRICT EXAMPLE STRATEGY Identified Need: Improve Tier 1 participation Strategy: Cross-district Professional Development Partnership PD for administrators, teachers, & paraprofessionals on inclusive practices, emphasizing co-teaching model School schedule & structure changes gradual expansion to more schools supported differently in each district based on context

DISTRICT EXAMPLE STRATEGY Identified Needs: Increase high school graduation rates, reduce disciplinary incidents, improve MCAS performance, & increase student engagement for students on IEPs Strategy: School Culture & Climate Improvement Thorough data review Multi-year behavior & inclusion specialist consultation Multi-year inclusive practice PD on supports for children with social- emotional needs, behavior & disability relationship, & de-escalation Multi-Tiered Structures – scheduling, course sequences, & supports Each year, expanding & deepening staff training

DISTRICT EXAMPLE STRATEGY Identified Need: Improve middle school inclusive education Strategy: Co-Planning & Co-Teaching Focused on one low performing school Hired Consultants Closely involved SSoS/DSAC Regional Team Built teacher inclusive practice capacity Introduced common planning time & peer modeling Monitored success & planned new M³ initiative

DISTRICT EXAMPLE STRATEGY Identified Needs: Improve academic achievement for students on IEPs & reduce special education placement Strategy: All classrooms introduce strategic lesson design (framing,  presenting, cognitive engagement, checking for understanding, anchoring) Intensive PD to Instructional Leadership Teams by consultant Closely involved SSoS/DSAC Regional Team PD for co-teaching teams

DISTRICT EXAMPLE STRATEGY Identified Needs: Increase collaborative leadership & cultural competency & reduce disproportional placement Strategy: District-wide common infrastructure All teachers establish clear, measurable, rigorous academic objectives tied to MA Standards & daily formative assessment All faculty and administrators engage PBIS & SEL strategies Aligned to turnaround plan Review of hiring & grading policies for cultural responsiveness Partnership with another district

DISTRICT EXAMPLE STRATEGY Identified Need: Improve elementary curriculum quality for students on IEPs Strategy: Evidence-based reading program District wide approach – all elementary schools Coaching for special education administrators & district staff on data collection & root cause analysis PD on Tier 1 inclusive practice support for special educators & literacy specialists Curriculum PD & modeling for general education teachers who work with students on IEPs

DISTRICT EXAMPLE STRATEGY Identified Need: Close achievement gap for students on IEPs Strategy: Restructuring at lowest performing schools Culture & Climate Committee Child Study Teams & Common Planning Time (CPT) Co-teaching Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS)/RTI Social Emotional Learning PD Leading Educational Access Project (LEAP)-SSoS Systems for Student Success Office (SfSS) initiative Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Academy – SfSS initiative

M³ Grant Requirements M³ Grant Requirements 04

FY19 M³ YEAR-END ACTIVITIES In May, notice of FY20 Eligibility & FY19 Report template Report from All districts by August 31(sooner is better) Informs targeted assistance planning & program improvement Non-continuing district reports are important Word or SurveyGizmo format options Length and scope similar to past Aligned with FY20 Application Program Description Submit Multi-year Strategic Plan and FY20 full Action Plan (if applicable) by August 31

FY19 M³ YEAR-END REPORTING FY19 M³ Planning or Monitoring Process M³ Planning team membership Improvement leadership team involvement SSoS support Fund Use FC 240 IDEA funds percentage Budget detail Braided or blended resources (i.e., coordination of multiple funding sources toward common goals or strategies)

FY19 M³ YEAR-END REPORTING Current M³ Program Status M³ Theory of Action and targeted needs Program Description Alignment with other school improvement Stakeholder involvement Accomplishments & Impact, including historically underserved student groups Challenges Sustainability FY20 Action Plan Summary (if applicable) Use for FY20 application

FY20 M³ ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA 2018 Special Education Determination Level Needs Assistance (NA), Needs Intervention (NI), or Needs Substantial Intervention(NSI) AND 2018 Accountability Determination At Least 1 School in Percentile 1-10

ELIGIBILITY DURATION Eligibility continues for at least 3 years from first year of participation Eligibility will continue as long as a district meets both the Special Education and school percentile criteria; Districts that no longer meet those criteria, but have participated for less than three years remain eligible for a minimum of 3 years

FC 240/262 Consolidated Workbook - Tab 7 FY20 M3 APPLICATION All year-end documents and all parts of FY20 M³ application must be complete for FY20 FC 240 IDEA grant approval FC 240/262 Consolidated Workbook - Tab 7

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION PART I - CONTINUING DISTRICTS ONLY

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION PART II – ALL DISTRICTS Quick Reference Guide for 240: http://www.doe.mass.edu/federalgrants/idea/resources/qrg-240.docx Allowable Costs Document: http://www.doe.mass.edu/federalgrants/idea/resources/allowablecosts.docx

FY20 FC 240/262 CONSOLIDATED APPLICATION BUDGET

Link will be in FY20 Posting for Consolidated Grant FY20 M3 YEAR-END REPORT Due by June 30, 2020 Very similar to FY19 No Fund Use reporting Link will be in FY20 Posting for Consolidated Grant

Thank you THANK YOU David Parker, Regional Assistance Manager & Abigail Slayton, M³ Project Manager 123.456.7890 aslayton@doe.mass.edu www.doe.mass.edu 75 Pleasant Street, Malden, MA 02148