EASTERN placer COUNTY NEXUS-BASED AFFORDABLE/Workforce HOUSING FEE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Ordinance Public Hearing: Orange County Board of County Commissioners February 21, 2012.
Advertisements

Bae Housing Nexus Study Pinellas County and the Cities of Clearwater, Largo and St. Petersburg Prepared by Bay Area Economics.
Highland Park, Illinois Affordable Housing Trust Fund.
January 20, 2015 City Council Meeting. Purpose Council direction on moving forward with: Housing linkage fee in short term based on 2009 Study and existing.
City of Santa Rosa Housing Element Update October 2, 2008.
Implementing State Density Bonus Law in Berkeley November 13, 2014 City of Berkeley Planning & Development Department.
P. Gurstein & A. Lesnikowski, UBC Vancouver Presented At ACSP 2014 Conference.
June 17, 2008 Fresno County Board of Supervisors First Public Hearing / First Reading of Ordinance Public Facilities Impact Fees and Capital Improvement.
Reduction and Deferral of Impact Fees Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item March 29, 2011.
Commonwealth Housing Task Force Draft – For Final Review Confidential – Not for Distribution Zoning Overlay Districts & State Financing Recommendations.
Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility Study City of Berkeley City.
West Oakland Specific Plan Equity Strategies. Potential impacts of new development and investment on existing West Oakland community New development &
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District March 10, 2009 Board of County Commissioners.
Board of County Commissioners Airport Industrial Park at Orlando (AIPO) Development of Regional Impact Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment Transmittal.
Impact Fee Updates Board of County Commissioners Public Hearings October 30, 2012.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP DECEMBER 14, Sec Review requirements. (a) The City Manager shall each fiscal year prepare a preliminary capital improvement.
Implementing SB 1525: An Update Cheyenne Walsh Squire Sanders (US) LLP Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona Winter Conference Prescott, Arizona.
Illinois Affordable Housing Planning and Appeals Act (AHPAA)
Board of County Commissioners Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District February 24, 2009 Board of County Commissioners Lake Avalon.
Department of Housing and Community Development Mission Provide leadership, policies and programs to preserve and expand safe and affordable housing opportunities.
Multi-Family Housing Limited Tax Exemption Program Applications City Center Redevelopment Authority December 17, 2015 Peggy Sheehan, Program Manager.
Housing Element Update Workshop #2 January 28, 2009.
Department of Public Works Recommended Residential Impact Fee Distribution Methodology Change October 26, 2015.
“ Grand Landings North” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing March 3, 2015.
Community Development Department City Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPA) & Zoning Map Amendments Planning & Land Development Regulation Board.
City of Burlingame Housing Element Update Community Workshop # 1 | March 18, 2014.
I. Review of FY12 and FY13 expenditures; and II. Review AH Plan/CAHAB and recommendations for implementation; and III. Craft budget recommendations in.
Placer County Housing Element Update Stakeholder/Community Workshop #2 – Auburn | April 10, Stakeholder/Community Workshop #2 Auburn Placer County.
Presentation By: OLSON LEE MAYOR’S OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT April 10, 2014.
Berkeley Denver Los Angeles Sacramento Housing Resolution & Policy Review Blue Ribbon Commission Meeting February 1, 2016 Prepared by: Daniel R. Guimond,
Affordable Rental Housing Plan A PEACE INITIATIVE March 19, 2010.
Affordable Housing Impact Fees City Council Hearing, Redwood City October 26, 2015.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
ITEM 6.a AT GREEN BUILDING ORDINANCE City Council – August 25, 2009.
TREE ORDINANCE WORKSHOP DISCUSSION September 3, 2014.
Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item.
CITY OF STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTORS : AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTORS : 9.02Agricultural.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
Wyoming Community Development Authority Financing Affordable Housing in Wyoming Wyoming Community Development Authority National Housing Trust Fund (NHTF)
Planning & Community Development Interim Development Process to Implement the General Plan Land Use Element City Council July 11, 2016.
PROPOSED CITY OF STOCKTON WATERFORD ESTATES EAST PHASE II ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PUBLIC HEARING Stockton City Council January 6, 2004.
Department of Sustainable Development and Construction Inclusionary Zoning Housing Committee August 1, 2016.
Anti-Displacement Policies
City Council Community Development Committee
Affordable Housing Joint Park City & Summit County Council Meeting December 6, 2016 Rhoda Stauffer & Anne Laurent Patrick Putt & Peter Barnes.
Housing Production Plan: Meeting Local Needs
Commercial Linkage Fee Research
Large scale development groundwater balance
The Washington county community development agency
Voluntary Inclusionary Zoning Update
Canyons Voluntary Assessment Area
Understanding Development Fees + A Regional Perspective Presentation to Mountain Housing Council Fee Roundtable November 30, 2017.
Updates to the Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvements Fee (TR/TIF) City Council July 24, 2017.
Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. January 30, 2018
HOME Underwriting and Subsidy Layering Training
Appeal: Time Extension for Variance # East Walnut Street
LAKE TAHOE BENCHMARKS CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION
Highlights of Legislative Package
Multifamily Housing Tax Exemption Program
Hotel Conversions Background
CP-TXT Amendment to the Capital Improvements Element & Public School Facilities Element (Annual Update) October 2008.
City Council October 15, 2018.
UNDERSTANDING HOW TO MAXIMIZE YOUR FEES
Affordable Housing Fees Study
Minor Amendments to Housing Incentives Policy
Accessory Dwelling Units: Maximum Unit Size and Residential Impact Fee
Agricultural Land & Avian Foraging Habitat Mitigation Fee
12B: Scott County CDA Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Zoning Code Amendment City Council June 18, 2018 Laura.
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AB 1600 UPDATE
Housing Tax Exemptions
Presentation transcript:

EASTERN placer COUNTY NEXUS-BASED AFFORDABLE/Workforce HOUSING FEE North Lake Tahoe Resort Association August 7, 2019

Purpose of the Study To consider establishing an Eastern Placer County Affordable/Workforce Housing Fee for:  New Market-Rate Residential Development, and New Commercial Development By demonstrating nexus between new development and the increase in demand for workforce housing

Background In 2015, Placer County contracted with Hansford Economic Consulting and Mintier Harnish Planning Consultants to provide a nexus-based Workforce Housing Fee Study The Study determined the maximum justifiable fee that could be adopted as impact or in-lieu fee. August 8, 2017, as part of the Annual Housing Program Work Plan agenda item, Board received a presentation from Hansford Economic Consulting on the Eastern Workforce Housing Fee Study. January 26, 2018, the nexus-based eastern Workforce Housing Fee Study was updated to reflect more current cost information. October 23, 2018, an item went to the Board discussing establishing the Eastern Placer County Affordable/Workforce Housing Fee

Current Requirement New Development: Required to provide workforce housing equal to at least 50 percent of the housing demand generated by the project. Required workforce housing is to be provided in one of four ways: Construction of on-site employee housing; Construction of off-site employee housing; Dedication of land for needed units; and/or Payment of an in-lieu fee. Expansion of Existing Development: Requirement only applies to the portion of the project that is expanded OR an intensification of use.

What is the Basis of the Fee Development in eastern Placer County of new residential and non residential land uses will generate additional need for workforce housing. The fee is mitigation for the impact of increased demand for workforce housing. Calculated on the number of income-qualified worker households generated by new development and the financing gap / subsidy amount necessary to house those low to moderate income households. The study uses the affordability gap methodology, which is an industry- established methodology, to calculate “maximum justifiable fees”.

Affordable Housing Fee Options Option 1: No Fee Currently there is no established fee for affordable/workforce housing in unincorporated Placer County. If the Board does not wish to move forward with a fee, the County would continue negotiating affordable housing obligations on a case-by-case basis. Option 2: Adopt a Fee If the Board wishes to move forward with a fee, the nexus study completed for eastern Placer County provides fee program and level options.

Staff Recommends No fee option for specific plan or Area Plan or larger General Plan amendment projects. - These projects should be required to construct affordable housing units as the plan areas have sufficient acreage to make it feasible. Allow a Workforce Housing Fee as an option for projects when an affordable housing obligation equals less than five units (“Smaller Projects”). Set Affordable Housing Fee at 20% below the maximum justifiable amount for rental residential units or 2.6% of sale price 50% of maximum justifiable for non-residential new development as an option for Smaller Projects only. $36.50 per campsite $5,850 per lodging room $20.50 to $30.50 per building square foot Except, restaurant/bar uses, which would be set at $92 per square foot (due to low wages in that sector)

Staff Recommended Fee Exemption Exemption to the policy for Projects that propose a General Plan or Area Plan amendment that achieves one or more of the following: Amendment to Medium to High Density Residential for the purpose of constructing 8 or more units per acre that result in the development of a mix of housing sizes, types and affordability. Development of an infill site as defined by Public Resource Code 21061.3. Development within a “Transit priority area” defined as an area within one-half mile of a major transit stop that is existing or planned. Conversion of nonresidential buildings to residential use. Market rate units with a habitable square foot of less than 1,800 sq. ft.

Conclusion and Next Steps If the Board directs staff to proceed with the adoption of a fee, staff would return with: Ordinance to regulate when and how the fee would be applied, and Resolution that approves the Nexus Study for the establishment of the Affordable/Workforce Fee schedule, and sets the initial amount of the fees and an escalator. For more information please contact: Shawna Purvines at spurvines@placer.ca.gov or 530-745-3031