BEST PRACTICES A Dozen Pieces of Tested Advice by Gil Harootunian, PhD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
David McGinnis Cindy Bell Jerusha Shipstead. Dave McGinnis GSP director Returned in January from NSF two-year rotation Cindy Bell Experienced grant writer.
Advertisements

INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES WRITING GRANT PROPOSALS Thursday, April 10, 2014 Randy Draper, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Room 125, IBS.
NSF Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney, Ph.D Adjunct, Department of Biology New Mexico State University 24 September 2008.
How to Write Grants Version 2009.
1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.
Effective dissemination and evaluation
The Council on Undergraduate Research ProVisions September 17, 2013.
Tips for Writing a Successful Grant Proposal Diana Lipscomb Associate Dean for Faculty and Research CCAS.
Introduction to Proposal Writing Proposal Development Team Office of Research & Sponsored Projects (ORSP) September 30, 2009.
Grants Pre Award Workshop Barnard College “From A to F (Abstract to Funding)” Fall 2010.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Grant Workshop School of Business Marina Aloyets, Pre-Award Officer Office of Research and Sponsored Programs October 10, 2012.
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
Science & Engineering  New Faculty Orientation Research at Rice Nancy Nisbett, Director Office of Sponsored Research.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) What is RCR? New Requirements for RCR Who Does it Affect? When? Data Management What is the Institutional Plan? What.
What We Do & How We Do It By Gil Harootunian, PhD Director, ORSP.
How to Obtain National Institutes of Health Awards: The Basics A workshop providing information on the process of applying for external research awards.
BEST PRACTICES by Gil Harootunian, PhD, Director, ORSP A Dozen Pieces of Tested Advice.
How to develop an independent research plan – review literature with an eye for problem, approach, solution, new ideas – review objectives of funding programs.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
NSF: Proposal and Merit Review Process Muriel Poston, Ph.D. National Science Foundation 2005.
Update on NSF Geoscience & STEM Education Programs in FY 2014 Jill Karsten, Ph.D. Directorate for Geosciences National Science Foundation AGU Heads & Chairs.
Applying for Grants and Fellowships: Advice for SLA Graduate Students (Fall 2015) Christopher Rodning, Associate Professor, Anthropology Kevin Gotham,
Funding Caroline Wardle Senior Science Advisor, CISE Directorate National Science Foundation
Funding Opportunities in the Arts & Humanities Office of Research & Commercialization Jo Ann Smith, Ph.D.
Research grants opportunities and applications. Richard Arnold, Muskingum University.
Proposal Preparation NSF Regional Grants Conference October 4 - 5, 2004 St. Louis, MO Hosted by: Washington University.
Presented by the College of Arts & Sciences with the Office of Contracts and Grants University of San Francisco April 2012.
Research Funding Opportunity & Scientific Capacity Building in Developing Countries By Dina R. Andersson 1.
Toolkit for Finding Grants: Elements for a Successful Grant Search Office of Sponsored Programs Raubinger Hall, Room 309 William Paterson University
Humanities Proposal Review Process January 24, 2014 University of Southern Mississippi Sandra George Richard Wellons.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Collaborating with the Office of Research Development to Advance NU Research April 7, 2017.
Grant Finding and Writing Resources at the New Jersey State Library
Promotion & Tenure Workshop
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
A strategic conversation with Tim Jewell and Thom Deardorff
Promotion: Policy and Procedures for COM Faculty in State College
Cultivating An Inclusive Culture for Faculty Retention:
Applying for Grants and Fellowships: Advice for SLA Graduate Students (Fall 2016) Christopher Rodning, Associate Professor, Anthropology Kevin Gotham,
Thanks for coming. Introduce 21st Century and team.
Emil Mara Vice President, Finance, Administration and Membership America’s Public Television Stations.
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Educating the Educator in a Medical School David M. Harris, PhD
Welcome! We will begin our webinar at the top of the hour
Writing Competitive Research Funding Applications: Tips and Advice Early-Career Researchers Information Session Friday, 26th October, 2012 Dr Barry Dixon.
The Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Federal Grant Programs Conference October 23, 2017
Applying for Grants and Fellowships: Advice for SLA Graduate Students (Fall 2017) Christopher Rodning, Professor, Anthropology Kevin Gotham, Associate.
Building Partnerships:  How the Office of Assessment and Accreditation Can Help You and Your Program Be Successful.
The NSF Grant Review Process: Some Practical Tips
Research Development Office
Professor Salary Incentive Program
Using Pivot and GrantForward to Find Research Funding
National Endowment for the Humanities
Department of Medicine Michael Farkouh, Vice-Chair Research michael
Considerations in Engineering
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Topics Introduction to Research Development
NSF Tribal College Workshop
School of Education Opportunity for Discovery, Learning & Engagement
ANNUAL TITLE Grants MEETING
Lessons from the Front Lines: Streamlining Grants Management
SSHRC Institutional Grant University
Community Development Block Grant
Hannah Clarke, sparqs Steph Kirkham, sparqs
AFRI Integrated Programs.
ORSP Overview: What We Do & How We Do It By Gil Harootunian, PhD
Karen Frank Mays Fitchburg State University
Presentation transcript:

BEST PRACTICES A Dozen Pieces of Tested Advice by Gil Harootunian, PhD Director, ORSP

#1: Program Guidelines Read (then re-read) the sponsor’s Program Guidelines. The guidelines make explicit ‘eligibility thresholds.’ Research or teaching priorities Funding ceilings, floors, or allowances Standards for expert evaluation Supplementary requirements or documents; etc.

#1: Program Guidelines Examples National Endowment for the Humanities Department of Education National Science Foundation Outline the critical requirements. I create a “Summary Sheet” for every major grant that I work on—see Handout. “Summary Sheet” is a quick guide during planning and during submission.

#2: Past Awards From past awards, you can deduce implicit expectations (vs. explicit expectations in Program Guidelines). What are they actually funding? You are ‘reading between the lines’ of the Program Guidelines. Discern Funding Trends. Department of Education

#2: Past Awards Other examples National Endowment for the Humanities National Science Foundation Department of Education Outline—and then consult frequently.

#3: Touch Base w/ ORSP We will— Translate ‘sponsor-ese’ into plain English. Share experiential knowledge of what gets funded (and what does not). Explain both internal and external procedures.

#3: Touch Base w/ ORSP We will— Elaborate on sponsor prerogatives like “positive accountability.” Example: “GRPA” Elaborate on most common reasons for declension of a grant application. An excessive or poorly justified budget (NSF). Why? Indicates that project is poorly designed.

#4: Touch Base w/ Program Officer Example: After you have studied the program guidelines and talked w/ ORSP, contact sponsor’s program officer to see if your idea is competitive. NSF requirement Keep in touch w/ program officer between applications or between pre- and post- award.

#4: Touch Base w/ Program Officer Cycle back: discuss w/ staff in ORSP the highlights of your discussion w/ sponsor’s program officer. Share and store knowledge for future applications. Verify program officer’s comments (no human is infallible). Be careful you do not hear what you want to hear.

#5: Heed the Reviewers Question: Whom should you heed? Answer: Always heed the reviewers. Team of experts reviews and—importantly—responds to your project. Reviewers have more say than anyone else in the funding of your project. That is why second-time submissions have the highest funding rate. Most program officers (if asked) will repeat all this.

#6: Form Teams Disciplinary Interdisciplinary Readers Mentors “De facto team” w/ reviewers [who remain anonymous]

#7: Leverage, leverage, leverage A.k.a., “Bang for the Buck” Example: National Science Foundation’s “Math and Science Partnerships” See Handout

#8: Network, network, network Read notices in professional journals. “How I Got My First Grant” tale Visit sponsor booths at professional conferences. If time and resources permit, go to federal agency workshops. The feds are fast becoming the ‘gold standard’ in external funding.

#9: Be Resourceful Use resources. Do not re-invent the wheel. ORSP resources Sample Budget Narratives Evaluation guidelines Letters of support guidelines and samples Sponsor resources NIH “OppNet” ―Basic Behavioral & Social Sciences Opportunity Network Do not re-invent the wheel.

#10: Disseminate…. Shows you are valuable member of the field. Advances knowledge in field. Assures sponsor of real mileage. Does not apply to salary or proprietary information.

#10: Disseminate…. Examples Articles Papers at conferences NSF: National Science Digital Library NIH: Pub Med Central NEH: Publicly accessible results

#11: Evaluation—Make It Good Sponsor ensures it is getting what it wants through on-going evaluation. Examples: Department of Education IMLS NEA

#11: Evaluation—Make It Good New standard = positive accountability (vs. old standard of negative accountability) Get objective, external evaluator. Formative and Summative Formative = strategy to monitor project as it evolves to provide feedback Summative = strategy to measure overall effectiveness and extent to which goals met

#12: Align w/ Sponsor’s Priorities Examples Scalability (a.k.a., Replication). Does sponsor want a project that can be scaled up regionally or even nationally? U.S. Department of Education National Science Foundation Sustainability Does sponsor want only projects that can be institutionalized? The Council for International Exchange of Scholars (a.k.a., Fulbright Program)

#12: Align w/ Sponsor’s Priorities Examples Community Engagement Does sponsor want more fluid boundaries between academy and surrounding community? National Endowment for the Arts Infrastructure Does sponsor want to strengthen department’s long- term capacity to support your work? National Endowment for the Humanities

#12: Align w/ Sponsor’s Priorities How can you be sure that you are aligning your project’s goals with the sponsor’s goals? Cycle back: Re-read the program guidelines.

Questions?

Follow-up Questions Gil Harootunian, PhD Director, RSP 8-0863 gharootunian@csufresno.edu